About Islam

The Islamic religion in its purest (political) form is totalitarian in nature and therefore anti democratic. We speak about the meaning of the word “moderate” in relation to Islam and find it as something no longer holding any meaning.

The reason for this is simple: many so-called “moderates” have been praised in the west, only later being found to have been supporting jihad against non-Muslims from the very beginning.

“Mild Muslims”, are the ones we look to with hope, who truly believe in liberal democracy such that Islam should be a matter of personal faith, not politics.

Those who refuse to condemn sharia (Islamic law) as being incompatible with modern day society, are the Muslims we take issue with. It is these Muslims who present a clear and present danger to the rest of society.

NOTE: I received the following from Bill Warner’s organization:

Dear Sir/Sirs and madam,

The old Bill Warner lecture link on Foundational Audio Lectures on Political
Islam by Bill Warner, has been down for a long time now.

The old link was found here:
http://actwestnashville.com/?page_id=544

We have therefore put up a new link page here:
https://sites.google.com/site/warnerlectures/

Either you have the new link or not, please put it somewhere on your website.

Thanks in advance

Kind regards

248 Responses to About Islam

  1. The moderate Moslems who stay silent about the Jihadists are like the Germans who didn’t speak out against the Nazis.

    • I’ve mentioned the same fact a few times recently. There was a march in LTON, ENGLAND, by Muslims, and it scared the hell out of me. In Australia, immigration have allowed a radical to speak at an upcoming ‘peaceful’ gathering in Melbourne. The very issue and problem is that the radicals have everything to gain and nothing to lose if the majority keep acceding t their insidious invasion. Watch the Muslim Luton march on YouTube and that is what we’ll all be facing if we don’t say “Enough is enough”. Japan WILL NOT allow mosques, and Muslim people cannot own property. Great idea!

    • Jean says:

      Worst !

      Because with all the 21th century knowledge of “Barbary Shore”

      cf Norman Mailer

    • bill says:

      The people who spoke out against Nazism very quickly found themselves in the camps, which I remind you were set up for opponents of the Nazis. the first thing they did when they attained power (legally remember) was to declare all the other parties illegal and put the members in the camps for ‘re education’

  2. Malcolm Dodd says:

    I have read the koran and the bible, both books promote intolerance, inhumanity and the subjugation of women; if written today, they would be immediately banned for racial discrimination, religious discrimination and the advocacy of genocide.

    • KGS says:

      No one is denying the violent passages in the Old Testament, but neither does the OT promote this violence for future generations. Comparing the OT and the Islamic texts is a like comparing an apple to an orange.

      Get back to me when Jews are and Christians are doing the same as Muslims today, and veryifying their deeds from “holy texts”, with the overwhelming majority of their scholars standing in approval.

      • Malcolm Dodd says:

        Hi KGS

        The Islamists are perpetrating violence in the name of their “good” book just as the so-called Christians did for many hundreds of years. The OT showed Christians how their omniscient, omnipotent, loving and forgiving god advocated genocide as a means of settling disputes, how to treat slaves, wives and women and how and when to apply sadistic punishments etc.

        Nowadays we still see the so-called Christians perpetrating horrific acts but they mostly occur in third world countries such as the LRA in Uganda.

        The Roman Catholic cult perpetuates genocide in a more subtle way by condemning to death millions each year from aids, over-population and the resulting poverty. This occurs because old virgins, such as Ratzinger, are obsessed with sex and what people do in the privacy of their bedrooms; these gullible followers are then told that it is a sin against god to use contraception and that the use of condoms will exacerbate the aids situation (advice that is ignored in advanced countries and by hypocrites such as Tony and Cherie Blair).

        The difference is that Islam is some 650 years younger than Christianity so it continues to behave in the same way as Christians did in the 13/14th centuries, give them another 650 years and they may achieve 21st century values, like stopping the subjugation of wives by their owners; but I will not be holding my breath!!!

        All religions claim to be the truth, that inevitably creates competition and tension, the resulting evil statements and deeds create even more intolerance and so the cycle continues for as long as religions exist; our world would be a better place without them, god definitely is not great.

        • KGS says:

          Well I seen this type of thinking played out before, it’s called “they’re all the same”. I reject that notion, it’s not born out by the facts. Western civilization (as we know it) resulted from ancient Christian intellectualism who took the Greek philosopher Aristotle as one of their own. The atrocities that occur around the world are overwhelmingly done by the followers of the ROP, not Christians. Like I said, being me the Christians who point to their own books to validate their violence, and condoned by the rest of the Christian world. you won’t find any…otherwise you would be filling up the comment section with url links.

          • Malcolm Dodd says:

            Hi again KGS
            Do please respond to my discussion with substance rather than generalizations; we are talking about Abrahamic religions who take their inspiration from that disgusting book that advocates smashing children’s heads against rocks, genocide, barbarism, misogyny etc that is recognized as the supreme word of god and is known as the Old Testament. Is it, therefore, so surprising that Christians, Jews and Muslims have so much blood on their hands?
            I entirely agree that of all religions in the 21st century, Islam is an evil political movement, posing as a religion, that is determined to overthrow our Western values.
            I have always advocated that the only test that need be imposed on those seeking to enter our Western countries is “which religion have you been brainwashed in” and if the answer is Islam, Scientology or Mormon then our response should be NEVER. If their answer is any other religion then our reply should be, go away for a while and consider the error of your ways then come back again when you have eradicated the religion virus from your brain.

          • KGS says:

            All totalitarian ideologies have an amazing amount of blood on their hands, including the socialists, in which a great number of their members are atheists. That said, I reject your notion that I’m not responding with substance, you have yet to show me the legion of Christian and Jewish terrorists around the world committing acts of terror and validating them with religious texts, and the majority of their scholars standing in silence because they can’t refute their interpretation. The least you could do is to put up or shut up when equating Islam with Judaism and Christianity.

        • Lenya says:

          Mr M Dodd there is a thing called plagiarism and most of your article was picked up from random readings. especially the 4th paragraph about the “the difference is that Islam 650 years younger….”.

          We can see you are an athiest but even worse a plagiarist.
          Until you can concoct your own theories please refrain from making any more comments.

      • C J says:

        1. The ‘violent’ events in the Bible are DESCRIPTIVE and not PRESCRIPTIVE. Let me explain. They are just narratives of the past that just explain/show what happened. They are describing the events and NEVER suggesting us to take up the sword. Nor do the Bible scholars/teachers today in any part of the World suggest Christians to do so. If someone does, he simply does not know how to read books that contain history or just pretending to be a Christian. There is no such thing as a ‘violent Christian’ against nonbelievers in the Bible.

        • KGS says:

          Exactly CJ, great comment, 100% spot on

        • Anne says:

          Thank you CJ. In the Hebrew Bible, (The Tanach), violence is not just descriptive (as opposed to prescriptive), it is often condemned so harshly that the prophets warned that it would lead to defeat and banishment from their beloved land. Incest is also described and condemned, and when it was practiced, it was considered a terrible sin. In fact, sins remained sins — even if they were committed by kings, and the prophets and sages could and did confront the monarchs about their transgressions. No one was considered above the law or “the perfect man”, and the flaws of the kings were described in detail. Even Moses is described only as God’s “servant” when his name is mentioned (only once) in the Passover Hagadah (prayerbook). In Islam, things that once were condemned were later changed to perfectly acceptable, as long as Mohammed wanted to engage in them at the moment. Whatever suited him at any given time was suddenly deemed ‘approved by Allah’, even if some time before it was considered forbidden.

