Lebanese bishop

(Photo above: Massoud Fouroozandeh)

Radio interview with Massoud Fouroozandeh, a Danish-Iranian Christian leader.

Translated from Uriasposten (support our translations, donate via

“You ask who is a real Muslim. Well, according to the Quran and Islamic custom, a real Muslim is a person who emulates his prophet Muhammad. A real Muslim is one who can emulate Muhammad.

So how did Muhammad live?

In fact, Muhammad did not live differently from the way Islamic State lives. What IS does is not a misunderstanding or abuse of the Quran. Islamic State sympathizers are actually just trying to live up to and imitate their prophet Muhammad. …It’s not me who says this, it is Islamic history books of Muslims and Arabs who have written this. That Muhammad did exactly the same as the Islamic State does today. …

More here  H/T: Nicolai Sennels


Saudi Arabia, a place where one can still visit the seventh century and not be in a museum.

While I may disagree with the assumption that today’s Islamic ‘radicalism’ was born out of the Wahhabist movement, in fact it was born the moment Mohamed left Mecca for Yathrib (now Medina, a former Jewish town before Islam annihilated it), the writer has some strong words to say about the Saudis:

saudi mecca_road_sign

Saudi Arabia, an ISIS That Has Made It

Black Daesh, white Daesh. The former slits throats, kills, stones, cuts off hands, destroys humanity’s common heritage and despises archaeology, women and non-Muslims. The latter is better dressed and neater but does the same things. The Islamic State; Saudi Arabia. In its struggle against terrorism, the West wages war on one, but shakes hands with the other.

This is a mechanism of denial, and denial has a price: preserving the famous strategic alliance with Saudi Arabia at the risk of forgetting that the kingdom also relies on an alliance with a religious clergy that produces, legitimizes, spreads, preaches and defends Wahhabism, the ultra-puritanical form of Islam that Daesh feeds on.

Wahhabism, a messianic radicalism that arose in the 18th century, hopes to restore a fantasized caliphate centered on a desert, a sacred book, and two holy sites, Mecca and Medina. Born in massacre and blood, it manifests itself in a surreal relationship with women, a prohibition against non-Muslims treading on sacred territory, and ferocious religious laws. That translates into an obsessive hatred of imagery and representation and therefore art, but also of the body, nakedness and freedom. Saudi Arabia is a Daesh that has made it.

The West’s denial regarding Saudi Arabia is striking: It salutes the theocracy as its ally but pretends not to notice that it is the world’s chief ideological sponsor of Islamist culture. The younger generations of radicals in the so-called Arab world were not born jihadists. They were suckled in the bosom of Fatwa Valley, a kind of Islamist Vatican with a vast industry that produces theologians, religious laws, books, and aggressive editorial policies and media campaigns.

One might counter: Isn’t Saudi Arabia itself a possible target of Daesh? Yes, but to focus on that would be to overlook the strength of the ties between the reigning family and the clergy that accounts for its stability — and also, increasingly, for its precariousness. The Saudi royals are caught in a perfect trap: Weakened by succession laws that encourage turnover, they cling to ancestral ties between king and preacher. The Saudi clergy produces Islamism, which both threatens the country and gives legitimacy to the regime.

One has to live in the Muslim world to understand the immense transformative influence of religious television channels on society by accessing its weak links: households, women, rural areas. Islamist culture is widespread in many countries — Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Mali, Mauritania. There are thousands of Islamist newspapers and clergies that impose a unitary vision of the world, tradition and clothing on the public space, on the wording of the government’s laws and on the rituals of a society they deem to be contaminated.

More here.


YLE = fake journalism

yle propaganda

Salafist Islamist on Finnish TV, Sadek Elwan, is asked for advice on how to keep muslims from being ‘radicalized’. It’s kind of like asking a KKK representative on how to keep racists from being racist.

NOTE: Also, the fake journo, Jan Andersson, fields softball questions to the salafist, which makes him either a clueless boob, or completely uninterested in the background of this islam 101’er. Here’s the full 54 minute program.

