These people are contemptible…..
Obama is a walking example of an extremist narcissism that many a shrink would love to explore.
Alan Dershowitz: Obama meddles in Brexit but shuns Netanyahu when he speaks up about Iran
By Alan Dershowitz Published April 22, 2016
At a joint press conference Friday with Britain Prime Minister David Cameron, President Obama defended his intrusion into British politics in taking sides on the controversial and divisive Brexit debate.
In an op-ed, Obama came down squarely on the side of Britain remaining in the European Union – a decision I tend to agree with on its merits. But he was much criticized by the British media and British politicians for intruding into a debate about the future of Europe and Britain’s role in it.
Obama defended his actions by suggesting that in a democracy, friends should be able to speak their minds, even when they are visiting another country: “If one of our best friends is in an organization that enhances their influence and enhances their power and enhances their economy, then I want them to stay in. Or at least I want to be able to tell them ‘I think this makes you guys bigger players.'”
Nor did he stop at merely giving the British voters unsolicited advice, he also issued a not so veiled threat. He said that “The UK is going to be in the back of the queue” on trade agreements if they exit the EU.
President Obama must either have a short memory or must adhere to Emerson’s dictum that “foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” Recall how outraged the same President Obama was when the prime minister of a friendly country, Benjamin Netanyahu, spoke his mind about the Iran Deal.
Remember, Obama believes that it’s his (unconstitutional) presidential duty to run defense for Islam.
VIDEO: WH Censors French President Saying ‘ISLAMIST Terrorism
The White House website has censored a video of French Pres. Francois Hollande saying that “Islamist terrorism” is at the “roots of terrorism.”
The White House briefly pulled video of a press event on terrorism with Pres. Obama, and when it reappeared on the WhiteHouse.gov website and YouTube, the audio of Hollande’s translator goes silent, beginning with the words “Islamist terrorism,” then begins again at the end of his sentence.
Even the audio of Hollande saying the words “Islamist terrorism” in French have, apparently, been edited from the video.
According to the official White House transcript of Hollande’s remarks, Hollande refers to “Islamist terrorism.” The audio of the bold text in brackets is missing from the video – the only point in the video were the audio is absent:
“We are also making sure that between Europe and the United States there can be a very high level coordination.
“But we’re also well aware that the roots of terrorism, [Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq. We therefore have to act both in Syria and in Iraq, and this is what we’re doing within the framework of the coalition.] And we note that Daesh is losing ground thanks to the strikes we’ve been able to launch with the coalition.”
Watch the video of Hollande’s censored comment:
NOTE: This can be thought of as a supplement to the previous post addressing the radical shift in US society towards advocating for socialism.
The feckless media silent……
Robert Spencer Video: Obama Quotes Muhammad’s Speech Endorsing the Caliphate and Beheading
One outrage after the other……
And all of this is taking place in a post-9/11 America.
A few weeks later, in my office at the Port of Atlanta, the television hummed with the inevitable Congressional hearings that follow any terrorist attack. While members of Congress grilled Obama administration officials, demanding why their subordinates were still failing to understand the intelligence they had gathered, I was being forced to delete and scrub the records. And I was well aware that, as a result, it was going to be vastly more difficult to “connect the dots” in the future—especially before an attack occurs.
DHS ordered me to scrub records of Muslims with terror ties
February 05, 2016, 12:00 pm
By Philip Haney
Amid the chaos of the 2009 holiday travel season, jihadists planned to slaughter 290 innocent travelers on a Christmas Day flight from the Netherlands to Detroit, Michigan. Twenty-three-year old Nigerian Muslim Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab intended to detonate Northwest Airlines Flight 253, but the explosives in his underwear malfunctioned and brave passengers subdued him until he could be arrested. The graphic and traumatic defeat they planned for the United States failed, that time.
Following the attempted attack, President Obama threw the intelligence community under the bus for its failure to “connect the dots.” He said, “this was not a failure to collect intelligence, it was a failure to integrate and understand the intelligence that we already had.”
Most Americans were unaware of the enormous damage to morale at the Department of Homeland Security, where I worked, his condemnation caused. His words infuriated many of us because we knew his administration had been engaged in a bureaucratic effort to destroy the raw material—the actual intelligence we had collected for years, and erase those dots. The dots constitute the intelligence needed to keep Americans safe, and the Obama administration was ordering they be wiped away.
After leaving my 15 year career at DHS, I can no longer be silent about the dangerous state of America’s counter-terror strategy, our leaders’ willingness to compromise the security of citizens for the ideological rigidity of political correctness—and, consequently, our vulnerability to devastating, mass-casualty attack.
