I agree with him, Obama apologized for an ‘evil America’ that exists only in his own mind.

Interestingly enough, Obama had no problem being under the sign of allah, but under the sign of the cross, nah, he had it covered over. Maybe it was the IHS that got him, which means Jesus.

Donald Trump: Obama ‘Apologizes’ to Muslims in Mosque

GOP frontrunner Donald Trump said that President Obama apologized to Muslims when he visited a mosque earlier this week.

“And then President Obama yesterday goes to a mosque and he apologizes,” Trump said as the crowd booed in response. “I mean, what’s going on?”

Trump previously criticized Obama’s visit to a mosque in Baltimore, saying, “Maybe he feels comfortable there.”

Trump told the audience at his campaign rally in Florence, South Carolina on Friday night that Christianity is under siege. He urged that churches should unite on political issues, but they don’t because they are “afraid to lose their tax-exempt status,” the real estate mogul explained.

More here.


Obama, not so much……..


Iran humiliates US, again, with a drone flyover

Iran continues to flex its muscles and display its military might in the Gulf, while US forces are constantly on the defensive.

USS Harry S. Truman

By: AP

Iran flew a surveillance drone over a US aircraft carrier and published video of the encounter Friday, the latest in a series of edgy naval incidents between the two countries in the Persian Gulf after the recent nuclear deal.

While the US Navy stressed it knew the drone was unarmed and the flyover didn’t interrupt US operations in the war against the Islamic State (ISIS) group, the incident underlined the continued tension over control of waterways crucial to global oil supplies. It follows a rocket test last month by the Islamic Republic near coalition warships and commercial traffic, as well as Iran’s brief capture of American sailors who strayed into its territorial waters.

Iranian state television and the semi-official Fars news agency, which has close ties to the Revolutionary Guard, published identical images Friday both said came from the drone. The footage, which The Associated Press could not independently verify, purported to show the drone being launched and then hovering over an unidentified aircraft carrier, a targeting bracket briefly passing over a jet parked on the deck below.

More here.



The Obama – Islamonazi connection…….


Daniel Greenfield

The New York Times only chose to run this as part of the left’s new pro-Iran and anti-Saudi tilt. And indeed, the Saudi execution of Jihadist pro-Iranian cleric Nimr repeatedly comes up in the piece. But it does contain some interesting information about the extent to which Obama had at one point allowed the Saudis to set the agenda. (Now he’s allowing Iran to set the agenda.)

When President Obama secretly authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to begin arming Syria’s embattled rebels in 2013, the spy agency knew it would have a willing partner to help pay for the covert operation. It was the same partner the C.I.A. has relied on for decades for money and discretion in far-off conflicts: the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Since then, the C.I.A. and its Saudi counterpart have maintained an unusual arrangement for the rebel-training mission, which the Americans have code-named Timber Sycamore. Under the deal, current and former administration officials said, the Saudis contribute both weapons and large sums of money, and the C.I.A takes the lead in training the rebels on AK-47 assault rifles and tank-destroying missiles.

Except that sometimes the CIA actually helps the Saudis obtain the weapons.

American officials have not disclosed the amount of the Saudi contribution, which is by far the largest from another nation to the program to arm the rebels against President Bashar al-Assad’s military. But estimates have put the total cost of the arming and training effort at several billion dollars.

More here.


This story is about the newly released movie on the Benghazi security team’s response to jihadis attacking the consulate in Libya on 9/11 2012.

obama flag and benghazi bloody wall

At The Blaze, three medal of honor recipients were interviewed about the documentary movie 13 Hours. One of the things mentioned towards the end of the article hit me the most, the way in which these highly distinguished medals were handed out to everyone that was there, whether they risked their lives, or were being rescued themselves.

It diminishes the significance behind the earning of the medal itself.

Wiki: “The Medal of Honor is the United States of America’s highest military honor, awarded for personal acts of valor above and beyond the call of duty. The medal is awarded by the President of the United States in the name of the U.S. Congress to U.S. military personnel only.”