UPDATE: Simon Elo notes:

On A-Talk now sits Sadek Elwan, with whom I discussed on a-Talk in 2012, on the situation in the middle east. Then Elwan said that Muslims have the honour to die in under Israel gunfire and deemed Hamas terrorism as legitimate.
Later on A2 Islam Night Elwan spoke over the phone that he wants to fight in Syria and admitted himself as an Islamist. Elwan was later an interpreter when islamist preacher Anjem Choudary visited Finland and said that the flag of Islam will fly on the roof of the parliament.
Sadek Elwan is an Islamist who calls radicals to Finland, so I deeply wonder if he represents to YLE “Moderate Muslims”.

On twitter (h/t DM) Veli Kikander tweets about the YLE show, hitting the nail on the head:

Do take note of the full beard and lack of moustache, something of which he wasn’t sporting in times past, things have changed for Sadek.



With Islam 101’er hate preacher Bilal Philips

sadek ilwan 1

sadek ilwan 3

sadel ilwan 2

Oh, and here he is in the recent “hug a muslim” schtick, or should I say, “hug a salafist”.

And this guy is the toast of the Leftist media. What a bunch of maroons.


Well she (Mustafa) would know her co-religionists wouldn’t she?

If she (Mustafa) were ever to visit large portions of the Islamic world, that’s exactly what would happen to her.

‘You Deserve To Be Raped In Every Hole By Hordes Of Muslims‘: Email Sent From #KillAllWhiteMen Campaigner Bahar Mustafa To Pamela Geller


The London university student responsible for the #KillAllWhiteMen hashtag has allegedly sent American blogger and radio personality Pamela Geller a degrading gang-rape e-mail telling her she “deserves to be raped in every hole by hordes of muslims”. Addressed to Ms. Geller

More here.


I have bumped into Inna on a couple of occasions. Glad that she gets it.

clapping orson

All serious experts on radical Islam, people like Morgen Storm who infiltrated the highest command of Al-Qaeda and has studied Islam for ten years non-stop, are telling the Western authorities: “Those people are not coming to Europe and the West to live. They are coming to die”. Why on earth did Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande, and all the rest of the Western leaders not have the sense of responsibility to listen? Western European leadership has failed in its most important duty, that is, to provide security and safety for their citizens.

But how can even the best intentions to limit Islamic radical threat be realistically carried on when the current government of Greece is enthusiastically letting all the hordes coming from the Middle East and Africa to get into Europe without bearing any responsibility for flooding the continent with hundreds and thousands of potential terrorists?


Finland, too, is trying to regulate the uncontrollable stream of refugees coming from Sweden, but not with much success. Additionally, the Finnish premiere who is a good and believing person, but one without much experience in international policy, and who did act spontaneously and emotionally, prompted by tragic personal reasons, and publicly invited the refugees to his house, literally to his house. What better PR scheme to get potential terrorists on to European soil?

Analysing the activities of Western European leaders with regard to handling the refugee crisis in 2015, one just cannot help being totally taken aback by their ability to do everything in their power to put their own citizens in danger. Mortal danger, for the record.


Op-Ed: It’s Jihad, Europe!

The war against the West is proof of the inept leadership of the Western world. A step by step history of how Islam took over Europe.

Published: Sunday, November 22, 2015 8:20 AM

“Those people are not coming to Europe to live; they are coming to die”.

After Friday November 13, 2015, we are living in a different reality. The reality of a switched off Eiffel tower, evacuated Hanover stadium, shut down Brussels subway, and tanks on the deserted streets of the capital of the European Union.   The people in the West are struggling to live a normal life in surreal circumstances, their minds pulsating with a flashing diagnosis: It’s Jihad, Europe!..