Just before that Christmas Day attack, in early November 2009, I was ordered by my superiors at the Department of Homeland Security to delete or modify several hundred records of individuals tied to designated Islamist terror groups like Hamas from the important federal database, the Treasury Enforcement Communications System (TECS). These types of records are the basis for any ability to “connect dots.” Every day, DHS Customs and Border Protection officers watch entering and exiting many individuals associated with known terrorist affiliations, then look for patterns. Enforcing a political scrubbing of records of Muslims greatly affected our ability to do that. Even worse, going forward, my colleagues and I were prohibited from entering pertinent information into the database.
Coming home to the most beautiful sound heard?
In First Public Visit to US Mosque, Obama’s Choice Hosted Global Jihadist Leaders
Anwar Al-Awlkai, the first American to be placed on CIA’s ‘kill or capture’ list.
Photo Credit: Muhammed Ud-Deen/Wikimedia
Barack Obama is in the final stretch of his time as President of the United States. It was announced on Sunday that Obama will make his first public appearance at a U.S. mosque to show solidarity with Muslims, whom many blame for all those terrorist attacks they commit.
The White House announced that Obama would be visiting the Islamic Society of Baltimore, which is located in Woodlawn, Maryland, just west of Baltimore. The ISB started in 1969 as a prayer group at Johns Hopkins University, which is located in Baltimore, according to the mosque’s website. A little more than a decade later, the community purchased an eight acre plot of land where the mosque is now located, as well as a school and a multi-purpose hall.
The vision of the ISB is “to be the anchor of a growing Muslim community with diverse backgrounds, democratically governed, relating to one another with inclusiveness and tolerance, and interacting with neighbors in an Islamic exemplary manner.”
Anything that’s actually good for America, he stonewalls.
Leading senators on Monday petitioned multiple Obama administration agencies to stop stonewalling a congressional investigation into the immigration histories of at least 113 foreign-born individuals implicated in terrorist operations after legally entering the United States, according to a copy of the letters.
The latest investigation comes just days after the Washington Free Beacon disclosed that an additional 41 foreign-born individuals who legally entered the United States had been arrested for planning a number of terror attacks.
Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) disclosed Monday that they had been pressuring the Obama administration for months to disclose the immigration histories of these foreign-born individuals implicated in terror plots.
Agencies including the Departments of State and Homeland Security have stonewalled these efforts, declining since mid-2015 to provide Congress additional information. This move has prompted speculation among lawmakers that the administration is withholding information to prevent the exposure of major gaps in the U.S. screening process for new immigrants.
“The American people are entitled to information on the immigration history of terrorists seeking to harm them,” Cruz and Sessions wrote to the secretaries of State and Homeland Security and the attorney general.
Similar requests for information issued sent in August and again in December have not been answered by the administration
The letter cites a recent Free Beacon report detailing that an additional 41 foreign-born individuals had been snagged on terrorism-related charges since 2014. The disclosure of these previously unknown accused terrorists brings the total number of foreigners brought up on terrorism charges to 113.
Everything about this man is a fraud.
Here’s what ‘constitutional scholar’ Obama really taught at law school
Among the lies about himself Obama consistently repeats is that he was a constitutional law professor.
Lie one: Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer. He did not have the qualifications to be a professor. Obama never published a single law paper. He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard. There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on. This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer.
Actually shedding a tear for not being able to completely grab all of your guns.
America is forced to weep over Obama’s release of violent criminals into our communities – like the 121 illegal aliens who committed murders after they were released from custody by the Obama administration instead of being deported. And that doesn’t take into account the others we don’t know about.
The whole world weeps waiting for American leadership in these troubled times as Islamic savages commit genocide against the Christians of the Middle East and terrorize innocent people in cities across the globe.
Meanwhile, Obama wept as he blamed law-abiding patriots for the nation’s insecurity and sought to strip them of the Constitutional rights that generations of Americans shed blood to protect.
Obama wept, while we all continue to weep for our country and the civilized world.
The legacy of the anti-Reagan.
The last year of Obama, let be over quicker than any year in human history.
POLL: OBAMA IS AMERICA’S WORST PRESIDENT
33% of Americans see Obama as the worst post-war president
It’s not quite a Nobel Peace Prize, but unlike it, this award is thoroughly deserved.
More Americans consider Barack Obama to be the worst President since World War II than they do any other president, according to a new poll.
The Quinnipiac poll out Wednesday found that 33% of Americans see Obama as the worst post-war president, while just 8% consider him the best. Another 28% see former President George W. Bush as the worst. Richard Nixon, the only American President ever to resign in disgrace, was picked the worst by 13%, according to the poll.
And 45% of Americans think the U.S. would be better off if Mitt Romney had been elected President in 2012, according to the poll, while 38% think the country would be worse off.
