— The Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) September 28, 2016
H/T: Boleslaw Bierut
I’ve been posting videos not only of Coughlin, but of other Counter-Jihad NGO’s at the OSCE event in Warsaw Poland over the past two days. Here’s Stephen from yesterday courtesy of Gates Of Vienna:
Last night we posted a report by the Counterjihad Collective on an EMISCO side event at this year’s OSCE/HDIM conference in Warsaw. Below is a follow-up intervention by Stephen Coughlin of Unconstrained Analytics, describing the frightening absurdities he heard at yesterday’s side event.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:
For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.
Very, very transparent……..
Their Calais Jungle romance has captured the public imagination – one a Syrian refugee and the other a British aid worker 17 years his senior.
But now Facebook friends of the 24-year-old Romeo in this love story, Hamoude Kahlil, right, have raised suspicions that his intentions towards Sarah Gayton, left with Kahlil, may be less than straightforward.
A Facebook friend who has known Kahlil since they studied together in Syria told MailOnline that he loved Sarah but added: ‘I understand he is doing this to take citizenship.’ Another former classmate and friend who is now living in Germany, said: ‘I don’t think it’s love.’
He’d be right, that’s where his intolerance towards the non-muslim originated.
By THOMAS BURROWS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 17:03 GMT, 27 September 2016 | UPDATED: 18:09 GMT, 27 September 2016
Shamed Coronation Street actor Marc Anwar has claimed he was already leaving the soap before he was fired for a series of racist tweets.
Pakistani-born Mr Anwar, 45, who plays the role of Sharif Nazir in Corrie, was sacked after referring to Indians as b******s’ and ‘p***-drinking c***s’ on Twitter.
But last night, the actor claimed he was set to leave the show at the end of his contract in November.
He said his apology was nothing to do with having lost his job.
Writing on Twitter Mr Anwar said: ‘For the record, I was to leave show at the end of [my] contract in November. Apology is from regret for offending, not at early exit. Love all.’
He added: ‘No human controls my livelihood but My Allah. Never have never will grovel to anyone! Proud Muslim, proud Pakistani, very proud British.
‘Oh and God save the Queen. Rule Britannia!’
Last night, the actor claimed he was set to leave Corrie at the end of his contract in November
Here’s one that everyone would like to drop-kick out of the country, even if he was born there.
Oh, and he’s unemployed, by design no doubt, how else could he find time to reek havoc on society if he had to put in a honest day’s work?
Unemployed Krissoni Henderson, 31, was convicted of religiously aggravated threatening behaviour after he confronted Noor Alneaimi in Birmingham’s New Street on July 4 this year. He has now been handed a community order and told to pay a total of £710 in costs after being sentenced at Birmingham Magistrates Court.
But Henderson claimed he and his wife, Danielle, were completely ‘innocent victims’ and vowed to appeal the sentence. The city’s magistrates court was yesterday shown a video which showed Henderson shouting ‘You’re all terrorists’ and ‘the Queen of England is a terrorist’ as he was led away by police.
NOTE: Yet another good reason to end the welfare state
Ok, it would have been more correct to have said ”but the overwhelming majority of terrorists are Muslims”, but that’s splitting hairs while muslims are splitting heads.
In July, shortly after the terror attack in Nice, France, the Finnish MP wrote that “all Muslims are not terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.”
NOTE: They’ll determine whether incitement of ”racial hatred” has occurred, though Islam is as much of a race as the US Republican Party.
Police say they have concluded their preliminary investigation about derogatory comments Finns Party MP Teuvo Hakkarainen wrote about Muslims on his Facebook page in July.
In July, shortly after the terror attack in Nice, France, the Finnish MP wrote that “all Muslims are not terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.”
In order to officially explain his comments, Hakkarainen spoke with police during the preliminary investigation.
Case headed to prosecutor’s office
The case will next be examined by the Prosecutor General’s office which will determine whether charges of incitement of racial hatred will be filed.
