Facts are stubborn things….

While situations in different countries vary, the overall situation in the jihad against rest of the world, remains a constant. The majority of recruits to the jihad are schooled or well schooled people who held jobs. They were not deprived nor discriminated against, they were just juiced up on post-hijra Islam

Get you some of this, from a World Bank study (H/T: Vlad):

Recruits of the IU, more educated than expected


“We found that the Islamic State group is not collected his foreign recruits among the poor and less well formed, but rather the opposite,” says the World Bank in these works based on the leak of internal data of the ISIS on 3803 recruits.

This is information on the country of residence, nationality, educational level or previous experience in jihadism and knowledge of Sharia, said the authors of the study devoted more broadly to the economic situation MENA (Middle East and North Africa).

“One of the most important discoveries is that these people are far from being illiterate,” says the World Bank, which believes that these data provide “insights” on the profile of the ISIS fighters

Most have a secondary education

Most recruits for the period from 2013 to 2014, “claimed to have a secondary education. An important part was educated up to university level”, say the researchers from the international institution, which determine the average age of foreign staff of the IS as being 27.4 years.

According to the data, 43.3% have completed secondary education, 25.4% went to college. Only 13.5% did not go beyond primary school and 1.3% expressed illiterate, the rest (16.3%) did not provide information on their training.

More here.

NOTE: I was recently blocked on Twitter by Finnish Chief Constable Jussi Huhtela for exposing his nonsensical meme that the jihad is fuelled by unemployment, lack of schooling and opportunity.


It’s Islam, that’s the reason for jihad, full stop…..

quran quran

What motivates a Canadian jihadist?

A study stresses real religious zeal, not loners seeking a way out

John Geddes  August 15, 2016

Video footage showing Aaron Driver is seen behind RCMP Deputy Commissioner Mike Cabana (left) and Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Strachan during a press conference for what the RCMP are calling a terrorism incident, in Strathroy, Ontario yesterday, on Thursday, Aug. 11, 2016 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

Video footage showing Aaron Driver is seen behind RCMP Deputy Commissioner Mike Cabana (left) and Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Strachan during a press conference for what the RCMP are calling a terrorism incident, in Strathroy, Ontario yesterday, on Thursday, Aug. 11, 2016 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

A new study based on interviews conducted over social media with foreign fighters in Iraq and Syria raises doubts about the commonly held notion that young men in North America and Europe who are drawn to violent Islamic extremism must be marginalized loners looking for an alternative to their dead-end lives.

Three university researchers who contacted dozens of jihadists from abroad in Iraq and Syria, including some Canadians, say they seemed to be drawn mainly by the religious ideas—“no matter how ill-informed or unorthodox”—behind jihadism. Rather than being isolated individuals who self-radicalized in front of their computer screens, the report says they usually found mentors and, at least in the case of the Canadians, joined the fighting in “clusters.”

In the working paper entitled Talking to Foreign Fighters: Socio-Economic Push versus Existential Pull Factors, the researchers caution against assuming that radical Islam appeals only young men on the edges of society, those without good job prospects or supportive family and friends.

They suggest previous academic studies have put too much weight on those “push” factors—the problems and frustrations in the lives of young men who turn to extremist Islam and, ultimately, terrorist violence. “Based on what we are hearing in interviews with foreign fighters—more interviews than anyone has yet to report on—we think more attention and significance should be given to the repeated affirmations of the positive benefits of being jihadists,” they say.

More here. H/T: Nicolai Sennels


Published on Jul 12, 2016

The Tears of Jihad is a summary of the deaths caused by jihad against the Kafir for 1400 years. It is the greatest story never told. Presidents Bush and Obama have denied this history. Our history talks about the invasion of Turks, Arabs, Saracens, Berbers, and Moors, but does not call it jihad. Our most recent report of the 9/11 attacks omits jihad. No explanation is ever given of why the native culture is always annihilated after Islam invades and puts Sharia law in place.

In the twentieth century over two million Armenian and Syrian Christians were killed in jihad. Who knows the details? We need a museum devoted to the greatest suffering in history. It would document the annihilation of Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, and polytheist cultures. It would document slavery, rape and how apologists for Islam deny all of this history.

The Museum would show how Islamic doctrine drives history–cause and effect. We would have accredited scholars giving seminars and debates. The Museum would have a physical center as well as a web presence.