Benghazi Security Team Says CIA Officer Did Not ‘By Any Means’ Deserve Medal of Honor

Kris "Tanto" Paronto,  Mark  "Oz" Geist, and John "Tig" Tiegen discuss the Benghazi attack with Glenn Beck Thursday, Jan. 14.

[…] According to Paronto, “Bob” was “overcome” with pride the night of the attack, which led him to maintain control of the situation, “instead of relinquishing control to the guys who had the expertise on the ground, which is us.”

“We’re glad we put that in the movie, as far as him getting a metal, [but], my opinion, did he deserve that? No — not by any means,” Paronto told Beck.

In fact, Geist said it was Teigan who truly deserved the Medal of Honor, claiming that it was him who saved several lives that horrific night in Benghazi.

But, in the end, Teigan, Geist and Paronto each walked away with a Medal of Valor, which Teigan seemingly felt wasn’t enough.

“We all got a Medal of Valor, which they gave to everybody that was there that was a contractor, to include the cook and everybody else, so, I mean, it doesn’t, when you do that, it kind of,” Teigan said before trailing off.

More here.

NOTE: What Obama did in handing these medals out to everyone, was to diminish the significance of the medal itself, if all are deserving of the medal in spite of what they did, the medal means nothing. That was his intention.


Describes the pretender-in-chief to a tee.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:


Forget Obama’s Worthless Speech; Read This Instead

thomas_jeffersonThe Declaration of Independence.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

H/T: Doris Wise Montrose via Dr.Hurd


This president through his purposeful bumbling, has given the enemy a powerful impetus to hinder, humiliate and humble the United States. That is the foreign policy legacy of the Obama years.

us capture by iran


Iran says seizure of U.S. boats a lesson to ‘troublemakers’ in Congress

DUBAI (Reuters) – Iran’s army chief said on Wednesday the seizure of two U.S. navy boats and their 10 sailors should be a lesson to members the U.S. Congress trying to impose new sanctions on Tehran.

“This incident in the Persian Gulf, which probably will not be the American forces’ last mistake in the region, should be a lesson to troublemakers in the U.S. Congress,” Major General Hassan Firouzabadi, head of Iran’s armed forces, was quoted as saying by Tasnim news agency.

Yahoo news


Obama treats the US Constitution like kindling.


As the Journal report put it, “White House officials believed the intercepted information could be valuable to counter Mr. Netanyahu’s campaign [to convince Congress to scuttle Obama’s nuclear capitulation to Tehran]. They also recognized that asking for it was politically risky. So, wary of a paper trail stemming from a request, the White House let the NSA decide what to share and what to withhold, officials said. “We didn’t say, ‘Do it,’ a senior US official said. ‘We didn’t say, “Don’t do it.”’” Cute. But probably illegal.


What should happen to a President who spies on America’s lawmakers and her allies?

Caroline Glick

Originally published by the Jerusalem Post.

It is far from clear why senior Obama administration officials told The Wall Street Journal that under President Barack Obama, the National Security Agency has been aggressively spying not only on Israeli officials but on US citizens and lawmakers who communicate with Israeli officials. Perhaps they were trying to make Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu look like a fool.

After all, the article concludes that the NSA intercepts of these communications “revealed one surprise.”

“Mr. Netanyahu and some of his allies voiced confidence they could win enough votes” in Congress to scuttle Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran.

Ha ha. What dummies.

If their goal was simply to show that the White House has more leverage over Democratic lawmakers than the Israeli government does, then the article overshot the mark.

Beyond expressing the administration’s contempt for Netanyahu, the Journal’s article showed that Netanyahu isn’t the only one the administration sneers at.

It sneers at the American public and at members of Congress as well. And in so doing, it sneers at and deliberately breaks US law and tramples the US Constitution.

Under US law, American intelligence gathering agencies, including the NSA, are only permitted to spy on US citizens in order to protect US national security.

