The man was -like the rest of his community does to the population at large- forcing sharia law on the woman and her children.

sweden muzzin in multicultural lala land

The judgment states: “The violence, he exercised against them appears to have been part of an attempt to control and subdue them and make them conform to the extreme and strict rules which he himself set up.”

Abused mother and daughter when they are not wearing the veil – now get the man in prison

The man forced his girlfriend and her daughter to wear the veil. They did not talk to any Swedes. When they disobeyed, they were beaten.

A Gävle man, 45, has been sentenced to one year in prison for gross violations of a woman, his partner, and to have abused their stepchildren. The man at one point intentionally fallen on the woman so that the open car door hit her and then drove away. Before he pulled the woman to the car, pulled her hair and hit her in the face.

He has, according to the woman’s son, held a knife to her chest. The woman then had her back against a wall.

The man at another time held the woman’s hand flat above a burning candle. He has repeatedly abused her in other ways.

The man forced her to wear a veil and she was forbidden to go out in trousers, wear makeup and have her own phone.

Although the woman’s teenage daughter has been beaten. The man forced her to wear a headscarf or veil, forbidden her to talk with Swedes and demanded that she should come home right after school.

When she refused to wear the veil, and talked with other Swedes and not come straight home from school, the man has punished her with slaps and pulling her by the hair.

The man has also on several occasions abused woman’s teenage son.

The judgment states: “The violence, he exercised against them appears to have been part of an attempt to control and subdue them and make them conform to the extreme and strict rules which he himself set up.”

More here. H/T: 

NOTE: A TundraTabloids translation


Mind you, this is the same country in which tens of thousands of people poured into the streets to honor a man executed by the state for murdering a politician who wanted to end blasphemy laws.

Mourners covered the ambulance carrying Qadri's body with red rose petals as it made its way past them

International Appeal for Justice and Compassion: The Heartbreaking Case of Shafqat Emmanuel and Shagfuta Kausar: By Farrukh Saif Foundation

shagufta shafaqt

Introduction: The Regular Abuse of Pakistan’s Controversial Blasphemy Law

Blasphemy laws have always been a controversial subject for discussion in Pakistan. These laws have put hundreds of members of minority communities behind the bars. It has commonly been observed that section 295- A/B/C of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan has been badly misused by the majority community.

Even discussion and dialogue in relation to this controversial law has taken the lives of two prominent Pakistani politicians, Governor of Punjab Salman Taseer and Christian Minister Shahbaz Bhatti. Both were assassinated in broad daylight in the capital of Pakistan. Similarly many of the victims of these laws were killed in court rooms, jails or in lockups by the extreme elements of Pakistani society.

Since 2009 [we] the Farrukh Saif Foundation (Previously known as World Vision in Progress) have been defending the victims of the Blasphemy Law. During that time we have found that in most cases people had been falsely and even maliciously accused. In some cases they accusations were solely the result of personal vendettas or rumor mongering.

The Pakistani Government has failed to provide security to such victims or to the communities in which they live. The Government may be trying to handle these matters diligently, but it is not handling them effectively. Radicalism in society has reached new and frightening levels and matters regularly spiral out of control and result in vicious acts of mob justice. Many times it has been observed that law enforcement agencies and even the institutions charged with delivering justice have failed in their duty to provide justice due to the enormous pressure that is applied by vociferous and aggressive extreme elements. The atmosphere of intimidation and fear within Pakistan is palpable!


Shafqat is regularly getting sick with the bed sores and recently 16 blood bottles were used to control is PH level. He cannot go to the washroom nor do anything without assistance. It is so difficult for a paralyzed man to handle all his personal issues while in the jail.

Appeal Lodged by the Farrukh Saif Foundation – and an Appeal to the International Community

Since the beginning of this case the Farrukh Saif Foundation (previously known as World Vision in Progress) has been protesting against the attitude of the Lower Court. We have submitted the application in the High Court that the Addition Session judge had already made up his mind in advance to give death sentence to the couple. The High Court of Lahore referred back our petition with the direction to expedite the matter.

We would request that the International Community and people of all nations speak out against this terrible and cruel injustice. We especially request that people pray for Shafqat and Shagufta.

In the Month of April the High Court of Lahore will hear the appeal that we filed against the Death Sentence.

More here


These are the jackals we have to share air breathing space with, thanks to the Leftist cult of multiculturalism.