          When Moses knew he was going to die, he spoke before the people and told them their future would be difficult but they should remain strong and of good courage. He did NOT tell them to forever hate the Egyptians and seek to kill them. At the Passover seder, Jews are commanded not to celebrate the deaths of the Egyptian soldiers or the sufferings of the people from the plagues — for they are also the children of God. No where is it stated that the enemies of the Jews are descended from monkeys and pigs and the humanity of the enemies of the Jews is never questioned.

    • Throughout human history, religious expansion programs resulted in brutal killings and other atrocities. Millions of people were perished when Christianity spread to Europe, the Americas, Africa and Asia. Later, many millions more were killed when Islam spread its wings from Saudi Arabia to other parts of the world. Therefore, I agree with Malcolm Dodd’s view to ban religious books, namely The Bible and Quran from public education institutions. Since we are now in the era of globalization and the world is moving forward into modernization, it is advisable to segregate religion with politics and social life of all the people in this planet. I think, without religion, human beings could live peacefully among themselves in order to survive.

      • KGS says:

        Then you must be in disagreement with the Founding Fathers of the United States who based their Declaration and Constitution upon Natural Law. If you believe that rights come from man, then you’ll never be certain to sustain your freedoms.

      • ef says:

        This absolutly wrong. people will find ways to kill each other even without religion. Exaple are: nazi and soviet union.

      • G O'D says:

        I took myself to Sunday School for a few years until we moved when I was 7.5 yr. old. The hour once a week consisted of 1/2 hr. singing and each week a new episode of Christ’s life in a 4 page comic book form. I would love to have those Sunday School papers today as I treasured those stories. My favourite when Christ told the angry mob wanting to stone a prostitute to death “Let he without sin cast the first stone” No one in the mob had any right to kill this woman. The second most visual I remember is the Good Samaritan and the graphics of a bloodied innocent man lying in a ditch until the Good Samaritan came along after many had passed by is with me today. Never did I hear about doing harm to any living thing and Christ is the only perfect man in the world and they crucified him so the human race has no chance.

    • pjb says:

      “I have read the koran and the bible, both books promote intolerance, inhumanity and the subjugation of women; if written today, they would be immediately banned for racial discrimination, religious discrimination and the advocacy of genocide. ”

      Exactly, thank you! And both books were are very violent in content also! Scary!

    • Scott Rawlings says:

      You are WRONG Malcolm Dodd……We live in the New Testament times and us Christians are under the Blood of Jesus, not the old Law. You need to understand the difference between the OLD Testament and the NEW Testament …….The Laws back then are no longer for today, Jesus didn’t teach what you just got through saying. You don’t know The Holy Bible then don’t talk about it.

    • Thomas says:

      Cultural Marxism has created the moral relativism you’re blathering. Nothing more.

    • Ray Mantua says:

      As to Malcolm Dodd’s remark that he had read the Bible and the koran:

      Malcolm…you are a liar. You’ve never read the koran. Anyone who has opened it’s pages and gone past the first 16 verses is struck by the horrific hatred that it spews pretending to be a religion. As to your claim that you’ve read the Bible, it’s clear you are lying here in this case as well. There are no, none, zero passages that promote hatred in the New Testament. The worst thing Christ says to non-believers is a command to His Apostles, once encountering resistance in receiving His Gospels, is simply to leave the area: “And if some home or town will not welcome you or listen to you, then leave that place and shake the dust off your feet.” (Mat 10:14) You can’t compare that with the evil instructions in the koran as to how to torture people who refuse to follow islam. (The exact instructions were to chop off the “infidel’s” right hand and left foot thus making them a mockery to all who see them.) Further, the koran specifically gives instructions as to how to charge the jizya against Christians and Jews who refuse to convert to islam thus reducing them to poverty. If you can point out passages of equal savagery and hatred in the New Testament, I will denounce Christ, His Church and accept whatever twaddle you’re currently peddling. Until that point, stop pretending to be an intellectual by lying as to having read any book let alone the Bible or the koran. You reek of ignorance. And just in case you wish to change the point of your pointless argument, though it is true that there are Christians (and Jews for that matter) who do evil, they do evil because they refuse to or otherwise fail to put into practise the laws spelled out in their respective Testaments. A moslem who follows the letter of the law as spelled out int he koran will destroy you and all Judeo-Christian countries and their inhabitants. Allah is not the Judeo-Christian God. Only an irretrievably and glibly ignorant person like yourself could confuse the two.

    • Diane says:

      The OT yes, there is violence in it, but are you forgetting about the New Testament where Jesus came to do away with stonings etc…..The only violence in the NT is what the Romans did to Christians

    • bill says:

      There is aproblem with Christianity and the Old Testament but Christianity is basically the New Testament. I regard them both as fictional but that is another discussion. I think Jesus famously said if a man strike you turn the other cheek, I do not see anywhere that Moh’d said anything like that. Islam’s idea of tolerance is the other religions paying a tax to Islam, to allow them to practice. If you offer an olive branch to a Muslim he is likely to make you get on your knees so he can beat you with it until you accept Islam. The message is after all Submit.

  3. Malcolm Dodd says:

    I totally agree that the ROP is the only religion that is today perpetrating violence based on their holy texts (since 9/11 the total now exceeds 16,500 attacks) and nowhere have I said otherwise.

    My point about the other Abrahamic religions is that, when they were 1,300 years of age (same age as the ROP is today), they were perpetrating violence based on their holy texts, but being technologically less advanced and without the media coverage of today their violence was obvioousy less widespread, less devastating and less widely publicized.

    • KGS says:

      Judaism moderated itself over 2000 years ago, the Christian faith had never been violent until it became a state religion of many states in Europe (the crusades reflect the period of the time and were a late reaction to Islamic encroachment and atrocities in the ME.. Persecution of Jews in Spain (read= the Inquisitions) began in earnest after Islam had been expelled from the peninsula , where they learned some real nasty business from the Mussulmen who ruled the region.

      Your fixation on the violence that Judaism and Christianity are responsible for, and that no one denies today, finds no validation in their holy books to be meted out to the unbeliever of future generations. Islam does just that, therein lise the problem. That’s why I’m saying you’re mixing apples and oranges.

    • Thinker says:

      Malcolm what you are saying is complete non-sense! The crusades, inquisitions or whatever genocides the christians did, whether they did it to protect themselves or otherwise, is NOT important here BECAUSE THEY DO NOT IN ANY CASE JUSTIFY MUSLIMS PERSECUTION OF NON-MUSLIMS WORLDWIDE! There’s no reason why a bhudist, b’hai, zoroastrian, jain, hindu, or atheist should be persucuted just because christians did some folly in the past!
      Think! Million of people are being persecuted or denigrated at this very moment while we sit in the safety of our homes in the West. Think! Christ nowhere in the bible asked his followers to kill in His name, whereas this is explicitely requested in the Quran and even examplified in the Hadiths and Sirahs!