Ronald Reagan was the most common answer among those surveyed for the best President since World War II, with 35% choosing the Republican icon. Another 18% chose Bill Clinton, and 15% chose John F. Kennedy.
Democrats were really hoping for an icon, instead they got an anchor dragging them down. The left won, but nuked the Democratic Party to do it.
I don’t care a bit what others may say, Obama has an affinity for the mohammedan creed, so you might as well count him being one of its members, at least as a willing useful stooge.
17 Transfers from Gitmo Imminent
The man-child on a mission.
Hey Barack, It’s Time To Man Up, And Explain To The American People Why Our Lives Don’t Matter To You.
© Wolff Bachner 2015
What on earth is going on in this country? The American people are deliberately being endangered by the policies and actions of Barack Obama, many of which are unconstitutional and illegal. While we expected this from the insane man who defrauded his way into the presidency, we also expected the members of Congress to oppose any actions or executive orders that will endanger American lives if they are enacted. There is little question that a president who knowingly endangers the lives of the citizens with his policies should be impeached for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Where exactly on G*D’s green earth are the elected officials who have also taken an oath to protect us from a president who refuses to do his sworn duty, endangers the nation, and constantly violates the Constitution?
This is no longer about Obama’s experience or the fact he has none, or his obnoxious demeanor, or his excessive vacations, or the dozens of golf rounds, some of which required Air Force One to fly the Duffer in Chief to a country club in Florida at $181,000 per hour. This is about the lives of 330 million Americans who are being threatened with terror and death by a foreign enemy the simpering weakling in the White House refuses to even name.
But, we must also remember the day this weasel of a president stood at the podium to announce that ISIS had beheaded James Foley. Two quick sound bites about “Jim,” as if James Foley was a pal of his from the Choom Gang, and 10 minutes of political psychobabble blaming everything but Islam for Mr. Foley’s murder.
America elected a president who lacks even the most basic manners. Obama exuded extreme disinterest throughout his speech except when he was lecturing the American people about Islam being the Religion of Peace. He insisted ISIS was not Islamic, and ISIS members were not real Muslims. Obama mumbled a few more meaningless platitudes about how tough he was when he dealt with America’s enemies, and thankfully, people in the audience realized that the news out of Syria was too serious to laugh in Obama’s face. As Obama made for the exit, he absorbed the praise from his minions as if it was fine wine, and 15 minutes later, he was back on the golf course.
I have been a political columnist for the better part of four decades, and I have never witnessed a more disrespectful attitude or more self-absorbed, sociopathic individual occupying the Oval Office than this creepy political hack from Chi Town. He is truly a vile, contemptible human being, and Obama’s behavior was just heartless. Barack Hussein Obama spit in the face of every single American, and he used the announcement of James Foley’s murder to run interference for the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic supremacist ideology. An American journalist was executed by ISIS, and the takeaway from Obama’s performance made it abundantly clear he was going to do nothing whatsoever to stop the Islamist takeover of the Middle East and Africa.
Fast forward to December of 2015, and ISIS has arrived in France and the United States to commence the slaughter. 139 dead in Paris and 14 dead in San Bernardino, and Obama is still doing nothing to stop ISIS, while he continues to insist Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. Instead, he increases the number of Syrian Refugees that will arrive in the US in 2016 by 1000 percent.
When the news broke that there was no way to run proper security checks on the Syrian refugees, Obama essentially said, “So What,” told Congress to screw off, and doubled down on his belligerent demeanor. He made it clear to all concerned that the country will absorb 100,000 more penniless Muslims, and no one will make him change his mind.
The American people have essentially been completely disenfranchised, and the Congress has been put out of business by Harry Reid, who is still managing to block every single Republican bill to come down to the Senate from the House of Representatives, as he has done.for the last seven years. The only part of the government that is functioning is Obama’s pen and phone. Call it by any name you please; I call it a coup by Barack Hussein Obama and his cadre of inner circle advisers. We have lost our country.
Because you can always count on Obama doing exactly the opposite of what you would expect an American president, or yourself would do.
No room in America for Christian refugees
By Abraham H. Miller
At the end of World War II, the Jewish survivors of Europe’s Holocaust found that nearly every door was closed to them. “Tell Me Where Can I Go?” was a popular Yiddish song at the time. Decades later, the Christians of the Middle East face the same problem, and the Obama administration is keeping the door shut.
America is about to accept 9000 Syrian Muslims, refugees of the brutal war between the Assad regime and its Sunni opposition, which includes ISIS, Al Qaeda, and various other militias. That number is predicted to increase each year. There are no Christian refugees that will be admitted.