The fifteen lost years: 2000-2015

The escalating real and imminent danger to millions of Europeans did not strike the West out of the blue. It was all building up starting from the 9/11 attacks in New York and is a part of the existing strategy of radical Islam from the end of 1980s on. The success of the 9/11 attack had been a major and victorious landmark of this strategy, major encouragement to the forces of darkness.

But contrary to common sense and despite existing information about the radical Islamists’ plans and the list of their mounting activities, the Islamization of Europe – and the West, still in progress – was allowed to happen, both by the dangerously blinded Western leadership and by a largely naive public.

It is irrelevant to blame the special services for this. With all their shortcomings and occasional failures, the special services, especially the strong ones of the UK, Germany and some other Western European countries – France included – as well as the able special services of Canada and Australia  –  work day and night, with good results information-wise. The problem is what the special services are allowed – or not allowed – to do by their political bosses, by their countries’ leadership. And here is the core of the problem with regard to really fighting a war on terror.

Soon after the 9/11 disaster, from 2003 on, as the experts were realizing how little had been done in practice to prevent the spread of militant Islam, several senior analysts tried consistently to wake up the Western leadership to very real risks of the steady process of the radical Islamist penetration into Western societies – see my article on the issue “Europe: A Dangerous Place to Live”. This analysis has been widely cited in many books and dissertations on counter-terrorism, both in popular and professional publications. At the time of the analysis’ publication, its headline was widely perceived as ‘a bold metaphor’. Just 12 years on, this line has become a very much-used statement in the media, a development that I deeply regret.

More here.


Excellent. We need more undercover exposés like this.

Israeli documentary on Islam in Europe Part 1 

This is part 1 of a new Israeli documentary made right after the Paris attack on the 13th about Islam in Europe and its ambitions for the world. This is the same group that made the excellent Israeli documentary 4 years ago about muslim enclaves within Europe.

Upload Vlad




Pure evil, but you already know that…….

The ISIS bombs hidden inside dolls and toys to kill CHILDREN: Iraqi military reveal IEDs placed in toys by Islamists

Pure evil: Iraqi security forces in Baghdad with 18 IEDs which had been hidden inside the hollow bodies of children's toys, before being dressed in doll clothes

Pure evil: Iraqi security forces in Baghdad with 18 IEDs which had been hidden inside the hollow bodies of children’s toys, before being dressed in doll clothes

  • Iraqi security forces defused and destroyed 18 doll-bombs in Baghdad
  • Bomb plot set to target Shia Muslims on pilgrimage for upcoming holiday
  • The dolls had been filled with explosives before being dressed again
  • ISIS is led by and mainly composed of Sunni Muslims from Iraq and Syria
  • See full news coverage of ISIS at 

Iraqi security forces have seized more than a dozen booby trapped dolls which had been part of an ISIS bomb plot against Shia pilgrims.

Security forces in Baghdad defused and destroyed 18 IEDs which had been hidden inside the hollow bodies of children’s toys, before being dressed in doll clothes.

ISIS had planned on scattering the doll-bombs on the road between the Iraqi capital and Karbala, where millions of Shia Muslims are set to walk during the annual pilgrimage for Arbaeen next month.

Arbaeen is a Shia religious observance that marks the end of the 40-day period of mourning after the anniversary of Imam Hussein’s death, the grandson of Prophet Muhammad.

It is considered one of the largest religious gatherings in the world, with millions set to make the journey to Karbala over the upcoming weeks.

Read more:


Most however, if given the choice, would not.

Tundra Mail


In a comment to a Tundra Tabloids’ post on Muslims in Finland wanting to raise awareness on wearing the hijab “to reduce societal fear on wearing it“, a commenter name Sara from Morocco says:

“don’t stop keep on doing what you’re doing hijabis women are like any others women in our societies they live a normal lifestyle like all other women, the core idea is that it’s supposed to be a symbol of modesty of woman’s intellectual ability over her physical beauty and a women you should be able to wear whatever you want and if that’s what you want to wear;then that’s what you should wear”

The Tundra Tabloids’ response:

The hijab is a symbol of sharia, the sharia is a hate doctrine against the non-muslim, we have every right to be opposed to its symbols of hate as a Jew (and any other sane rational person) is opposed to the Swastika and former Soviet dissidents (and other sane people) are opposed to the hammer and sickle and any Black American (as well as any other sane person) is opposed to the garb of the KKK.