    • deepak says:

      Malcolm just get a brain if not a conscience. No one is out there trying to establish Christianity with beheadings and Crusades..talk about the issues on the table..and the issues are Islam, Islam & Islam. Get rid of this menace before it gets rid of all sanity.

      • OpenMindedFreak says:

        Okay, Having studied history, did you know that Islam was driven to such extremes because of the “Christian Crusades”. And you guys are bashing the one guy who Opens his mouth and speaks his mind and USES HISTORY To Prove his points and all you guys have is bigoted egotism and generalization. GIVE FACTS or else no one will take you idiots seriously. NO ONE IS THE GOOD GUYS HERE! IT IS ALL A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE! The Christians, when they took Jerusalem, MURDERED everyone in the city, Muslem, Jew, or Christian, Men Women and Children. Saladin, when he took the city back from the Crusaders, Offered safe passage and amnesty to everyone inside the walls, Crusaders and Civilians. I DARE YOU TO TELL ME that when the Crusaders took the City the first time that the reason they killed everyone, was because they were traitors to their religion for cohabiting with Muslims. Its ignorant and bigoted idiots like you that keep pushing for conflict, you and the extremist Jihadists are WRONG! Peace is possible with tolerance and the sharing of knowledge. THINK ON THAT!

        • KGS says:

          Hey OpenMindedFreak, you have distorted view of the Crusades, which were actually a delayed responses to Islamic encroachments of Christian lands. read Andrew Bostom’s Legacy of Islamic Jihad and Efraim Karsh’s Islamic Imperialism, A History, then get back to me.

          • Diane says:

            also read the P.I.G.to Islam by Robert Spencer….or any one of the other books out there. Get some books on the Crusades. And, FYI. When Saladin offered that free passage…it was a ruse…he then slaughtered those who would not convert.

        • Rollo says:

          Blaming the Crusades is a tired old Muslim practice. The fact is that the Crusades began as a response to Islamic expansionism (Muslims in Spain etc), severe oppression of Christians (and Jews) in the Holy Land and Muslims’ murders of Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem.
          The sack of Jerusalem was typical of siege warfare in the middle ages. When Muslims re-captured Aleppo they killed every Christian. Later, Muslims chose to live in Crusader lands because they prospered and enjoyed better treatment than they received from Muslim leaders. (Ibn Jubayr c.1180).
          Islam began as a violent ideology. The false prophet killed, tortured and oppressed his opponents long before anyone in Europe had heard of him.

        • Thomas says:

          You’re so “open-minded” your brain fell out. You’ve got to be the stupidest, most indoctrinated, Useful Idiot on the face of the earth. You actually said, “did you know that Islam was driven to such extremes because of the “Christian Crusades”.”

          That’s amazing! The Muslims started their Jihad over 400 years BEFORE the Crusades! Muhammad was a “prophet.”

          No. You’re just an idiot.

  4. PLO says:

    I used to write pro-palestinian comments to this blog (and others) but now I want tell you that I was wrong. Radical islam and terrorism is a threat to us all and the so called “anti-jihadist” movement have been absolutely right from the begininng.

    Palestine is far from my country but there are no other people in the world who have been completely brainwashed with hate-speech like the Palestinians are. Israel is just one front in the global jihad and even if the jews left Palestine, muslims would still hate them because its sanctioned in their holy book.

    Of course there are moderate muslims but that doesnt mean that islam is moderate and it isnt. These moderate muslims just dont follow their religion to the letter and quite often they dont want anything to do with the religion.

  5. Pingback: WE’VE GOT MAIL: DEAR TUNDRA TABLOIDS THE COUNTERJIHAD WAS RIGHT……. |

  6. Teeque Abbot says:

    Why are you such haters????
    Muslims are people like any other. The religion of Islam follows the exact tradition of the Abrahamic faiths. Your lies and your hateful interpretations only fuel more hate for small minded, arrogant and backwards people such as your selves. GOD sees what you do.

    • KGS says:

      No. While Muslims walk, talk and breathe like anyone else, they are bound to a book that is a bastardization of the Book of Moses and the New Testament. It does not follow the exact tradition of the other faiths, it co-opts them, so much so that it deems all other prophets before Mohamed, as Muslims, rewrites Christian scripture and commands it followers to hate Jews and Christians. It’s a grossly anti-Semitic book full of violence and misogyny and pedophilia, and that’s not even getting to the hadiths.

      I don’t have to say anything to prove my point, just turn page after page of Koran where almost every sentence is greeted with out right horror and intolerance of the unbeliever. Nope, you and all your cohorts are the ones who are small minded, arrogant (read also supremacist) and backwards. Just look at Saudi Arabia as your role model, that’s enough proof of what I say.

      • a Muslim says:

        If you read the Koran , and only (if) you can’t really figure the meaning of any sentence unless you have read other books which gives you enough knowledge to really understand what does every page means. Therefore, stop counting that you read the Koran which I really doubt it as a proof of violent or whatever you think it’s. Moreover, I am a Muslim, and I have been read the krona my whole life, and i still don’t know what does every page mean because it requires a lot of knowledge

        • KGS says:

          Understanding the koran requires next none in imagination and no expert knowledge at all, and five year old can tell you that it’s a hate book against all non-muslims, while condoning the worst of the worst in human nature. Enough said.

        • Rotait says:

          Wow – I thought I had heard it all but this is a new one on me. The Koran is chock full of explicit violence to non muslims in particular. But hang on , says a muslim , the Koran is not really advocating violence because it needs to read with ‘ other books ‘

        • bill says:

          Explain then how if the Quran is full of peace and love the very people who preach from it preach hatred
          and encourage young men to jihad, and I mean violent jihad not the personal struggle

    • Boris says:

      The fact that one may interpret the writings as he wishes, and brainwash hundreds of people in his daily speech in the Mosque, only shows how exact is your tradition, and how close is it to it’s original writings.
      Have you heard of the Koran found in North Africa, dated earliest written copy found?
      Well, comparing your current Koran and that Koran, showed major differences. Especially showed that interpretation have been made and written by someone. You see these interpretation today in you book.
      If you’re lucky to have one of the Saudi Arabia editions, you might have found the “pigs” and “jews and christians” keyword embedded in proper parts of the text. Talking about normal people following exact traditions. Huh.

  7. Raj says:

    Well, I respect your view and agree completely, having lived in India which has one of the largest Muslim populations, I know it for a fact that most Muslims will masquerade as law abiding people who like a multi cultural society are at least ok with it. But the conditioning each Muslim receives growing up from his/her elders, their religious leaders (Imams and Maulvi’s) and from their holy book, never leaves them. Most Muslim men (and women too even though the law is the toughest on them) will fight for and murder to bring about Sharia when the time comes. In fact, the message to have 7,8, 9 children is openly blared from speakers whenever you pass a mosque in a Muslim neighborhoods during their ‘religious’ meetings – “Alah wants you to create an army of soldiers to fight kaffirs (Infidels)”

  8. David Woolmer says:

    The trouble with Malcolm Dodd is that he is totally unable to divorce the NEW Testament, the Bible for CHRISTIANS, from the Old, mainly a history of the Jews. A religion usually takes its character and worth from its founder so Islam having an inventor, Muhammad, who according to his contemporaries, Arab leaders and writers was one of the most flawed human beings who has ever walked the earth, described by the Apostates of Islam in their website as ” a particularly nasty Mafia godfather”!