The prosecutor’s office has also previously investigated Hakkarainen’s other comments, including ones about “negro men” and heckling Muslims.
Previously, Hakkarainen also suggested that all of Finland’s Somalians and homosexuals should be sent to Åland to form an ideal society, but later said he was only joking.
They chose the non-Muslim Finns on purpose though……
No march by Leftists and fraudulent sanctimonious politicians in the center of Helsinki over the brutal murder of one Finnish man by an Iraqi asylum seeker, and the theft and beating by another iraqi settler of another ethnic Finn.
Police have detained two Iraqi asylum seekers as suspects in both incidents. The two individuals have reportedly told police about the course of events which took place in the early morning hours of September 11.
Police say they are now considering charges of manslaughter, aggravated robbery and payment fraud in the death of a man from Kajaani’s Otanmäki district.
In that incident a man was violently attacked and robbed of his cell phone and bank card. Police suspect that the victim died from the injuries he received in the attack.
Another incident which took place that same night, a man was slightly injured when he was robbed of his cell phone and a small amount of money, and is being investigated as robbery.
Police say that both victims were chosen at random and that the suspects did not know either of them previously.
Investigators say that the men had had an altercation with a resident at a local bar before the crimes were committed.
I never give A dime to them.
The Red Cross is keen to help others, but in doing so, they actively work against the citizens of their own countries. They’ve been taken over by sanctimonious leftists who use the public trough to further their utopian goals.
The authorities only talk about on x amount of ”refugees” allowed into the country, then when we add the amount of family members brought in through ”family reunification, the number explodes exponentially.
NOTE: There is no way to properly vet any of these people (Jew hating Muslims) coming in from Syria, there’s no up and running extensive data base, and a horrific mish-mashing of similar sounding names it’s impossible to say with any degree of certainty that they are who they say they are. These Red Cross workers are idiots, and they’re playing with our lives.
Currently there are major hurdles that applicants must overcome to even start the family reunification application process.
If someone in Finland applies for family reunification for a relative in Syria, for example, the person in Syria has to travel to the Finnish embassy in Turkey in order to get the process started.
On Monday however, Interior Minister Paula Risikko told Yle’s A-Studio programme that the Immigration System would soon start using an online application form in order to get applicants into the system more easily. Risikko said that the system could be operational in the next few weeks.
Once the application process has started the applicant will still have to travel to the nearest embassy in order to identify themselves to Finnish officials.
Timo Salmio, who works at the family reunification division of the Finnish Red Cross, said that a web-based system is not a solution to the underlying difficulties.
“Plans to start the [family reunification] process with online applications will probably not help as much as hoped,” Salmio said.
He said that even after an electronic system is in place, applicants from Syria will still be required to get a visa and travel to Turkey in order to identify themselves to Finnish officials.
“It would be best if refugees would be able to apply at the closest local [Finnish] consulate, instead of having to make the long journey to Turkey,” Salmio said.
Actually any non-muslim woman can become a sex slave for the (male) followers of islam, if they’re deemed ”booty of jihad”, which history has proven has a very very wide interpretation.
Islamic State jihadis laugh and joke about buying and selling Yazidi sex slaves, in a propaganda video.
by Raymond Ibrahim
Recently in Iraq, 19 Yazidi girls were placed in iron cages and burned alive in front of a crowd of hundreds, for refusing to copulate with jihadis.
Islamic law, always harsh, is still harsher for women. According to the Koran, men have “authority” over women and may beat them if they are “disobedient” (4:34). According to Mohammad, the prophet of Islam, women are less intelligent than men — two women are needed to equal one man’s testimony — and the majority of hell’s population is made up of women, who are likened to donkeys and dogs in their ability to distract a man from his prayer and thereby annul it.
What, then, is Islam’s view of women who are “infidels”? They are at best “meant for one thing, the pleasure of the Muslim man,” as one Muslim told a group of young Christian girls in Pakistan before terrorizing and murdering one. In the Koran, (see 4:24), non-Muslim women seized in a jihad can be bought and sold as sex slaves for Muslim men, as the Islamic State has been doing.
