It’s fiction…..

According to a gentleman I know, formerly a high ranking officer in the U.S. military,

THE US IS NOT AT DEFCON 3 – PERIOD. Some in the media reporting on this are biting into a pure propaganda campaign. DEFCON is a defense condition (DEFenseCONdition) relating to the United States posture relating to treats of nuclear war established and maintained by US STRATCOM (United States Strategic Command) and has since then 1950s. Anything and everything about DEFCONs not coming from them is just non-sense. US STRATCOM has not issued a DEFCON 3 status. That is the ONLY measure that matters on this topic.

This article below explains it as a conspiracy, and it is one.

US citizens warned to prepare for NUCLEAR WAR over claims attack warning upgraded

THE US could be edging ever closer to nuclear war with Russia after upgrading its attack defence readiness, it has been claimed.


DEFCON level upgraded for nuclear threatGETTY

DEFCON is an alert system used by the US military

DEFCON is an alert system used by the US military to indicate the current threat of nuclear war.

The system has five states of alert, increasing in severity from DEFCON 5 – the least severe – to DEFCON 1 – the highest level.

Currently, the levels is understood to be at 5.

But conspiracy theorists have warned the threat has secretly been upgraded two levels to DEFCON 3 – meaning the US could mobilise troops in as little as 15 minutes.

More here.



This book review by Dr.Manfred Gerstenfeld was first published in full at the JCPA.

Jewish conspiracy-mural

Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories in Contemporary Germany

Antisemitische Verschwörungstheorien nach dem 11. September (Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories after September 11) by Tobias Jaecker, LIT, 2005, 208 pp. [in German]

Reviewed by Manfred Gerstenfeld

Anti-Semitic conspiracy theories have been around for close to twenty centuries. They blame Jews for many problems for which they bear no responsibility. A well-known example with ancient roots is the Christian claim that Jews in all generations bear the guilt for the death of Jesus. Another is the libel, originating in the Middle Ages, that Jews use the blood of Christian children for ritual purposes. Yet other theories blame Jews for transmitting various plagues, such as the Black Death in the fourteenth century.

In more modern times, the putative conspiracy has been revived in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a Czarist forgery maliciously attributed to the Jews. This hate manifesto remains a bestseller, widely disseminated in the Arab and Muslim world and elsewhere. Another example is the German “dagger-stab” (Dolchstoss) legend, which held the Jews responsible for Germany’s defeat in World War I and was subsequently used by the National Socialists in their murderous anti-Semitic campaigns. Contemporary anti-Semitic phenomena are mainly mutations of core motifs that have been extant for many centuries.

Conspiracy Ideology and Myth

Continue Reading



It’s a very insightful view on Muslim conspiracy theories, which have been over the years, highlighted and exposed here at the Tundra Tabloids for what they are. This interview has been published at Israel National News and republished here with the author’s permission.

How Muslim Conspiracy Theories Affect Jews

Manfred Gerstenfeld interviews Richard Landes 

In this new century, we see a revival of conspiracy theories. Muslim societies are most prominent in the production, circulation and belief in them. The best known conspiracy theory is probably that Americans themselves, or the Mossad, carried out the 9/11 terror attacks and not the jihadist Al Qaida perpetrators. This belief permeates the elites throughout the Muslim world. In quieter times, conspiracy theories remained on the fringe. After World War II, many people thought that Western culture had definitively marginalized them, including that ‘warrant for genocide,’ the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Conspiracy theories coming out of the Muslim world are accompanied by another surprising phenomenon. In the past, conspiracists blamed a malevolent “other” – the Jews, the lepers, the witches, the communists. Now we find Western believers in conspiracy theories which target themselves – for instance on 9/11 – in which they confirm the paranoid accusations of their enemies. Postmodern conspiracy theory’s siren song runs: ‘We’ are to blame, ‘our’ enemy is innocent.”