Under the US Constitution, the administration is arguably prohibited from spying on US lawmakers.

And yet, according to the Journal report, to advance its diplomatic opening to Iran, the administration has knowingly and deliberately spied on both law-abiding US citizens who posed no risk to US national security and on US lawmakers engaged in their lawful, constitutional duties.

More here.


Actually shedding a tear for not being able to completely grab all of your guns.

Exclusive – Sarah Palin: Obama Wept

Obama wept.

America is forced to weep over Obama’s release of violent criminals into our communities – like the 121 illegal aliens who committed murders after they were released from custody by the Obama administration instead of being deported. And that doesn’t take into account the others we don’t know about.

The whole world weeps waiting for American leadership in these troubled times as Islamic savages commit genocide against the Christians of the Middle East and terrorize innocent people in cities across the globe.

Meanwhile, Obama wept as he blamed law-abiding patriots for the nation’s insecurity and sought to strip them of the Constitutional rights that generations of Americans shed blood to protect.

Obama wept, while we all continue to weep for our country and the civilized world.


The legacy of the anti-Reagan.

The last year of Obama, let be over quicker than any year in human history.


33% of Americans see Obama as the worst post-war president

It’s not quite a Nobel Peace Prize, but unlike it, this award is thoroughly deserved.

More Americans consider Barack Obama to be the worst President since World War II than they do any other president, according to a new poll.

The Quinnipiac poll out Wednesday found that 33% of Americans see Obama as the worst post-war president, while just 8% consider him the best. Another 28% see former President George W. Bush as the worst. Richard Nixon, the only American President ever to resign in disgrace, was picked the worst by 13%, according to the poll.

And 45% of Americans think the U.S. would be better off if Mitt Romney had been elected President in 2012, according to the poll, while 38% think the country would be worse off.

Ronald Reagan was the most common answer among those surveyed for the best President since World War II, with 35% choosing the Republican icon. Another 18% chose Bill Clinton, and 15% chose John F. Kennedy.

Democrats were really hoping for an icon, instead they got an anchor dragging them down. The left won, but nuked the Democratic Party to do it.

More here.

obama crazy faced forward


Strategy, what strategy…..?


12 Pictures That Sum Up Obama’s ISIS Strategy In 2015

National Security/Foreign Policy Reporter

ISIS has dominated the headlines across the globe in 2015. Be it the attacks in Paris in November or the various high-quality execution videos peppered across the Internet, the group has captivated the attention of policymakers and the general public alike.

Likewise, concern for President Barack Obama’s handling of ISIS has been at the forefront of the public mind. His strategy has been at times unclear and on many occasions criticized by both his own former cabinet advisers and his own political allies. Below are some pictures that sum up the Obama administration’s ISIS policy in 2015.

January: ISIS takes over CENTCOM’s Twitter account

Source: Twitter

Read more:


The thing is, Obama couldn’t care less, any ‘indecision’ works to his over agenda.


Chuck Hagel’s Astonishing Admission on Syria

The former defense secretary has exposed yet another example of the White House’s negligence.

U.S. President Barack Obama greets former U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel during a farewell ceremony at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall in Virginia. Yuri Gripas / Reuters

Last week, former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel gave his first extended interview since resigning as Pentagon chief in November 2014. The curated interview with Foreign Policy is worth reading in its entirety, if for nothing else than the insights into how White House officials and staffers micromanaged Department of Defense decisions; Hagel claims that staffers would call generals “asking fifth-level questions that the White House should not be involved in.” (This would not be the first or last White House charged with this degree of oversight.)

