UK: TOP CANCER DOCTOR SAYS DEMANDS BY HEALTH TOURISTS (MIGRANTS) PUSHING HEALTHCARE SYSTEM TO THE BRINK……

And there are more to follow………..

tard settlers on the march

‘Migrants are pushing NHS to breaking point’: Top cancer doctor warns health tourists are bleeding hospitals dry with demand for treatment

Professor Angus Dalgleish, the principal of the Cancer Vaccine Institute, says the NHS is being bled dry of resources by health tourists denied care at home. Cancer treatment can cost £200,000 and, under Brussels rules, Britain has to offer it to all EU nationals

Professor Dalgleish says this partly explains the NHS’s £3billion deficit. He will also claim the Government has hindered progress into key disease areas ‘by blindly adhering to EU directives’.

  • Professor Angus Dalgleish is preparing speech speaking out against EU
  • Says British hospitals are struggling to cope with demand from refugees
  • Will insist this considerable expense partly explains NHS’s £3billion deficit
  • For more on the EU migrant crisis visit www.dailymail.co.uk/migrantcrisis

The NHS has been left ‘on its knees’ by uncontrolled migration from the EU, a leading cancer expert will warn tomorrow.

Professor Angus Dalgleish, the principal of the Cancer Vaccine Institute, says the NHS is being bled dry of resources by health tourists denied care at home.

Cancer treatment can cost £200,000 and, under Brussels rules, Britain has to offer it to all EU nationals.

‘Our membership of the EU is putting an intolerable strain on our NHS,’ Professor Dalgleish, a melanoma expert of global renown, will tell a conference.

‘The NHS is on its knees and could collapse completely. NHS Trusts were not prepared for the millions of EU migrants who have poured into Britain because the Government estimate was nowhere near the reality.

Read more:

UK: POLICE SAY THEY WILL CRACK DOWN HARD ON UNRULY ACTIVISTS AT PEGIDA DEMO IN BIRMINGHAM…….

As they should……..

And we know if it happens what side will be instigating the trouble….

antifa

Solihull Pegida march: Police warn they will ‘come down hard’ on troublemakers

Top cop says officers have no power to ban peaceful protests

Pegida UK co-ordinator Tommy Robinson held a debate with Coun Waseem Zaffar in Lozells.
Pegida UK co-ordinator Tommy Robinson held a debate with Coun Waseem Zaffar in Lozells.

Police have warned they will ‘come down hard’ on troublemakers ahead of Saturday’s protest by right-wing group Pegida UK .

More than 300 Pegida members are expected at the mile-long silent march ‘against extremism’ .

It will start at Birmingham International railway station at 1pm.

The group will then walk to the demo point at Starley Way, which will be closed throughout the day to motorists.

Bickenhill Lane will also be closed for a short time.

Police said they were also expecting a small group of counter-protestors, who would be kept separate.

Solihull police commander , Chief Supt Alex Murray said: “The protest is away from residential and retail centres.

“Organisers have told us they are planning a peaceful, silent march from the train station to the protest site.

“So far around 370 Pegida supporters have indicated they intend to participate – and we are also planning for a small group of counter protestors near the railway station but away from the Pegida protest site.

More here.

UK: CAMERON DEAL TO STAY IN EU OFFERS MIGRANTS HIGHER CHILD BENEFITS, PEOPLE OUTRAGED…..

And they should be, this might be the tipping point UKIP is looking for in leaving the EU for good.!

collapsing EU

What a farce! Cameron’s EU deal unravels as it emerges migrants from some European countries will get HIGHER child benefits than UK families

David Cameron's EU deal reveals that some migrants will get HIGHER benefits

The Prime Minister tried desperately to defend his referendum stitch-up with Brussels – which he insisted would make the country ‘stronger and better’. Incredibly, the small print of the draft deal reveals that some overseas workers – far from losing their child benefit altogether – would receive even more. They will be given extra handouts for children living abroad if the cost of living in their country is higher than the UK. Pictured above, Mr Cameron as depicted in a cartoon by the Daily Mail’s Mac, with the caption: ‘The emperor’s new clothes’.

More here.

UK TROOPS AT RISK OF ”CAPTURE AND RELEASE OF TERROR TARDS CAPTURED ON THE BATTLEFIELD……

It’s reason why detention centers in secluded areas offshore are the best solution for these 7th century jackals. Or simply take no prisoners in combat at all.