Professor Richard Landes of Boston University was trained as a Medievalist. He focuses on the interaction between elites and commoners in various societies. He has published many books and maintains several websites including: ‘The Second Drafti and a blog, the ‘Augean Stables.’ii

Landes observes: “In the last millennium of Western and Middle Eastern history, the more fevered the conspiracy theory, the more the Jews play a key role— from blood libels and international plots to global ambitions to enslave mankind. Communities terrified by their impotence in the face of the Black Death blamed the Jews, accusing them of poisoning the wells to kill their neighbors. Conspiracy theories simplify some people’s moral universe: ‘the bad things that happen to us are not our fault but due to the evil of others.’

Conspiracy theories demand and justify extreme action. Anything is permitted when struggling for one’s very existence against some agent plotting to destroy ‘us.’ At their worst, they are ‘warrants for genocide.’iii

The book The Protocols of the Elders of Zion for example, is transparent forgery. If readers are impartial historians can document that.iv But a rational approach has limited impact on believers who argue, as Hitler did, that even if The Protocols is forged, it represents a higher truth.v The Shoah offers the most startling example: perpetrated by people in the grip of mass paranoia, who believed in a giant Jewish conspiracy.

Continue Reading


If president Barack Obama had been more forthcoming about his original birth certificate, actually allowing the public to see it, instead of depending upon the Lefty blogosphere to present a bogus copy of a COLB (certificate of live birth), that indeed, was proved to have been a forgery by a confidante of Pamela Geller’s at Atlas Shrugs, then the there would be no suspicion over Obama’s record of birth whatsoever. Period.
Then there is the fact that, Barack Obama, was born, and raised early on as a Muslim. That is not in question, at all. A mystery however, surrounds his conversion to Christianity, which the president maintains that he is, so there’s no use trying to refute that. But as an apostate from Islam, Obama lacks the fundamental explanation as to why he left Islam, something of which many Muslims are very keen on explaining since the decision is very controversial, and with life threatening consequences.
All of this need not be an issue if the president was open about it, instead of surrounding them with a wall of silence, which is exactly what he has done concerning his records at Harvard. Suggesting his involvment with jihad is of course silly, but people can be excused for jumping to conclusions when the man refuses to condemn an overt attack on a US military base that murdered 13 people as an act of Islamic inspired terrorism.
Obama himself has done much to create the conspiracy theories floating around himself and his presidency, but doesn’t seem too worried in deflating them once and for all, with a complete and open accounting of himself. It shouldn’t be too difficult, since it was he who built the wall of silence and obfuscation, he alone can end it, which he should. KGS

Anti-Obama billboard stirs controversy

WHEAT RIDGE, Colo. – Call it Freedom of Speech. A billboard recently erected in Wheat Ridge compares President Barack Obama to a terrorist and questions his U.S. citizenship.
The billboard, located at 4855 Miller Road, shows two cartoonish images of Obama wearing a Muslim turban and reads “PRESIDENT or JIHAD?”
It also says “BIRTH CERTIFICATE – PROVE IT!” alluding to the conspiracy theory which claims Barack Obama was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii, which would disqualify him for the office of President.
The words “WAKE UP AMERICA! REMEMBER FT. HOOD!” appear on the bottom of the billboard.
The sign belongs to a car dealership.
“Since Fort Hood, I’ve had it,” owner Phil West told FOX 31 News Friday. “You can’t suggest things. You can’t profile. You gotta call a spade a spade.”
“Everything I have read about Mr. Obama points right to the fact that he is a Muslim. And that is the agenda of what Muslim is all about. It’s about anti-American, it’s about anti-Christianity,” West said.
The Anti-Defamation League condemned the sign, as did AM760 radio host David Sirota, who discussed the sign and interviewed West on his program Friday morning.
“It’s out of control,” Sirota said. “This conservative hatred of Barack Obama is out of contol, and this brings together all those strands of it: the racism, the anti-Muslim fervor. It’s one thing to criticise the president on health care, or Wall Street reform, or immigration. But this is outrageous. And I think it’s a fair question to ask why these questions about religion and ancestry are being directed so viciously at the first African-American President of the United States.”

NOTE: Obama’s 20 year involvement in a racist black sepratist pseudo Christian church in Chicago doesn’t help the matter either.

Obama Advisor Believes in the Anti-Israel USS Liberty Conspiracy Theory…….