However, the most revealing moment of the interview was not an instance of White House micromanagement, but rather indecisiveness. In September 2014, in reaction to the horrific videos of U.S. citizen beheadings released by the self-declared Islamic State, Congress passed legislation mandating that the Pentagon “provide assistance, including training, equipment, supplies, and sustainment, to appropriately vetted elements of the Syrian opposition.” The most critical question regarding this policy decision was not whether the program would be effective—almost immediately nobody inside or outside of the Pentagon thought it would be—but what direct military support the United States would provide to the Pentagon-trained rebels in Syria. As I later wrote, initial, limited support to Syrian rebels could escalate to a Bay of Pigs situation, where the U.S.-backed rebels were easily killed or captured, and subsequently U.S. credibility further eroded.


I can’t wait for this foul administration to end soon enough.

Abbas and Obama

Whether it’s Hamas or Fatah or the PLO, it’s all the same terrorist Islamonazi crap, in pajamas and sandals or in pinstripe suits.

Obama Hires Former Hamas Terrorist For His ISIS Advisor

by Judicial Watch

A radical foreign policy adviser fired by President Obama years ago for meeting with the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas is back as the administration’s new czar in charge of countering the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS).

The White House downplayed the new appointment by burying it deep in a press briefing delivered at a Paris hotel during the recent climate summit. “The President recently elevated Rob Malley, the NSC [National Security Council] Coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa, to serve now as the Senior Advisor to the President for the Counter-ISIL Campaign in Iraq and Syria,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said during the briefing at the Marriott Rive Gauche Hotel and Conference Center. Before moving onto the next topic Earnest said the president has directed Malley to “support our reinvigorated diplomatic track toward a political transition in Syria…”

More here. H/T: ChanaS.


The man-child on a mission.


Hey Barack, It’s Time To Man Up, And Explain To The American People Why Our Lives Don’t Matter To You.

obama dobey

© Wolff Bachner 2015

What on earth is going on in this country? The American people are deliberately being endangered by the policies and actions of Barack Obama, many of which are unconstitutional and illegal. While we expected this from the insane man who defrauded his way into the presidency, we also expected the members of Congress to oppose any actions or executive orders that will endanger American lives if they are enacted. There is little question that a president who knowingly endangers the lives of the citizens with his policies should be impeached for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

obama-one-nation-under-socialism-painting-march-2012Where exactly on G*D’s green earth are the elected officials who have also taken an oath to protect us from a president who refuses to do his sworn duty, endangers the nation, and constantly violates the Constitution?

This is no longer about Obama’s experience or the fact he has none, or his obnoxious demeanor, or his excessive vacations, or the dozens of golf rounds, some of which required Air Force One to fly the Duffer in Chief to a country club in Florida at $181,000 per hour. This is about the lives of 330 million Americans who are being threatened with terror and death by a foreign enemy the simpering weakling in the White House refuses to even name.

But, we must also remember the day this weasel of a president stood at the podium to announce that ISIS had beheaded James Foley. Two quick sound bites about “Jim,” as if James Foley was a pal of his from the Choom Gang, and 10 minutes of political psychobabble blaming everything but Islam for Mr. Foley’s murder.

Early Obama: The Choom Gang

America elected a president who lacks even the most basic manners. Obama exuded extreme disinterest throughout his speech except when he was lecturing the American people about Islam being the Religion of Peace. He insisted ISIS was not Islamic, and ISIS members were not real Muslims. Obama mumbled a few more meaningless platitudes about how tough he was when he dealt with America’s enemies, and thankfully, people in the audience realized that the news out of Syria was too serious to laugh in Obama’s face. As Obama made for the exit, he absorbed the praise from his minions as if it was fine wine, and 15 minutes later, he was back on the golf course.

Obama and the world

I have been a political columnist for the better part of four decades, and I have never witnessed a more disrespectful attitude or more self-absorbed, sociopathic individual occupying the Oval Office than this creepy political hack from Chi Town. He is truly a vile, contemptible human being, and Obama’s behavior was just heartless. Barack Hussein Obama spit in the face of every single American, and he used the announcement of James Foley’s murder to run interference for the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic supremacist ideology. An American journalist was executed by ISIS, and the takeaway from Obama’s performance made it abundantly clear he was going to do nothing whatsoever to stop the Islamist takeover of the Middle East and Africa.

