It’s classic Leftist thinking, dividing peoples along racial lines in order to divide and rule.

This is part of Obama’s fundamental transformation of the US, making it into a 3rd world banana republic which will constantly be at war with itself as the political elite herd the populace into this and that direction.

Now, what Obama and the MENA-race activists want is a political distinction in post-modern America, land of grievance and entitlement, for…wait for it…a bunch of people who are increasingly Muslim, as opposed to Christian and Jewish.  They want to export to America the pattern of the Great Crossroads, and distinguish Caucasian from Caucasian for political purposes.

Obama’s new ‘race’ category: The Trojan Horse that would turn us into the Middle East

Obama’s new ‘race’ category: The Trojan Horse that would turn us into the Middle East

The Middle East in flames. (Image: AFP via BBC)

I posted on this gambit of Obama’s on Saturday, but didn’t say much about it at the time.  I won’t go into a terribly extended discussion here either.  But I do want to make sure people are thinking hard and clearly about this appalling move.  It has a unique power to destroy America: a diabolically insidious power nothing else has had.

I’ll start by simply copying here some thoughts I composed for email correspondents.

It’s an invidious political move, which is why it was slipped quietly into the Federal Register as a proposed regulatory change, just before the weekend.  As usual.

The original demand of Syrians was to not be classified by the political narrative of the time about what Asia is.  Syrians in fact ARE “white,” in racial terms – unlike Chinese.  Syrians are Caucasians.  The geopolitical perception of an older era actually obscured that reality about the Syrians, by setting them in the Near East: part of an alien Asia divided into Near East and Far East.

But no one thinks of Syria as part of an Asian “Near East” anymore.  In fact, outside of wonks at the Pentagon and Foggy Bottom, no one thinks of Syria (or Saudi Arabia, etc.) as being in “Asia” at all.  That area is all imagined today as the “Middle East.”

And the politics of race have shifted too.  In the current political narrative of race, Caucasian is equated so firmly with “white European” that college kids are aghast at the idea of non-Europeans being “Caucasians.”

Yet in reality, Asia, including Southwest Asia, and North Africa have Caucasians of varying pigmentation all over them.  Beyond the Arabs; India, Pakistan, Iran – all absolutely stuffed with Caucasians.  Ancient, indigenous non-Arab peoples in Iraq, the Levant, and across North Africa (even the Horn of Africa).  The Caucasus itself, of course, is IN Asia.

Politics has divided “Caucasians” to a greater extent than it has the other major gene groups.  The Caucasian world, all by itself, IS the globe’s front line of geopolitical confrontation – and it has encompassed West Asia, North Africa, and Europe (centered on the “Great Crossroads”) in that regard for many centuries.

Geography has played a big role, of course.  In the Great Crossroads, it magnified the import of the same kinds of invidious tribal distinctions that other peoples also fight over (i.e., in Asia, Africa, and the Americas).  Ultimately, the historical persistence of the pattern and its import has been unique, in the Caucasian-dominated Great Crossroads.

Now, what Obama and the MENA-race activists want is a political distinction in post-modern America, land of grievance and entitlement, for…wait for it…a bunch of people who are increasingly Muslim, as opposed to Christian and Jewish.  They want to export to America the pattern of the Great Crossroads, and distinguish Caucasian from Caucasian for political purposes.

Remember how badly it turned out to distinguish Caucasian from “Black African,” for political purposes?  Remember how ugly, destructive, and stupid it has been?  (Even apart from slavery, which has been practiced everywhere by everyone against everyone.)

Yet at the time, the advocates of that and other like distinctions claimed to have only good intentions.  This is no different.

Consider just this one point.  Classifying the Caucasian MENA peoples as a separate “race” will mainly divide whom from whom, depending on who is politically motivated to embrace the new race or not?  That’s right:  Muslims from Jews and Christians.

The new “MENA race,” if it can be installed as part of an accepted narrative, will serve to bolster the false, latter-day political narrative that Jews and Christians are colonizing interlopers in the MENA region.  (Because that’s what “white Caucasians” are, wherever they go.  The narrative says so.)

 More here.



