Another useless meme by those who have their heads in the sand and up their rears……

Ostrich-with-head-in-sand-and up its butt

Daniel nails it as always….

When you’re in a hole, stop digging. Muslim populations are a hole. Immigration is the shovel. Dig deep enough and you’re six feet under.

Only Islam Can Save Us From Islam

In the Washington Post, Petraeus complained about the “inflammatory political discourse that has become far too common both at home and abroad against Muslims and Islam”. The former general warned that restricting Muslim immigration would “undermine our ability to defeat Islamist extremists by alienating and undermining the allies whose help we most need to win this fight: namely, Muslims.”

At Rutgers, Obama claimed that restricting Muslim immigration “would alienate the very communities at home and abroad who are our most important partners in the fight against violent extremism.”

If we alienate Muslims, who is going to help us fight Muslim terrorism?

You can see why Obama doesn’t mention Islamic terrorism in any way, shape or form. Once you drop the “I” word, then the argument is that you need Islam to fight Islam. And Muslims to fight Muslims.

This is bad enough in the Muslim world where we are told that we have to ally with the “moderate” Muslim governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to fight the Muslim terrorists whom they sponsor.

Petraeus has troublingly close ties to the Saudis. He defended their oil dumping program, praised the role of Islamic law in fighting Islamic terrorism and endorsed their Syria plans. While defending the Saudis as allies, he blamed Israel for America’s problems with the Muslim world. The narrative he was using there was the traditional Saudi one in which Israel, not Islam, is the source of the friction.

He defended Pakistan as an ally and claimed to believe the Pakistani excuses that they did not know Osama bin Laden was living right in their military center and that they really wanted to fight the Taliban.

Obama’s “partners” against “violent extremism” have included Muslim Brotherhood terror supporters at home and abroad. He backed Al Qaeda’s LIFG in Libya, Iran’s Shiite terror militias in Iraq, Al Qaeda allies in Syria and those are just a few of the worst examples of his partners against extremism.

Petraeus and Obama view terrorists and state sponsors of terror as important allies. Their policies have led to multiple terrorist attacks against Americans. And they still insist that we need Islamic terrorists as allies to protect us from Islamic terrorists. We need moderate theocrats to protect us from extremist theocrats. We need the Saudis and Pakistanis to save us from the terrorists whom they arm and fund.

But it’s Muslim immigration where their argument really shines.

The United States faces a terror threat because a certain percentage of the Muslim population will kill Americans. Every increase in the Muslim population also increases the number of potential terrorists. Muslim immigration increases the terrorism risk to Americans every single year.

These are undeniable facts.

When you’re in a hole, stop digging. Muslim populations are a hole. Immigration is the shovel. Dig deep enough and you’re six feet under.

Even if the mainstream narrative about a moderate majority and extremist minority were true, how could the cost of Islamic terrorism justify the expansion of even moderate Muslim communities?

More here.


In other words, Islam is much much more harsh than you already know it.

koran koran koran koran

 Arabic writing was far from settled at the claimed time the koran was revealed with possible confusion over consonants and vowels resulting in many possible ‘readings.’   Yet claims are made that it is ‘clear’ or mubeen (eg Koran 5:15, 12:1; 15:1; 26:2; 27:1; 28:2; 43:2; 44:2)

The text is more horrifying and more deadly in the original classical Arabic than in English ‘translations’.

But all these problems are smoothed over and we are fed a sugary version of the ‘meaning’ of the text as the aim is to attract people to Islam and blind us to its real aims. 

Islam’s text is sugar coated in translation:

Dr Mark Durie

Non-Muslims or exMuslims who know Islam’s text in the Arabic and particularly those who know classical Arabic (few people) will tell you that the text is ‘worse’ meaning more horrifying and more deadly in the original classical Arabic than we are led to believe in English ‘translations.’   Islamic terminology carries with it concepts, cultural practices and a worldview belonging to an ancient Arab society.  The words translated into English or modern European languages fail to convey the full meaning that would be understood in an Arabic/Muslim society.

Only the original classical Arabic koran is the true text which cannot be changed and anything else is merely an interpretation and can be ‘modified.’  Dr Mark Durie a linguist and specialist in Islam explains some of the problems with our correct understanding of Islamic text which is often a translation of the ‘meaning’ as explained by the commentaries rather than a direct translation.   He notes that the real meaning can be ‘lost in translation’ with possible disastrous results as we fail to comprehend the real message in Islamic text.