Fast forward to December of 2015, and ISIS has arrived in France and the United States to commence the slaughter. 139 dead in Paris and 14 dead in San Bernardino, and Obama is still doing nothing to stop ISIS, while he continues to insist Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. Instead, he increases the number of Syrian Refugees that will arrive in the US in 2016 by 1000 percent.

obama and islam pig

When the news broke that there was no way to run proper security checks on the Syrian refugees, Obama essentially said, “So What,” told Congress to screw off, and doubled down on his belligerent demeanor. He made it clear to all concerned that the country will absorb 100,000 more penniless Muslims, and no one will make him change his mind.

The American people have essentially been completely disenfranchised, and the Congress has been put out of business by Harry Reid, who is still managing to block every single Republican bill to come down to the Senate from the House of Representatives, as he has done.for the last seven years. The only part of the government that is functioning is Obama’s pen and phone. Call it by any name you please; I call it a coup by Barack Hussein Obama and his cadre of inner circle advisers. We have lost our country.


Continue Reading →


Because you can always count on Obama doing exactly the opposite of what you would expect an American president, or yourself would do.

obama bowing

No room in America for Christian refugees

By Abraham H. Miller

At the end of World War II, the Jewish survivors of Europe’s Holocaust found that nearly every door was closed to them. “Tell Me Where Can I Go?” was a popular Yiddish song at the time. Decades later, the Christians of the Middle East face the same problem, and the Obama administration is keeping the door shut.

America is about to accept 9000 Syrian Muslims, refugees of the brutal war between the Assad regime and its Sunni opposition, which includes ISIS, Al Qaeda, and various other militias. That number is predicted to increase each year. There are no Christian refugees that will be admitted.

Why? Because the Department of State is adhering with all the rigidity of a Soviet era bureaucracy to the rule that only people at risk from massacres launched by the regime qualify for refugee status. The rapes of Christian women and the butchery of Christian children do not count. No matter how moved Americans were this Christmas season by the plight of their fellow Christ followers in Syria and Iraq, no matter how horrific the visuals of beheadings, enslavement, and mass murder, the Christians fleeing death do not engender the compassion of this president.

The Christians are being raped, tortured, and murdered by militias, not by the Syrian government. This technicality condemns them to continue to be victims without hope. And this technicality is being adhered to with all the tenacity with which President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s State Department manipulated quotas and created subterfuges to keep out the Jews fleeing the oppression of Nazi Germany. Obama no more wants the Middle East’s Christian refugees than Roosevelt wanted Europe’s Jewish refugees.

We have seen in the last several weeks that President Obama has no difficulty using his “phone and his pen,” as he dramatically boasts, to circumvent the law. When it comes to immigration, he had no difficulty enacting an amnesty that a federal judge subsequently ruled unconstitutional. He has had no problem circumventing Congress to change the relationship with Cuba. This president has shown that he will push back on the constraints of law when he wants to get something done.

More here.


Obama Lectures America on Islamic State: What We Should Not Do

In a televised speech from the Oval Office, President Obama tried to reassure Americans that he was properly handling terrorism and national security in the wake of the attacks in Paris and California.

This is the third televised major Oval Office speech delivered by the president, as he has struggled in recent weeks to respond appropriately to the attacks in Paris after being distracted with several days of overseas travel to promote his Trans-Pacific Trade Deal and what he described as an historic climate change summit in Paris.

Obama’s speech, however, did not include any new steps to defeat radical Islamic extremism, but focused on what Americans should not do in response to the unavoidable resurgent fear of terrorism under his leadership.

“We should not be drawn once more into a long and costly ground war in Iraq or Syria,” he said, arguing that it would fulfill the wishes of terrorists overseas.

“We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam,” he said. “That, too, is what groups like ISIL want.”