This is the price we pay for allowing radical leftist ”yuman wights” activists into high levels of government. The enemy must really be laughing their soiled rears off at the buffoonery of the West.

Our troops may be forced to free prisoners of war… because of human rights! Soldiers face ‘lethal Catch 22’ where they cannot hold fighters or hand them over in case they are tortured

British forces may be prevented from detaining prisoners of war for more than a few days in case it breaches their human rights, the Supreme Court heard yesterday

If he wins the case, hundreds of other insurgents held by British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for more than four days could all win substantial payouts.

  • British forces may be prevented from holding prisoners for over a few days
  • Troops may not be able to hold fighters or hand over due to torture fears
  • Comments come after a legal case in which a convicted senior Taliban chief captured by British soldiers is suing the Ministry of Defence

British forces may be prevented from detaining prisoners of war for more than a few days in case it breaches their human rights, the Supreme Court heard yesterday.

Troops could face a ‘lethal Catch 22’ in which they can neither hold enemy fighters or hand them over to authorities in case they are tortured, judges were told.

Instead, commanders would be forced to set militants free to potentially ‘kill and maim’ UK troops. The comments came at the start of a landmark legal case in which a convicted senior Taliban chief captured by British soldiers is suing the Ministry of Defence.

Mohammed’s case, taken on by controversial law firm Leigh Day, is the first to challenge the legal basis for UK detention and could have a major impact on every future war Britain fights in.

Ministry of Defence lawyer James Eadie QC said: ‘It is a lethal Catch 22. If you cannot detain and you cannot transfer – what are you going to do? The only alternative is to release. If you can’t detain and can’t transfer then you might not be able to capture in the first place.’

More here.

UK JUDGE TELLS IT LIKE IT IS: CALAIS MIGRANTS NOT REFUGEES, BUT ECONOMIC TOURISTS…….

Colonizers as well……

The judge who dared to tell the truth about migrants: Many in Calais Jungle AREN’T refugees… and ARE after benefits, he says

  • Mr Justice McCloskey said many migrants have ‘no real basis’ to be there
  • Judge: Migrants avoid asylum in France because of UK’s ‘advantages’
  • Warning came in a ruling allowing four Syrian refugees to come to Britain
  • Case could lead to hundreds more applications after ‘special’ case 
Ruling: Immigration judge Mr Justice McCloskey, said migrants are claiming asylum  because of the 'perceived advantages' of lodging an application in Britain

Ruling: Immigration judge Mr Justice McCloskey, said migrants are claiming asylum because of the ‘perceived advantages’ of lodging an application in Britain

Many migrants living in the ‘Jungle’ camp in Calais are ‘probably not’ genuine refugees who flock there just to get to the UK, a senior immigration judge said today.

Mr Justice McCloskey also said many have ‘no real basis’ to be there and will decline to claim asylum in France in favour of Britain because of ‘perceived advantages’.

He also said there was no reason for many in the squalid camp to remain there.

His warning came in a landmark ruling allowing three teenagers and a disabled man from Syria to come to Britain from Calais because their siblings are already here.

Campaigners claim the case could clear the way for hundreds more to come from the Calais camp

Justice McCloskey said their case was ‘special’ but admitted that it could lead to hundreds more similar asylum applications.

His full judgment, issued today said: ‘It seems likely that there is no real basis for many of its occupants remaining indefinitely in The Jungle and enduring the conditions that obtain there.

‘Many are probably not refugees in any general sense or any sense entitled to recognition.

‘Rather, they are migrant nationals of a number of countries outside the European Union, who, while intending to make a claim for refugee status, decline to make the claim in France due to perceived advantages, correct or otherwise, of doing so in the United Kingdom.

‘In general terms there is no basis at all for thinking that a person who claims asylum in France will not be treated properly and will not have the benefit of the reception and other facilities which those duties entail.’

More here.

UK: SHARIA LAW TO STOP MP’S FROM DRINKING…….?