Dr Durie notes — Reading the Quran presents many challenges.  One is that the Arabic of the Quran is often just hard to understand.  It contains many opaque words and expressions, and the mode of expression is often highly elliptical, leaving out material which the reader must infer.

Translations are often ‘translations of meaning’  eg ‘The Noble Koran:  English translations of the meanings and commentary’  — Endowment for allah’s sake from the custodian of the two holy mosques King Abdullah ibn’Abd al-‘Aziz al Sa’ud.

Does the supposedly divine origin of the koran  render it untranslatable?    Or are there problems?

Ibn Warraq (1995) notes the use of  at least 275 ‘foreign’ words ie not Arabic while the koran is supposed to be in perfect Arabic –eg  Hebrew words and concepts plus a great many Aramaic and Syriac words and ideas, also Ethiopic, Persian, and Greek.   The word koran comes from the Syriac  (Warraq 1995  p 108) .

There are variant versions of the koran  so the claim of one pure unaltered version is false.  Immense errors are noted in the style, the broken or missing sequence of events, the poor connection of ideas, sentences where the beginning and end don’t fit grammatically, and phrases and words which are repeated.

“Seemingly unrelated verses often sit side by side, for example, while duplicate material, exact phrases, or even entire verses may be situated in entirely different contexts’(Reuven Firestone, Islamics professor)

Stories from others have been  plagiarised and distorted and are better read and understood from their original, non-Muslim source.  Verses seem to have been added while others are missing and many inconsistencies show that considerable revision has occurred.

More here. H/T: ServandoS.


Professor Gad Saad interviews psychologist Nicolai Sennels on Islamic mentality

Professor Gad Saad interviews psychologist Nicolai Sennels on Islamic mentality

Watch the video interview here (there’s no embed).

“We explore the unique mindsets of Muslim criminals in Denmark, an exploration of the violence prescribed in Islamic texts, immigration policies, and Islamic reform, among other topics.

Correction:At the 46 minute, 44 seconds mark, I misspoke.Mushriqun refers to idolaters and polytheists whereasMunafiqun refers to hypocrites.

Note: Apologies for some technical difficulties that arose during the taping and for some echo (in terms of the audio quality).  I have edited a few seconds out that were dead air time; otherwise the clip is whole.

Nicolai’s Twitter account: @NicolaiSennels”


H/T: Nicolai Sennels


Of course Islam is a scourge on mankind, it’s as plain as the nose our our faces…….

Lebanese bishop

Carreira mainly sees a threat to Western countries, and that is above all Islam. “I would say that Islam is the worst plague that  humanity has seen in the past 2000 years.”. Islam is “completely unable” to develop, respect for human dignity.
For Muslims it is therefore “impossible to respect human rights and the Western tradition”.

Jesuit Manuel Carreia: “Islam, the Worst Plague the Human Race Has Ever Seen”


(Madrid) the famous astrophysicist and Jesuit, Father Manuel Carreira, has said “Islam, the worst plague that the human race has ever seen.”<

In an interview Carreira had indirectly responded  to a discussion on West Germany and said that one could not plausibly claim that “Islam is compatible with the rights of a European nation”.

Astrophysicist and Jesuit

The Spaniard Manuel Maria Carreira Verez SJ became famous mainly as an astrophysicist, but also as a philosopher and theologian. Since 1974 he is a member of the Vatican Specula, was an employee at numerous NASA projects in the United States and taught more than 30 years at various universities, including the John Carroll University in the US and the Pontifical University of Comillas in Spain.

In an interview with El Español he addressed some current issues, including the migration crisis, the relationship between the West and Islam, and the relationship between the state and Church.

The State must preserve Christian heritage, he does not want to jeopardize its existence

“The state need not impose any specific religious behavior,” but it has to be taken into account, that the Western countries are based on Christian ethics, because this has formed these States and made them what they are and what is necessary to defend.

“The Catholicity is a central key element in the development of the state”, which applies to all of Western Europe. Therefore, the European countries could not accept the abolition of Christianity without putting their very existence at risk.

There is growing secularization, and this was “up to a certain point, even desirable, because religion must not be a political element.” But the state has the task and duty to protect its Christian heritage as part of the common good.

Islam is “completely unable” to respect human dignity and human rights

Carreira mainly sees a threat to Western countries, and that is above all Islam. “I would say that Islam is the worst plague that  humanity has seen in the past 2000 years.”. Islam is “completely unable” to develop, respect for human dignity.