Why? Because the Department of State is adhering with all the rigidity of a Soviet era bureaucracy to the rule that only people at risk from massacres launched by the regime qualify for refugee status. The rapes of Christian women and the butchery of Christian children do not count. No matter how moved Americans were this Christmas season by the plight of their fellow Christ followers in Syria and Iraq, no matter how horrific the visuals of beheadings, enslavement, and mass murder, the Christians fleeing death do not engender the compassion of this president.
The Christians are being raped, tortured, and murdered by militias, not by the Syrian government. This technicality condemns them to continue to be victims without hope. And this technicality is being adhered to with all the tenacity with which President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s State Department manipulated quotas and created subterfuges to keep out the Jews fleeing the oppression of Nazi Germany. Obama no more wants the Middle East’s Christian refugees than Roosevelt wanted Europe’s Jewish refugees.
We have seen in the last several weeks that President Obama has no difficulty using his “phone and his pen,” as he dramatically boasts, to circumvent the law. When it comes to immigration, he had no difficulty enacting an amnesty that a federal judge subsequently ruled unconstitutional. He has had no problem circumventing Congress to change the relationship with Cuba. This president has shown that he will push back on the constraints of law when he wants to get something done.
His “czar” doesn’t want them beaten.
It all makes sense when you finally come to understand that Obama isn’t in it to win, meaning America triumphing over its enemies, but instead laying America low in order for its enemies to walk all over it.
OBAMA’S NEW PRO-TERRORIST ISIS CZAR DOESN’T BELIEVE TERRORISTS CAN BE DEFEATED
How can this plan possibly go wrong?
During the Ebola crisis, there were complaints that Obama’s Ebola czar was completely unqualified for the job. That was true. But at least he didn’t have Ebola.
The same can’t be said for Obama’s ISIS Czar who was originally fired for his backdoor contacts with Hamas. And then got taken back on and basically put in charge of a big chunk of regional policy. So now there’s a terrorist sympathizer heading up the effort to fight ISIS.
How can this plan possibly go wrong?
While President Obama was in Paris for the past few days cavorting with other world leaders on the dire global threat of climate change… his spokesperson made the announcement that Obama’s new ISIS czar will be none other than Robert Malley.
In 2008, Malley was booted from the Obama election committee when it was discovered that he had met with Hamas members. Although removed from the public stage, Malley was still one of Obama’s most trusted advisers on Middle East issues.
Robert Malley doesn’t believe that you can militarily defeat terrorists.
Great going Mooch, hopefully you won’t hear the calls of “kafir” trailing behind you.
H/T: Andy Bostom
First Lady Michelle Obama is in Qatar this week for a summit sponsored by a state-controlled foundation that is known for operating mosques that have welcomed extremist clerics, according to a range of sources.
Obama is in Qatar—a country under congressional scrutiny for its financing of terrorists—through the end of the week to attend the country’s World Innovation Summit for Education, an annual educational conference sponsored by the Qatar Foundation, which has been marred in controversy due to its ongoing hosting of radical clerics.
Founded and run by the former Qatari emir’s wife, Sheikha Mozah, the Qatar Foundation houses six satellite campuses owned by American universities and other Western schools at a site outside Doha known as Education City.
At its mosque there, the Foundation has welcomed multiple radical clerics in the past several months, prompting criticism from some who accuse the charity of quietly promoting terrorism.
One cleric who recently spoke at the mosque, Omar Abdelkafi, has mocked the killings of French satirical writers at Charlie Hebdo, calling the terrorist act “the sequel to the comedy film of 9/11.” Another maintained that “Jews and their helpers must be destroyed.”
Where was this hack years ago? Sucking up to Obama, that’s where.
Also, the U.S. has no friends in Syria, they’re all just anti-west jihadis and Assad supporters.
HURRAY!!! A JOURNALIST ACTUALLY QUESTIONED OBAMA’S LEADERSHIP!
H/T: Gary Aminoff
Because an impoverished nation (by him) needs more of the same.
And we all know that if he thought that there was a way to circumvent the constitution and run for a 3rd term, he would.
OBAMA: I COULD WIN THIRD TERM AS PRESIDENT — BUT I WON’T RUN
President Obama insisted that he could run and win a third term as president if he wanted to, but assured Americans that he would follow the lead of previous presidents before him.
When asked directly by Steve Kroft in a 60 Minutes interview if he could win a third term as president he replied without hesitation, “Yes. I do.”
He pointed out that it was “bittersweet” heading into his last year in office admitting that he would “love to do some more” to help the country.
But he compared his own struggle with that of the nation’s first president, George Washington, to explain why he would step down.
“I think having a fresh set of legs in this seat, I think having a fresh perspective, new personnel and new ideas and a new conversation with the American people about issues that may be different a year from now than they were when I started eight years ago, I think that’s all good for our democracy,” he concluded.