We need to document the suffering, so it can be stopped. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.



egyptian tards

A couple of weeks ago in Helsinki, in a building associated with the Finnish parliament, I sat in on a seminar with Dr. Gil-ad Ariely, CKO (Chief Knowledge Officer) and senior researcher at the Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) of Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy, at The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya.

Christian Democrat paper at the event wrote the following, here’s an excerpt:

“The fight against terrorism is a continuing learning competition. When the terrorist organization carried out actions, it will also analyze professionally what it can learn, explained the Israeli terrorism researcher Dr Gil-Ad Ariely yesterday at the Parliamentary Civil Info event.
According to Ariely, analysis and guidance for the conduct of terrorist acts and for terrorist organizations to quickly adapt their behavior, is spread via the Internet.
– If a single mode of operation can be prevented, others find gaps in security. It is no longer shoe bombs being used, having moved to underwear bombs or bombs that can also be placed inside a rectum.


Now the terrorists’ strategy is to stimulate the lonely wolves to attack with axes, knives, or other means which are simple handy methods.
– The attacker is not necessarily a terrorist, but he can be a petty criminal or suicidal husband or persons who feel rejected who just wants to get rid of their problems and to die in a “heroic” way, Ariely explained.

His one hour presentation also included a Q&A in which I posited the following question:

How crucial is it for law enforcement, the intelligence community, the military and politicians in general, to first have a good understanding of Jihad as threat doctrine, in order to use/implement the strategies you laid out for us today? To understand what motivates these terrorists, where do they draw their source of motivation when choosing, then attacking their targets?

gil -ad arielyDr.Ariely replied that it wasn’t crucial, that everyone already knows that jihad means ”holy war”. He then went on in his response to speak about “operational knowledge in critical environments, crisis management and preparedness, and security studies” that he already spent the last hr. speaking to us about.

It was a superficial response to a serious and important question. It was like someone responding to a question about the meaning of representational government with ”everyone already knows that democracy means someone drops a ballot into a box”.

This was from a man, an Israeli who is considered the top in his field, and yet, understanding jihad as a threat doctrine was not high on his list of priorities, in fact, it wasn’t on his list at all.

Now read the following  two quotes at Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch piece where he was interviewed at the Detroit News on last weekend’s jihad attack on the gay bar in Orlando where 49 people were slaughtered and a larger number of people wounded.

Robert Spencer in the Detroit News: Orlando reveals our willful ignorance about jihad

But the DHS official was just reflecting government policy. The East Orlando Post reported Sunday that James Copenhaver, whom it described as a “veteran investigator and former Orlando law enforcement officer,” said: “I have been in this business for 30 years, and … never in all my years of training, and being involved in several investigative units, to include the FBI Task Force, would we have ever guessed a LGBT club be a target of an terrorist attack.”

Why would they never have guessed? Because the FBI and other law enforcement agencies don’t study the motivating ideology behind jihad terror attacks. They do not know or care that the prophet of Islam, Muhammad says: “If you find anyone doing as Lot’s people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done.” (Abu Dawud 38:4447)

More here @ Jihad Watch

Bruce Bawer, a homosexual ex-pat American living in Norway who wrote the book: ”While Europe Slept, How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within’‘ had witnessed first hand this dramatic shift in Europe from being an open and free society:

As an American living in Europe since 1998, Bruce Bawer has seen this problem up close. Across the continent—in Amsterdam, Oslo, Copenhagen, Paris, Berlin, Madrid, and Stockholm—he encountered large, rapidly expanding Muslim enclaves in which women were oppressed and abused, homosexuals persecuted and killed, “infidels” threatened and vilified, Jews demonized and attacked, barbaric traditions (such as honor killing and forced marriage) widely practiced, and freedom of speech and religion firmly repudiated.

There is no excuse for people who are in the know on so many fronts, not to know about the motivating factors involved in Islamic jihad attacks. It’s a wilful ignorance, or a rejection of reality, or simply a caving into the intimidation from those pushing the political correct mindset.

NOTE: Listen to Stephen Coughlin on the Bill Bennett show discussing exactly that, Jihad as a threat doctrine.