    On the other hand, great men, philosophers,writers,historians, such as Mahatma Ghandi have all referred to Jesus in laudatory tones. The great Swiss C19 theologian, Dr Philip Schaff answering a writer doubting Christ’s character wrote “How in the name of logic,common sense and experience could a selfish, deceitful man have founded and consistently maintained from the beginning to the end the purest and noblest character known in history with the most perfect air of truth and reality?”

    If Mr Dodd would do us and himself a favour by reading just two prophets of the Old Testament Amos and the greatest of all,Isaiah, he would learn of events more than six hundred years before Jesus’s birth, a wonderful and extremely accurate record of our Lord’s foretelling,birth,life and teaching, his passion,death and resurrection. His only perceivable fault and that was because of his compassion towards his ultimate creation-human kind- was to grant us free will-a great gift used and abused by evil men to further themselves financially and for power and for imposing Christianity in a manner our Lord abhorred i.e the Crusades and the Inquisition.

    Thank God that the Reformation in C16 led by Martin Luther led so many millions of Christians back to the “straight path” followed by Christians for many centuries after his death whereas of all the religions – and because it is a political,social,financial,military movement garbed in a quasi-religious shroud-Islam has followed a path of killing,hating, dividing and conquest almost from the day Muhammad died!

  9. Ankur says:

    Islam is the enemy of civilization

    • KGS says:

      I hear you loud and clear Ankur. And as an Indian, you know all to well just what Islam is, up front and ugly. The TT feels for the Indian state that’s had to defend itself from the jihad ever since Islam rolled over its border. We in the West have a lot to learn from our Indian brothers.

  10. ibrahim says:

    bravo Teeque Abbot. These accusations against İslam just make people wonder about it and thank God that there are objective resources too on internet, for those people who want to see more than vain propaganda…

    Islam, by the root of the word, means “peace” in Arabic.

    Peace be upon those whose hearts are not locked because of their sins and who can tolerate and welcome different religions, races, beliefs and cultures.

    • KGS says:

      Islam only welcomes Islam, not other religions, beliefs and cultures or races, it only knows how to subjugate, it’s a true imperialistic, supremacist ideology that enslaves…not liberates. Every non-Muslim reading this exchange understand that.

    • alahad says:

      The three Arabic words translated as “peace” in English are salaam, hudna, and suhl. The words “Islam” and “Muslim” come from the same 3 letter root word (s,l and m) in Arabic. Islam by definition means “surrender” and “submission.” A “muslim” by definition means one “who surrenders and submits.” To what?
      Try these verses for example:
      Qur’an 9:29—Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

      Qur’an 9:73—O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.

      Qur’an 9:111—Surely Allah has bought of the believers their persons and their property for this, that they shall have the garden; they fight in Allah’s way, so they slay and are slain.

      Qur’an 9:123—O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness; and know that Allah is with those who guard (against evil).

      Qur’an 47:35—Be not weary and fainthearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good) deeds.

      Qur’an 48:29—Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.

      Please care to enlighten us where “peace” is in all of these.

      • brimah says:

        Most of the verses you quoted where sent to our prophet in war times, times when he was being hunted and persecuted by Meccans.
        In islam, as in the original christianity, there is no “turn the other cheek” while being persecuted. Jesus told his desciples to sell their belongings and purchase swords. These swords where not tobe hung on walls as ornaments!
        And if you have the patience to read a little further than your argument requirs, you will always find that Our Allah always tells us that-
        Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. But if they cease, Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (2:190-192)
        Please fellow mankind, go beyond the sound bites, read about the compassion of our dear Prophet who told us, not to go to bed while our neighbor’s hungry, and no one is a muslim if peoples lives and property are not safe with him, and how not to mock other ppls religion.
        The muslim doesn’t have to, and should not love the kafir “unbeleiver” but he must respect him and his property. Simple as that.

        • Boris says:

          The sad thing in all this, is that two different people make two different interpretations of the same writings.
          The funny thing is, that this is exactly what is happening in the Muslim world.
          Most of the poor, uneducated people, get the first version presented by alahad.
          The more educated ones, care to understand further, and do the second analysis, presented by brimah.
          But educated people are a scarce. Since Islam loves scholars, but the Sharia does not. It is easier to control uneducated people.

  11. Ewm says:

    Why do we continue to hear Islam means Peace from Muslims.

    It does not it means Submission, which is exactly what Islam is, subjugating every aspect of your life to an Islamic norm, even how to urinate.

    Being a devout Muslim means never having to think for yourself!

    • Algerian anti-islam says:

      You are absolutely right Ewm!

    • brimah says:

      Yes, my dear, you are right. It means submission to the will of Allah. We beleive we were created only to worship Allah. Worship for us goes from Praying the right way, feeding the poor, working in proper jobs, smiling to both muslims and non muslims, eating halal foods, having sex with only our wives and oh yes, washing up after urinating. If these things are done the right ways, then its all part of worship and we get blessings for doing each one of them!
      My dear, I’m sure you would rather shake hands with a Muslim who washed up after urinating than one one of your own kind! Oh, or maybe not!

      • Algerian anti-islam says:

        Brimah,
        If you are a Moslem and have read Coran from cover to cover, you sure know that submission to Allah also means :
        1. Women are half-brained, created for Men’s pleasure and service, and she is the source of temptations and evil.
        2. You can have sex with a non-moslem woman that you capture in wars
        3.You can beat your wife when she refuses to have sex with you (regardless her state of health).
        4. Infidels have to convert into Islam, or pay Jizya (Read about Islamic conquests throughout history)
        5. Submission to Allah means also brain-washing , you accept and swallow every thing written in Coran, everything said or done by Mohamed, without critics, without questioning…where crimes become acceptable, child-marriage becomes normal, looting sounds acceptable, as long as they were done by Mohamed (the most perfect man since the creation of universe). in this respect, I want to ask you a question, do you find it logical that a raped woman can’t file a suit against her raper, if she does not bring 4 witnesses ? Do you think that rapes are commited publically? Don’t you see that this “islamic law” indirectly and implecitly protects rapers?
        6. Submission to Allah also means killing innocent people simply because they do not believe in your Allah, this blood-thirsty divinity, that you aim to please by any means.
        7. This submission taught you hypocrisy: While you curse infidels and call to fight them, you are using their inventions and enjoying the comfort they are offering you

        Brimah, washing your hands after “urinating” does not mean that you are cleaner than those who do not, after all, the real cleanliness is the one of the heart, thoughts and deeds. The good values are shared by all beliefs and religions, and yet, they do not call it Submission to Allah.