Sickening moment two henchmen of ISIS executioner ‘Jihadi Sid’ giggled as they watched beheading video – while eating a meal in London restaurant

ISIS militant nicknamed 'Jihadi Sid' warned the black flag would fly over Downing Street

Londoner Abu Rumaysah, 32, is suspected of being the masked fanatic waving a pistol at the camera in a gruesome IS propaganda video showing the murder of five men released this month.

Before escaping to the Middle East while on bail two years ago, the former bouncy castle salesman was filmed by a documentary maker denouncing the Queen and declaring that only Muslims should hold power in Britain.

And his two henchmen, who continue to preach and recruit in the UK, told the Channel 4 programme that his ‘legacy lives on’ here as they boasted that they are ‘brainwashing’ youngsters with their ‘deadly’ message.

More here


Over at the Gates of Vienna, Baron Bodissey and Dymphna have been following the comments of someone who goes by the name of ”Muslim”. It’s a very innocuous handle, but to the point, the commenter wants them to know that he’s a practitioner of the Islamic creed.


The method he (or she) employs is a sophisticated mixture of sophistry and accentuated politeness, feigned ignorance when cornered and outright lying (taqiyya) accompanied with a complete disappearing act only to resurface elsewhere to continue the parrying.

I have come across similar advances from the practitioners of what GOV now refers to as ‘Maqamists‘. After engaging with the back and forth comments, one quickly discerns the disingenuousness in the responses of the person you’re debating. You can’t continue, knowing that anything you say will be met with all of the above just mentioned, so you bid them farewell and delete their attempts at swaying your readership, and most importantly, you block them.

Most of the West’s battles with Muslims pursuing civilizational-jihad will not be on the battlefield with rifles and bullets, but with computers and keypads. This kind of verbal warfare is also encountered in any of the ”dialogue between faiths” events. Many a good and honest clergymen have been taken in by the supposed sincerity of the Muslim practitioner of maqama, it’s too bad they haven’t understood the method being employed against them, it’s entirely dishonest in intent, and entirely Islamic in nature.

Bookmark Baron Bodissey’s piece, study it, and most importantly use it in your own exchanges with these professional dawa propagandists.

An Encounter With a Maqama Troll

In medieval Arabic literature, maqama were collections of tales recounted in a mixture of poetry and prose. Each vignette described the accomplishments of a sly trickster who hoodwinked his adversaries using deceptive rhetoric.

In recent days here at Gates of Vienna we’ve had our own silver-tongued Arab dazzling us with his maqama in comments on various posts. Dubbing himself “Muslim”, he left a series of reasonable-sounding, carefully balanced comments whose style verged on the unctuous. When anyone responded to him, he offered additional soothing bromides with equal verbal virtuosity.


I knew that I would eventually have to ban Muslim, but first I needed to demonstrate to my own satisfaction that he was not commenting in good faith, but was in fact a maqama troll.

My expectation was that a sufficiently skilled reply to him would elicit no response. Sure enough, when he mentioned the Crusades, I asked him a question (about how Syria, Palestine, and Egypt became Muslim after formerly being Christian) and received no reply.

That was strike one, and I was only going to allow him two strikes. I was eventually presented with another opportunity when he left this comment:

The proselytizing violence is an overplayed stereotype, which does not reflect the reality of roughly 20% plus of humanity.

Anyone can pick a large enough population, apply constant monitoring & then highlight fringe behaviour as representing the norm to the ignorant or agenda-driven echo chambers. [emphasis added]

By including the highlighted statement he had made himself vulnerable to fact-based refutation, because violence is deeply embedded in the scripture and laws of Islam, and is in fact the major technique employed to convert non-Muslims to Islam — or convert them into milch-cows for their Islamic masters.

First I told him this:

I have asked you reasonable questions previously and received no answers. If you fail to answer the questions detailed below, I shall assume that you are a troll, and any subsequent comments by you will be deleted.

And then I presented a carefully prepared rebuttal, drawing on the groundbreaking work of Major Stephen Coughlin to lay out the basis for jihad in Islamic scripture, tradition, and law:

You say: “The proselytizing violence is an overplayed stereotype”.

There is a text of Islamic law that defines jihad. In full, its title is ‘Umdat al-salik wa ’uddat al-nasik, or The reliance of the traveller and tools of the worshipper. It is commonly referred to as Reliance of the Traveller when cited in English.

The Revised Edition (published 1991, revised 1994) is “The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law ‘Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices”, edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller. The publisher is listed as amana publications in Beltsville, Maryland.