Also listen to Andrew Mccarthy, he knows what the threat doctrine is all about, and how important it is to know about it and understand it:


The maroon media digs in its heels……


Daniel Greenfield

As bad as the US media is, you really need to look to the Brits to produce a truly idiotic response to the Orlando Muslim massacre. This piece by Ruth Sherlock (the jokes write themselves) reads like a perfect parody of clueless liberalism at its ridiculous worst.

Ruth complains that Trump’s “decision to label the attack ‘Islamic terrorism’ came before any official assessments were made.”

You mean just based on the shooter calling himself an Islamic terrorist? How could Trump fail to wait for the “official assessment”?

“Just as the nation needed unity, Mr Trump said President Obama should resign in ‘disgrace’ for refusing to use the term Islamic terrorism so early on in the events.”

The nation needs unity against Islamic terrorism. Not unity in covering up Islamic terror.

More here.


The jihad is forcing us all to take measures to avoid attacks…….

Dutch Schools Reschedule International Travel after Terror Attacks

The NOS media outlet has interviewed a hundred Dutch schools about international travel plans for their pupils. They concluded that many of them have changed policies after the terror attacks in Paris and Brussels.

One of the measures taken is that schools avoid trips to capital cities, for instance trips to Berlin and London are rescheduled to go to smaller cities. Many schools had planned to travel to Istanbul but almost all schools have rescheduled their trips. Also when abroad, school groups are to avoid public transport.




Suicide attack by Dutch Jihadi Kills Fifty Syrian Soldiers in Damascus

According to Pieter Van Ostaeyen, a Dutch expert on jihadists in Syria, fifty Syrian soldiers were killed in a suicide attack by a Dutch jihadi.  The murderer was 24-year old Abu Mujahid al-Hulandi, also known as Anis Zerguit.  According to Van Ostaeyen, Zerguit’s brother was killed at the end of 2014 in the battle for the Syrian town of Kobani.


islamonazis in syria with koran and fascist salute 30.9.2013


We all knew this beforehand, but it’s now official.

lone wolf jihad 1.6 billion and counting

And no, Im not taken aback by the FOX news channel as describing it as a ‘lone wolf’ terrorist attack, when one already knows that independent acts of jihad comes straight out of the Al-Qaida play book of “abu Musab al Suri a/k/a Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, global jihadi strategist, author of the ‘Jihadi Mein Kampf'”:

His name is Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, although he’s also known as abu Musab al Suri (the Syrian).  Perhaps his most significant contributions to the cause of global jihad was his insistence that the old-style al Qaeda, with its rigid hierarchical structure, was a disaster for the movement and had to be jettisoned in favor of a different strategy.  In his 1600 page manifesto, al Suri stressed the need for the global jihadi movement to create a new fighting style focused on “individual terrorism.”

This innovation, also known as “leaderless jihad,” is a strategy designed to escape detection. Al Suri advised followers not to have cells or “brigades” larger than ten members, and ideally the cells would be in the single digits.  He also advocated that jihadists use the Internet and other methods to gather their information to conduct attacks. Those unwilling to embrace his strategy before and in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, have now largely become believers, whether by necessity or by revelation.

But perhaps al Suri’s greatest significance to those of us still reeling from the horrors of the Boston Marathon bombings, is advice he offered in this magnum opus, written while on the run between 2001 and 2005, “The Call for Global Islamic Resistance.” It is available online.

H/T: Vlad


They don’t come with an automatic pop-up zebibah…….

Published on Jan 20, 2016
The film followed a group of Britain’s most dangerous extremists for two years, giving unprecedented access into the bubbling undercurrent of home-grown terrorism. Documentary maker Jamie Roberts even spent time with Siddhartha Dhar (aka Abu Rumaysah), the former bouncy castle salesman who is now suspected to be the second “Jihadi John”.

H/T: Vlad

The Jihadis Next Door, Channel 4, review: ‘shocking and crucial’

Gerard O’Donovan reviews Jamie Roberts’s eye-opening documentary, which featured a chilling interview with ‘Jihadi Sid’, the bouncy castle salesman turned Isil executioner

It is hardly unusual these days to see men in beards preaching radicalism and hatred on our TV screens. But it is unusual, as in The Jihadis Next Door (Channel 4), to see such a man waving the flag of Islamic State in his Walthamstow garage, knowing that from there, two years later, having fled to Syria with his family, he went on to become suspected of being at the center of a horrific murder video by the so called Islamic State in Syria.