        • brimah says:

          To my Anti-islamist
          Response to points 1 to 3 (women in Islam)
          The Quran says: “O You who believe! You are forbidden to inherit women against their will, and you should not treat them with harshness, that you may take away part of the Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at time of marriage) you have given them, unless they commit open illegal sexual intercourse. And live with them honorably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allah brings
          through it a great deal of good.” (An-Nisa 4:19)
          Islam society’s where the first to give rights to women. Its was only 90 yrs ago that women where allowed to vote in USA.
          Response to point 4:
          Indonesia is the largest muslim country and never was there any crusade or campaign there. Also, about 5000 thousand ppl convert to Islam in U.K annually (mostly women) BBC statistics. Are these threatened ppl, or are they running from jizya ?
          Response to point 5:
          Yes Islam does mean submission to Allah without our own opinions. If you beleive in any God then you must agree that, God knows best what is good for you. He created you, He extends over time He is, and will always know what is best for mankind.
          Child marriage is not permitted, he/she must have attained puberty as Aisha had before her marriage was consumated.
          On the wittnes issue, Allah always wants us to err on the side of caution. He will deal severly with who ever escapes justice on this earth.
          Response to point 6:
          Surah 109 Al Kafirun(The Disbelievers) There is no compulsion in religion.
          Response to point 7:
          I am sure that you are enlightened enough to know about the inventions of islam, we pioneered in science from Cordoba to timbuktu to andolusia, we are to use and enjoy all lawfull technology. Islam loves all kind of lawful knowledge. And unlike you, we get blessings from using them. Because everything we do in Islam, is rewarded, from our worship, to school to employment to marriage, even to educating you on what beautiful religion Islam is!
          Back to washing hands, we don’t claim to be cleaner than anyone, we only hope to be obedient to our creator and do whatever we are told to do, including washing hands!
          I hope I haven’t offended you but have helped you to understand my religion.

          • KGS says:

            From The Religion of Peace:

            The Myth:

            Muslims often claim that their religion fostered a rich heritage of scientific discovery, “paving the way” for modern advances in technology and medicine. On this topic, they usually refer to the period between the 7th and 13th centuries, when Europe was experiencing its “Dark Ages” and the Muslim world was acquiring new populations and culture through violent conquest.

            The Truth:

            Although there is no arguing that the Muslim world was relatively more advanced during this period than the “Christian” world, the reasons for this have absolutely nothing to do with the Islamic religion (other than its mandate for military expansion). In fact, the religion tends to discourages knowledge outside of itself, which is why the most prolific Muslim scholars have always tended to be students of religion rather than science.

            [Note that the country of Spain alone translates more learning material and literature into Spanish each year than the entire Arab world has translated into Arabic since the 9th century. As the Saudi Grand Mufti bluntly put it in 2010, “The Quran with its stories and knowledge are sufficient for us… we don’t need the Torah, or Gospels, or any other book].

            There are four basic reasons why Islam has little true claim to scientific achievement:

            First, the Muslim world benefited greatly from the Greek sciences, which were translated for them by Christians and Jews. To their credit, Muslims did a better job of preserving Greek text than did the Europeans of the time and this became the foundation for their own knowledge. (One large reason for this, however, was that access by Christians to this part of their world was cut off by Muslim slave ships and coastal raids that dominated the Mediterranean during this period).

            Secondly, many of the scientific advances credited to Islam were actually “borrowed” from other cultures conquered by the Muslims. The algebraic concept of “zero”, for example, is erroneously attributed to Islam when, in fact, it was a Hindu discovery that was merely introduced to the West by Muslims.

            In truth, conquered populations contributed greatly to the history of “Muslim science” until gradually being decimated by conversion to Islam (under the pressures of dhimmitude). The Muslim concentration within a population is directly proportional to the decline of scientific achievement. It is no accident that the Muslim world has had little to show for itself in the last 800 years or so, since running out of new civilizations to cannibalize.

            Third, even accomplished Muslim scientists and cultural icons were often considered heretics in their day, sometimes with good reason. One of the greatest achievers to come out of the Muslim world was the Persian scientist and philosopher, al-Razi. His impressive works are often held up today as “proof” of Muslim accomplishment. But what the apologists often leave out is that al-Razi was denounced as a blasphemer, since he followed his own religious beliefs – which were in obvious contradiction to traditional Islam.

            Fourth, even the contributions that are attributed to Islam (often inaccurately) are not terribly dramatic. There is the invention of certain words, such as alchemy and elixir (and assassin, by the way), but not much else that survives in modern technology which is of practical significance. Neither is there any reason to believe that such discoveries would not have easily been made by the West following the cultural awakening triggered by the Reformation.

            As an example, consider that Muslims claim credit for coffee, since the beans were discovered in Africa (at the time, an important venue for Islamic slave trading) and first processed in the Middle East. While this is true, it is also true that the red dye used in many food products, from cranberry juice to candy, comes from the abdomen of a particular female beetle found in South America. It is extremely unlikely that the West would not have stumbled across coffee by now (although, to be fair, coffee probably expedited subsequent discoveries).

            In fact, the litany of “Muslim” achievement often takes the form of rhapsody, in which the true origins of these discoveries are omitted – along with their comparative significance to Western achievement. One often doesn’t hear about the dismal fate of original accomplishments either. Those who brag about the great observatory of Taqi al-Din in [freshly conquered] Istanbul, for example, often neglect to mention that it was quickly destroyed by the caliphate.

            At the end of the day, the record of scientific, medical and technological accomplishment is not something over which Muslim apologists want to get into a contest with the Christian world. Today’s Islamic innovators are primarily known for turning Western technology, such as cell phones and airplanes, into instruments of mass murder.

            To sum up, although the Islamic religion is not entirely hostile to science, neither should it be confused as a facilitator. The great achievements that are said to have come out of the Islamic world were made either by non-Muslims who happened to be under Islamic rule, or by heretics who usually had little interest in Islam. Scientific discovery tapers off dramatically as Islam asserts dominance, until it eventually peters out altogether.

          • KGS says:

            More: Fjordman: On Science and Religion

            First of all, I’d like to say that I published an essay recently on why I don’t think Islam can be reformed. All of my essays can be republished online for free, but this one can also be republished in print, as long as I am credited as the author.
            I’ve read quite a few books on the history of science. One of them is The Beginnings of Western Science by David C. Lindberg, who has also written the book Theories of vision – From al-Kindi to Kepler, which I will quote more extensively from later this fall when publishing a multipart essay on the history of optics. Lindberg is a good scholar and well worth reading, but has a few minor flaws.

            Chapter eight in the second edition of his book about the history of science is titled “Islamic science.” Mr. Lindberg is not alone in employing this term, but I am not personally in favor of it. Nobody talks about “Buddhist science” or “Christian science,” so I so no reason why we should use the term “Islamic science,” either. It is misleading, since whatever existed of science in countries under Islamic rule relied heavily on contributions of non-Muslims and pre-Islamic knowledge. Some use the term “Arab science” instead, but this is hardly much better, since among those who were at least nominally Muslims, a disproportionate amount were Persians, not Arabs. Which term should we use, then? “Middle Eastern science” could be one possibility, as it puts emphasis on the region but not on the religion.
            […]
            Gerard of Cremona and those associated with him translated dozens of works from Arabic to Latin, among them probably Alhazen’s book on Optics, which could not have been translated from Greek since it did not exist in Greek. It is thus true that there were translations from Arabic and that some of these did have some impact in Europe. It would be historically inaccurate to claim otherwise. But although this translation movement was significant, we should focus at least as much on how these different civilizations used this information.