Another of B.Hussein’s advisors
 who loves sticking it to Israel
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
It’s the Jews Obama, it’s the Jews….
The kind of people president Obama staffs his administration with, should tell us greatly about the man himself. While it’s healthy for the president to entertain diverse opinion from a select panel of advisors, what the Tundra Tabloids fails to understand however, is why he seeks advice from a man who believes in conspiracy theories, especially when they involve the only ally the US has in the Middle East region?

I read about this incident early this morning, and am finally getting around to blogging about it. It’s one of those stories that, unless one had read enough about the subject material at hand, it might be passed over entirely due to misunderstanding the context of the statement in question. Over at the Weekly Standard, Michael Goldfarb, writes the following:

In a little noticed interview with the Daily Beast (presumably little noticed because serious people don’t read the Daily Beast), Zbigniew Brzezinski suggests that Barack Obama do more than just refuse to support an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear sites — the American president must give the order to shoot down Israeli aircraft as they cross Iraqi airspace:

DB: How aggressive can Obama be in insisting to the Israelis that a military strike might be in America’s worst interest?

Brzezinski: We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?

DB: What if they fly over anyway?

Brzezinski: Well, we have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse.

Contrary to Brezinski’s half-hearted disclaimer that no one wishes for such an outcome, there are plenty on the left who would delight in a pitched battle between the United States and Israel. Democrats in Congress routinely support resolutions affirming Israel’s right to take whatever steps it deems necessary to assure its own national defense. And Obama has at least paid lip service to the concept. But hostility to Israel among the rank and file is very real on the left — and among “realists.”

So conjure the image — the Obama administration sending U.S. aircraft up to protect Iran’s airspace and it’s nuclear installations from an attack by a democracy that is one of America’s closest allies. Unfortunately, this may not be so hard to imagine in Israel, where the number of people who believe Obama is pro-Israel is at just 4 percent — and falling. And given Obama’s (literally) submissive posture to the Saudis, his indulgence of the Iranians, and his simultaneously hard-line approach to Israel, it seems even some of Obama’s supporters can savor the possibility of a “reverse Liberty.”

Now, taken at face value, the story by itself is bad enough. Advising the US president to fire upon an ally if it fails to act according to his expressed wishes, should give pause to any of Israel’s supporters who also support the US president. Samantha Power, another of Obama’s close advisors, had even advised the invasion of Israel to impose a settlement on Israel and the Palestinians.

But there is another dimension to the story that deserves exploring, that being, what Zbigniew Brzezinski, actually meant when he stated: “Well, we have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse.”

What Brzezinski was referring to of course, was the USS Liberty incident, in which the US ship, the USS Liberty was attacked by Israel during the last days of the 67′ war between Israel and the invading armies of Egypt, Syria, Jordan, with Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria supplying troops as well.

During the heat of battle and accompanied by a host of failures on both sides of the incident, the US surveillance ship was attacked by both Israeli Airforce and Navy, in a series of deliberate attacks lasting over a period of some fifteen minutes. In the book The Liberty Incident, A.Jay Cristol writes the following:

“There is an old U.S. Marine Corps adage that is perhaps appropiate here: “Never attribute malice that which can be explained by stupidity.”

What the author is alluding to is, stupid, and very deadly stupid things happen in the fog of war, and the USS Liberty Incident is one of those stupid, but deadly, friendly fire incidents. The same happens in every war, most recently in Operation Iraqi Freedom, where the US command came under great criticism for it repeated friendly fire incidents. Yet, none of the US’s allies are blaming the US milititary for purposely killing its soldiers, they know all too well that sh*t happens during war and friendly fire incidents occur and will continue to occur as long as there is a human element involved.

But that doesn’t stop the anti-Israel conspiracists from bringing up the lame charge against Israel, that it intentionally targeted the US ship, knowing full well that it was indeed a US ship, to cover up some other supposed Israeli misdeed elsewhere. That Obama’s chief foreign policy advisor buys into the USS Liberty conspiracy is troublesome, because the US president deems Brzezinski’s advice as worthy enough to consider.

This is as serious as it gets. KGS