For Muslims it is therefore “impossible to respect human rights and the Western tradition”.

A Muslim in Europe “denies either this respect, then is an internal threat to Europe, or he accepts European thought, which means he is an unbeliever and is dead according to Islamic understanding.” Either way, “there is no positive contribution by Islam to a modern society that is respectful of the fundamental rights of every human being,” said Carreira.

Idea of the multicultural state “an intellectual blunder”

H/T  & via Riippumatonmedia.com


Freedom scarf my eye, it’s political/religious oppression.

It’s a sharia symbol to tell the neighbourhood that you’ve arrived, and takeover is just a matter of time.

On the surface, a wide garment, scarf, or hijab looks like a piece of cloth. But, in fact, the dominating power of this piece of cloth is extraordinary. The idea is that once I can control your body, and once I can confine your body, I basically own you.


The widespread misconception about Islamic covering among leftists in the West.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh

I spent most of my life in the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria until a few years ago. Now, living in the West, I am stunned with all misconceptions and misleading information about Islam. It seems to me that this stems from a large propaganda campaign coming from various platforms ranging from the dominant liberal media to Western Muslim scholars who have never lived in an Islamic country, but only read books published in the West. Liberals are brainwashed to view the West as the victimizers and the Muslims as the victims.

While covering all the misconceptions would require hundreds of books, I am going to only address the truth about the hijab in this article and the fallacies that are taught to ordinary people in the West about veiling, Muslim women, and the idea of victimhood.

(I have covered other truths and aspects of Islam in my memoir, Allah: A God Who Hates Women.)

Two of my own sisters have gone through the phases of wearing the hijab. I believe that the repression and domination of women in the Muslim world begins with the dress code — wearing a scarf, or hijab; wearing wide garments, chador; and hiding the body. In other words, the religion of Islam provides the language for men to dominate women by Sharia law, which takes possession of a women’s body from the moment a girl is born.

On the surface, a wide garment, scarf, or hijab looks like a piece of cloth. But, in fact, the dominating power of this piece of cloth is extraordinary. The idea is that once I can control your body, and once I can confine your body, I basically own you.

I believe and personally witnessed that wearing a scarf and wearing a wide garment, do not have anything to do with divine religious rules, as some ignorant imams or Muslims attempt to promote. Hijab is the first crucial step to possess a woman and make her follower of Islam.

I argue that the process of enforcing the hijab on women and making it feel natural to them is carried out through several institutional and psychological steps.

The First Phase: Indoctrination

The first phase is indoctrinating the idea of hiding one’s hair and body in the mind of a woman. The process of indoctrination begins from the moment a baby girl is born.

One concrete example is my sisters. They were forced to wear the hijab at the age of 8 in the schools of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria. So even before girls reach the age that they can make decisions, before they know right from wrong, they are indoctrinated to hide their body.  From age 3 or 4, they are repeatedly told about the “nice” things that will happen to them when they wear their hijab, and how they will be a good girl and be treated as a mature girl when they hide their body.

More here.


The comparison between the mohammedan creed and national socialism ( and traditional socialist thinking as well) is a credible one. It will anger many, and perhaps amuse some, but the facts are there.

ein mo and ad

National Socialism is the ideology of peace

Since this (post) was removed a moment ago for being “inappropriate”, I put it back in a slightly revised version. If this is removed, I would like to see the point where I am posing inappropriate content to anyone. The text is plain facts of history and picked from the Koran and Mein Kampf.

Before I was wondering how that Islam is a religion of peace, because the whole Qur’an is full of hate speech, racism, sexism and incitement to war and call for the killing of infidels. I heard the imam supporting the religion of Islam to be of peace, because when the whole world is subjected to Islam, and all adhere to Sharia law, there will be world peace.

In this same logic, National Socialism is the ideology of peace and the Nazis are holy, peaceful apostles who spread the message of peace.

National Socialism and Islam are very much similar to each other and both of their history, teachings, and disseminations are very much alike. In this post I compare Hitler, the leader of National Socialism, the holy book of Mein Kampf, as well as the leader of Islam, Muhammad, and his holy book the Koran.

Both of them are on an equal footing, dictators, who came to power through violence and seized power.

Both have a dictator’s holy book, the Koran and Mein Kampf.

Both think they are on God’s errand. The views of God are different in each other yes, but the ideas are substantially the same.