Brian of London observes: I’m struggling to reconcile this:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”[1]
with this:
We have to put our money where our mouths are. And we can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints. Sometimes I’m criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions, but I’m convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long-term, enhances our security.

Is there a provision in the US Constitution allowing a President to propose to cede powers to the UN or some other body?  Because for my money he should have been led away from that stage in hand cuffs and taken off to whatever you people have instead of the Tower of London.

‘Welcome the stranger’ Outgoing Obama tells nations to OPEN THEIR BORDERS to immigrants

President Obama and refugeesGETTY

Obama has called on nations to welcome more refugees

BARACK Obama has urged nations to open their borders to refugees and “welcome the stranger” during his final speech at the United Nations.


The outgoing President used his speech at the UN summit to beg world leaders to house millions of refugees.

Obama’s plea comes as a record 65million people around the world were displaced from their homes last year, but no coherent plan among world leaders is in place to resettle the millions of refugees.

The 55-year-old also used his speech to launch a thinly veiled attack on White House hopeful Donald Trump, claiming the world’s response to the refugee crisis was “a test of our common humanity — whether we give into suspicion and fear and build walls or whether we see ourselves in one another”.

In his eighth and final address to the UN, Obama said the world faced a choice between a “better model of cooperation and integration” or “a world sharply divided and ultimately in conflict along age-old lines of nation and tribe and race and religion”.

More here.


Not shocked…..

An impeachable offence for the entire upper echelon of the Obama regime……….


US-led nuke negotiators allowed inspections loopholes for Iran, think tank says


If not for a feckless GOP establishments squishes, he would have long since been removed.

obama winking


From Carter to Obama, it’s time for politicians to pay a price for appeasing Iran.

Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

The Islamic Republic of Iran was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984. That move came several years after Iran had seized American hostages while demanding $24 billion in cash and gold to be paid into a Muslim bank for their release.

The total, according to Secretary of State Muskie, came out to $480 million per hostage.

Carter eventually reached a deal to release billions to Iran while Muskie claimed that the ransom payment meant that “the United States emerged stronger and Iran emerged weaker.” Such counterintuitive arguments have become a staple of Obama rhetoric which insists that appeasing terrorists somehow weakens them and strengthens us.

Muskie also said the deal would “not to make any arrangement to encourage terrorism in the future”.

That of course was not true. Paying out ransom to terrorists only encourages more terrorism. While the hostages were freed, the terror tactic never went away.

In 1989, Iran was still trying to blackmail President George H.W. Bush by offering to free yet more American hostages in exchange for around $12 billion in assets. The hostages had been seized by terrorist affiliates of Iran which by now had been on the state sponsor of terror list for nearly half a decade.

More here. Graphics by Bosch Fawstin


No surprises here……..


Report: US paid Iran $400 million as American prisoners were freed

US Secretary of State John Kerry (R) meets with Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif

The January release of four Americans prisoners from Iran allegedly coincided with a secretly-arranged US cash payment of $400 million to Tehran,The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The report cited US and European officials along with members of Congress who were reportedly later briefed on the airlift that rendered the first payment of a $1.7 billion deal the White House administration settled with Iran over a disputed, failed arms deal signed before the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

More here.


The great divider……

America’s Worst President?

I nominate Barack Obama, the anti-Lincoln.

July 10, 2016

”If you want to ignite race riots, a sure-fire way to do it is to stir up black hatred and suspicion of cops, which will in turn make cops warier of blacks and more trigger-happy, and so on, until an explosion occurs. So thanks, President Obama. You have set back American race relations by 50 years”

More here.

It could have been much much more different if we had a conservative Black president.



With a fist full of matches and a can of gas in the other…….


MARK LEVIN: Obama is the “Anti-Lincoln”

By Chris Pandolfo

On Friday’s radio program, Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin addressed the assassination of police officers in Dallas Thursday evening.“I think the police in this country are under attack,” Levin said.

Levin talked about President Obama, the “little man with a massive ego,” noting that the United States is more divided today than when Obama assumed office eight years ago, calling him the “anti-Lincoln.”