            In this case, we are dealing with an example where three different civilizations, the Islamic world, the Christian East (the Byzantine Empire) and the Christian West had access to much of the same material, yet where the end results were quite different. I have read a lot about the history of mechanical clocks and eyeglasses, both of which were invented in Europe in the second half of the thirteenth century AD. These inventions had no counterparts in any other civilization and were important for later scientific and technological advances, which often benefited from more accurate timekeeping. The creation of microscopes and telescopes was to some degree an extension of the invention of eyeglasses and the use of glass lenses.

            I cannot point out any significant piece of information that Europeans had access to at this time which Muslims didn’t also have access to. If anything, Middle Easterners had more knowledge at their disposal since they had regular contacts with the major Asian civilizations and could supplement Greek natural philosophy with Indian and Chinese inventions. Europeans were prevented from having extensive direct contacts with these civilizations because they were geographically isolated from them by a large bloc of hostile Muslims. The only possible conclusion why Europeans invented mechanical clocks is that they were more efficient and creative than Muslims in using the body of information they had at their disposal. Muslims could have done the same, but they didn’t. They failed, pure and simple.

            The case of the Byzantine Empire is even more puzzling, as Byzantine scholars appear not to have taken advantage of the readily available treasure house of science and natural philosophy in their native Greek language. The Byzantine Empire was essentially a theocracy as the Emperor was regarded as the head of both church and state. According to Edward Grant in Science and Religion, page 228:

            “[U]ntil the end of the sixth century, important contributions to natural philosophy were made in the Byzantine Empire by a number of commentators on the works of Aristotle, such as Alexander of Aphrodisias (fl. 2nd-3rd century A.D.), Themistius (c. A.D. 317-c. 388), Simplicius, and most important of all, the Christian neo-Platonist John Philoponus, whose ideas were destined to have a large impact on both Islamic and Latin natural philosophy. But the level of achievement was seriously affected in A.D. 529, when, on religious grounds, the emperor Justinian ordered the closing of Plato’s Academy in Athens, forcing a number of philosophers to depart the Byzantine Empire and move to the East. After that natural philosophy and science played a minor role in Byzantine intellectual life. This is surprising when we realize that, as compared to their contemporary counterparts in Islam and the Latin West, Byzantine scholars were truly fortunate, because their native language was Greek. They could read, study, and interpret, without problems of translation, all the works available in the Greek language that had accumulated in the Byzantine Empire, especially in Constantinople, since the fifth and fourth centuries B.C. Indeed, most of our Greek manuscripts come from Byzantium.”

            Alhazen, when he made his work on optics, relied heavily on Greek mathematics, philosophy and medicine, most of which had initially been translated to Arabic from Byzantine manuscripts. Yet there was no Alhazen in Byzantium itself. Grant again, page 229:

            “It is a paradox of history that the civilizations of Islam and Western Europe contributed significantly to the store of human knowledge, using translated works and often lacking important earlier texts, while the Byzantines, who had command of the Greek language and easy access to the manuscript sources of their great Greek predecessors, failed to capitalize on their good fortune.”

            There were some brief Byzantine “renaissances.” The Empire wasn’t static and did an invaluable job in preserving older knowledge, but few works of lasting significance were produced there during the Middle Ages. I still believe that my conclusion in the online essay The Legacy of Byzantium, inspired by Timothy Gregory’s fascinating book A History of Byzantium, was largely correct:

            It is true that the Byzantine Empire has received some bad press. However, scholars James E. McClellan III and Harold Dorn sum up the established wisdom in their book Science and Technology in World History, second edition, when they state that ‘Byzantium never became a center of significant original science.’ It is surely one of history’s great ironies that the Greco-Roman knowledge that was preserved by the Byzantines had a greater impact in the West than it did in the Byzantine Empire itself. Although being for centuries at the front lines of Islamic Jihad certainly didn’t help, this doesn’t suffice to explain fully the failure of Byzantium to develop modern science. When studying the Byzantine Empire, one cannot help but notice that the separation of church and state which took place in the West after the papal revolution never happened there. Byzantium remained a somewhat autocratic state, thus in some ways resembling China – and perhaps later on Russia – more than Western Europe. The development of parliaments, autonomous cities and numerous universities that took place in the Christian West did not happen in the Christian East.

      • ef says:

        ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF SLAVES. Last thousand years people who follow islam doctrin did not produce anithing
        except killings.

  12. KGS says:

    What a bunch of hooey Brimah, Jesus was speaking in metaphors, never did he ever condone violence. The founder of Islam, mohamed, spoke in words differently during a period when the Islamic community was a minority, and soon thereafter when he made his infamous journey from Mecca to Medina, then he began to reveal the sword and hatred of the other. Even during that time period in Mecca, the locals tried to get mohamed stop antagonizing them, that being the non-Muslim population:

    [The Meccans] said they had never known anything like the trouble they had endured from this fellow. He had declared their mode of life foolish, insulted their forefathers, reviled their religion, divided the community and cursed their gods (Ibn Ishaq 183).

    They (the Meccans) decided to send for Muhammad and to negotiate and argue with him… When he came and sat down with them, they explained that that they had sent for him in order that they could talk together. No Arab had ever treated his tribe as Muhammad had treated them, and they repeated the charges… If it was money he wanted, they would make him the richest of them all; if it was honor, he should be their prince; if it was sovereignty, they would make him king. (Ibn Ishaq 188)

    Face it, Islam is a sham, a rip off from other religions, and violent to the core, every society that becomes islamized, becomes a vigilante society, where people prey on each other for some sign of weakness, then pouncing on them “for the good of society”.

    Kick the habit of Islam and embrace modernity, freedom of the individual that’s coupled with morality and virtue. The fake morality that Islam preaches leaves the follower empty inside, because their is no choice involved, it’s either do or be punished, or worse, die.

    • brimah says:

      KGS, My dear brother in humanity, Meccans at that time where barbaric! They burried their daughter alive, had no respect for women, they had no loyalty and where afflicted with much of the vices that are predominant in todays world.
      It was only appropriate that a Prophet be sent to them to call for them to amend their ways. Yes he “Muhammed” turned down their offers of riches cause riches only help in this temporay life of (0 to about 100) years. He was looking at the bigger picture. Life after death (eternity).
      Now lets get down to his teachings and the Quran:
      The Quran was revealed at different times in his life. Some times of war and some of peace. But a consistent theme through out the Holy Book is forgiveness and mercy. Please try and read it!
      There is a great difference between muslim societies of today and the ideal society that the Prophet left behind. In those days, we muslims where protectors of others regardless of their beleifs. Jews many a times found safety in our societies. The Islamic societies you refer to today are those of Your puppet leaders and oppressed ppl who sometimes feel the need to go to extremes to get their point accross.

      • KGS says:

        Dear delusional and brainwashed, you’ve been sold a bill of goods, your handlers have fed you one lie after the other to keep you in bondage to a historical figure that many say never even existed, and if he did, was schizophrenic and heard voices that he thought was from above…but actually originated in his own grey mass.