It is an authoritative source on Sunni Islamic law, because it is certified as such by Al-Azhar University in Cairo. There is no higher authority on Sunni Islamic doctrine than Al-Azhar. The government of Saudi Arabia has given its seal of approval to this translation as an authoritative source on the fiqh.

Book O, “Justice”, § 9 begins the section on jihad. Jihad is similarly defined in Book X “The Book of Jihad” from Ibn Rushd’s book The Distinguished Jurist, and in Book XIII “Siyar (Relations with non-Muslims)” of the Hidayah:

Jihad means to war against non-Muslims and it is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying war to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad.

It goes on to explain that the greater jihad is the struggle for the spiritual self. However, it also tells us that the hadith that is weak or false, depending on what authority is referenced, so is not authoritative. When the book refers to the greater and lesser jihad, it indicates that it is not a part of the law of jihad.

More here.

NOTE: Remember folks, the whole intent of the Maqamaist is not to sway you (more the victory for him if he does) but to sway those fence sitters watching the debate on the side. Appearing above reproach in style of manner, he hopes to win sympathy for being the victim of any heated rhetoric (that might ensue due to his tactics), as well as taking up endless amounts of time from the opponent, to the point of wearing him down through attrition. This might save you endless hours of your time best used elsewhere in fighting the scourge that is Islam. Never, ever underestimate your enemy.


Simple Islam 101 in action.

This does not surprise anyone who follows these issues on a daily basis, Islam is not here to co-exist, but to supercede. Religious interfaith “dialogue” where Islam is involved, is but an opportunity to push Islamic norms on everyone else, and to be avoided at all cost.


A British Rabbi has launched a complaint after mosque practices were enforced in a supposed multi-faith prayer room at London’s Heathrow airport.

Liverpool university Rabbi Shmuli Brown visited one of Heathrow’s nine interfaith prayer rooms after flying back from the United States to make his morning prayers, reports the theJC.

Speaking to the paper, Rabbi Brown reported during his prayers he was interrupted by “a man in uniform, though I am not sure from which department”. The man proceeded to ask Rabbi Brown to take his shoes off while he was in the multi-faith prayer room — as is the faith in Muslim mosques.

Tweeting about the incident, the Rabbi claimed the staff member who tried to force the rule on him was “Muslim”.

More here.


They couldn’t care less, they’re tribal before anything else.

Arab countries lack compassion and action to rescue each other despite the rhetoric of Arab/Islamic unity. Saudi Arabia and Gulf nations never open their borders to poor Muslims in distress. Even Egypt rejected the Darfur refugees who were later forced to go to Israel, which took them.

Oil rich Arab countries make it very difficult for other Arabs to visit except for haj. They are very tribal and refuse to dilute their culture with influx of foreigners. Third world country workers are treated inhumanely and are rarely given permanent residency, citizenship or equal rights as citizens.

Why Did Oil-Rich Arab Countries Abandon Muslim Refugees?


|  | Source: FrontPage Mag | Nonie Darwish

Western media is reporting on the Muslim refugee crisis as a humanitarian problem that the West must deal with. But where are the media’s questions about the huge financial and land resources available to oil rich Arab and Muslim countries? Where are the Islamic solutions in this equation?

The world is often lectured to about the urgency of respecting Arab and Islamic brotherly love, but where is the Arab action to rescue fellow Muslims and Arabs from the claws of ISIS?

Where are Arab feminists, especially those who demonstrated against France for banning the hijab? They are silent and doing nothing to rescue thousands of women that are victims of Islamic jihadist rape and enslavement. The only compassionate women helping women in the Middle East are the Christian mother Teresas and Kayla Muellers of the western world.

Where are the mighty Arab armies who waged dozens of wars against Israel? Why aren’t they fighting ISIS and building tent cities in the vast deserts of Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the wealthy Gulf States? They are all claiming they are “moderate” Muslims and that they are against ISIS. But is one substantive thing they have done?

Where are the thousands of Islamic human rights groups operating in the West, the likes of CAIR and ISNA, who are dedicating their energy and millions of dollars to stop discrimination against Muslims and “Islamophobia” in the West? This is the same West that their refugees are escaping to.

Where is the wealthy Arab League to coordinate safe cities on Arab land that extends from Morocco to Iraq and from Northern Syria to Sudan?

It is obvious that Arab and Islamic governments have not prepared or planned for the consequences of Islamic turmoil all over the Middle East. The refugee crisis should have been expected and a disaster was waiting to happen ever since the Arab Spring failed to produce an Islamic State in Egypt and ISIS emerged in Syria. But Islamic countries have ignored the humanitarian crisis resulting from the barbaric behavior of the Islamic State.

More here.


Yet another example of multi-culti enrichment gone bad.

Lets all hope she stays where she is in Islamo-utopia land.

EXCLUSIVE: ‘LOL!’ UK schoolgirl jihadi’s sick reaction to the Tunisian beach massacre in a series of extraordinary messages with undercover MoS reporter

Jihadi schoolgirl: Amira Abase, 16, vanished from her East London home to join IS in February of this year

Jihadi schoolgirl: Amira Abase, 16, vanished from her East London home to join IS in February of this year

  • Amira Abase said she was laughing out loud at Tunisian beach massacre
  • She was messaging an undercover MOS reporter whose Abase believed was another British teenager planning to run away to join Islamic State
  • Conversation reveals extent of indoctrination Abase has been subjected to
  • The 16-year-old fled Britain to join IS with two school friends in February 

A teenager ‘jihadi bride’ who fled Britain to join Islamic State terrorists has callously mocked the victims of the Tunisian massacre – as she tried to lure another schoolgirl to join her in Syria.

Amira Abase, 16, wrote that she was laughing out loud – ‘Lol’ in text language – as Britain mourned the 30 citizens murdered on the Sousse beach.

The sickening remark came in an extraordinary series of exchanges with an undercover Mail on Sunday reporter, who Abase believed to be another British teenager planning to run away to join barbaric IS. Abase encouraged her to make the dangerous trip to marry a frontline jihadi fighter.

Read more: H/T: Buck


The price of islamization.

It’s the very thing we in the Counter-Jihad have been warning about for years. The more islam you have, the less freedom you have, it’s that simple.

Muslim store bans women on weekdays

Muslim store bans women on weekdays

Veiled women in a shopping centre in southern France. Photo: AFP

Published: 22 Jun 2015 16:59 GMT+02:00

If you’re a woman and it’s a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Friday, you’re not welcome at the De L’Orient à L’Occidental grocery store in Bordeaux.
Similarly, if you’re a man and it’s a weekend, you’re going to have to go somewhere else if you want to do your shopping there.
The move was put in place by the store’s owners, who are newly converted to Islam, in a bid to ensure the two sexes don’t meet.


Islam 101.

Like I have said hundreds of times, once a tard reconnects with his inner mohamed…..

NOTE: We are constantly told time and again about so called ”peaceful Islam”, with Bosnia, Malaysia and Indonesia held up as the poster-childs of proof. Reality however speaks otherwise.

More moderate followers of Islam (those who pass over huge violent & intolerant chunks of the desert creed thanks to the influence of their non-Muslim surroundings) once reconnected to the core source in the M.E., begin to exhibit the same intolerance, and for some, violent nature, that the founder of Islam exhibited over 1400 years ago.

mo tunic 29.12.2011H/T: Vlad


Makes the blood boil doesn’t it?

It’s all halal when it’s done for allah, taking non-Muslims to the cleaners to help the jihad is something that mohamed the warlord himself would smile about.


Two more suspects have appeared in court in connection with the “bank of terror” plot to con vulnerable pensioners out of their money in order to fund Islamic State.

Fahim Islam, 20, and Achmed Ahmed, 22, have been remanded in custody after appearing at Westminster Magistrates Court on Thursday charged with conspiracy to commit fraud. A Metropolitan Police spokesman confirmed to Breitbart London that the men were charged as part of the ongoing investigation, making them the 11th and 12th suspects in the case.

Last month, the first five suspects appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court, accused of conning pensioners as old as 96 out of more than £160,000. They then allegedly used the money to help fund terrorists fighting in Iraq and Syria.

Makhzumi Abukar, 23, Sakaria Aden, 21, Mohamed Dahir, 22, and Yasser Abukar, 23, who are all from North London, and Ibrahim Anderson, 38, from Luton, were all charged.

Speaking at the time, prosecutor Edward Aydin called the group a “sophisticated criminal network” and “a threat to national security”.

More here.


How many times do we have to play this game of whack-a-tard to finally figure out that any form of support of Islam in the West has to be suspect?

H/T: Sheik Yer’Mami (pbuh)

That was until a Quebec blog, Point de Bascule, re-published some of his student writings in April and alleged he was linked, through his charitable donations, to organizations like IRFAN-Canada, designated a terrorist group by the federal government in 2014 for its links to Hamas.

Hussein Hamdani: Vetted by the feds, felled by a blog

hussein hamadi

Three months ago, Hussein Hamdani was widely hailed as a hero on the front lines of Canada’s war against homegrown terrorism, regularly pulling teenagers back from the brink of radicalization — before they boarded a plane to Syria or Iraq.