This shocking footage of Siddhartha Dhar (aka Abu Rumaysah), now known in certain sectors of the press as “Jihadi Sid”, filmed two years ago, may have been the most publicity-garnering in Jamie Roberts eye-opening film about extremist hate preachers in the UK. But it was not the most repulsive.

That shame undoubtedly went to a segment featuring the two men who where the chief focus of the film, Abu Haleema and Mohammed Shamsuddin, leaders of the London-based recruiting and propaganda group of which Dhar was once a leading light. Haleema and Shamsuddin spent much of the film denying that they supported Isis while spouting sentiments that would suggest otherwise. But actions always speak louder than weasel words and in one scene Roberts caught them gleefully tucking into supper while watching – and laughing at – online videos in which innocent men were being murdered by members of the so-called Islamic State in Syria.

More here.


Proponents of Civilization & Violent Jihad are working in tandem to produce desired results.

Without one, the other wouldn’t have much of an effect against us.

The following guest-essay by Sonia Bailley concerns the demonic convergence of the Al Qaeda and OIC timelines — which is occurring RIGHT NOW.

Islamic Timelines Fueling Jihad
by Sonia Bailley

Summary: With the convergence of two Islamic timelines (al Qaeda, OIC) to destroy the West culminating THIS month (the OIC’s timeline ending Dec. 9th), along with the Muslim Brotherhood’s engagement in violent jihad, as opposed to the softer jihad of dawah (inviting non-believers to Islam, meant only as a preparatory phase to violent jihad), Westerners, as predicted by Major Stephen Coughlin, are in for the biggest shock of their lives in the dark times ahead, beginning this week, especially now that the caliphate has been re-established.

These two Islamic timelines, in addition to two Muslim Brotherhood documents — all of which were ignored by Western leaders — are mobilizing jihadists worldwide. The Muslim Brotherhood’s primary mission of dawah, which shakes the identity and faith of Westerners, making them more vulnerable to Islamic conversion and submission, has reached its goal and is ready to be superseded by the next jihad phase, that being all-out war, or violent jihad. All Islamic groups are working together to wage violent jihad on the West. Their intention to do so began ever since the first caliphate was abolished in 1924.

All-out war with the West has begun. With the culmination of two Islamic timelines imposing Islamic law or Sharia worldwide converging this month, in fact one this week, things are bound to get worse. More deadly terror attacks are expected worldwide as a result of this, as forecasted by Major Stephen Coughlin, a former U.S. army intelligence officer and Pentagon expert on Islamic law of jihad. The timelines are building momentum in parallel, with one plan using violent jihad to destroy the West, and the other using soft jihad to destroy Western civil liberties through the use of Sharia-compliant UN resolutions and hate speech codes to curtail any discussion or analysis of Islam.

Al Qaeda’s 20-year plan to violently impose Sharia on the West in stages is just entering Phase Six (2016-2020) of “Total Confrontation”. This timeline, hatched well before 1996, was known to the West for ten years.

The other death-to-the-West Islamic timeline implemented ten years ago by a highly powerful and influential organization — the world’s second largest intergovernmental organization (next to the United Nations) and largest Islamic organization — is also building momentum in a less violent but parallel way.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the largest voting bloc at the UN (comprising the world’s 57 Islamic states) proposed a Ten-Year Programme of Action (at a two-day summit in Mecca concluding on Dec.9th) to internationally criminalize any criticism of Islam or so-called Islamophobia, culminates this week (December 8th and 9th).

Criminalizing Islamophobia[1] was the OIC’s major initiative since 1999, at which time it began pushing for a blasphemy-against-Islam UN resolution. That resolution finally passed in 2011 as UN Resolution 16/18 — the underpadding of which is to establish a global Islamic hegemony or caliphate that subjugates the entire world to Sharia. UN Resolution 16/18 and the hate-speech laws that it gave rise to simply facilitate the Islamization of the West.

Both timelines are influencing, guiding, and mobilizing jihadists worldwide to launch attacks that are gaining momentum throughout the West. All-out war has begun with more and more Islamic terrorist attacks launching worldwide, including now in the U.S.