Sigh……..

big ben

Sharia law may stop MPs drinking: Bars will be banned if politicians move to Department of Health – because of secret deal to finance Islamic bond scheme

  • Department of Health building is governed by the body of Islamic law
  • The lease was transferred to finance an Islamic bond scheme in 2014 
  • MPs are searching for new home while Parliament undergoes £4bn repairs
Barred: MPs have been warned that drinking will be banned if they move into the Department of Health

Barred: MPs have been warned that drinking will be banned if they move into the Department of Health

MPs could be forced to stop drinking alcohol when they move out of the Palace of Westminster while it undergoes much-needed repairs over the next decade – because of Sharia law.

Earlier this week plans were revealed for MPs to be rehoused in a temporary chamber in a courtyard in the Department of Health, but it has emerged that the building is governed by Islamic law.

The building, located at 79 Whitehall, was quietly transferred to finance an Islamic bond scheme in 2014.

Under terms of the lease, alcohol is one of the activities banned on the premises, according to The Times.

A Whitehall official told the newspaper: ‘It’s true. If MPs want to use Richmond House they’d better give up any hopes it will include a bar.’

Richmond House is one of three Whitehall buildings that were transferred to the £200million Islamic bond scheme, which switched their ownership from British taxpayers to wealthy Middle Eastern businessmen and banks.

George Osborne announced the move in June 2014 as part of an effort to make the UK a global hub for Islamic finance.

But critics say the scheme would waste money and could undermine Britain’s financial and legal systems by imposing Sharia law onto government premises.

The bonds – known as Sukuk – are only available for purchase by Islamic investors.

The money raised will be repayable from 2019.

But instead of interest, bond-buyers will earn rental income from the three Government offices as interest payments are banned in Sharia law.

The proposal to move to the Department of Health is among the most popular because it is housed just 100 yards from the Commons entrance and many MPs' offices are in the adjacent building at 1 Parliament Street

Read more:

UK: TAPE OF DETECTIVE WARNING SEX GROOMING VICTIM NO HELP FROM POLICE WHO SAW HER BEING ABUSED…….

There you have modern day 7th century Britain……

Detective ‘was taped warning alleged child grooming victim that police officers who saw her being abused would not give evidence – because they might get in trouble for not stopping it’

An alleged victim of Arshid Hussain, pictured seating in wheelchair, recorded police officers when she went to make a complaint about him

An alleged victim of Arshid Hussain, pictured seating in wheelchair, recorded police officers when she went to make a complaint about him

  • Five men and two women are on trial over alleged grooming ring
  • One of the complainants recorded police when she made a complaint
  • Transcript shown to jury says detective told her police wouldn’t testify
  • He said officers wouldn’t make statements if they thought they would ‘get in the s***’ for not acting

A detective in the Rotherham abuse case was recorded by an alleged victim saying police wouldn’t give evidence in case they got in trouble for not acting sooner, a court heard.

Arshid Hussain is one of five men and two women standing trial over an alleged grooming ring in the South Yorkshire town from 1987 to 2003.

Sheffield Crown Court heard that one of the complainants in the case recorded a policeman involved in the investigation on her mobile phone in 2013 as she spoke about Hussain.

The woman, who is now 30, is said to have told police that she had been found having sex with Hussain aged just 14 on a day she was arrested for stealing.

She asked police to look into whether there were any records from the police who found her, showing she was with the defendant, the Sheffield Star reported.

But, in a transcript provided to the jury, DC Lee Robinson said: ‘If they walked in there and they saw you were having sex on the floor and they know you’re only 14 and they’ve seen this Asian male, if they put that in a statement, they know full well they’re going to get in the s*** because why didn’t they do something about that?’

He went on: ‘It may be that if we went to speak to that person, they might turn around and say, “I didn’t see anything like that”,’ the court heard.

He later added: ‘Opinions have changed now. Now we identify that as child abuse. Before they’d see it as sort of a lovesick teenager who keeps going back to this fella.’

Earlier in the trial, the jury heard that police allegedly missed the chance to spare another young girl an appalling sexual abuse ordeal by accusing her of lying when she turned to them for help.

Seven people are standing trial over the alleged grooming ring. Pictured left to right: Qurban Ali, Arshid Hussein, Karen Macgregor, Shelley Davies, Majid Bostan and Sajid Bostan

Seven people are standing trial over the alleged grooming ring. Pictured left to right: Qurban Ali, Arshid Hussein, Karen Macgregor, Shelley Davies, Majid Bostan and Sajid Bostan

More here.  H/T: Buck

UK: ‘PRANKSTERS’ CAUSE UNREST IN SUBWAY DRESSED IN FAKE SUICIDE BOMBER VEST AND POLICE OUTFITS…….