He insisted that the Islamic State “does not speak for Islam” and were a “cult of Death” who were only a “tiny fraction” of Muslims around the world.

He also hinted that his Republican critics were being counterproductive in his struggle, arguing for a “smart” reaction instead of “tough talk.”

“Our success won’t depend on tough talk, or abandoning our values, or giving into fear. That’s what groups like ISIL are hoping for,” he said. “Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless. And by drawing upon every aspect of American power.”

More here


Obama’s buddy, the islamonazi Erdogan, wanted Islamic State armed to fight the Kurds, so Obama funneled them weapons from Libya.

Just think of the fiasco ”Fast and Furious” and you’ll get the picture of how lame brained the idea was.

obama erdogan meeting

Benghazi Commission: Obama Admin Gun-Running Scheme Armed Islamic State

The Obama administration pursued a policy in Libya back in 2011 that ultimately allowed guns to walk into the hands of jihadists linked to the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) and al-Qaeda (AQ) in Syria, according to a former CIA officer who co-authored a report on behalf of the Citizen’s Commission on Benghazi (CCB), detailing the gun running scheme.

In Congress, the then-bipartisan group known as the “Gang of Eight,” at a minimum, knew of the operation to aid and abet America’s jihadist enemies by providing them with material support. So says Clare Lopez, a former CIA officer and the primary author of CCB’s interim report, titled How America Switched Sides in the War on Terror, speaking with Breitbart News.

The ripple effects of the illegal policy to arm America’s enemies continue to be felt as the U.S. military is currently leading a war against ISIS and AQ terrorists in Iraq and Syria, according to Lopez.

In late October, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said that the U.S. would begin “direct action on the ground” against ISIS terrorists in Iraq and Syria who may have reaped the benefits from the gun-running scheme that started in Libya.

“The Obama administration effectively switched sides in what used to be called the Global War on Terror [GWOT] when it decided to overthrow the sovereign government of our Libyan ally, Muammar Qaddafi, who’d been helping in the fight against al-Qaeda, by actually teaming up with and facilitating gun-running to Libyan al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood [MB] elements there in 2011,” explained Lopez. “This U.S. gun-running policy in 2011 during the Libyan revolution was directed by [then] Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and [the late Libya Ambassador] Christopher Stevens, who was her official envoy to the Libyan AQ rebels.”

More here.



Iranian president-elect Hassan Rowhani speaks during a press conference in Tehran on June 17, 2013. Rowhani expressed hope that Iran can reach a new agreement with major powers over its disputed nuclear programme, saying a deal should be reached through more transparency and mutual trust. AFP PHOTO/BEHROUZ MEHRI (Photo credit should read BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images)

Which reminds me of the dead stinky Arafat’s non-recognition of Israel trumpeted as an amazing success by serial rapist (then president) BJ Clinton.



State Department says Iran NEVER SIGNED nuclear deal and it’s not ‘legally binding’ as it tells Congress to butt out of Obama’s ‘political commitments’

  • Obama administration makes acknowledgments in letter to Kansas congressman
  • Administration did not make a signature on the nuclear agreement necessary
  • Controversial deal was not passed by Congress, but approval wasn’t necessary
  • Deal is expected to start taking effect in January 
  • See more of the latest news updates on the Iran nuclear deal 

The Obama administration has disclosed to Congress that this summer’s controversial nuclear arms agreement with Iran was never signed and is not legally binding, according to a new report this week.

The State Department made the disclosures in a letter to Kansas congressman Mike Pompeo, a Republican, who had written the department to inquire why the agreement as submitted to Congress in July did not bear the signature of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.

‘The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is not a treaty or an executive agreement, and is not a signed document,’ Julia Frifield, an assistant secretary for legislative affairs wrote Pompeo last Thursday.

Secretary of State John Kerry took a leading role in negotiating this summer's controversial nuclear arms deal with Iran

Secretary of State John Kerry took a leading role in negotiating this summer’s controversial nuclear arms deal with Iran

More here.