        Mohamed never saw riches that he didn’t like, and set to grabbing it as soon as his cult got enough followers and took to looting and plundering the countryside. Thanks, but a Jesus or a Moses he was not. Mohamed’s cult consisted of keeping the followers cut completely off from their non-believing loved ones and friends, sanctioning rape, assassinations, and a whole host of other atrocities that in this day and age, if he were to do the same, he would be either in an orange jumpsuit in Gitmo, or executed as a common criminal.

        Islam is evil, pure evil and those who follow it are nothing more than the brainwashed. I would rather have the ancient Meccans as neighbors than the mohammedan.

      • ef says:

        Brimah, all total bull.

  13. brimah says:

    Furhermore, it was because Jesus kept speaking in inconsistent metaphors that Allah had to send down Muhammed to “tell it like it is”
    Just a couple of Jesus’ metaphors:
    Telling ppl to sell their garments and buy swords.
    Telling them to cut ears off.
    His rage in the church.
    Jesus telling us not charge interest. (which only muslims do today)
    Jesus seeking help from Bigger god when he was being crucified.
    Jesus telling his deciples “why look for me among the dead” when he was alive.
    Jesus telling us that all the miracles he carried out where not by his power.
    Jesus eating bread. (which only humans do)
    Where do the metaphors END and where does the religion BEGIN.
    My dear KSG, I choose the one who tells it like it is!

    • KGS says:

      What a crock of crap. When you read the entirety of Jesus message, he was looking forward to the building of the kingdom of heaven above, not some temporal play pen on earth. That was Mohamed’s modus operandi in a nut shell. Steal, kill, murder and maim, rape, plunder and pillage.

      The ear you spoke of being cut off, was Peter acting out of anger and slicing of the ear of a guard, it was then written that he replaced the ear back onto the guard that was there to arrest him and eventually to crucify him. If it were Mohamed in the same situation, he would have driven the blade clean through the man’s gullet or lobbed of his head, and then afterwards, while wiping the blood off on his sleeve tell peter to take better aim, for he sure could have intended to be aiming for the ear.

      His rage in the Temple was over the money lenders taking not what was due, but making money off the peoples’ religious duties, that has nothing to do with money lending today that isthe backbone of a vibrant capitalist economy that has lifted the overwhelming majority of the world’s population out of dirt poor poverty.

      Go ahead and choose to believe in Mohamed’s imaginary friend, that’s your right, but don’t you dare think that I cannot come up with a legion of examples showing just how contradicting the Koran is,….I’m waiting to crack the knuckles to get started if you want to go there.

      I draw the line in the sand waiting for you to step over it.

      • Algerian anti-islam says:

        KGS,
        I will provide a list of contradictions in Koran, as well as Scientific and historical errors.

    • ef says:

      muhamed is not messanger of God , he is messanger of devil. Millions people
      died because of it, before and now.

  14. brimah says:

    KSG, I agree with you, Islam can’t and should never be reformed. God has finally perfected a religion for mankind that can’t be refromed through kings in high places and through Human judges in high courts and through U.S and British think tanks. It has been perfected! The Ummah can only get weak, but one day, it shall be strenghtened. Thats a promise from Allah!

    • KGS says:

      Thanks for you honesty, I shall endeavor to enlighten my readers about it.

    • KGS says:

      The Koran is perfect in every way?

      Yes, Allah can do anything.
      35:1
      Praise be to Allah, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, Who appointeth the angels messengers having wings two, three and four. He multiplieth in creation what He will. Lo! Allah is Able to do all things.
      No, there are some things Allah cannot do.
      6:100-101
      Yet they … impute falsely, without knowledge, sons and daughters unto Him. … The Originator of the heavens and the earth! How can He have a child?2:219

      How long is Allah’s day?
      1,000 years.
      22:47 A Day with Allah is as a thousand years of what ye reckon.
      32:5 He directeth the ordinance from the heaven unto the earth; then it ascendeth unto Him in a Day, whereof the measure is a thousand years of that ye reckon.
      50,000 years.
      70:4
      Unto Him in a Day whereof the span is fifty thousand years.

      Does Allah send people astray?
      Yes.
      2:6-7 As for the Disbelievers, Whether thou warn them or thou warn them not it is all one for them; they believe not. Allah hath sealed their hearing and their hearts, and on their eyes there is a covering.
      6:25 We have placed upon their hearts veils, lest they should understand, and in their ears a deafness.
      17:97-98 As for him whom He sendeth astray, for them thou wilt find no protecting friends beside Him, and We shall assemble them on the Day of Resurrection on their faces, blind, dumb and deaf; their habitation will be hell; whenever it abateth, We increase the flame for them. That is their reward because they disbelieved Our revelations.
      18:57 Lo! on their hearts We have placed coverings so that they understand not, and in their ears a deafness. And though thou call them to the guidance, in that case they can never be led aright.
      No.
      9:115 It was never Allah’s (part) that He should send a folk astray.
      18:55 And naught hindereth mankind from believing when the guidance cometh unto them, and from asking forgiveness of their Lord unless (it be that they wish) that the judgment of the men of old should come upon them or (that) they should be confronted with the Doom.

      Is Allah kind and merciful?
      Yes
      1:1, 3, 163 In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
      2:37, 54 He is the relenting, the Merciful.
      2:128 Thou, only Thou, art the Relenting, the Merciful.
      2:143 For Allah is Full of Pity, Merciful toward mankind.
      2:160 I am the Relenting, the Merciful.
      2:173, 182, 192, 199, 218 Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
      No
      2:7 Allah hath sealed their hearing and their hearts, and on their eyes there is a covering.
      2:17 Allah taketh away their light and leaveth them in darkness, where they cannot see.
      4:56 Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the Fire. As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment.
      4:168-9 Lo! those who disbelieve and deal wrong, Allah will never forgive them, neither will He guide them unto a road, Except the road of hell, wherein they will abide for ever. And that is ever easy for Allah.
      5:33 The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom.
      7:50 And the dwellers of the Fire cry out unto the dwellers of the Garden: Pour on us some water or some wherewith Allah hath provided you. They say: Lo! Allah hath forbidden both to disbelievers (in His guidance).

      • brimah says:

        KSG,
        Please try harder next time, our Quran is perfect and our Religion is perfect. I was able to respond to all your rants even though I am not learned in Islam.
        First, Yes Allah can do anything, but some things are beyond him. He wouldn’t be crucified, and plead to some other higher god. Obviously, he wouldn’t have children as the verse you quoted implies.
        You Quoted: It was never Allah’s (part) that He should send a folk astray
        But it is actually: And Allah will not mislead a people after He hath guided them, in order that He may make clear to them what to fear (and avoid)- for Allah hath knowledge of all things.
        Note that he was spaeking about ppl that had already been guided!
        Verse 18:55 is not contradictory as well:
        Allah created procreation as we know it. Why would the creator of procreation procreate ? He creates!
        Secondly, A day with Allah is a specific lenght of time that only he knows. He is the creator of time itself. After we die, he will ask us “how long we where on earth” ? and we will say “maybe a day or part of a day, but he knows best. Time is relative!
        Since you are such a scientist you should also know that days are different on different planets and even here on earth, science has proven that days haven’t always been the same lenghth since creation began! Time is RELATIVE to location and era.
        Thirdly, on leading ppl astray, you took 9:115 out of context as usual!
        And finally about his mercy and wrath, he is both!
        He is mercifull to those who ask for his mercy and deserve his mercy and he is wrathfull to those who attribute partners to him.
        It is said that after Allah created the world, he wrote in his Book that His Mercy will supercede His Wrath. May Allah be Mercifull on His followers. Amen.