Emily Fuentes, communications director for Open Doors, a human rights organization that advocates for persecuted Christians, said:
Unfortunately, more and more women are the target of [Muslim] terrorist groups. There are numerous international incidents of women being kidnapped, raped, and forced to convert from Christianity to Islam by radical extremist groups…. Many are also sold on the open market. This brutality is not only occurring in the Middle East but in Africa and in many other places. In many of these countries, women are subject to persecution because they are considered second-class citizens because of their gender. As minorities in both gender and faith, Christian women face double the persecution. Although we don’t have an exact number, we know that millions of women are being persecuted…. In these Muslim-dominated countries, Christian women are systematically deprived of their freedom to live and are denied basic human necessities.
Christian women are double damned: barely tolerated both as women and as non-Muslim “infidels; it becomes clear why they are the greatest recipients of Islamic abuse.
Shimon Peres, Israel’s ninth President, former Prime Minister, Nobel Prize winner, who served for nearly five decades as a member of the Knesset, passed away on Wednesday morning at age 93, following a severe stroke. He will be buried in a state funeral in the plot on Mt. Herzle dedicated to the nation’s great leaders. Peres was married to the late Sonia Peres who died in 2011. They had three children: Tsvia Walden, Yonatan (Yoni) Peres, and Nehemia (Chemi) Peres.
Peres was born on August 2, 1923 as Shimon Perski (a relative of Lauren Bacall a.k.a. Joan Persky), in Wiszniew, Poland (now Vishnyeva, Belarus). In 1934, together with his mother Sara and younger brother Gershon, they followed his father, who made aliyah in 1932. Peres grew up in Tel Aviv and studied at the Ben Shemen agricultural school. He met Sonia in Ben Shemen and they got married in 1945.
Peres became active in the Socialist youth movement Hanoar Haoved and in 1947 was recruited by Levy Eshkol to serve in the Hagana underground headquarters, alongside Eshkol and David Ben-Gurion. In 1953, after a stint as head of naval services in the newly formed IDF, Peres was appointed (at age 29) as Director of the Defense Ministry by Ben-Gurion.
Give em a call and tell them of your disgust!
Address: Stortorget 21, 211 34 Malmö, Sweden
Phone:+46 40 12 55 55
Ilya Meyer on Face Book:
Yesterday a friend of ours went into a store to buy something. The man at the counter took one look at her Magen David (Star of David) necklace and said he would not serve her.
And he did refuse to serve her. She had to leave the store.
She has filed a complaint with the police and with Sweden’s Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman.
But that is not the point. The point is that many people who have only relatively recently immigrated to this country from, let’s be diplomatic here, “Middle Eastern countries”, feel confident enough to take a public anti-Semitic stance and live with the consequences – because they know the consequences, if any, will be exceptionally mild. Usually a gently worded reprimand that this is not really entirely acceptable in Sweden.
Now if, say, a blond, crew-cut, blue-eyed white Swede working in a shop were to look at a black or Muslim customer and flatly refuse to serve him/her, the mighty wrath of the entire Swedish media, political establishment, justice department and public opinion would explode in a frenzy of harsh condemnation and legal action.
Waiting now to see how the police and the Anti-Discrimination Ombudsman respond. Not holding my breath, however.
In the case of the police, this is not because they are anti-Semitic, but because the perpetrator is Muslim. The “M” word, like many physical areas in this country, is a no-go zone for the police in Sweden.
If Political Correctness prevents you from correctly identifying the nature of a problem, then as a society you will never – EVER – be able to solve that problem.
Which is what Sweden’s Islamists understand, and Sweden’s politicians and media elite don’t.
Like I have stated before on prior occasions, Islamic canonical Jew hatred has been around for over 1400 years, and in many areas, it dovetails with it’s European/Western variant derived from classic Christian understanding if its ancient texts. That said, Islamic texts make it brutally clear of its enmity with the Jews, which of course predates the rise of Nazi Germany.