Both feel that they are privileged, and their violence is justified.

In Islam, people are divided into broadly two categories, believers and non-believers.

In Mein Kampf people are classified into three different groups, the founders of culture, the bearers of culture, the destroyers of culture, Eg. Aryans developed, Asians bore it, and the Jews destroyed it.

In these books of the conquering of the world and the killing of people is based on a slightly different perspectives: Islam wants to kill infidels, just because they are infidels.

8:39. “And fight them until there is no longer the worship of idols, but God alone”

In Mein Kampf Hitler again sees the survival of the Aryan race of vital importance that there is enough land on which to live. During the thousands of years of the Reich, this would mean the subordination of the whole world.

More here in Finnish. H/T: Kumitonttu

NOTE: It’s not bigotry and intolerance to point out bigotry and intolerance and pure tyranny.



WE HAVE BEEN WARNING ABOUT THIS FOR YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now we see the reason for the weak-in-the-knees by our elected officials, after decades of championing this disaster, they now see that their number is up. We’re now told to play nice to Muslims by the very people who said we were hyping the danger that they pose. Morons!

Europe ‘to have more Muslims than Christians’: Belgian minister warns Brussels attacks hearing that the continent should not ‘make an enemy of Islam’

Muslims will ‘very soon’ outnumber practising Christians in Europe, a Belgian minister claimed yesterday

Muslims will ‘very soon’ outnumber practising Christians in Europe, a Belgian minister claimed yesterday

  • Koen Geens said the continent ‘does not realise this, but this is the reality’ 
  • Remarks follow Jan Jambon’s claims in the wake of Brussels bombings ‘a section of the Muslim community danced when attack took place’
  • Mr Jambon was accused of stoking tensions with Belgium’s Muslims 

Muslims will ‘very soon’ outnumber practising Christians in Europe, a Belgian minister claimed yesterday.

Koen Geens, the justice minister, told the European Parliament the continent ‘does not realise this, but this is the reality’.

At a hearing by MEPs into the Brussels attacks, the Belgian deputy prime minister Jan Jambon added that ‘the worst thing we can do is to make an enemy of Islam’.

The remarks follow claims by Mr Jambon in the wake of the suicide bombings that ‘a significant section of the Muslim community danced when attacks took place’.

Speaking before the Parliament’s justice and home affairs committee yesterday, Mr Koens said the EU needed to realise a shift in population was taking place.

‘In Europe, very shortly we’re soon going to have more practising Muslims than practising Christians,’ he said.

‘That is not because there are too many Muslims, it is because Christian are generally less practising.

‘Europe does not realise this, but this is the reality.’

More here.


What a bunch of bull crap…….

Christians and Jews, Hindus and Buddhists all over the world are being persecuted for their faith and ethnicity by Muslims (relying on classical Islamic texts for validation) and do not behave like Muslims. Hindus, Buddhists, Jews and Christians in the US/West are not creating terror cells to carry out attacks on Muslims anywhere that they can find them because, Muslims elsewhere, are murdering their co-religionists. Only Muslims are doing that because the koran and other Islamic texts sanction it.

NOTE: The problem is Islam itself, in particular, Post-Hijra Islam, the Medina period that abrogates the Meccan period. Full stop. Do not be taken in by these propaganda spin-meisters.

‘Swedes must realize only soft power can defeat radicalism’

'Swedes must realize only soft power can defeat radicalism'

File photo: Mstyslav Chernov/Wikimedia

Published: 20 Apr 2016 07:39 GMT+02:00

The pen is mightier than the sword, the old saying goes. The challenge presented by radical Islamic extremism to the civilized world is one that cannot be defeated solely by military means; it is the nature of such radicalism to metastasize and grow when it is physically attacked.

This is because extremism of this sort is based on the belief that Islam is besieged and persecuted by armies of infidels and it is the duty of “true” Muslims to kill in its defense. The fact that the shocking attacks in Brussels last month came just days after the arrest of one of the planners of the recent Paris attacks demonstrates this martyr effect.

Swedes shouldn’t overlook the significance that one of the suspects in the attacks became radicalized in Malmö. Why were ideas grounded in hate and violence more attractive than the tolerance and understanding typically associated with Swedish values?

One source of strength and strategic advantage among these radicals is in their belief that terrorism is sanctioned by God. This is the great “mirage” of extremism and no amount of military hardware can defeat it.

Rather, extremism must die in the battlefield of ideas.