He described how the Left in this country thrives on dividing the American people and using our divisions to maintain power. “Our country is dying,” Levin said. “Our country is dying because the politicians and the government are killing it.” 

Doug Ross@Journal


obama winking


Obama is the biggest smuggler of guns to terrorists.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

You won’t find many of the Democrats who pulled their phony publicity stunt over gun control backing the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act. It was after all their very own administration that chose to sendF-16 fighter jets, not to mention other serious firepower, to the Muslim Brotherhood regime that ruled in Egypt before being overthrown by military intervention and popular protests.

Not only was the Muslim Brotherhood regime linked to Hamas, which was designated as a foreign terrorist group by the State Department, but it had helped ISIS open up a front in the Sinai. Hamas is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. Al Qaeda is currently run by a Brotherhood splinter group. Osama bin Laden had been a member of the Brotherhood. Zarqawi, the founder of the group that eventually became ISIS, was freed as a gesture to the Muslim Brotherhood. If the Muslim Brotherhood were any more involved in Islamic terrorism, it would have copyrighted the term.

But Secretary of State John Kerry had defended the weapons giveaway to the Brotherhood by claiming that, “Not everything lends itself to a simple classification, black or white.” Apparently aiding Islamic terrorists defies simple classification. Not everything is black and white. Sometimes it’s bright red.

More here.


Obama is a petulant child, as well as a marxist ideologue.


Former UN Ambassador John Bolton Takes Off The Gloves…Calls Obama ‘A Small Man’ Because…

“Snark is not an admirable trait …”

When it comes to criticizing the Obama administration’s craven approach to foreign policy and fighting terrorism, no conservative is more consistent than former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton.

Back in the first year of Barack Obama’s presidency, Bolton used a New York Times op-ed to accurately predict Obama’s approach to nuclear negotiations would “seriously weaken the United States” (see the Iran deal). Less than two weeks ago, Bolton slammed Obama for his near-apology for the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima.

But Bolton’s outrage this week over the way Obama used the Orlando nightclub massacre to attack political opponents hit hard at the president whom Bolton calls a “small man.”

“Snark is not an admirable trait and criticizing your political opponents in a speech to the nation at a time when they want to know what we’re doing to protect ourselves from other attacks is beneath the dignity of the office. He’s never been qualified to be commander in chief,” he said.

Fox News legal analyst Judge Jeanine Pirro joined in.

“If this president had, for one minute, tried to give some empathy to the victims and their families in Orlando, then we would have been cheering him on,” she said. “This president spent more time dealing with the fact that it’s not a religious war, that we can’t paint all Muslims with the same broad brush … The whole thing was an embarrassment.”

More here. h/t: 


Obama is a walking example of an extremist narcissism that many a shrink would love to explore.

Alan Dershowitz: Obama meddles in Brexit but shuns Netanyahu when he speaks up about Iran

At a joint press conference Friday with Britain Prime Minister David Cameron, President Obama defended his intrusion into British politics in taking sides on the controversial and divisive Brexit debate.

In an op-ed, Obama came down squarely on the side of Britain remaining in the European Union – a decision I tend to agree with on its merits.  But he was much criticized by the British media and British politicians for intruding into a debate about the future of Europe and Britain’s role in it.

Obama defended his actions by suggesting that in a democracy, friends should be able to speak their minds, even when they are visiting another country: “If one of our best friends is in an organization that enhances their influence and enhances their power and enhances their economy, then I want them to stay in. Or at least I want to be able to tell them ‘I think this makes you guys bigger players.'”

Nor did he stop at merely giving the British voters unsolicited advice, he also issued a not so veiled threat.  He said that “The UK is going to be in the back of the queue” on trade agreements if they exit the EU.

President Obama must either have a short memory or must adhere to Emerson’s dictum that “foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”  Recall how outraged the same President Obama was when the prime minister of a friendly country, Benjamin Netanyahu, spoke his mind about the Iran Deal.


Remember, Obama believes that it’s his (unconstitutional) presidential duty to run defense for Islam.

obama winking

VIDEO: WH Censors French President Saying ‘ISLAMIST Terrorism

The White House website has censored a video of French Pres. Francois Hollande saying that “Islamist terrorism” is at the “roots of terrorism.”

The White House briefly pulled video of a press event on terrorism with Pres. Obama, and when it reappeared on the WhiteHouse.gov website and YouTube, the audio of Hollande’s translator goes silent, beginning with the words “Islamist terrorism,” then begins again at the end of his sentence.

Even the audio of Hollande saying the words “Islamist terrorism” in French have, apparently, been edited from the video.

According to the official White House transcript of Hollande’s remarks, Hollande refers to “Islamist terrorism.” The audio of the bold text in brackets is missing from the video – the only point in the video were the audio is absent:

“We are also making sure that between Europe and the United States there can be a very high level coordination.

“But we’re also well aware that the roots of terrorism, [Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq.  We therefore have to act both in Syria and in Iraq, and this is what we’re doing within the framework of the coalition.]  And we note that Daesh is losing ground thanks to the strikes we’ve been able to launch with the coalition.”

Watch the video of Hollande’s censored comment:


One outrage after the other……

obama winking

And all of this is taking place in a post-9/11 America.

A few weeks later, in my office at the Port of Atlanta, the television hummed with the inevitable Congressional hearings that follow any terrorist attack. While members of Congress grilled Obama administration officials, demanding why their subordinates were still failing to understand the intelligence they had gathered, I was being forced to delete and scrub the records. And I was well aware that, as a result, it was going to be vastly more difficult to “connect the dots” in the future—especially before an attack occurs.

DHS ordered me to scrub records of Muslims with terror ties

February 05, 2016, 12:00 pm

By Philip Haney

Amid the chaos of the 2009 holiday travel season, jihadists planned to slaughter 290 innocent travelers on a Christmas Day flight from the Netherlands to Detroit, Michigan. Twenty-three-year old Nigerian Muslim Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab intended to detonate Northwest Airlines Flight 253, but the explosives in his underwear malfunctioned and brave passengers subdued him until he could be arrested. The graphic and traumatic defeat they planned for the United States failed, that time.

Following the attempted attack, President Obama threw the intelligence community under the bus for its failure to “connect the dots.” He said, “this was not a failure to collect intelligence, it was a failure to integrate and understand the intelligence that we already had.”

Most Americans were unaware of the enormous damage to morale at the Department of Homeland Security, where I worked, his condemnation caused. His words infuriated many of us because we knew his administration had been engaged in a bureaucratic effort to destroy the raw material—the actual intelligence we had collected for years, and erase those dots. The dots constitute the intelligence needed to keep Americans safe, and the Obama administration was ordering they be wiped away.

After leaving my 15 year career at DHS, I can no longer be silent about the dangerous state of America’s counter-terror strategy, our leaders’ willingness to compromise the security of citizens for the ideological rigidity of political correctness—and, consequently, our vulnerability to devastating, mass-casualty attack.

Just before that Christmas Day attack, in early November 2009, I was ordered by my superiors at the Department of Homeland Security to delete or modify several hundred records of individuals tied to designated Islamist terror groups like Hamas from the important federal database, the Treasury Enforcement Communications System (TECS). These types of records are the basis for any ability to “connect dots.” Every day, DHS Customs and Border Protection officers watch entering and exiting many individuals associated with known terrorist affiliations, then look for patterns. Enforcing a political scrubbing of records of Muslims greatly affected our ability to do that. Even worse, going forward, my colleagues and I were prohibited from entering pertinent information into the database.

More here.


Coming home to the most beautiful sound heard?


obama mosque

In First Public Visit to US Mosque, Obama’s Choice Hosted Global Jihadist Leaders

President Obama plans to visit a U.S. mosque for the first time, but the one he’s chosen has hosted at least two major jihadist leaders.
By: Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Published: January 31st, 2016
Anwar Al-Awlkai, the first American to be placed on CIA's 'kill or capture' list.

Anwar Al-Awlkai, the first American to be placed on CIA’s ‘kill or capture’ list.
Photo Credit: Muhammed Ud-Deen/Wikimedia

Barack Obama is in the final stretch of his time as President of the United States. It was announced on Sunday that Obama will make his first public appearance at a U.S. mosque to show solidarity with Muslims, whom many blame for all those terrorist attacks they commit.

The White House announced that Obama would be visiting the Islamic Society of Baltimore, which is located in Woodlawn, Maryland, just west of Baltimore. The ISB started in 1969 as a prayer group at Johns Hopkins University, which is located in Baltimore, according to the mosque’s website. A little more than a decade later, the community purchased an eight acre plot of land where the mosque is now located, as well as a school and a multi-purpose hall.

The vision of the ISB is “to be the anchor of a growing Muslim community with diverse backgrounds, democratically governed, relating to one another with inclusiveness and tolerance, and interacting with neighbors in an Islamic exemplary manner.”

More here.


Anything that’s actually good for America, he stonewalls.


Obama Admin Stonewalling Investigation Into 113 Terrorists Inside United States

Free Beacon report sparks investigation (UPDATED

BY: Adam Kredo

Leading senators on Monday petitioned multiple Obama administration agencies to stop stonewalling a congressional investigation into the immigration histories of at least 113 foreign-born individuals implicated in terrorist operations after legally entering the United States, according to a copy of the letters.

The latest investigation comes just days after the Washington Free Beacon disclosed that an additional 41 foreign-born individuals who legally entered the United States had been arrested for planning a number of terror attacks.

Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) disclosed Monday that they had been pressuring the Obama administration for months to disclose the immigration histories of these foreign-born individuals implicated in terror plots.

Agencies including the Departments of State and Homeland Security have stonewalled these efforts, declining since mid-2015 to provide Congress additional information. This move has prompted speculation among lawmakers that the administration is withholding information to prevent the exposure of major gaps in the U.S. screening process for new immigrants.

“The American people are entitled to information on the immigration history of terrorists seeking to harm them,” Cruz and Sessions wrote to the secretaries of State and Homeland Security and the attorney general.

Similar requests for information issued sent in August and again in December have not been answered by the administration

The letter cites a recent Free Beacon report detailing that an additional 41 foreign-born individuals had been snagged on terrorism-related charges since 2014. The disclosure of these previously unknown accused terrorists brings the total number of foreigners brought up on terrorism charges to 113.

More here.


Everything about this man is a fraud.

obama dope smoke

Here’s what ‘constitutional scholar’ Obama really taught at law school

By Karin McQuillan

Among the lies about himself Obama consistently repeats is that he was a constitutional law professor.

Lie one:  Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer.  He did not have the qualifications to be a professor.  Obama never published a single law paper.  He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard.  There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.  This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer.

Obama was not capable of writing, and eventually, after failing to deliver, he changed it to a memoir, which he also struggled with.  Finally, he asked Bill Ayers to write his memoir for him, using tapes that Michelle dropped off at the Ayerses’.

Lie two: Obama did not specialize in the Constitution.  Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race.  One course was about race in the Constitution.  It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.

As the New York Times explains, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: “race, rights and gender.”

His most traditional course was in the due process and equal protection areas of constitutional law. His voting rights class traced the evolution of election law, from the disenfranchisement of blacks to contemporary debates over districting and campaign finance. …His most original course, a historical and political seminar as much as a legal one, was on racism and law…

[In] one class on race, he imitated the way clueless white people talked. “Why are your friends at the housing projects shooting each other?” he asked in a mock-innocent voice. …

Read more:


Actually shedding a tear for not being able to completely grab all of your guns.

Exclusive – Sarah Palin: Obama Wept

Obama wept.

America is forced to weep over Obama’s release of violent criminals into our communities – like the 121 illegal aliens who committed murders after they were released from custody by the Obama administration instead of being deported. And that doesn’t take into account the others we don’t know about.

The whole world weeps waiting for American leadership in these troubled times as Islamic savages commit genocide against the Christians of the Middle East and terrorize innocent people in cities across the globe.

Meanwhile, Obama wept as he blamed law-abiding patriots for the nation’s insecurity and sought to strip them of the Constitutional rights that generations of Americans shed blood to protect.

Obama wept, while we all continue to weep for our country and the civilized world.