He has been the federal government’s bridge to the Muslim community, and at a counter-terrorism summit in Washington in February, Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney himself praised the efforts of Hamilton’s Muslim Community — of which Hamdani is an integral part.

Following recent reports on a Quebec blog and then a news network, however, Hamdani now stands accused of being a radical Islamist himself — and the federal government has stopped returning his emails.

But is Hamdani, by day a corporate and commercial lawyer, really a fox in the henhouse?

Or is he, as some suggest, the latest target in a fear and smear campaign, made in Quebec and imported to Ottawa?

Hamdani learned the news like everyone else: through the Quebec media. At the end of April, the TVA news network reported that Hamdani had been suspended from the Cross Cultural Roundtable on National Security, which he has sat on since 1995.

“I’ve been there longer than Stephen Harper has been prime minister,” Hamdani said earlier this month, from his office in downtown Hamilton.

The Roundtable, which has 15 members from different ethno-cultural communities across Canada, is meant to be a bridge between those communities and the government, meeting every few months to “focus on emerging developments in national security matters and their impact on Canada’s diverse and pluralistic society.”

Among their recent topics: countering violent extremism, cyberspace and migration (See the full list of members here)

Hamdani has also led outreach efforts, helping CSIS and the RCMP approach sometimes reluctant groups, while intervening with youths showing signs of radicalization on behalf of their parents.

“I’ve probably done more than anyone else in Canada,” Hamdani says. “And because we’re exposed to certain information that’s not public and we work with the RCMP and CSIS, I have security clearance and my background has been vetted. There are no links to anything of concern.”

More here.



ISIS are forcing captured Yazidi children to train as Islamist soldiers and brainwashing mentally handicapped boys into becoming suicide bombers, Iraqi politician reveals 

Sick: Extremists based in the terror group's strongholds of Raqqa in Syria (pictured) and Tal Afar in Iraq stand accused of forcing young boys to attend terror training camps, where are they groomed for war

Sick: Extremists based in the terror group’s strongholds of Raqqa in Syria (pictured) and Tal Afar in Iraq stand accused of forcing young boys to attend terror training camps, where are they groomed for war

  • Sheikh Shamo, an Iraqi MP of Yazidi origin, accused ISIS of war crimes
  • He said they are forcing Yazidi slave children to become child soldiers
  • Boys are sent to camps and trained as jihadi soldiers or suicide bombers 
  • Militants prey on mentally disabled children in particular – forcing them to carry out suicide attacks on buildings and enemy positions, Shamo said 

Depraved militants fighting for the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq are forcing captured Yazidi slave children to become jihadi soldiers and suicide bombers, it has been claimed.

Extremists based in the terror group’s strongholds of Raqqa in Syria and Tal Afar in Iraq stand accused of forcing young boys to attend terror training camps, where are they groomed for war.

ISIS have long used child soldiers – known as Caliphate Cubs – both as frontline combatants and executioners – with a number of young boys having starred in the group’s sickening murder videos.

Details of ISIS using Yazidi slave children as jihadi soldiers and suicide bombers were revealed by the Kurdish news agency Rudaw, who spoke with a Yazidi member of the Iraqi parliament named Sheikh Shamo.

‘ISIS has established military training camps for the Yezidi children held by the group in the Syrian city of Raqqa and Tal Afar in Mosul,’ the MP was quoted as saying.

Read more:


Once again you see the myth of so called ”marginalized Muslims” lured to the jihad, being laid bare for all to see.

Brainwashed, well yes, but from the very same book(s) all other Muslims pay heed to.

islamic state seig heil

Nine ‘brainwashed’ British medical students join ISIS as desperate families travel to Turkish border to beg them to return 

  • Families alerted when one sent a text to her sister near the border
  • She told her she wanted to ‘volunteer to help wounded Syrian people’
  • Teenagers were born in England and studied medicine in Sudan
  • Officials believe they have gone to work in hospitals in country 
Volunteer: Lena Abdulqadir has gone to Syria to work in ISIS controlled hospitals

Volunteer: Lena Abdulqadir has gone to Syria to work in ISIS controlled hospitals

Nine British medical students have travelled to Syria to work in hospitals in Islamic State-held areas, it emerged last night.

Four women and five men entered the country last week, keeping their plans secret from relatives until shortly before they crossed the border.