Dry run……….

Yeah right, ‘pranksters’ until they end up spilling people’s blood.

The most insensitive man in Britain? Prankster dresses as SUICIDE BOMBER on the Tube

A “CRASS” prankster has been slammed after stoking terror fears by riding the Tube dressed as a suicide bomber.

Prankster and Fulham Broadway stationSWNS•Google Street View

A witness photographed the group (l) at Fulham Broadway station (r)

The unknown man donned camouflage gear and a fake suicide vest last night, unnerving fellow London Underground passengers.He wore a black bag with a detonator-style string dangling from it – sparking fears it was a bomb.

The man finished his outfit with a blue beret and wrap-around sunglasses.

Busy District Line trainGetty

The men got on a District Line train headed to Central London (file photo)

He was accompanied by three friends who were dressed in unconvincing police officer outfits, complete with fake GUNS.

The gang of four were spotted on the District Line at Fulham Broadway station around 7.15pm on Monday.

One witness snapped a photo of the idiot joker from behind – and said he and his accomplices seemed like they were drunk.

More here. H/T: 

PIERS MORGAN: SAME PARLIAMENT HASN’T BANNED RETURNING JIHADIS SERIOUSLY DEBATING BANNING DONALD TRUMP…….

Finally something from Piers Morgan worthwhile repeating……

King Salman of Saudia Arabia can allow 50 people to be beheaded last month and nobody in the corridors of British officialdom batted a public eyelid. Yet he is treated like some kind of deity when he arrives in Britain in his fleet of gold-plated jets.

Russian President Vladimir Putin commits and spouts all manner of despicable, murderous, bigoted things and Britain welcomes him with State dinners at Buckingham Palace and handshakes outside Downing Street.

PIERS MORGAN: Why I’m so embarrassed today for Britain. The same parliament that hasn’t banned a single UK citizen from returning after fighting for ISIS is seriously debating banning Trump from its shores

PIERS MORGAN: Why I’m so embarrassed today for Britain

PIERS MORGAN: As I write this column, members of the UK Parliament (right) are debating whether or not to ban Donald Trump (bottom left) from entering Britain. They’ve allocated three hours of time to do this. Time that could have been spent debating terrorism, famine, nuclear weapons, the Middle East refugee crisis or the Syrian War. But no, instead British law-makers have concluded their own time is best served seriously considering a proposal to ban a man who may end up being the next President of the United States.

The reason they’re doing it is, of course, is because Trump recently called for a temporary ban on all Muslims entering the U.S. in the wake of an horrific mass shooting by two Islamic terrorists.

Like many, I didn’t agree with what Trump said and indeed, I wrote him an open letter at the time saying it was ‘dangerously wrong and bigoted’.

But to ban a foreign politician for expressing an opinion is utterly absurd. Particularly a foreign politician who stands an increasingly good chance of becoming leader of the world’s biggest superpower and Britain’s supposedly closest, most powerful ally.

Can you imagine a situation where President Trump, if he is elected, is actually banned? It would make Britain the laughing stock of the world, and confirm to Americans that we’re just as pathetically petty and small pond in our thinking as you’ve always suspected.

It would also cause serious, probably irreparable damage to Britain’s relationship with the United States.

The sheer hypocrisy in all this ‘Ban Trump’ nonsense is breathtaking.

Britain throws down the red carpet and blares out the royal bugles all the time for leaders of countries with heinous human rights records.

More here.

NOTE: A temporary ban on Muslims entering the US is not an unreasonable request, especially in light of violent and stealth jihad. No one has a ”right” to immigrate to the US, a sovereign nation determines its own immigration policy, or at least it should.

UK: MORE TRUMPED UP CHARGES AGAINST TOMMY ROBINSON: BEING ATTACKED IN PRISON AND DEFENDING ONESELF IS A PUNISHABLE OFFENSE……

Political prisoner………

3636215909

EDL Founder Tommy Robinson To Be Charged Over Alleged Fight In Prison

The former leader of the English Defence League is set to be charged over an alleged attack on an inmate at HMP Peterborough.

Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Lennon, attended Luton Police Station last Wednesday and was quizzed over the incident back in August 2015.

He has been ordered to attend Peterborough Magistrates’ Court on February 3, where he will be charged with battery.

A Cambridgeshire Police spokesperson said: “A 33-year-old man from the Bedford area, who was arrested in August last year, attended Luton Police Station on Wednesday (January 13) and has been reported for battery.

“He has been summoned to attend Peterborough Magistrates’ Court on February 3.”

Mr Lennon, originally from Luton, now fronts anti-Islamist group Pegida UK.

TR

QUEEN OF JORDAN LECTURES THE UK ON ‘WHAT IT NEEDS TO DO WITH (FRAUD) SYRIAN REFUGEES…….

How quick the shoe would be planted on her keister if a person of character and standing were to occupy the British Prime Minister’s office.

Yeah, the new (proper) approach would be to funnel these frauds to Jordan, keeping them there with a twelve meter high wall and moat around them, as well as a worldwide ending of the subsidies to the Paleostinian terror entity to pay for it all.

Britain must find a ‘new approach’ to dealing with Syrian refugees, says Queen Rania of Jordan in No 10 crisis talks

Meeting: Queen Rania met Mr Cameron in Downing Street today to discuss the Syrian refugee crisis

Meeting: Queen Rania met Mr Cameron in Downing Street today to discuss the Syrian refugee crisis

  • Monarch says European nations must take a ‘bolder approach’ on Syria
  • Rania’s nation Jordan – and neighbours – flooded with Syrian refugees 
  • UK politicians call for RAF to drop supplies to marooned in Madaya  

Queen Rania of Jordan today urged David Cameron to find a ‘new approach’ in dealing with refugees running for their lives from ISIS and Bashar al-Assad’s forces.

The monarch said the Prime Minister and other leaders must take ‘bolder measures’ to deal with the crisis, which has seen displaced Syrians flee to neighbouring countries, including Jordan.

Queen Rania met Mr Cameron in Downing Street today as the RAF was urged to carry out emergency food drops to help starving Syrians.

Shocking reports emerged of civilians in besieged town Madaya dying through lack of food while others were eating dirt and rubbish.

Queen Rania told the Prime Minister in No 10 talks (pictured) that he and other leaders must take 'bolder measures' to deal with the crisis
Queen Rania told the Prime Minister in No 10 talks (pictured) that he and other leaders must take 'bolder measures' to deal with the crisis

Message: Queen Rania told the Prime Minister in No 10 talks (pictured) that he and other leaders must take ‘bolder measures’ to deal with the crisis

Solutions: Queen Rania's country Jordan is one of several nations being flooded with Syrian refugees

Solutions: Queen Rania’s country Jordan is one of several nations being flooded with Syrian refugees

Read more:

UK: EU SKEPTICS STILL GAGGED WHILE PRO-EU MINISTERS SPREAD THEIR PROPAGANDA……

It’s buffoonish to believe that the statist will easily give up statism.

collapsing EU

These post enlightenment throwback regressives will throw everything in their playbook at you in order to keep their grip on power. Big government, and even bigger government, is always their agenda, the people…..nothing more than mere pawns to manipulate.

NOTE: The EU is nothing more than a crony (corporate welfare) enterprise working at the behest of the neo-aristocracy.

So much for a free debate on the EU: Ministers hit the airwaves to back Brussels…while Eurosceptic colleagues are still gagged

Free debate: Downing Street was accused of a referendum stitch-up after ministers made pro-EU statements in public, while Eurosceptics face the sack if they speak in favour of leaving

Free debate: Downing Street was accused of a referendum stitch-up after ministers made pro-EU statements in public, while Eurosceptics face the sack if they speak in favour of leaving

  • The Foreign Secretary said he ‘can’t envisage’ campaigning to leave the EU
  • Treasury Secretary Greg Hands also praised EU rules on free movement
  • Eurosceptics are unhappy they face the sack if they speak in favour of exit
  • But their pro-European colleagues are free to speak out in favour of staying

Downing Street was accused of a referendum stitch-up last night after the Foreign Secretary declared that he ‘can’t envisage’ campaigning to leave the EU.

Philip Hammond, a one-time Eurosceptic, said he was confident that the Prime Minister would secure a good deal to remain in the Brussels club, which he would then back.

At the same time, Treasury Secretary Greg Hands extolled the virtues of EU rules on free movement, saying migrant workers are a ‘fantastic thing to have’.

Eurosceptic ministers are unhappy that – while colleagues are free to make pro-EU comments – they face the sack if they speak in favour of leaving. So-called ‘collective responsibility’ on the topic will only be lifted once the Prime Minister’s negotiations are complete in February or March.

In the meantime, any minister who publicly criticises the renegotiation or speaks in favour of Britain leaving could be disciplined. Tory high command is issuing regular instructions on ‘lines to take’ which Eurosceptics claim have a pro-EU bias.

Insiders also claim that junior ministers are being licensed to make media comments on the benefits of EU membership. And Whitehall departments have been told to drum up stories which suggest membership helps Britain, sources said.

Eurosceptic ministers say the situation gives the Government time in which it can make the case for remaining in the EU without answer. Last night Robert Oxley, of Vote Leave, said: ‘It’s unacceptable that Eurosceptic ministers are gagged, while the Government machine is being deployed in favour of staying in.’

Yesterday, Mr Hammond said he ‘can’t envisage’ breaking ranks to campaign against EU membership if Mr Cameron secures a renegotiation deal. The Foreign Secretary – who has previously said he would back a ‘Brexit’ if the relationship does not change – told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘Our first challenge is to get the right deal, and we are making good progress on that. I can’t envisage us negotiating a deal which the Prime Minister thinks is good enough to recommend to the British people and which I feel I want to campaign against.’

Significantly, his remarks were immediately seized upon by the Britain Stronger In Europe campaign, which said they were a ‘significant blow’ to the leave groups.

Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond (pictured), a one-time Eurosceptic, said he was confident that the Prime Minister would secure a good deal to remain in the Brussels club, which he would then back

Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond (pictured), a one-time Eurosceptic, said he was confident that the Prime Minister would secure a good deal to remain in the Brussels club, which he would then back

Read more:

UK: PETITION PM CAMERON OVER TREATMENT OF TOMMY ROBINSON…….

Enough is enough already.

The UK has made British Law into a Benny Hill parody sketch long enough, time to step back from the edge of the abyss and re-establish rule of law and not of men.

Independent Review into the Treatment of Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (also known as Tommy Robinson)

I’m appealing to David Cameron as I don’t know who is in charge of these independent reviews. I am extremely distressed by the way the authorities have treated Stephen Yaxley Lennon – former leader of the EDL.

Before I start I will say that I am not affiliated with Tommy in any way and have no political agenda. I have just seen this man treated completely unfairly by the supposed “best justice system in the world”.

Tommy was sentenced to 18 months in prison for mortgage fraud in 2013. I am unaware of the ins and outs of his conviction, but I know he was released a few months later with licence restrictions that were completely unrelated to the crime he committed.

He was recalled to prison before he made an arranged speech at the Oxford Union. After release, he made his speech at OU, which has gained the sympathy of many people who were previously against Tommy.

A week or so before the end of his licence, he was once again recalled. This time, he wasn’t even told the reasons for his recall. Whatever the reasons, he wasn’t segregated from people who violent criminals who want to kill him.

Tommy has once again been arrested. For whatever reason, this is clearly an illegal attempt to silence him. Tommy has strong views against militant Islam, and there is a deep concern that somebody is trying to keep him quiet.

More here.

UK TYRANNY: POLICE ARREST TOMMY ROBINSON AGAIN JUST AFTER PEGIDA UK ANNOUNCEMENT……

It’s not a coincidence, it’s highly orchestrated governmental persecution.

Tommy Robinson Arrested AGAIN Two Days After Launching PEGIDA UK

Two days after launching the UK branch of the pan-European anti-Islamisation movement PEGIDA, Tommy Robinson, the former English Defence League (EDL) leader, has been arrested and detained for an assault allegedly committed in prison in 2014.

“The police told my solicitors I was going to be charged with battery. I was told this allegation was dropped and then two days after the Pegida UK press conference they say I’m going to be charged”, Mr. Robinson told the IB Times tonight.

Continuing: “Whatever this is all about, it’s a complete fabrication. It’s all to do with that press conference. The amount of stupid things they’ve arrested me for in the past, it’s ridiculous.”

“This is so blatant police & state collusion because of my political beliefs”, Mr. Robinsontweeted tonight. “How can you drop the case & then months later decide to come back & charge me @bedspolice it’s embarrassing how blatant this is” he added.