Coughlin attributes the recent escalation in worldwide Islamic terrorist attacks to the convergence of these two Islamic timelines culminating in December, and to the collaboration of leftists with Islamic organizations that include the Muslim Brotherhood[2], which was listed as a terrorist group in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Why has the media neglected to raise the alert and publish these Islamic timelines, known for over ten years, as front-page bold headlines in every major newspaper? Al Qaeda’s timeline is hell-bent on waging violent jihad on the West. The OIC’s timeline to criminalize speech deemed offensive to a Muslim, even when that criticism speaks the truth about Islam, is already underway in some European countries as hate speech laws that abridge our right to free speech and expression. Deadlines are quickly approaching, while Islamic terror attacks are escalating worldwide.

In all likelihood, the OIC-backed-and-boosted UN Resolution 16/18 will become law not only in Canada, beginning with Quebec as Bill 59[3] (which would criminalize websites offensive to Islam with fines of up to $20,000) — but in the U.S. as well, in light of Attorney General Loretta Lynch vowing just one day after the San Bernardino Islamic terrorist attack that she will prosecute anyone using “anti-Muslim rhetoric” — although she didn’t mention anything about prosecuting anyone using genocidal or jihadi rhetoric against non-believers.

What applies to one religion should equally apply to all, but it doesn’t. Drawing a cartoon of Mohammed warrants a death sentence, whereas a portrait of Pope Benedict XVI made out of 17,000 colored condoms (Eggs Benedict), a photograph of Christ on the crucifix in a glass of the artist’s urine (Piss Christ), and a painting of the Virgin Mary made of elephant dung and clippings of porno magazines (Black Madonna) all warrant center stage at the Museum of Modern Art. The same rules do not apply for Muslims whose religion is always protected from discussion, analysis, or criticism.[4]

Lynch’s promise conforms to UN Resolution 16/18, which, if it becomes international law, would enforce Sharia against Islamic blasphemy. This will be in accordance with those laws enforced by Mohammed 1,400 years ago that condemned to hell or called for the killing of his dissenters and insulters.

Continue reading


Published on Dec 4, 2015
Former Defense Intelligence Agency Director David Shedd and Kyle Shideler of the Center for Security Policy discuss the San Bernardino shooting and intelligence collection.
Watch Deirdre Bolton on Risk And Reward.


Thanks to Obama and his government for their impeccable vetting skills.


EXCLUSIVE: ISIS loyalist woman in San Bernardino massacre is linked to Pakistan’s most notorious radical cleric and mosque known as center for fundamentalists

Radical preacher Maulana (a title given to Islamic scholars) Abdul Aziz runs the Red Mosque in Islamabad, which US officials say is linked to Tashfeen Malik
Tashfeen Malik is the wife of Syed Farook (pictured). The couple massacred 14

Notorious: Radical preacher Maulana (a title given to Islamic scholars) Abdul Aziz runs the Red Mosque in Islamabad, which US officials say is linked to Tashfeen Malik, wife of Syed Farook. The couple massacred 14

  • US officials have handed information to Pakistani authorities linking Tashfeen Malik to country’s notorious Red Mosque 
  • Pakistani authorities now considering a move against Maulana Aziz, the preacher at the mosque who this year proclaimed support for ISIS
  • Malik was born in Pakistan, brought up in Saudi, and returned four years ago to study pharmacy degree at university 
  • Pakistani prime minister’s brother held talks with US officials in London over country’s link to massacre of 14 in San Bernardino 

The woman who took part in the ISIS-inspired San Bernardino massacre is linked to her native country’s most notorious radical mosque, American officials believe.

Sources have told Daily Mail Online that US officials handed over information to their Pakistani counterparts about links between Tashfeen Malik and the Red Mosque in Islamabad.

The mosque is infamous for its links to violence and authorities in Pakistan are now considering taking action against its preacher, Maulana Abdul Aziz, after the disclosures by US officials.

It is unclear currently how law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the US have connected Malik to the mosque.

Read more: 


Islam 101 = post-hijra islam

syed farook with koran

He went to the mosque and read the same koran, memorized it, studied the same hadiths and came away convinced shedding infidel blood would be pleasing to allah. Therein lies the problem, the post-hijra muslims are right and there is nothing that the four schools of islamic orthodoxy can do (nor would they) to steer them from this path, outside impressing upon them not to do this or that due to their own short-long term goals in the political realm. This is camel in the room.

Also, the mosque’s imam states the following standard apologetic flim-flam which totally discredits him and underlines my point, that they are entirely uninterested in ”combating violent Islamic impulses”, because they can’t, doing so would be anti-islam.

