Wafa Sultan at LA ”can islam coexist with western civilization” conference……
They hate us regardless of what we do, or don’t do, it’s just because we aren’t like them, nor do we want to be.
The fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam.
H/T: Brian John Thomas:
“This should be required reading. Hamas is no different from ISIS. They hate us because we are not Muslim. They hate us because we permit things that Allah has forbidden (like bikinis or allowing people born LGBTQ to live, simple stuff).
They hate us. The problem is not us or anything we do, the problem is their hatred. Solve that, solve everything. If you’re not solving THEIR hatred of us, you’re solving nothing.”
Excerpt from pages 30-33
Shortly following the blessed attack on a sodomite, Crusader nightclub by the mujahid Omar Mateen, American politicians were quick to jump into the spotlight and denounce the shooting, declaring it a hate crime, an act of terrorism, and an act of senseless violence. A hate crime? Yes. Muslims undoubtedly hate liberalist sodomites, as does anyone else with any shred of their trah (inborn human nature) still intact. An act of terrorism? Most definitely. Muslims have been commanded to terrorize the disbelieving enemies of Allah. But an act of senseless violence?
One would think that the average Westerner, by now, would have abandoned the tired claim that the actions of the mujahidin – who have repeatedly stated their goals, intentions, and motivations – don’t make sense. Unless you truly – and naively – believe that the crimes of the West against Islam and the Muslims, whether insulting the Prophet g, burning the Quran, or waging war against the Caliphate, won’t prompt brutal retaliation from the mujahidin, you know full well that the likes of the attacks carried out by Omar Mateen, Larossi Aballa, and many others before and after them in revenge for Islam and the Muslims make complete sense. e only thing senseless would be for there to be no violent, fierce retaliation in the first place!
Many Westerners, however, are already aware that claiming the attacks of the mujahidin to be senseless and questioning incessantly as to why we hate the West and why we fight them is nothing more than a political act and a propaganda tool. e politicians will say it regardless of how much it stands in opposition to facts and common sense just to garner as many votes as they can for the next election cycle. e analysts and journalists will say it in order to keep themselves from becoming a target for saying something
that the masses deem to be “politically incorrect.” The apostate “imams” in the West will adhere to the same tired cliché in order to avoid a backlash from the dis- believing societies in which they’ve chosen to reside. The point is, people know that it’s foolish, but they keep repeating it regardless because they’re afraid of the consequences of deviating from the script.
There are exceptions among the disbelievers, no doubt, people who will unabashedly declare that jihad and the laws of the Shari’ah – as well as everything else deemed taboo by the Islam-is-a-peaceful-religion crowd – are in fact completely Islamic, but they tend to be people with far less credibility who are painted as a social fringe, so their voices are dismissed and a large segment of the ignorant masses continues believing the false narrative. As such, it becomes important for us to clarify to the West in unequivocal terms – yet again – why we hate you and why we fight you.
1. We hate you, rst and foremost, because you are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah – whether you realize it or not – by making partners for Him in worship, you blaspheme against Him, claiming that He has a son, you fabricate lies against His prophets and messengers, and you indulge in all manner of devilish practices. It is for this reason that we were commanded to openly declare our hatred for you and our enmity towards you. “ ere has already been for you an excellent example in Abraham and
those with him, when they said to their people, ‘In- deed, we are disassociated from you and from whate- ver you worship other than Allah. We have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone’” (Al-Mumtahanah 4). Furthermore, just as your dis- belief is the primary reason we hate you, your dis- belief is the primary reason we fight you, as we have been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming Muslims, or by paying jizyah – for those afforded this option – and living in humiliation under the rule of the Muslims.
Thus, even if you were to stop fighting us, your best-case scenario in a state of war would be that we would suspend our attacks against you – if we deemed it necessary – in order to focus on the closer and more immediate threats, before eventually resuming our campaigns against you. Apart from the option of a temporary truce, this is the only likely scenario that would bring you fleeting respite from our attacks. So in the end, you cannot bring an indefinite halt to our war against you. At most, you could only delay it temporarily. “And fight them until there is no fitnah [paganism] and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Al- lah” (Al-Baqarah 193).
2. We hate you because your secular, liberal so- cieties permit the very things that Allah has prohibi- ted while banning many of the things He has permit- ted, a matter that doesn’t concern you because you separate between religion and state, thereby granting supreme authority to your whims and desires via the legislators you vote into power. In doing so, you desire to rob Allah of His right to be obeyed and you wish to usurp that right for yourselves. “Legislation is not but for Allah” (Yusuf 40). Your secular liberalism has led you to tolerate and even support “gay rights,” to allow alcohol, drugs, fornication, gambling, and usury to become widespread, and to encourage the people to mock those who denounce these lthy sins and vices. As such, we wage war against you to stop you from spreading your disbelief and debauchery – your secu- larism and nationalism, your perverted liberal values, your Christianity and atheism – and all the depravity and corruption they entail. You’ve made it your mis- sion to “liberate” Muslim societies; we’ve made it our mission to ght o your in uence and protect man- kind from your misguided concepts and your deviant way of life.
3. In the case of the atheist fringe, we hate you and wage war against you because you disbelieve in the existence of your Lord and Creator. You witness the extraordinarily complex makeup of created beings, and the astonishing and inexplicably precise physical laws that govern the entire universe, but insist that they all came about through randomness and that one should be faulted, mocked, and ostracized for recognizing that the astonishing signs we witness day after day are the creation of the Wise, All-Knowing Creator and not the result of accidental occurrence. “Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]?” (At- Tur 35). Your disbelief in your Creator further leads you to deny the Day of Judgment, claiming that “you only live once.” “ ose who disbelieve have claimed that they will ne- ver be resurrected. Say, ‘Yes, by my Lord, you will surely be resurrected; then you will surely be informed of what you did. And that, for Allah, is easy’” (At-Taghabun 7).
4. We hate you for your crimes against Islam and wage war against you to punish you
for your transgressions against our religion. As long as your subjects continue to mock our faith, insult the prophets of Allah – including Noah, Abraham, Mo- ses, Jesus, and Muhammad – burn the Quran, and openly vilify the laws of the Shari’ah, we will continue to retaliate, not with slogans and placards, but with bullets and knives.
5. We hate you for your crimes against the Muslims; your drones and fighter jets bomb, kill, and maim our people around the world, and your puppets in the usurped lands of the Muslims oppress, torture, and wage war against anyone who calls to the truth. As such, we ght you to stop you from killing our men, women, and children, to liberate those of them whom you imprison and torture, and to take revenge for the countless Muslims who’ve suffered as a result of your deeds.
6. We hate you for invading our lands and fight you to repel you and drive you out. As long as there is an inch of territory left for us to reclaim, jihad will continue to be a personal obligation on every single Muslim.
What’s important to understand here is that although some might argue that your foreign policies are the extent of what drives our hatred, this particular reason for hating you is secondary, hence the reason we addressed it at the end of the above list. Te fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you. No doubt, we would stop fighting you then as we would stop fighting any disbelievers who enter into a covenant with us, but we would not stop hating you
What’s important to understand here is that although some might argue that your foreign policies are the extent of what drives our hatred, this particular reason for hating you is secondary, hence the reason we addressed it at the end of the above list. The fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you. No doubt, we would stop fighting you then as we would stop fighting any disbelievers who enter into a covenant with us, but we would not stop hating you.
What’s equally if not more important to understand is that we fight you, not simply to punish and deter you, but to bring you true freedom in this life and salvation in the Hereafter, freedom from being enslaved to your whims and desires as well as those of your clergy and legislatures, and salvation by worshipping your Creator alone and following His messenger. We fight you in order to bring you out from the darkness of disbelief and into the light of Islam, and to liberate you from the constraints of living for the sake of the worldly life alone so that you may enjoy both the blessings of the worldly life and the bliss of the Hereafter.
The gist of the matter is that there is indeed a rhyme to our terrorism, warfare, ruthlessness, and brutality. As much as some liberal journalist would like you to believe that we do what we do because we’re simply monsters with no logic behind our course of action, the fact is that we continue to wage – and escalate – a calculated war that the West thought it had ended several years ago. We continue dragging you further and further into a swamp you thought you’d already escaped only to realize that you’re stuck even deeper within its murky waters…
And we do so while offering you a way out on our terms. So you can continue to believe that those “despicable terrorists” hate you because of your lattes and your Timberlands, and continue spending ridiculous amounts of money to try to prevail in an unwinnable war, or you can accept reality and recognize that we will never stop hating you until you embrace Islam, and will never stop fighting you until you’re ready to leave the swamp of warfare and terrorism through the exits we provide, the very exits put forth by our Lord for the People of the Scripture: Islam, jizyah, or – as a last means of fleeting respite – a temporary truce.
It’s Islam, that’s the reason for jihad, full stop…..
A new study based on interviews conducted over social media with foreign fighters in Iraq and Syria raises doubts about the commonly held notion that young men in North America and Europe who are drawn to violent Islamic extremism must be marginalized loners looking for an alternative to their dead-end lives.
Three university researchers who contacted dozens of jihadists from abroad in Iraq and Syria, including some Canadians, say they seemed to be drawn mainly by the religious ideas—“no matter how ill-informed or unorthodox”—behind jihadism. Rather than being isolated individuals who self-radicalized in front of their computer screens, the report says they usually found mentors and, at least in the case of the Canadians, joined the fighting in “clusters.”
In the working paper entitled Talking to Foreign Fighters: Socio-Economic Push versus Existential Pull Factors, the researchers caution against assuming that radical Islam appeals only young men on the edges of society, those without good job prospects or supportive family and friends.
They suggest previous academic studies have put too much weight on those “push” factors—the problems and frustrations in the lives of young men who turn to extremist Islam and, ultimately, terrorist violence. “Based on what we are hearing in interviews with foreign fighters—more interviews than anyone has yet to report on—we think more attention and significance should be given to the repeated affirmations of the positive benefits of being jihadists,” they say.
More here. H/T: Nicolai Sennels
As predicted almost two years ago………
Passports solicited by Islamic State have been found in Greek refugee camps
The international investigation stretched around the world, with police monitoring events in Syria, Iraq, Greece and Austria in an attempt to find out where the documents were being used to breach borders.
At least two of the perpetrators of November’s terror attacks in Paris re-entered Europe from Syria posing as refugees and travelling on false Syrian documents.
Italian newspaper La Stampa claims ISIS-inspired terrorists are currently trying to make their way to Austria, via Greece, giving themselves a European base from which to carry out deadly attacks.
Following the conduct code of their prophet mohamed……
The decision by the country’s constitutional court removes a key legal provision
The decision by the country’s constitutional court removes a legal provision that all sexual acts against children under the age of 15 are “sexual abuse”.
Children aged 12, 13 and 14 will no longer receive automatic protection as a minor, according to the ruling, but will be expected to offer or decline consent in sexual activity.
Experts say this is a green light for sex with “consenting” minors as young as 12.
Women’s rights activists have also voiced concern it would lead to cases of child abuses going unpunished.
However, supporters of the new ruling, which was made following an application by a local court, will lead to tougher sentences for child abusers.
The new legal status, which will be enforced from January next year is based on the court’s judgement that a 15-year old’s mental capacity is similar to that of a 12-year-old.
Islam expert Professor Bill Warner has spoken on this subject before, here is another well written piece on the subject.
Islam and the Decalogue
I first noticed something unusual about Islam during the 1980s when I was doing research for my book, Ethics in Context. I devoted one section of the book to the “Golden Rule.” The Golden Rule, in its negative or positive formulations, is incorporated not only in Christianity (Matt. 7:12), where Jesus declares it is a summary of “the law and the prophets,” but also in other major religions. For example, in Judaism, “What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor”; in Hinduism, “Let no man do to another that which would be repugnant to himself”’; in Buddhism, “Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful”; in Confucianism, “What you do not want done to yourself, do not do unto others.”
I took this as evidence of the relative universality of rational ethical principles in the world. But in Islam, I could find nothing of the sort, rather just the opposite – a reverse Golden Rule, so to speak: “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. Be merciful to one another, but ruthless to the unbelievers” (Qur’an 48:29); “Never take unbelievers for friends” (3:28). Furthermore, the commands in the Qur’an to slay the unbelievers wherever they find them (2:191), not befriend them (3:28), fight them and show them harshness (9:123), and smite their heads (47:4) – accentuate distance from the Golden Rule.
So I decided at that time just to omit any reference to Islam in that chapter. As I have discovered in further researches, however, the ethical/religious problems within Islam are even more serious. Just as Islam teaches the reverse of the Golden Rule, it teaches the reverse of the last seven of the Ten Commandments, which have to do with morality:
- 4 th Commandment, Honoring Father and Mother: Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam states that retaliation is generally required for murder, but not subject to retaliation is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” Honor killings can go in the other direction, too. Boys captured by ISIS report that they were ordered to kill their parents, according to injunctions in the Qur’an – Suras 9:23, 58:22, 60:4, which mandate complete hatred of, and disassociation from unbelievers, even if they are kindred or parents.
- 5th Commandment, no killing: Muhammad is considered by Muslims to be the“perfect man”, and offered numerous examples of murder for devout Muslims to follow – beginning with the murder of poets who ridiculed him in Medina and Mecca, and ending with beheading of hundreds of “unbelievers” in his various raids and battles. Osama bin Laden, in his 1996 “Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” justified his Fatwa to kill Americans by quoting Quranic verses 3:145, 47:4-6, 2:154, 9:14, 8:72, and 9:5 (the “verse of the sword”). Terrorism is specifically supported in verses 8:12, and 3:151, and a hadith of Bukhari 52:256. And conversion from Islam to another religion is punishable by execution, according to Bukhari 9.84.57, “[Muhammad ordered] ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him’.”
Background Discussion Of The Cover Design By Bosch Fawstin For My Forthcoming Book, “Koranic Jew-Hatred”
“And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.”—Koran 33:26, Hilali-Khan translation 
“And He brought down those of the People of the Book who supported them from their fortresses and cast terror in their hearts; some you slew, some you made captive.”—Koran 33:26, Arberry translation 
Friday, October 9, 2015, brandishing a knife, Gaza cleric Sheikh Muhammad Sallah “Abu Rajab”’s sermon at the Al-Abrar Mosque in Rafah, explicitly fomented  murderous knifing attacks on Israeli Jews as sanctioned by Muhammad’s actions towards the Jews of the Khaybar oasis, and the Medinan Jewish tribe, Banu Qurayza . “Abu Rajab” further invoked  the murderous verdict, and even ghost-like spirit, of Muhammad’s vindictive “arbiter” against the Qurayza, Sa’d b. Mu’adh .
The soldiers of the Prophet Muhammad are here. Brothers, this is why we recall today what Allah did to the Jews. We recall what He did to them in Khaybar….Now, we are imposing a curfew with daggers, and in the next phase, which is Allah willing, about to be realized… We shall not send you back to Russia, Bulgaria, the Ukraine, or Poland. We shall not send you back there. You have come here… The Islamic military court has ruled… This court, presided over by the Prophet’s Companion Sad Ibn Mu’adh, has ruled… Sa’d Ibn Mu’adh has reappeared – in the West Bank. Sa’d Ibn Mu’adh is now in the streets of Jerusalem, Afula, Tel Aviv, and the Negev. The Islamic military court has made the divined ruling: You will get nothing in our land except for slaughtering or stabbing. Why? The world will say that we are terrorists, that we incite. Yes! “Oh Prophet, sufficient for you and for whoever follows you of the believers is Allah. Oh Prophet of Allah, incite the believers to fight.” Oh people of Al-Abrar Mosque and the people of Rafah – from this mosque of yours, you have the honor of delivering these messages to the men of the West Bank: Form stabbing quads. We don’t want just a single stabber. Oh young men of the West Bank: Attack in threes and fours. Some should restrain the victim, while others attack him with axes and butcher knives.[…]Do not fear what will be said about you. Oh men of the West Bank, next time, attack in a group of three, four, or five. Attack them in groups. Cut them into body parts.
Mohamed the murderous warlord would have approved…….
Teenage girl accused of ‘premarital sex’ with fiancé stoned to death by Taliban
The girl was said to have fled with her 23-year-old fiancé to get married against their parents’ wishes.
A teenage girl accused of having sex before marriage is brutally stoned to death by barbaric Taliban fighters in sickening footage posted online.
The distressed girl, identified only as Rokhshana aged 19, screams out as she is thrown into a narrow hole so she cannot escape.
Some of the men begin to throw small stones at her as the poor youngster’s cries for mercy are ignored.
The missiles get larger and heavy boulders are launched at the pit.
At least a dozen people can be seen watching the brutal murder, some even recording the horrific ‘punishment’ on their mobile phones.
Rokhshana was accused of having premarital sex with her 23-year-old fiancé Mohammad Gal.
He was reportedly lashed but escaped the death penalty.
Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty said local official Mohammad Zaman Azimi blamed Taliban militants for the execution.
Azimi added that the stoning took place in the village of Ghalmin on the outskirts of Firoz Koh, the provincial capital, in Afghanistan.
The couple had allegedly fled their families in a bid to find a place to get married.
But unmarried girls in Afghanistan are often restricted to their homes and banned from having contact with men outside their immediate families.
Brutal punishments often await Afghan women and girls who break the social norm.
Afghan officials often blame the Taliban for such punishments.
This is how islamic norms becomes the norm in a once normal society…..
Shocked French mayor wants to ban ‘burqini’ pool party
Published: 04 Aug 2016 09:51 GMT+02:00
- French blast brands behind Islamic ‘burqinis’ (30 Mar 16)
The Speed Water Park near Marseille, a city home to around 220,000 Muslims, has been reserved for the private event on September 10th, between 10am and 6pm.
Smile 13, which presents itself as a sports and social group for women and children wrote on a poster that during the eight-hour period the pool is “exclusively for women and children, and for boys up to the age of ten.”
And the women have been encouraged to comply with Islamic rules demanding Muslim women dress modestly and do not turn up in bikinis.
“We count on you to respect the AWRA (the body parts that must be covered according to Islamic law) and not come in a two piece (the body must be covered from the chest to the knees),” reads the message on the poster.
I couldn’t put it any plainer……
The Islamic State terror group has come out publicly to reject Pope Francis’ claims that the war being waged by Islamic terrorists is not religious in nature, assuring the pontiff that their sole motivation is religious and sanctioned by Allah in the Qur’an.
The Islamic State terror group has come out publicly to reject Pope Francis’ claims that the war being waged by Islamic terrorists is not religious in nature, assuring the pontiff that their sole motivation is religious and sanctioned by Allah in the Qur’an.
In the most recent issue of Dabiq, the propaganda magazine of the Islamic State, ISIS criticizes Pope Francis for his naïveté in clinging to the conviction that Muslims want peace and that acts of Islamic terror are economically motivated.
“This is a divinely-warranted war between the Muslim nation and the nations of disbelief,” the authors state in an article titled “By the Sword.”
The Islamic State directly attacks Francis for claiming that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Quran are opposed to every form of violence,” saying that by doing this, “Francis continues to hide behind a deceptive veil of ‘good will,’ covering his actual intentions of pacifying the Muslim nation.”
Pope Francis “has struggled against reality” in his efforts to portray Islam as a religion of peace, the article insists, before going on to urge all Muslims to take up the sword of jihad, the “greatest obligation” of a true Muslim.
The Italian Interior Ministry had a imam, described as “increasingly anti-Western” and “radical” back to Morocco in less than a day.
Radicalized imam expelled
A Moroccan imam of 51 years, Mohammed Madad, living up to 6 months ago in Reggiano and recently in the Vicenza, was expelled on decision of the Minister of the Interior for reasons of public order and state security. It was followed by time by the Digos of Reggio Emilia Police for his radical attitude, and lately his sermons in Noventa Vicentina had taken on an increasingly anti-Western profile. The suspicion is that it could also facilitate international terrorism.
The investigation that led to the expulsion of Imam Noventa Vicentina also collaborated Vicenza police. Madad was taken yesterday from the house, and was boarded at 22.40 on a flight departing from Fiumicino and direct in Morocco. Precisely because of his suspected dangerousness the prohibition to return to Italy has been inflicted for the next 15 years. The charge for the Salafi imam of the matrix is to be a supporter of radical Islam. The man was a few months at the helm of the Center of Prayer and Islamic culture in Noventa Vicentina, where he had arrived late last year from Carpineti, Apennines Reggiano. In Reggio Emilia, followed a religious community in the village of Gatta. Once transferred in the Vicenza, police investigations – which had been reported by colleagues reggiani – they have noted the gradual radicalization of the Imam, whose sermons have become increasingly anti-Western and violent, aimed also to the indoctrination of the community’s children. Madad – who before becoming exclusively iman had the worker in a food company and then had unsuccessfully attempted to open an Islamic butcher – among other things, in exchange for money, was also of the ‘magic rituals assumptions’.
YET MORE MUSLIMS ARE MURDERED BY OTHER MUSLIMS THAN BY ANYONE ELSE…..
‘You Christians, you kill us’: Nun reveals words of ISIS knifemen who forced elderly priest, 84, to kneel at altar as they slit his throat on camera after invading Mass – before police shot them
One of the ISIS gunmen who brutally slaughtered an 84-year-old priest in the French town of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray near Rouen in Normandy has been named as 19-year-old Adel Kermiche (centre). Kermiche, who was known to police as a terror threat, stormed the church with an accomplice and filmed themselves slitting the throat of elderly priest Jacques Hamel (left). Both attackers were shot dead after they emerged from the church shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’. Kermiche had twice been arrested for attempting to flee France to join ISIS in Syria, and had spent time in prison in both France and Switzerland. After being released early, he was supposed to be living with his parents in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray and being monitored with an electronic tag. But under his bail conditions he was allowed to roam unsupervised between 8.30am and 12.30pm – leaving him free to slaughter the unsuspecting priest during the attack, carried out between 9am and 11am.
That’s far more than what Obama and a host of other simpleton leaders would have said…
France Is at War, Officials Say After Terrorist Attack in Nice Kills at Least 84
KYIV, Ukraine—At 3:45 a.m. Friday, just hours after a man drove a large truck through a crowd in the French seaside town of Nice, killing at least 84, French President François Hollande made a televised address to the nation.
He began by making it clear the attack at the close of Bastille Day, France’s Independence Day, was an act of Islamist terrorism.
“All of France is under threat from Islamist terrorism,” Hollande said from the Elysée Palace in Paris. “This attack, of which the terrorist nature cannot be denied, is once again of an absolute violence, and it is clear that we must do everything to fight the scourge of terrorism.”
The supposed ”un-islamic” tunisian jihadi followed I.S. instructions to the letter.
Islamic State terror chief told supporters to run over ‘filthy French disbelievers’ with their cars two years before Nice attack
Abu Mohammed al-Adnani, pictured, urged ISIS sympathisers to kill the ‘filthy French’ anyway they could, including by running over them with vehicles
- ISIS chief Abu Mohammed al-Adnani urged people to attack ‘filthy French’
- In 2014 he told jihadists to ‘smash his head or run him over with your car’
- ISIS have not yet claimed responsibility for last night’s attack in Nice
An ISIS leader predicted the attack in Nice two years ago when he urged jihadists to run over the ‘filthy French disbelievers’ in their cars.
ISIS has not claimed responsibility yet for last night’s attack in Nice but it is widely believed that the driver of the lorry which ploughed into crowds celebrating Bastille Day, killing 84 people and injuring scores more, was a jihadist.
Abu Mohammed al-Adnani released a statement in September 2014 in which he urged ISIS sympathisers to carry out attacks on ‘disbelieving’ Westerners.
He said: ‘If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way, however it may be.’
He went on: ‘Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him.’
In January this year it was reported that al-Adnani, the terrorist movement’s chief spokesman in Iraq, had been severely injured in an airstrike.
Authorities investigate a truck after it ploughed into crowds in Nice, killing 84 people
He shouted allah akbar before being shot….
Doesn’t matter how infidel the muslim, according to Islam, waging jihad and dying in the action delivers his soul to allah. The 9/11 terrorist islamonazis drank booze and whored around before their last act of jihad.
It’s why those who deal out capital punishment to homosexuals and other offenders of Islamic law believe they’re being ”compassionate”, the ending of one’s own life in blood absolves the offender of his sins. The media will hype the ”non-Islamic” nature of this bastard to show that this wasn’t an act of jihad….when the facts speak other wise.
EXCLUSIVE – ‘He drank alcohol, ate pork and took drugs. He was NOT a Muslim – he was a s***’: Truck terrorist’s cousin reveals he is an ‘unlikely jihadist’ who beat his wife and NEVER went to the mosque
- Truck terrorist who murdered 84 people in a horrific drive along the Nice seafront drank alcohol, ate pork and took drugs – all banned by Islam
- A cousin of his estranged wife said ‘he was not a Muslim, he was a s***’
- Revealed he didn’t go to the mosque and didn’t pray or observe Ramadan
- The couple had separated after reports of domestic abuse two years ago
- Detectives raided the family home in Nice and took his wife into protective custody
Truck terrorist Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel was an ‘unlikely jihadist’ who flouted every rule of Islam, his cousin told MailOnline today.
The 31-year-old – who wreaked terror on the Nice seafront as he turned an evening celebrating Bastille Day into a night of terror in which he murdered 84 innocent people – drank alcohol, ate pork and took drugs.
He never prayed or attended a mosque, and hit his wife – with whom he had three children aged five, three and 18 months – and was in the process of getting a divorce.
Monster: Truck terrorist Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel who murdered 84 on Bastille Day in Nice, was described by a cousin as a ‘s***’ and a ‘nasty piece of work’ who never observed the rules of Islam