“The state persecution continues. Police have contacted me telling me I have 2 hand myself in 2 face charges. I’ll make video of details later”, he promised on the social media site.

More here.

UK: WAR VETS UPSET OVER AMBULANCE CHASING LAWYERS…….

Could you ever imagine Nazis and Bushido Japanese launching lawsuits against the soldiers of the victorious Allied Powers after WWII? Neither can I.

We have to end this lunacy.

Furious war veterans demand: Ban foreigners from claiming legal aid to hound our soldiers: ‘Ambulance-chasing’ firms should not be handed taxpayers’ money 

Foreign citizens who make often ‘spurious’ claims of mistreatment against British troops should be banned from claiming legal aid, top military brass demanded last night

Foreign citizens who make often ‘spurious’ claims of mistreatment against British troops should be banned from claiming legal aid, top military brass demanded last night

  • Anger over the inquiry into soldiers’ behaviour during Iraq War intensified 
  • The furious war veterans also demanded an inquiry into the firms and said they should be prosecuted for using agents 
  • ‘Touting for business’ is a breach of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 
  • Around one third of cases against British troops have been knocked back

Foreign citizens who make often ‘spurious’ claims of mistreatment against British troops should be banned from claiming legal aid, top military brass demanded last night.

As anger over the inquiry into UK soldiers’ behaviour during the 2003 Iraq War intensified, they said ‘ambulance-chasing’ law firms should not be handed taxpayers’ money.

They also demanded an inquiry into the firms and said they should be prosecuted for using agents, such as Abu Jamal, who persuaded a grieving widow to mount a claim against the MoD in the aftermath of the war.

The practice of ‘touting for business’ is a breach of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct whether it is undertaken by the firm or an agent working for them.

Colonel Richard Kemp, a former commander in Afghanistan, said: ‘We need to deny legal aid to foreign citizens making claims against our troops. This is the major factor that encourages so many of these cases.

‘They [law firms] should be prosecuted if they are found to be breaking the law and struck off if they are breaking the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct.

‘The Government needs to find a better way of stopping all of these fraudulent claims coming in and filtering out the genuine ones.’

Read more: H/T: Buck

UK GOVERNMENT ANTI-DEATH PENALTY CAMPAIGN NAMES BARBADOS AND JORDAN, SOWDY BARBARIA LEFT OFF LIST……..

Barbados named, Saudis…..nope.

beheading saudi arabia

I’m for capital punishment in slam dunk cases, that said, leaving Saudi Arabia off the list goes to show just how deep the pockets go for this member of the pajamas and slippers club.

UK left oil-rich Saudi out of drive to halt death penalty: Country was only one with capital punishment missing from list as Britain targeted Barbados and Jordan

Followers of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr burn an effigy of King Salman of Saudi Arabia as they hold posters of Sheik Nimr al-Nimr and Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr during a demonstration in Baghdad, Iraq

Followers of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr burn an effigy of King Salman of Saudi Arabia as they hold posters of Sheik Nimr al-Nimr and Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr during a demonstration in Baghdad, Iraq

  • Saudi Arabia was omitted from a UK campaign against the death penalty 
  • It was the only major country with the death penalty left off a Whitehall list 
  • Those given a greater priority than Saudi Arabia, which carried out 158 executions last year, included Barbados, Singapore and Jordan 

Saudi Arabia was omitted from an official UK campaign against the death penalty despite the number of executions it carries out.

The oil-rich state was the only major country with the death penalty left off a Whitehall list to be challenged by diplomats, it emerged last night.

Those given a greater priority than Saudi Arabia, which carried out 158 executions last year, included Barbados, Singapore and Jordan which passed fewer than ten death sentences between them in 2014.

The revelation comes as a dangerous rift between Saudi Arabia and Iran deepened last night over the execution of a prominent Muslim cleric.

Nimr al-Nimr, a Shia imam, was one of 47 convicts executed by beheading or firing squad at 12 separate Saudi prisons last weekend.

The fallout threatens to destabilise the entire Middle East after Iran, which mainly adheres to the Shia branch of Islam, said Sunni-run Saudi would face ‘divine vengeance’. Saudi Arabia cut its diplomatic and trade ties with Tehran yesterday and suspended all commercial flights.

Its allies Bahrain and Sudan also severed diplomatic ties with Iran, and the United Arab Emirates recalled its ambassador.

Read more: H/T: Buck

UK: SOLDIER WHO LOST LIMBS IN AFGHANISTAN FORCED TO MORTGAGE HIS HOME TO PAY FOR NEW PROSTHETICS……..

And pieces of crap like Hani al-Sibai live in a million £ home and on the dole.

There’s something really wrong when the best of the best have to pay for their own prosthetics after losing limbs in combat fighting for the home team. This shows once again just how whacky the West has become.

Soldier who lost both legs in Afghanistan blast says he’s been forced to re-mortgage his home to fund new prosthetic limbs

  • Soldier who lost legs in explosion says he’s been forced to mortgage home
  • Clive Smith wants to pay for pioneering artificial limb surgery in Australia
  • He claims he’s been left with no choice after ‘betrayal’ by the NHS and MoD
  • For 12 months he has been in a wheelchair waiting for new prosthetic limbs
'Betrayed': Clive Smith, who lost his legs to a bomb in Afghanistan, says he has been forced to mortgage his home to fund new prosthetic limbs in Australia

‘Betrayed’: Clive Smith, who lost his legs to a bomb in Afghanistan, says he has been forced to mortgage his home to fund new prosthetic limbs in Australia

A soldier who lost his legs to a roadside bomb in Afghanistan says he has been forced to mortgage his home to fund new prosthetic limbs after a 12-month wait on the NHS.

Clive Smith is spending £90,000 flying 10,000 miles to Australia for an operation he hopes will allow him to walk again.

He claims he has been left with no choice because the NHS and the Ministry of Defence have betrayed him, despite pledges that injured veterans would get the best possible care.

The former sapper, who stepped on a land mine in Helmand Province in 2010, has been in a wheelchair for a year waiting for new prosthetic limbs.

Mr Smith, 30, the face of the Poppy fundraising appeal in 2012, said: ‘I’ve put my life on the line for my country and I feel let down that I am now having to put my home on the line to get the best treatment.

‘I’ve finally lost my patience with the NHS.

‘They are not looking after veterans. I’m stuck in a wheelchair with my life on hold and it’s not fair. I want to be out and about but I can’t because I’ve no legs to wear.’

Mr Smith, of Cannock, Staffordshire, will have titanium rods bonded to his bones and artificial legs screwed on in Sydney.

The process, known as osseointegration, gives amputees the sensation of walking naturally.

Mr Smith lost his legs above the knee while leading a ten-man patrol from 33 Engineer Regiment to find buried bombs in the Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand.

He endured a lengthy rehabilitation period but was later able to walk again with the aid of prosthetic limbs supplied by the NHS.

However, due to poor fitting he suffered agonising chafing and blistering and was unable to wear the new legs for long periods.

He had to have plastic surgery to repair skin damaged by the rubbing and for the past 12 months has been virtually housebound while waiting for the NHS to fit new casts.

More here.

THE COST OF SPREADING THE WEALTH: UK RESIDENTS GET GYPPED, CORRUPT STATES NO SO MUCH…….

The first primary concern and focus of any government is the security of the citizen.

When people get short shrifted because their money (yes, their money) is sent abroad to others who did nothing to earn that money, then yes, there is great room for justified anger. If people want to be ‘noble’ with their cash, they’re free to send it where they wish, but not the money of others.

Here’s a good reason against the welfare state mentality if there ever was one. Without the welfare state (which means big government/centralization of concentrated power) none of this could be happening. The sending of billions abroad as well as the inundation of multitudes of unassimilable people from 3rd world backwaters is the hallmark of statism.

It’s the removing of representational government from the hands of the citizenry, elections are held, but the circle of individual liberty (which property rights form of crucial functional basis) shrinks with each day’s passing.

Misery for the residents of towns swamped by worst floods in decades – but Britain still sends £1BILLION in aid to the world’s most corrupt nations

Britain still sends £1BILLION in aid despite towns being swamped by floods

York drowns in the tide of filthy floodwater that has devastated swathes of the North. The scenes of misery across Yorkshire and Lancashire triggered outrage last night over Britain sqaundering cash on foreign aid. Residents asked why they had been told there was no money for local flood defences when £12billion a year is spent on overseas aid – including, it emerged yesterday, £1billion to the 20 most corrupt nations. More here.