Prof. Bill Warner on the hate symbol



Research: Islam is the world’s most violent religion

Research: Islam is the world’s most violent religion

Research: Islam is the world’s most violent religion

By: Nicolai Sennels, psychologist

Together with a number of research assistants, the Danish linguist Tina Magaard spent three years examining the texts of the 10 largest religions. The purpose was to investigate whether any of the religions incite violence.

The conclusion was clear: “The texts of Islam is clearly distinct from the other religions texts as it to a higher degree call for violence and aggression against followers of other faiths. There are also direct incitement to terror. … Moreover, in the Qur’an hundreds of invitations to fight against people of other faiths.”

The verses are in black and white and without mitigating context. One of the verses that deal with non-Muslims is: “So when you meet those who disbelieve, strike their necks until you have inflicted slaughter upon them.” (Qur’an, 47: 4).

Violent in practice
Islam is not only the world’s most violent religion in writing. A huge study, based on in-depth interviews with 45,000 subjects confirms that it is also the world’s most violent religion in practice.

The study shows that Islam is the only religion in the world where people become more violent, the stronger they believe in their religion.

More here.


He mentions “radical” Islam four times, but launches into exactly what Islam is all about. I can forgive the use of the term “radical”, Islam is Islam, but he forcefully drives home the point on what to do about Islamic state and the rest of the jihadis. His take on mohamed is excellent.

H/T: Vlad


How refreshing…..

Published on Nov 18, 2015
In the November 16 episodes of his show on Al-Khaera Wal-Nas TV, Egyptian journalist Ibrahim Issa discussed the reactions of the Egyptian media and politicians to the Paris terror attacks. Issa criticized the common claim that ISIS “has nothing to do with Islam” as well as the conspiracy theories that attribute terror attacks to Western intelligence agencies. “How can this be a conspiracy when the Congress sends 1.3 billion dollars to Egypt every year?” he asked.


Polite golf clap.

geert-wilders (1)

Wilders: Islam is a hostile Ideology not fitting Western Civilization

In an interview with the daily De Telegraaf Geert Wilders, leader of the Freedom Party (PVV) says that Islam is a hostile ideology, which does not fit Western civilization. He added that almost all terrorists are Muslims and all immigration from Muslim countries should be stopped. Wilders wants to close the Dutch borders and leave the Schengen agreement



Islam 101…..

mo tunic 29.12.2011

Are you satisfied with this life you have, staying home, sitting at your place?’ ‘Are you satisfied with this life you are having? This humiliating life whether it’s in Europe, Africa, Arabic countries, America? Are you satisfied with this life? This humiliating life where you call yourself Muslim? You still dare to be called a Muslim?’  ‘Look for pride and honour – you will only find it in your religion… you will only find it in your religion, in jihad.’

This is the reason why Islam has to be treated as inherently violent ideology, and detrimental to any society that allows it entrance or curries its favor.

‘You still dare to be called a Muslim?’ Video emerges of suspected Paris attacks mastermind Abdelhamid Abaaoud issuing a chilling call to arms as gunfire cracks in the background

Paris attacks mastermind Abdelhamid Abaaoud says Muslims cannot be happy without jihad

In the undated short clip which was uploaded to social media Beligian Islamist Abdelhamid Abaaoud (pictured) addresses the camera as the sound of gunfire is heard in the background. In the chilling 55-second video Abaaoud, who also operates under an assumed name of Abu Omar al-Balgiki, calls on Muslims to join jihad. Abaaoud appears disorientated and slurs his words throughout the 55-second clip. It is currently unclear if it was filmed before yesterday’s shoot out in the north Parisian suburb of Saint-Denis where he and his cousin are believed to have been killed.