More here.


Let them be outraged, and let them prove otherwise (they can’t).

Truth tellers!


She had also said her party would call for a ban on Islamic symbols such as minarets on mosques, muezzins’ calls to prayer and full-face veils, speaking to newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung.

German right-wing AfD party under fire over anti-Islam comments

April 18, 2016

Beatrix von Storch of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party (L) pictured alongside the party&#39;s founder Bernd Lucke (R)in 2014

View photos


Beatrix von Storch of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party (L) pictured alongside the party’s founder Bernd Lucke (R)in 2014 (AFP Photo/Hannibal Hanschke )

Berlin (AFP) – Germany’s right-wing populist AfD party drew heavy fire Monday after two of its leaders labelled Islam incompatible with the country’s values and constitution.

The three-year-old Alternative for Germany party, which harshly opposes Chancellor Angela Merkel’s liberal refugee policy, plans to adopt an anti-Islamic manifesto at a conference this month.

The chairman of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany Aiman Mazyek charged that “the AfD is riding a wave of Islamophobia”.

More here.

NOTE: If Islam had no Post-Hijra, then it might be a different story.


As history and human experience proves, utopia can never be achieved, and islam is not peace.

A Myth Demolished
by Srdja Trifkovic

The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise:
Muslims, Christians, and Jews Under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain
by Darío Fernández-Morera Wilmington, DE: ISI Books 336 pp., $29.95

Over the past two decades a great chasm has opened up between the tenured American professoriate specializing in the humanities and social sciences, and the meaningful discussion of its subjects in the public arena. It is hard to find a recent work by an academic authority on social, historical, and cultural anthropology in general, or on the specific issues of religion, family, race, immigration, education, gender, and sexuality, that is not “informed” by the legacy of critical theory and its conceptual and methodological framework. The authors may divide themselves into different “schools” (constructivist, postmodern, poststructuralist), but they are all initiates of the same sect.

Almost a century after Julien Benda coined the phrase, the trahison des clercs has morphed into a new form. By rejecting the notions of objectivity, truth, and historical reality in favor of the approved forms of ideological “antihegemonistic discourse,” the treasonous clercs of our time have severed the link between what can or should be known and the knowledge itself. The result is a myriad of myths covering every area of human endeavor, past and present. Some have had far-reaching political consequences: The myth of “diversity” has engendered a massive state apparat dedicated to social engineering and control, while the chimera of “human rights” has produced an assault on the institution of marriage hardly imaginable a generation ago. What they all have in common is their visceral antipathy to Western civilization, and to the Christian concept of personhood (dignitas personae) and its related historical “constructs.”

Seen against this cultural and ideological backdrop, Darío Fernández-Morera’s Myth of the Andalusian Paradise is doubly subversive. It is a first-rate work of scholarship that demolishes the fabrication of the multiethnic, multiconfessional convivencia in Spain under Muslim rule. The book is also an exposé of the endemic problems of contemporary Western academe, as manifested in the dishonesty, corruption, and dogmatic intolerance of the Islamic-studies establishment both here and in Europe. The author ascribes this phenomenon to a mix of “stakeholder interests and incentives,” “motivated blindness,” “Occidentalism” and “Christianophobia,” and to the corrosive influence of the multimillion-dollar grants that many leading Islamic-studies departments receive from the governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and others.

Fernández-Morera’s book presents a clear and present danger to the “stakeholders.” It undermines one of their cherished orthodoxies so comprehensively that it potentially threatens many careers and reputations. They will take note. An optimistic reviewer has predicted that “[i]t will soon find its place on the shelves of premier academic institutions,” but there is reason to fear the opposite. It is more likely to be demonized, as Sylvain Gouguenheim’s debunking of the myth of Islam’s key contribution to the late-medieval civilization of Europe was demonized in France in 2008; or else ignored, as Raphael Israeli’s prescient Islamic Challenge in Europe was in that same year and after.

Continue Reading &amp;amp;amp;amp;rarr;


This article (as well as all of Daniel’s writings) are immersed in rational, logical thinking, being a student of history, he looks into the past to flesh out the present and to some degree, even to the future.

We are expected to believe that there are hundreds of explanations for Islamic terrorism, but not one. And while no doubt individual choices and emotions play a role in the making of a Muslim terrorist, the same is true in the making of a soldier. An army exists as part of a positive national ethos. Reducing an army to a series of personal dissatisfactions is absurd. So is reducing ISIS to individually dissatisfied people while ignoring what its members actually believe. It’s as absurd as believing that Hitler became a monster because he couldn’t get his painting career off the ground.


The issue isn’t radicalization. It’s Islamization.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

There are Jihadists from dozens of countries who have joined ISIS. What do they all have in common?

The official answer is radicalization. Muslims in Europe are “radicalized” by alienation, racism and unemployment. Neglected by governments, Muslim youth band together and become terrorists. Muslims in Israel are responding to the “despair and hopelessness” of the “Occupation”. Muslims from the rest of the Middle East are angry over their “dictators”. Muslims from the Ukraine? Who knows.

Radicalization comes packaged with a set of local grievances and explanations. It contends that all Muslim terrorism is a response to local conditions and that we are responsible for those conditions. Even though the “radicalization” is Islamic, it denies that Islam plays a positive role as a Jihadist goal. Instead, like Halal liquor or hashish, it’s what Muslims turn to when they have been disappointed in the West or in their own governments. Islam is just what happens when a Belgian Muslim can’t get a job.

And yet Islam is the only positive uniting factor for Islamic terrorism.

Why otherwise should a Moroccan youth from a French suburb who works at a nightclub, the son of a rural Saudi farmer who has never been outside his country and an American teenager who converted to Islam all risk their lives to form an Islamic State? The Jihadis of ISIS are a truly multinational and multicultural bunch. They have traveled to two foreign countries that most of them have never been to.

What else unites them into a common identity that they are willing to kill and die for if it isn’t Islam?

More here.


But they can’t!

muslim showing koran verse

To integrate and become just like everyone else goes against the grain of core Islamic tenets. There is no ”golden rule” concept in Islam.

muslim showing koran 48-29

Yes, we Muslims MUST be braver and do more to integrate says Labour MP after former equalities chief’s call provokes furious backlash

It comes amid fears of a divide in society. Pictured is a muslim woman in a niqab selling ice cream to a child in Dewsbury (file picture)

Khalid Mahmood, Labour MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, urged more Muslim men to ‘challenge unacceptable attitudes’ amid a row over the integration of the faith into British society.

More here.


The fact remains, it’s totally irrelevant the number of ”peaceful muslims”, those who are not vocal with Islam’s clear tenets of murder, slavery, subjugation and supremacy.

What matters most is the historical record, that all all political/societal upheavals always, meaning without exception, occurred at the hands of a minority, whether for the good or bad. Also the fact that, Islamic texts from the post-hijra period of Mohamed’s which are full of violence and intolerance (Jew hatred, as well as against Christians and others) supersede (abrogate) the earlier more peaceful blatherings.

True koran believing Muslims find it almost impossible to refute the teachings of Post-Hijra Islam, and for that reason alone, makes them a potential fifth column in any society. They may not make that step, but only because they haven’t been confronted with that teaching face to face, nor live in a community with that dominant ideology pressuring them 24/7.

Almost a quarter want the introduction of sharia law in this country; and a frightening 4 per cent — equivalent to 100,000 people — support violence, including suicide bombings, to ‘defend’ Islam. Only one in three say they would report a suspected terrorist to the police.

Trevor Phillips is no sensationalist. He’s a thoughtful man, who will have weighed the implications of his findings carefully.

So when he warns of the dangers of persisting with this pernicious policy of multi-culturalism and appeasement of militant Islam, our head-in-the-sand politicians should pay serious heed.

He is at pains, as I am, to emphasise that most Muslims in Britain want nothing more than to live in peace and do the best for themselves and their families.

But there is a voluble and intolerant strand of Islam in this country that proselytises separatism, denigrates all other religions and cultures, and is violently opposed to any kind of compromise with mainstream British values.

We’re all going to hell in a hijab: RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says it is time our head-in-the-sand politicians take serious heed of Trevor Phillips’s comments about Muslim attitudes

It has taken Trevor Phillips, pictured, to shine a light on the disintegration of Britain in the name of ‘diversity’, writes Richard Littlejohn

Not for the first time, it has taken Trevor Phillips to shine a light on the disintegration of Britain in the name of ‘diversity’.

By way of disclosure, I should remind readers that Trevor is a long-standing friend of mine, as well as executive producer of my old London Weekend Television series.

When he took a break from journalism to seize the poisoned chalice that is the chairmanship of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, he told me he had only done so because he wanted to close it down.