Turkish politician Mehmet Al Ediboglu told The Observer: ‘We all assume they are in Tel Abyad now, which is under Isis control.

‘The conflict out there is fierce, so medical help must be needed.’

Mr Ediboglu, who has met the students’ families, said they felt the young Britons had been ‘cheated [and] brainwashed’.

The group, in their late teens and early 20s, are all Britons of Sudanese descent studying at a medical school in Khartoum.

Mr Ediboglu added: ‘These kids were born and raised in England, but they were sent to Sudan to study at medical school.’

The nine flew to Istanbul on March 12, he said, and took a bus to the Syrian border the next day.

The families were alerted only when one of the students, Lena Maumoon Abdulqadir, 19, sent a text to her sister saying she wanted to ‘volunteer to help wounded Syrian people’.

The Home Office is reported to have said the group would not automatically face prosecution if they returned to the UK, as long as they could prove they had not been fighting for IS.

Read more:


 Islamic misogyny 101 in action.

‘In this studio, I run the show’: Moment Lebanese woman TV host stood up to sexist Islamist scholar after being told ‘it’s beneath me to be interviewed by you’ during live interview

Lebanese TV host

Rima Karaki (left and centre) was conducting an interview with London-Based Islamist Hani Al-Seba’i (right, top) for Lebanon’s Al Jadeed discussing ISIS when the sexist comments were made. In the footage, Karaki urges Sheik Al-Seba’i to get back to the present, and asks him another question, a request which sparks a heated argument. Al-Seba’i says: ‘Are you done? Shut up so I can talk. It’s beneath me to be interviewed by you. You are a woman who…’ With her palm facing the Sheikh, Karaki then delivers the ultimate end to the conversation. ‘How can a respected Sheik like yourself tell a TV host to shut up?’ she asks. ‘Either there is mutual respect or the conversation is over.’ More here.


Lipstick on a pig. 

obama and islam pig

It’s great that Asra Nomani is condemning Obama’s refusal to connect Islam with the Islamic State and other jihadis around the world killing people for their Allah and founder Mohamed. But she engages in the same tomfoolery as the Daily Mail I mentioned in an earlier post. The factual Islamic doctrine of abrogation is a reality, and will continual to be so long after anyone of us is around. Understanding that truth is crucial in formulateing effective policies against Islam/Islamization.

Once again, Stephen Coughlin:

Brave Muslim Warns of ISIS’s Apocalyptic Mission (video)

The terrorist group known as Islamic State, or ISIS, has issued a call on jihadis around the world to kill Twitter employees over blocked accounts. Among those on the target list include Twitter’s founder Jack Dorsey.

“Your virtual war on us will cause a real war on you,” an online post released by ISIS said. “We told you from the beginning it’s not your war, but you didn’t get it and kept closing our accounts on Twitter, but we always come back.”

Twitter is taking the threats seriously. In recent weeks, Twitter and YouTube have deleted posts and shutdown accounts that released ISIS videos.

Meanwhile, one brave Muslim women said President Barack Obama’s insistence that ISIS is not Islamic is “completely wrong” and that his reluctance to label the enemy will have dire consequences.

Asra Nomani is author of Standing Alone: An American Woman’s Struggle for the Soul of Islam.

Nomani recently wrote an article for The Daily Beast titled, “Will It Take the End of the World for Obama to Recognize ISIS as ‘Islamic’?” in which she argues that the president’s “verbal tap dance around Islamic theology and extremism” is “completely wrong.”

“We have to own the issue of extremist Islamic theology in order to defeat it and remove it from our world. We have to name it to tame it,” Nomani wrote.

She describes herself as a Muslim feminist and is a contributor at The Daily Beast.

In an in-depth interview with CBN News, Nomani also warned that ISIS is on an end-of-days Islamic apocalyptic mission. She said the world must grasp their evil ideology to even try to defeat them.

More here.

NOTE: Their ‘evil ideology’ is fundamental Islam, Islam 101, the very back to basics that Mohamed her prophet followed. That is the stark reality people are slowly waking up to.


Once again, the wise words of Stephen Coughlin, speaking at Frank Gaffney’s Defeating Jihad Summit

It doesn’t matter what the apologist say, ( I wish it were so) the fact remains that abrogation is a fundamental doctrine in discerning what passages in the koran are more relevant than others. Violent and intolerant passages superseding earlier peaceful passages are a de facto reality, and only Islamic apologists and those upset about their own co-religionists giving Islam a bad rep, are the ones pushing this crapola.