At the Islamic Center of Riverside, where Farook had worshipped until about two years ago, mosque director Mustapha Kuko described him as quiet, private and devoted to Koran study. “He knows that we believe that to take one life is to take all life. So for him to do the opposite of what we as Muslims believe … I don’t know,” Kuko said.

 This verse being invoked was addressed to/for the Jews……….
“Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”

Here it is for the Muslims…………..
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,

It’s obvious that the imam knows this, better than I, yet…..the lies and obfuscations.

Rampage killers led secret life, hiding plans and weapons

Laura J. Nelson, Soumya Karlamangla and Paloma EsquivelContact Reporters

Early Wednesday morning, Syed Rizwan Farook asked his mother for the sort of favor grandmothers love to grant: A few hours of baby-sitting. Farook told her that he and his wife, Tashfeen, had a doctor’s appointment and didn’t want to take their 6-month-old daughter.

In an account of the conversation provided by a relative through a local Islamic leader, the grandmother agreed. She was caring for the child at the couple’s Redlands home when news of a mass shooting in nearby San Bernardino broke.

Fearing her son and daughter-in-law were victims, “she started calling. No answer,” said Hussam Ayloush, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Los Angeles office. It was only after reporters started phoning her that she realized the couple were the assailants.

More here.


Andy Bostom is the go-to man on understanding the Islamic doctrine of jihad.

I understand his (Mohammed Chirani’s) need to dissemble, but it’s pure fantasy and needs to be debunked at every turn.

lying dawa artist france mohamed chirani

French Muslim Mohammed Chirani stares down Islamic State to declare jihad

A French Muslim who created headlines when he went on national television in France to declare jihad on Islamic State (IS) extremists says he is not deterred by the death threats he has received since.

In the wake of the Paris attacks, Mohammed Chirani, a specialist in religious radicalisation, delivered an impassioned speech telling IS that Allah would not protect them.

“Know that our dead, the innocent French citizens, are in paradise,” he said.

“And your dead, the terrorists, are in hell.”

Holding up a copy of the Koran and his French passport, he said he would use both to wage jihad against the extremists.

“I’d like to say we’ll wage jihad against you with the Koran,” he said.

“I’d like to tell the traitors who deceived France, betrayed their country and burned their IDs, that we are kissing our documents.”

More here. H/T: 



Preparing for that islamic brothel in the sky.

His use of playstation was more than likely the means by which he was communicating with his fellow jihadis, the encryption code has proven to be a headache for law enforcement and intelligence communities. The debauchery is telltale jihadi end game scenarios, the 9/11 islamonazi terrorists all binged in the forbidden before murdering the “non-believers“.

NOTE: Live update 23.11.2015: Paris attack suspect Salah Abdeslam ‘escapes in BMW towards Germany’ as Belgium police arrest 16 people – live news from Brussels and around Europe Brussels at highest terror threat level amid new atrocity fears, as search for Paris attacks fugitive Salah Abdeslam and ‘several others’ goes on – latest

Fugitive Paris jihadist loved gay bars, drugs and PlayStation

The missing Paris jihadist had a taste for gay sex, drugs and PlayStation.

As the international manhunt for 26-year-old Belgian Salah Abdeslam continued, patrons of a gay bar in Brussels told The Sunday Times of London that he was a regular there — known for boozing, smoking hash and flirting with other men.

“We had him down as a rent boy,” a bartender named Julien said of Abdeslam, who’s been on the run since the Nov. 13 attacks on Paris.

Others said he was known for long days playing video games in the bar owned by his killed terrorist brother Brahim in the poor Brussels suburb of Molenbeek.

The brothers’ tastes would appear to make them unlikely ISIS extremists. The terror group brutally punishes homosexuality — often hurling gay men off buildings or stoning them to death — and alcohol or drug use.

More here. H/T: Weasel Zippers


This took place on the same day of the Paris Massacre, just hrs before the attacks.

The global jihad movement, a multinational, multifaceted and dynamic and increasingly dangerous enterprise animated by the islamic supremacist doctrine of sharia and coming at us emboldened from a lack of strategy by the United States and from much of the Western world.

Watch Frank Gaffney and his Center for Security Policy event live today beginning at 12:00 p.m. EDT

Featuring speakers will incude: