The Alliance of Civilizations, originally based on an Iranian initiative to deal with the “Clash of Civilizations” meme, is holding its 5th anniversary assembly in Vienna, Austria. Top level representatives of both Islamic and democratic countries will be present, discussing how to lead the world in the desired direction.

NOTE: Tundra Tabloids has friends at the event and will be live blogging from the event, starting approximately 9:30 CET (10:30 Finnish/Israeli time). Live blogging will be updated to this post.


Well it looks like the conference’s organizers want full control of the reporting on the events of the day, I’m getting word that there is no internet provided. So the reports will be scant for the time being.

UPDATE: Reports are now coming in.


12: 51: Erdogan, the PM of Turkey is speaking to the conference, rambling on about the need to combat ”Islamophobia”.

13:00: [ NOTE: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff promises an update in an hour ]

13:04: The Emir of Qatar talks of Palestine, vital for him,

13: 05 Henrik R.Clausen: ”responsible leadership” is quite tellingly the moto of the conference. ”Responsible media” and  ”responsible use of free extpression” are repeated by the Emir, as others did. ”Political demagogy” must be countered by new laws.

13:06: End of Emir speech Qatar has as mentioned here, an  influence that stretches far beyond it borders. Well said…..

13:18: AoC has as a top priority the support of the Palestinians against Israel. That has been stressed several times. and implicitly by references to ”fully implement”  the founding document of the AoC

13:25:  ICLA: We are told from people on the ground at the event that the person who introduced the event suggested that they expected more harmony from this forum. Below is a gist of what specific individuals talked about:

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon


Suggested that anti-Muslim sentiment was commonplace. That Muslims are being vilified instead of being embraced. That leaders need to speak the language of tolerance. That the three most important issues that needed to be addressed by all speakers were:

1) The impasse between Israelis and Palestinians
2) The situation in Mali
3) The situation in Syria

Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

ERDOGAN AOC 27.2.2013

Suggested that racist attacks are on the rise. That the magnitude of the threat is threefold:

1) lack of information
2) Intolerance
3) Prejudice – he believes that we can eliminate the threat posed by prejudice. He
mentioned that there are many good examples of people living in harmony and such societies are more successful – however he did not name any of these countries or societies.

He suggested that we witness harsh and insulting behaviour towards Muslims and that this is an unconscionable act. Also that we need to act on prejudices and need to consider Islamophobia as a crime against humanity. He suggested that no religion would ever endorse violence, that Islam is a religion of peace and that the word ‘Islam’ means peace.

On behalf of Turkey he asked whether the UN Security Council represented the whole world and he concluded that it did not. He asked whether it represented all religious groups. He suggested that the fundamental problem is that the Alliance of Civilizations needs to establish and alliance with the Security Council.

13:44: ICLA also adds: “Our prediction of that the Alliance of Civilizations is a pro-sharia front seems to be coming true based on much of what has been reported above.  The focus seems very focused on issues that are seen as important to Islamic countries.  Nothing has been said about the persecution of non-Muslims in the Islamic world.  It seems from what Mr Erdoğan was saying about the Security Council that there should be permanent Islamic representation on that body.  This perhaps is an indication that Islam has political objectives.  It must be remembered that the Security Council is not a religious assembly.”

13:54: Erdogan responds to a question as to whether enough has been done to help the rebel opposition in Syria. Says that Assad will be removed.

14:00: Erdogan just confirmed that Turkey provides Syrian rebels with ”all kinds of support”.

14:04: Many stressed the need to get more funding for AoC.

International Media’s ‘War Crimes’ Slander Against Israel…….

Enough with the war crimes nonsense already

The war crimes meme has been bantered around the Internet and in the traditional news media ever since Israel began Operation Cast Lead, yet there hasn’t been one shred of concrete evidence that any such thing has occurred. Nothing, nada. The Tundra Tabloids recently blogged about the former spokesman for the Finnish Greens’ Osmo Soininvaara, well rest assured that he too spreads the lie of war crimes, without offering nothing in the way of fact to buttress his claims. These people are all fruitcakes, but unfortunately fruitcakes with power.

“War Crimes” Propaganda Against Israel

Most of the American and European media have accused Israel of having committed “war crimes” in its recent “assault” on Gaza, and of waging war indiscriminately on its civilian population. Israel is said to have damaged schools, hospitals, ambulances and mosques and to have inflicted an immense number of deaths and injuries on innocent civilians.

The same accusations have been hurled at Israel by the United Nations, by many of the world’s governments, and by numerous pseudo-do-gooder “Non-governmental organizations” (or “NGOs”), such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. The International Criminal Court in the Hague is considering whether to file war crimes charges against Israeli military and political leaders, and the nations of the European Community are debating amongst themselves whether to support such a move.