More here.


And the dumbest of the dumb keep on blithering otherwise…….

“…Islam is a delivery system that fires multiple warheads. And it is happening before our very eyes and with the willing complicity of our preceptorial betters, aka the political class, the intellectual clerisy, the corrupt academy and the media camarilla. It should be recognized, too, that these constituencies are given free rein by the widespread ignorance, complacency or timorousness of those they purport to serve.”

Islamism: An Invented Concept


Indeed, the culture that has sustained us for centuries is being breached, infested, eroded and is ultimately on the verge of being brought down by a primitive horde of invaders who represent its antithesis. They still have a long way to go to approximate the performance of the 18th century Emperor of Morocco Moulay Ismail who, as Lyall Watson recounts in Dark Nature, killed an estimated 30,000 people with his own hands and enjoyed the services of 500 wives. Such exploits may be normally unattainable, fodder for the Guinness Book of Records, but that is no source of consolation.

Regarding the effort by most liberals and some conservatives to lay the blame for Muslim violence on something called “Islamism” rather than Islam, it just won’t wash. The aforementioned Facebooker recently published an op-ed in the National Post in which, pro forma, he flogged the usual stable of spavined horses: distinguishing “Islamism” from Islam; slamming the former Conservative government for the eminently sane proposal to screen the tsunami of Muslims entering Canada; and dating the eruption of “Islamist” violence and Jew-hatred to the 20th century, thus revealing an ignorance of canonical Islam and Islamic history as vast as the desert from which it emerged.

Not content with resting on his juniper bush, he proceeds to argue on behalf of “the world’s democratic, liberal, reformist and otherwise moderate Muslim majority”—which from what I have seen over the last decade must live on some other planet in the distant reaches of the galaxy, perhaps the same planet the author lives on. But the real kicker is his assertion that the “Islamist” vanguard “sets its mission as doing what Muhammad did,” following the words and example of the universally revered founder of the religion. Perhaps this is just another of his characteristic misformulations, but it destroys his thesis rather dramatically. The conclusion to be drawn here is that pro-Muslim advocacy in whatever form is inherently fatuous and incoherent.

“Islamism” is an invented concept, like “Islamophobia” (a synonym for a fictitious “hate crime”). It is meant to make Islam palatable, in the same way “Islamophobia” is meant to marginalize and discredit those who know it is not. The term “Islamism” resembles in an obverse way the sort of homiletic pieties one notes on “brainy quote” plaques affixed above urinals in public rest stops, something meant to make us feel good about something else. We may be relieving ourselves, with or without difficulty, but we learn that nature is beautiful and friendship is a blessing.

“Islamism” is merely a word minted to obscure the truth of Islam as a theo-political ideology camouflaging its claim to world domination under the cloak of religious observances and domestic cultural practices, that is, the jihad of the spirit as cover for the jihad of eternal warfare. As Ayaan Hirsi Ali states—and she should know—“Islam is not a religion of peace. It’s a political theory of conquest that seeks domination by any means it can.” Public affairs consultant J. Robert Smith concurs: “The religion of bloody conquest will keep doing what it was built to do by Mohammed centuries before.” Muslim scholars like the respected Tawfik Hamid, who in his recent Inside Jihad labors to rescue Islam from the jihadist “distortion of the Quran,” are beating a dead camel. Hamid’s core assumption in his effort to “refute the violent edicts of Sharia” is conceptually illegitimate, for it rests on the intrinsic salience or presumed sufficiency of mere interpretation, as if the edicts in question were not what they plainly are but are in need of interpretation, or re-interpretation, as if Kill the Infidel consistently repeated in one form or another were not the explicit, non-interpretable command that it is.

More here


Totally irrelevant and a complete waste of time.