In a perfect world, there would be no need for laws forcing people of different races and religions to mutually respect each other and live together in peace and harmony.

He also insisted that as a black man, he could say things about race that people like me couldn’t — at least, not without being slandered as some kind of knuckle-scraping BNP troglodyte.

Trevor has been as good as his word. OK, he didn’t quite succeed in abolishing the Commission, but he has been prepared to tackle head-on the blinkered, bigoted doctrines of multi-culturalism.

Last year, he made a TV documentary called Things We Won’t Say About Race That Are True — a programme which had the gormless Guardianistas bouncing up and down with self-righteous indignation.

He exposed how the ‘diversity’ gestapo have deliberately encouraged apartheid, creating ghettos and closed societies in our inner cities, where ignorance and hatred flourish unchecked.

Read more: H/T: 


The hack journo working there on one hand says he’s free to criticize mohamed (lie) while his station censors Tommy during the debate for criticizing mohamed.

Special thanks to Dr.Brian of London for redoing the vid and making it crystal clear what in the hell is exactly going on in the debate. Stunningly brilliant display by Tommy and great video editing by Brian.


Islam was/still is, a political theory of military conquest……

Arab supremacy is its underlying characteristic, in language, culture and ideology.

“The only Muslim claim to Jerusalem or to any other part of Israel is based purely on the enterprise of colonial violence. There is no Muslim claim to Israel based on anything other than colonialism, invasion and settlement.”


Why you can’t “colonize” Palestine.

Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

At Israeli Apartheid Week, campus haters claim to be fighting “colonialism” by fighting Jews. Columbia University’s Center for Palestine Studies, dedicated to a country that doesn’t exist and which has produced nothing worth studying except terrorism, features diatribes such as Abdul Rahim al-Shaikh’s Palestine Re-Covered: Reading a Settler Colonial Landscape”. This word salad is a toxic stew of historical revisionism being used to justify the Muslim settler colonization of the indigenous Jewish population.

Colonialism is CPS’ favorite word. When Israeli social workers remove abused children from Muslim homes, that’s colonialism. Israeli farms are a form of environmental “colonialism”. When non-profits aren’t representative enough, it’s the fault of the “Israeli settler-colonial regime.”  If it rains on Thursday, it’s caused by “colonialism,” preferably of the “Israeli Zionist colonial settler regime” variety.

But you can’t colonize colonizers. The Muslim population in Israel is a foreign colonist population. The indigenous Jewish population can resettle its own country, but it can’t colonize it.

Not even if you accuse Jews of being a “super-double-secret settler colonial regime.”

Muslims invaded, conquered and settled Israel. They forced their language and laws on the population. That’s the definition of colonialism. You can’t colonize and then complain that you’re being colonized when the natives take back the power that you stole from them.

There are Muslims in Israel for the same reason that there are Muslims in India. They are the remnants of a Muslim colonial regime that displaced and oppressed the indigenous non-Muslim population.

There are no serious historical arguments to be made against any of this.

The Muslim conquests and invasions are well-documented. The Muslim settlements fit every historical template of colonialism complete with importing a foreign population and social system that was imposed on the native population. Until they began losing wars to the indigenous Jewish population, the Muslim settlers were not ashamed of their colonial past, they gloried in it. Their historical legacy was based on seizing indigenous sites, appropriating them and renaming them after the new conquerors.


Allah is the patron deity of colonialism. Jihad is just colonialism in Arabic. Islamic theology is nothing but the manifest destiny of the Muslim conquest of the world, colonial settler enterprises dressed up in the filmy trappings of religion appropriated from the culture of conquered Jewish and Christian minorities. Muslim terrorism is a reactionary colonial response to the liberation movements of the indigenous Jewish population.

Even “Allahu Akbar” did not originate as a religious sentiment. It does not mean “God is Great”, as it is often mistranslated. It was Mohammed’s taunt to the Jews he was ethnically cleansing. His purge of a minority group proved that “Allah was Greater.” Islamic colonialism is used to demonstrate the existence of Allah. And the best way to worship Allah is through the colonialism of the Jihad.

More here.


It really isn’t that hard, given the fact that they use Leftist tactics and koran based ideology, the followers of Islam can’t refute their message.

jihadi speaks

As well as ignoramus politicians and the think tanks that feed them (debunked) info on Islam, who are unwilling to name the enemy, post-hijra Islam (Islam 101), which is nothing  but ripped flesh and broken bones.