What I fear is happening inside Europe, is the supercharging of these classic Christian Europe anti-Jew tropes by already antisemitic Muslim settlers who find a kindred spirit with some on the Left and Right of the socialist aisle. What we are witnessing in an identity politics/group rights /statist (divide & rule) driven Europe, is the choosing of Muslims over that of Jews (and over other discriminated minorities as well) which has led to a staring at the problem through visibly shaking fingers.
NOTE: This is a much extended version of Dr.Gerstenfled’s article on Israel and ISIS, that was first published in the Jerusalem Post and republished here with the author’s consent.
Manfred Gerstenfeld and Leah Hagelberg
The libel that Jews are absolute evil is the core accusation of anti-Semitism for close to two thousand years. Since 2014, the Islamic State, the cruelest of the major Muslim terror groups, has started to replace Nazism as the symbol of absolute evil. The genocide by the Germans and their allies is many decades ago, while ISIS murders brutally today. In line with the tradition of anti-Semitism, a wave of accusations associating Israel with ISIS has rapidly sprung up.
This defamation has a number of variations including that Israel has helped to create ISIS, Israel is behind ISIS, Israel is comparable to ISIS, and Israel is the reason for ISIS. The short time during which the image of ISIS has developed in the public domain enables us to follow closely the genesis of a new version of the old core calumny that Israel is absolute evil. Most, but far from the only, promoters of this hate come from the Muslim world, the extreme left and the extreme right.
Some of the earliest propagators of the new hate motif were Iranian. Its Islamic Republic News Agency, published a story accusing America of mounting its offensive against ISIS as a means of destabilizing the region to protect Israel. This story cited a supposed interview with Edward Snowden that a U.S., British, and Israeli plot to destabilize the Middle East, code-named Hornet’s Nest, was the force behind the creation of ISIS.1 Another rumor attributed to Snowden, but which he has claimed is a hoax, is the one that IS leader Al Baghdadi is really a Jewish Mossad Agent named Elliot Shimon or Simon Elliot.2
In June of 2014, shortly before ISIS proclaimed itself a caliphate, Iranian Army Chief of Staff Gen Hassan Firouzabadi stated, “ISIS is Israel’s cover up for distancing the revolutionary forces from Israeli borders and creating a margin of security for the Zionists.”3 Iranian Deputy Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian claimed in November 2014 that Israel helped to create ISIS.4
Another Muslim group to jump on the bandwagon was The World Association for Al-Azhar Graduates, an umbrella organization for scholars connected to Al-Azhar University. It is the leading academic institution of Egypt, a country which is at peace with Israel. In June 2014 this association published a statement on its website claiming that ISIS and other extremist groups were “[a] Jewish product under various names that change every now and then.” The statement also quoted the head of the association’s Pakistani chapter Sheik Sahab Zadeh Aziz, who said, “the terrorist organization ISIS is a Zionist plot which aims to murder Muslims, shed their blood, and rape [their] women and girls.”5
Ayatollah Sayed Mortada Al-Qazwini, a popular Shia cleric in Iraq gave a sermon in summer 2014 declaring ISIS a “Jewish Israeli organization, established to tear apart the land of Muslims.”6 In February 2015 Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir – wanted by the International Criminal Court on charges of genocide – referred to ISIS and Boko Haram: “I said CIA and the Mossad stand behind these organizations. There is no Muslim who would carry out such acts.”7 Al Jazeera’s Arabic website, published in August 2015 an article claiming that Israel was behind ISIS.8
Working Session No 11
Tolerance and non-Discrimination I (continued):
Including Prevention and Response to Hate Crimes in the OSCE Area
And Combating Racism, Xenophobia and Discrimination,
Also Focusing on Intolerance on Religious Grounds
OSCE / ODIHR
26 September 2016
Thank you madam moderator, ladies and gentlemen,
Extreme “right wing”, “hate speech”, “hate crime”, “hater” – are terms that get thrown around freely in forums like this. Of course when one hears these words, what comes to mind are Nazis, skin heads, the Ku Klux Klan and virulent anti-Semites, etc and, hence, we can agree with the concern.
As these terms tend to be used, however, they are more often directed at citizens who simply dissent from prevailing narratives that seek to brand them as haters or for being extreme right wing for the purpose of forcing them into a stereotype in furtherance of criminalizing them through their speech if they don’t conform. It is used to intimidate law-abiding citizens.
This has become the true language of stereotyping, stigmatization and discrimination – directed at citizens whose only fault is that they voice dissent from the Orwellian narratives that impose 2 + 2 = 5 as the price for being permitted the right to have a voice in a public forum.
As many in this forum seek to criminalize “haters” thus putting the power of the state behind enforcing “free expression,” it makes a mockery of the very idea of free speech and of a free citizenry. Now we see a new term emerging “message crime”.
For example: At a Side Event at the 2013 OSCE meetings here in Warsaw, we got principals to admit that Islamophobia has no core definition at the same time other OSCE forums were (and still are) advocating criminalizing Islamophobia. Among the most common responses then – as now – is that “we all know what it is”. When something means anything you want, it usually means nothing at all.
When a term that lacks a reasonably articulable definition is used to criminalize a class of citizens, it gives the state the power to intimidate citizens for any reason or no reason at all.
In a Side Event today, we again asked the question: “Can you define Islamophobia?” The answer we got was 1) Islamophobia doesn’t apply to normal disagreements, 2) that it was Islamophobic to ask the question, 3) that there would be no definition provided in that forum because 4) “we all know what it means,” and 5) that Islamophobia should be criminalized.
Why isn’t it considered a threat when someone says that “failure to designate Islamophobia a crime is detrimental to international peace”?
These “hate speech” narratives are designed to intimidate otherwise ordinary citizens. They impose a chilling effect on speech.
Unconstrained Analytics recommends that the OSCE and all participating States rethink the narratives they are so casually putting in motion on the assumption that “we all know what it means” when what it appears to mean is the suppression of dissent through intimidation under color of state authority. Thank you!
They key factor in all of this (outside their depravity) is that they insist on choosing non-muslim girls only.
This is a systematical targeting of a certain kind of female, due to the (post-hijra) islamic thinking that non-muslims are sub-human filth to do with as they please.
The seven Somalian men face 4 different charges
The vulnerable youngsters, some who as young as 12, were allegedly subjected to “degrading, violent and horrible” abuse and coaxed with drugs and alcohol, where the men pestered the girls “again and again” for sex.
Anna Vigars, part of the prosecution, told the court some of the girls believed they were in a relationship with the men and were deemed vulnerable.
The rapes became part of a regular routine, with the girls being viewed as “cheap and easy” by the men, according to prosecutors.
The gang of seven Somali men are accused of 46 charges, including rape, rape of a child under 13, sexual assault, trafficking for sexual exploitation and false imprisonment.
Sakariya Sheikh, 23, Abdirahman Galal, 26, Mohammed Osman, 29, Mohammed Dahir, 24, Nuridin Mohamoud, 22, Abdirashid Abdulahi, 23, and Nasir Mahamoud, 23, deny all charges.
The parties can arrange their own moderators, keep the hacks out, the msm will fall all over themselves to air the debates nonetheless.
Lester Holt’s actions at the first presidential debate were inexcusable. And also unsurprising.
The day when media lefties were patient enough to believe that the system would work without being this blatant are over. They’ve been open this election about rejecting even the illusion of objectivity.
The only question is why do Republicans continue to allow mainstream media figures to moderate presidential debates? Lester Holt decided to debate Trump. But you can increasingly expect this kind of behavior from any media figure below a certain age to whom the concept of journalism is a dead and incomprehensible notion. Or rather, to them it means that it’s their duty to attack Republicans.