The Islamic State cherry picks sections of the Koran and misinterprets the accounts of the Prophet Muhammad in order to wage jihad and sign up new recruits, experts say.

It is estimated that 20,000 people have streamed into the territory in Iraq and Syria, where ISIS has proclaimed what it calls a ‘caliphate’, ruled by its often brutal version of Islamic law.

The group purport to recreate the conquests and rule of the Prophet Muhammad and his successors and maintains its worst brutalities – such as beheading captives – only prove its purity in following what it contends is the prophet’s example.

But now Muslims clerics and other experts are speaking out, saying that the group hand picks what it wants from Islam’s holy book, the Koran, and from accounts of Muhammad’s actions and sayings, known as the Hadith.

It then misinterprets many of these, while ignoring everything in the texts that contradicts those hand-picked selections.

Writings by the group’s clerics and its English-language online magazine, Dabiq, are full of citations from Koranic verses, the Hadith and centuries of interpreters, mostly from hardliners.

But Joas Wagemakers, an assistant professor of Islamic Studies at Radboud University in the Netherlands, says these are taken far out of context by ISIS.

He explained that Muslim scholars throughout history have used texts in a ‘decontextualised way’ to suit their purposes and says that ISIS represent the extreme.

He added: ‘It would be a mistake to conclude the Islamic State group’s extremism is the true Islam that emerges from the Koran and Hadith.

Read more:


Stunning in its frankness and candor.

The video interview of Mullah Krekar by Norwegian state boardcaster NRK, that landed him in jail again, gives the uninformed viewer and excellent birds eye view of what Islam is truly about, and in a chilling, calm and collected kind of way. Within Islam norms, Mullah Krekar is not a radical, but a knowledgeable voice on what Islam truly stands for.

Despite what NRK spins about Krekar’s views, Islam is but Islam. There is no separation of belief and politics, with over 500 verses spelling out how society is to run, it’s more a political ideology than a belief system, this is the elephant in the living room that needs to be acknowledged.

NOTE: Dr.Andrew Bostom spells out the highly mainstream, and unchanged, Islamic doctrine of murdering those who ‘slander Mohamed’, here.

(H/T & Upload Vlad) : Mullah Krekar in Norway gives chilling and honest interview about Islam and the West 

This is a profound and honest interview and should be seen by all. The Obama narrative that islam has nothing to do with the deconstruction of critical freedoms around the world is coming undone and more importantly irrelevant.

Translation: Liberty DK

NOTE II: An interesting point is brought up in the video by Krekar, ”the primary target will always be those who are first to produce material that ”slanders” Mohamed/Islam not those who reproduce it in solidarity.”

So the notion that the need stand in defense of someone caught in the Islamic cross hairs for ”slandering” Mohamed and/or Islam, will somehow diminish the threat, is not altogether true. Understanding Krekar’s thinking, we all need to ”slander” Mohamed on a regular basis, so much so that the world’s media and social sites are inundated with the material. But even then it won’t really protect anyone, they’ll just pick and choose the easier targets to kill.


Clarity is such a wonderful thing.

UPDATE and BUMP: Andy Bostom sends in the following, scroll down for more.

A treasure trove of truthfulness. The imam makes it very clear what I’ve been saying about ”interfaith dialogue” over the years, it has no place in Islam. So when Muslims engage in it, it’s all for the furthering of Islamic goals, like using churches and synagogues for prayer, but never ever allowing any kind or reciprocity of the same.

NOTE: Islam is not here to co-exist, but to eventually supplant.

On Eve of Synagogue Attack in Denmark, Copenhagen Imam Incited Against Jews 

FEBRUARY 18, 2015 5:06 PM

Author:David Daoud

During a Friday, February 13 sermon – one day before the weekend’s terror attacks in Copenhagen – Hajj Saeed, the Imam of the Al-Faruq Mosque in the city, rejected interfaith dialogue with Jews, watchdog MEMRI TVreported, publishing footage of the lecture.

From his pulpit, Saeed called interfaith dialogue a “malignant idea,” and claimed that, “the people responsible for interfaith dialogue want to make all religions equal. [By doing so] they want to equate Truth with Falsehood. Between heresy and deception, between the religion of the Prophet Muhammad and man-made laws, legislated by these criminals in order to rule the world.”

Behind Saeed hung a black flag, commonly associated with the Islamist extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, an international pan-Islamic political organization with the goal of uniting all Muslim countries under the aegis of an Islamic State. His sermon was posted on the internet by the group’s Scandinavian chapter.

Regarding Jews specifically, Saeed said that the Prophet Mohammad had Jewish neighbors in Medina, but instead of trying to call for reconciliation with them, “in the manner of…those who call to reconcile Truth with Falsehood,” he called them to accept Islam. And when they rejected his call to Islam, “he waged war against the Jews.”

More here.

Copenhagen Imam On Eve of 2/14/15 Jihad Terror Attack Eschewed “Dialogue,” Stated: “Muhammad Waged War Against The Jews”

Per the invaluable Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the sermon excerpted below, validates what I wrote about at length in my Breitbart.com essay, “Re-enacting Muhammad in Copenhagen.”

On the evening before jihadist Omar Abdel Hamid el-Hussein murderously attacked both a Copenhagen free speech conference, and then a synagogue, Hajj Saeed, Imam of the Al-Faruq Mosque in Copenhagen, eschewed “dialogue” with Jews, reminding his Muslim listeners that Muhammad waged jihad against the Jews when they failed to submit to his nascent Islamic order. The good imam Saeed intoned the following during his February 13, 2015 sermon:

Our Prophet Muhammad had Jewish neighbors in Al-Madina. Did he call for closer relations, harmony, and dialogue with them, in the manner of the UN and of those who call to reconciliation Truth and Falsehood? Or did he call upon them to worship Allah? When they violated their pledge and did not accept this call – well, you know what he did to them. It appears in his Sira. He waged war against the Jews.

More here.


A good rule of thumb, it’s all about Islam all of the time.

Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley and the “Meshugga Muslim” Jihad Against the Police (Addended)


Reflecting upon Maimonides’ timeless wisdom, we must have the intellectual fortitude to contemplate, with candor, from a non-Muslim perspective, whether Islamic jihadism and “madness”/“madmen” may interact in a complementary, even synergistic manner.


At 2:45 p.m., Saturday, December 20, 2014, Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley approached two people on a street in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn. After requesting that they follow him on Instagram, he told them, “Watch what I’m going to do.” Within 2 minutes, at 2:47 p.m., Brinsley reached the passenger window of a marked police car, and fired a lethal barrage at the heads of Officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu. Fleeing into a nearby subway station, pursued by police officers, Ismaaiyl Brinsley stopped, and shot himself, fatally, in the head.

Immediate post-mortem accounts riveted, appropriately, on Brinsley’s history of mental illness, personal failure, and paroxysms of violent anger—he even wounded his Baltimore area girlfriend, just before departing by bus for New York City, that fateful Saturday morning. However, by Saturday, Brinsley had focused his vengeful rage on the recent deaths of Eric Garner in Staten Island, N.Y., and Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo. According to the now rigidly enforced narrative, Brinsley executed Officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu in cold blood due, solely, to his warped perception of their “shared culpability” in the tragic deaths of Garner and Brown.

Although, doubtless, the aforementioned psycho-social factors contributed in significant measure to Brinsley’s heinous actions, major media reportage and “pundit” commentaries have scrupulously—and selectively—avoided any serious discussion of his Muslim background, and related pursuits, all of which can be gleaned from his social media accounts (see here; here; here; andhere). This willful lacuna in media coverage and analysis is unacceptable given the current spate of Muslim jihadist violence targeting Western institutions of authority, notably, the police (see here; here; and here). Whether such violence is fueled, additionally, by mental illness, etc., or not, we know that Abu Mohammed al-Adnani, official spokesman for, and a senior leader of, the Islamic State, openly encouraged Western Muslims to attack non-Muslims within their own societies in a September 22, 2014 pronouncement.Consistent with traditional, authoritative Islamic jihad war jurisprudence’s designation of even enemy non-combatant “harbis” (those non-Muslims from the “dar al-harb” [“lands of war”] not submitted to Islamic law) as licit targets of sanguinary attacks, al-Adnani, gave broad license to murderous assaults on Western “disbelievers”:

If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyone’s advice and do not seek anyone’s verdict. Kill the disbeliever whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling. Both of them are disbelievers. Both of them are considered to be waging war [the civilian by belonging to a state waging war against the Muslims]. Both of their blood and wealth is legal for you to destroy, for blood does not become illegal or legal to spill by the clothes being worn.

But attacks on law enforcement merited a specific priority for al-Adnani:

More here at Bostom’s.


An earlier version of this video was posted yesterday but was taken down, here it is again, thanks be to Vlad.

What he’s basically doing is summoning the 1.6 billion ”lone wolves” to wage independent jihad on the French.

UPDATE: It was removed again, but commenter Will provides yet another from LiveLeak