France PM Manuel Valls warns extreme Islam winning the propaganda war

Speaking at a roundtable on Islamism in Paris on Monday, the premier warned that Salafists were “winning the ideological and cultural battle” in France, home of Europe’s biggest Muslim population.

france PM, islam, brussels attack, france attack, ISIS, Manuel Valls, PM Manuel Valls, Manuel Valls france, islam in france, islam war, france muslims, french muslims, muslims in france, Islamism in Paris, ISIS in france, islamic state, IS, world newsPrime Minister Manuel Valls.

Prime Minister Manuel Valls said extreme forms of Islam were winning the propaganda war for hearts and minds, warning the veil was being used as a political symbol for the “enslavement of women”.

Speaking at a roundtable on Islamism in Paris on Monday, the premier warned that Salafists were “winning the ideological and cultural battle” in France, home of Europe’s biggest Muslim population.

And he pledged to “massively” increase France’s security and defence budgets in the coming years, as the country grapples with a growing jihadist threat after two deadly attacks last year.

More here.


This should be read in full, and underlined with my post on Post-Hijra Islam

Mona Walter: “Followers of Islam, it’s time to choose sides”

Translated from Paavo Tajukanga’s Finnish text:

“Mona Walter’s post after the Brussels terrorist attack is worthy of being translated into Finnish. The story is also worth sharing with your own parliamentary representative.”

victorian ornaments + + + image graphicsfairy3.jpg

Islam’s supporters, it’s time to pick a side

In recent times, after watching the news broadcasts from the attacks in Brussels, I have made the following observations. Numerous people flocked to the areas attacked in Brussels to show their disgust for the acts the Islamic holy warriors accomplished during their Jihad. Hand in hand, regardless of their race, or religious affiliation, to show that we are united against terrorism.  Muslims, Christians, Jews and atheists are united in protest against these heinous acts. Of course, I think this is an honorable act even though I would doubt what those Muslims who stood there really know about their religion?

The recent attacks that occurred in Brussels and Paris was performed by zealous Muslims against the Kuffar society here in Europe. Here in the West we want to believe that these jihadists must be mad, and that terrorists actions have nothing to do with Islam. You who have knowledge of Islam knows that these actions have everything to do with Islam. It is really easy to find from Islamic texts the Prophet Muhammad’s justification for these acts of terror.

In addition, I have read comments on social media in which Muslims are required to protest against the actions of these holy jihad warriors with a strong voice of protest. In order for a Muslim to protest against these acts two things are required. Either a complete ignorance of their own religion, or that the person is willing to lie right in the face of the kuffar society. Nowhere in Islamic texts does it prompt to show solidarity towards infidel kuffar. Instead, Islamic texts instructs how a Muslim should behave. With whom a Muslim can be friends, and what Muslims should do to protect themselves and their faith.

Qur’an 58:22, Thou canst not find people who [truly] believe in God and the Last Day and [at the same time] love anyone who contends against God and His Apostle – even though they be their fathers, or their sons, or their brothers, or [others of] their kindred. 

Qur’an 5:51, O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you – then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.

Qur’an 3:28, Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing with Allah , except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allah warns you of Himself, and to Allah is the [final] destination.

In the hadith Sahih Muslim, page 7, Volume 5, the Prophet Muhammad as follows.”If you meet a Jew or a Christian, do not greet them, and if you meet them on a narrow road, you should compel that person to the side”

If a Muslim wants to be faithful, they must respect and follow these texts.This I learned as a young Muslim in a mosque here in Sweden. Islam is very clear on this point. Muslims who follow Allah and the Prophet Muhammad are good Muslims. Muslims who deny the above is one of the kuffar and along with them the enemies of Islam, unless the Muslim in question does not knowingly lie to protect himself or the religion of Islam.

Finally, I want to give advice to Western Muslims. If you still want to call yourselves Muslims you will be dishonoring Islam, Allah and the Prophet Muhammad. That as many do stand with one leg on each side, one leg in Islam and the other in the Democratic kuffar society, it’s not compatible with Islam. Being Muslim is not a matter of group affiliation, ethnicity or cultural background. It is a religion that requires obligations to you as a Muslim. Choose your side according to your morals and ethics even if it means you have to stop calling yourself a Muslim.

H/T: Kumitonttu

NOTE: This was first translated into Finnish by Paavo Tajukangas from Mona Walter’s blog Swedish), and then translated into English by the Tundra Tabloids.