But when we probe into the matter a little deeper by looking at the reports of journalists who did some independent investigating, and who interviewed Gaza civilians who agreed to talk with them (anonymously or using nicknames, for fear of Hamas reprisals), we get a completely different picture: Israel took great care to avoid hurting innocent people, while Hamas deliberately tried to cause as many casualties among the Gazan people as possible.

The Lie: Israel waged war on Gaza’s civilian population; it deliberately killed innocent civilians.

The truth: Israel exerted more care than any other country in history to avoid inflicting casualties on civilians, even at considerable cost to the effectiveness of its military operations.

Continue reading here.

Alan Dershowitz has more to say as well:

For the International Criminal Court To Work, The Worst Must Come First

There are efforts now underway to try to bring Israel before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague on charges of alleged war crimes. Neither Israel nor the United States has signed on to this court, primarily out of fear that its power would be used against democracies that try their best to avoid war crimes, rather than against dictatorships and terrorist nations that routinely engage in them. This has certainly been the experience with many United Nations organizations, even including the International Court of Justice, which is largely a sham when it comes to Israel and other democracies under attack.

There has been high hope among some human rights experts that the ICC would be different for two reasons: First and foremost it is not a United Nations court. It was established by the Rome Statute, a treaty adopted in 1998 after years of negotiations, and is largely independent of the United Nations, though not completely so. Cases can be referred to it by the UN Security Council under Article 13(b) of the treaty. The second reason the ICC has encouraged optimism is that the person appointed as the court’s Chief Prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocompo, has a sterling reputation for objective law enforcement and basic fairness.

The ICC has rightly opened up investigations of genocide in Darfur, Sudan,. (It is now under pressure to suspend any prosecution of President Omar al-Bashir). It has not opened investigations with regard to Russia’s alleged war crimes in Chechnya and Georgia, where thousands of innocent civilians were killed. Nor has it opened investigations with regard to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe, the Congo and other places where civilians are routinely targeted as part of military and terrorist campaigns.

Nor — to its credit — has it opened an investigation of Great Britain and the United States, whose armed forces have inadvertently caused the deaths of thousands of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Were it now to open an investigation of Israel, ICC would be violating the cardinal principle that must govern all international prosecutions: namely, that the worst must be prosecuted first. It would also be violating its own rules which mandate that the International Criminal Court will not become a substitute for domestic courts.

If there are processes within the State of Israel to consider allegations against the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), then those processes must be allowed to move forward unless Israel is “unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution,” according to the Rome Statute. There is no country in the world — literally none — that has a judicial system that is more open to charges against its own government. Not the United States, not Great Britain, and certainly not Russia, Zimbabwe or Pakistan! Moreover, Israel has a completely open and very critical free press, which is constantly exposing Israeli imperfections and editorializing against them.

Third, the IDF has legal teams that must approve of every military action taken by the armed forces. There are obviously close questions, about which reasonable experts can disagree, but there is no country in the world that goes to greater lengths in its efforts to conform its military actions to international law. Listen to retired British Colonel Richard Kemp — a military expert who, based on his experience, concluded that there has been “no time in the history of warfare when an Army has made more efforts to reduce civilian casualties…than [the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza].”

Despite deliberate efforts by Hamas to maximize Palestinian civilian casualties by firing rockets from behind human shields, Israel has succeeded in its efforts to minimize civilian casualties. Hamas has a policy of exaggerating civilian casualties, both by inflating the total number of people killed and by reducing the number of its combatants included in that total. A recent study conducted by the Italian Newspaper Corriere della Sera disputed Hamas figures and put the total number of Palestinians killed, including Hamas terrorists, at less than 600. And this week, the UN withdrew claims made during the war that Israel had shelled a school run in Gaza by the UN Relief and Works Agency.

The same Rome Statute that established the ICC also describes many of Hamas’s actions during the war, such as attacking Israeli civilians and using Palestinian civilians as human shields, as war crimes. Any fair investigation by the ICC would have to conclude that Israel’s efforts to prevent civilian casualties, while seeking to protect its civilians from Hamas war crimes, rank it at the very top of nations in compliance with the rule of law. It would also conclude that efforts to brand Israel’s actions as war crimes are crassly political, based on ideology and not law. If anything, Hamas belongs in the dock, not Israel.

One of the most sordid legacies of the Bush administration has been the pressure the Bush White House put on the Justice Department to prosecute its political enemies and give passes to its political allies. The Justice Department, under former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, submitted to that pressure and engaged in a policy of selective investigations and prosecutions.

The prosecutor of the ICC must resist pressures — from the United Nations, from radical ideologues and from other biased sources — to apply a double standard to Israel by singling the Jewish state out from among law-abiding democracies for a war crimes investigation. No international court can retain its credibility if it inverts the principle of “the worst first” and instead goes after one of the best as one its first.

Time for Israel’s detractors to first put up, (initial proof would be nice) or shut the hell up and stop spreading malicious blood libels. KGS