There’s only pre- and post-hijra Islam, with the latter superseding the former.

not in my name

I suggest that any interested party wanting to come to terms with the actual reality of Islam and Muslims in general, read these two pieces, one by Prof. Mordechai Kedar, the other by Prof.Bill Warner.

There is no “radical Islam” and there is also no “moderate Islam”

There is also just one Sharia that includes everything, from the radical cutting off of a thief’s hands to the unquestionably moderate admonition to care for the poor and indigent.

That being the case, there is no “moderate Islam” and no “radical Islam”, just one Islam that incorporates both terms, ranging from extreme radicalism to extreme moderation. In practice, we see people with different cultures, some of them extremists and some moderates, all finding verses, ideas, precedents and laws that support their views on life and society in the same Qu’ran, Hadith, Sura and Sharia. The radical Muslim chooses to quote sources that support his extremist approach, while the moderate Muslim finds sources to buttress his moderate approach.


Statistical Islam Part 5 of 9 – Abrogation and Dualism Dec. 3, 2010

Case 4: Abrogation and Dualism

Not only are there two Korans, Meccan and Medinan, that are different in tone and subject matter, but also the Koran has many verses that contradict each other.

Koran 2:219 says that Muslims should be tolerant and forgiving to People of the Book.
Koran 9:29 says to attack the People of the Book until they pay the jizyah, the dhimmi tax, submit to Sharia law and be humbled.

Which verse shows the true nature of Islam?

NOTE: Drop a line in the comments on your thoughts.


You can rest assured that the taqiyya spewing imam Ibn Bayyah was not relating any of this to his ignoramus Finnish “friends” while visiting Helsinki today, in fact, it was quite the opposite

sheik bin ballah kicked out

There is only Islam. There is but the “pre” and “post” hijra text of Islam, (which you’ll discover by reading the koran chronologically) with the latter superseding the former according to the doctrine of abrogation.

An Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood supporter

There is no “radical Islam” and there is also no “moderate Islam”

The two expressions were coined by those who think that the real Islam is the moderate one and that the radicals hijacked it.

Published: Thursday, November 12, 2015 10:47 AM

Dr. Mordechai Kedar is a senior lecturer in the Department of Arabic at…

Beginning more or less with 9/11, the expression “radical Islam” became the accepted way for the media, politicians and public to define the religious and ideological foundations of Islam-based violence when referring to what the world calls “terror.” This expression was meant to be contrasted with “moderate Islam” which presents Muslims as ordinary people who wish to live in peace with all of mankind – Christians, Jews, Buddhists, unbelievers and the rest of us. The world created the image of two Islams, one radical and impossible to live with, and one moderate and “just like us.”

This differentiation between “radical” and “moderate” Islam is what gave rise to the claim that Islam had been “hijacked” by the radicals, implying that the real and original Islam is the moderate, not the false, radical one.

This is what allows today’s Europe to relate positively to the wave of mostly-Muslim illegal immigrants washing up on its shores – they represent “moderate Islam” and all they want is to live in peace and harmony with their European neighbors.

Permit me to raise some doubts concerning the psychological mindset that claims the existence of two types of Islam. In order to do this, let us clarify an important point: Islam is a text-based framework of ideas and behaviors, covering religion, culture, strictures, politics, law and economics. It is an all-embracing way of life. The most basic text is the Qu’ran, followed by the Hadith (oral law) and the Sura – biography – of Muhammad. The Sharia, Muslim law, is a system of binding laws and injunctions that Muslims are obliged to obey.

There are no two Islams, no moderate one and no radical one, there is just one Qu’ran that includes everything: verses on Jihad and all out war against unbelievers along with verses that speak of recognizing the “other” and living beside him.

There are no two types of hadith, one radical and the other moderate; there is just one body of hadith that includes everything, both violent and moderate ideas.

Muhammad does not have a moderate biography and a radical one; there is only one life story of the prophet of Islam and it has stories that express a radical, violent approach and others presenting a moderate one.

There is also just one Sharia that includes everything, from the radical cutting off of a thief’s hands to the unquestionably moderate admonition to care for the poor and indigent.

That being the case, there is no “moderate Islam” and no “radical Islam”, just one Islam that incorporates both terms, ranging from extreme radicalism to extreme moderation. In practice, we see people with different cultures, some of them extremists and some moderates, all finding verses, ideas, precedents and laws that support their views on life and society in the same Qu’ran, Hadith, Sura and Sharia. The radical Muslim chooses to quote sources that support his extremist approach, while the moderate Muslim finds sources to buttress his moderate approach.

Continue Reading →


Imam in Finland Anas Hajjari is a lying sack of crap…….

Anas Hajjar imaami IMG_2015_00426334

Former CIA informant weighs in, pay specific attention at the 3.30 mark…

Then there’s this lying shiite, Abbas Bahmanpour, who refuses to condemn sharia law’s edict on killing homosexuals. Here he is at YLE laying yet another steaming pile for the Finns to smear themselves in.

YLE: Interfaith, anti-violence demonstration in Helsinki

One of the demonstrators, Abbas Bahmanpour who is Imam of the Helsinki-based Islamic community Resalat, said that he thinks the demonstration’s tone fit the situation at hand.

“I think this is the right way – we should respond with love and unity and not with anger and suspicion. Because that’s what a terrorist organisation like Islamic State wants. They want to create discord and want to break our European ties,” Bahmanpour said.  YLE

Islam has no European ties you taqiyya artist, at least not the Europe of the Enlightenment. Also, Islam is a terrorist ideology the day mohamed left Mecca for Medina (Yathrib, the former Jewish town that mohamed decimated). Every aspect of the koran (chronologically) is full of verses glorifying and promoting terror and subjugation, it is these verses that abrogate the former (from the Meccan period).

You would like nothing better than for Europe to go full throated Islamic, thereby repeating Islamic history and misery in our societies. So go spread your Iranian honey laced bile back in your home country and leave us alone. You Jerk.

NOTE: Any Finn doubting my words, especially those in the fake media at YLE (that actually read this blog) take a copy of Sam Solomon’s “Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding“, read it for yourself, and then ask these hucksters what they think of it.


This is what I’ve been saying for years, it’s the inconvenient truth that stops all conversations on “reforming Islam”, or “Islam needs an enlightenment of its own”:

“With the benefit of hindsight, Muslims know where any enlightenment will lead, and will therefore …..reject it.”

islam rejects enlightenment

h/t:  Retweeted 


Like fish in a barrell.

Bataclan: ‘They were just shooting at the crowd’

Bataclan: 'They were just shooting at the crowd'

Photo: Miguel Medina/AFP.

Published: 14 Nov 2015 02:41 GMT+01:00

“We were in the main concert hall and had just finished watching the support band. We heard this noise behind us, but no one really thought much of it, at first. We never thought for one moment it was a terror attack,” Paul told The Local.
“They came in through the front door and just began shooting at the crowd, shooting at everyone like crazy.
Outside the Bataclan cafe, near the Bataclan concert hall. Photo: Martin Bureau. 

“I heard them shout something like, ‘This is for Syria’ and ‘This is for Iraq’. There were three of them. They were shouting at people not to move and if they did, they just shot them. They would shoot whenever a mobile telephone went off.

“There were people lying on the floor. There was blood everywhere. A man next to me was shot and he fell to floor. The friend I was with got some kind of shrapnel wound in her hip.

“I was watching what was was happening and just thought ‘I’m going to die’. The three gunmen then went up on to the balcony above the main hall and at that point we just thought, we have to move now. We ran out and I just remember seeing the police outside.

“I got outside and I was just happy to be out. I don’t remember what I saw, just lots of injured people. We got the Metro away from the area, but police advised us to go back to the Bataclan because we might have had some useful information.

“We are in shock. Total shock.”

Emergency workers help an injured man near the Bataclan concert hall. Photo: Miguel Medina.

More here