        • KGS says:

          Eh, wrong again, Allah is Mohamed’s imaginary friend, the Koran a collection of a schizophrenic’s rantings, and the followers of such an ideology severely brainwashed to believe such a story book to be real. You answered nothing, you just repeated psycho babel that means nothing to a learned mind. Your book is full of inconsistencies created by someone who created the cult of Islam.

          • brimah says:

            KSG,
            Exactly, you probably didn’t even take time to read my responses.
            2:7 Allah hath sealed their hearing and their hearts, and on their eyes there is a covering.
            2:17 Allah taketh away their light and leaveth them in darkness, where they cannot see.
            (taking from your quotes above)

          • KGS says:

            Should I care? Your responses are unintelligible, its all full of allah-speak who can be shown to say one thing when he clearly said another. I could care less. The book of the book of the Koran is a massive rip off of Christian and Judaic texts, it all the same to me what you think it says, what matters most is how the West reacts to what it knows to be the facts about Islam and act accordingly. Isolation and repatriation

        • ef says:

          your religion is perfect to murder people.

  15. KGS says:

    All my readers know very well that it’s immaterial for you to draw comparisons of the Torah and New Testament with the rip off version of those two books, called the Koran. What Mohamed didn’t invent, he ripped off from the just two mentioned books, and then twisted them all out of shape. It’s a well known fact that Muslims are either converting to Christianity or just plain leaving Islam in general, in droves, after they find out how much an evil person and reprobate Mohamed actually was, and that they’ve been lied to.

    Practice your dawa elsewhere

  16. olga kasabian says:

    Christianity promotes violence. its adherents are KKK and Hitler among other bloodthirsty that can no longer considered human. Christian USA dropped the atomic bomb on Japan killing 100 000 in a couple of seconds. Catholic pedophile priests are protected and hide by the Pope himself and did not handed them to authorities as there are no other authorities other than the Pope himself. This is an example of a Catholic state Vatican whereby no other faith are tolerated.

  17. Jon says:

    Allah is a false deity, he’s the per-Islamic moon god of the Arabs. In fact, the Koran suggests that there are many other gods. For example Allah says in Surah al-Anbiya’ 21:107 “And We did not send you (O Muhammad) except as a mercy to the world.”

  18. Erin Wallace says:

    Dear KGS,

    My name is Erin from Article Writing Services. We have a client who would like to pay you for the opportunity to post some of their content on your website. All of the content is professionally produced and you can select from pieces relevant to your audience.

    The result is you get some free, interesting content for your readers while getting paid.

    In return our client is asking for one link that they specify at the bottom of the content (no porn or gambling). Feel free to contact me with any concerns or clarifications you may have.

    If you would like to see some examples of our content, please email me at so we can begin.

    Sincerely,

    Erin Wallace
    Outreach Manager – Article Writing Services

  19. Mohammed says:

    Hi,
    I am a first time user of this website. I feel extremely appalled at the level of hatred towards Islam. Nevertheless, I do not agree with a majority of views however, I can understand where this anger is being vented from.
    Firstly, I would like to comment on the fact that KGS wrote: so much “so that it deems all other prophets before Mohamed, as Muslims, rewrites Christian scripture and commands it followers to hate Jews and Christians” This already indicates your level of understanding the religion of Islam. Islam DOES NOT deem all prophets as “Muslim” because the term Muslim was ONLY referred to those who accepted the Muhammadic faith. As is commonly known, Muhammad was the last Prophet.
    Secondly, Islam does establish from a root word which means peace and submission. Peace does not need to be explained. Submission of one’s will to God. What does this mean? Those acts which have been ordained as compulsory one must carry them out, e.g. 5 daily prayers.
    What I find extremely distasteful is the fact that because of a few an entire cast of people are being vindicated! I would find it utmost disrespectful if one member of my family had committed a crime and my whole family was made to suffer.
    Also, those who have studied the Qur’aan will know that every verse has a pre-text. Every verse that was revealed was according to the time and situation. No “jihad” “was ever an offensive jihad. In fact the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) never encouraged offensive jihad, only defensive jihad took place.
    Finally, I would encourage all of you to study the life and teachings of Prophet Muhammad. Why? Simply because you will find that Islam teaches that one’s social conduct and etiquette is considered superior to even the rights of God. The way one interacts with others (Muslim and Non-Muslim) is held in the highest esteem. It is unforgivable that one inflicts any sort of harm or difficulty on a fellow human being. Muslims believe that God is All-Forgiving, however, God will not forgive a Muslim until his fellow Human has forgiven him for the harm he has caused. You will also find that women are not subjected to inhumane treatment. This merely boils down to cultural views, not Islam. Islam prevails culture! A verse from the Holy Qur’aan, chapter 3:
    “There is no compulsion in religion”
    Many Muslim women choose to live their lives in different ways and no-one has the right to force things upon them. In actual fact,there are certain other faiths that subject heir women to treatment beyond imagination.
    I do not disagree that there are those who have tainted this beautiful religion, and many Muslims like myself also oppose these “radical Muslims” and those who believe so fiercely that jihad should be taking place everywhere. These people are probably not even practicing Muslims, rather they are “fantasists”. I have a lot more would like to explain and discuss, however, time does not permit me. As a final comment PLEASE DO NOT TARNISH ALL WITH THE SAME BRUSH, for this also portrays a lack of intelligence. May you all live peacefully. Thank you.

    • KGS says:

      You said:
      I am a first time user of this website. I feel extremely appalled at the level of hatred towards Islam. Nevertheless, I do not agree with a majority of views however, I can understand where this anger is being vented from.

      Firstly, I would like to comment on the fact that KGS wrote: so much “so that it deems all other prophets before Mohamed, as Muslims, rewrites Christian scripture and commands it followers to hate Jews and Christians” This already indicates your level of understanding the religion of Islam. Islam DOES NOT deem all prophets as “Muslim” because the term Muslim was ONLY referred to those who accepted the Muhammadic faith. As is commonly known, Muhammad was the last Prophet.

      Secondly, Islam does establish from a root word which means peace and submission. Peace does not need to be explained. Submission of one’s will to God. What does this mean? Those acts which have been ordained as compulsory one must carry them out, e.g. 5 daily prayers.

      TT: This is disinformation. From Koranic verses 2: 127-2:136 all the prophets mentioned were depicted as the first submissive believers (aka Muslims) The root word for Islam is “al-Silm,” which means “submission” or “surrender.” Muslims all take pride (wrongly) by co-opting all the prophets from the two great religions of Judaism and Chritianity.
      The same religion has He established for you as that which He enjoined on Noah … and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus 42:13 .

      Also, not only do they commandeer their prophets, they denounce their scriptures as having been corrupted because they differ with that of the Koran.

      But the transgressors changed the word from that which had been given them (2:59)

      You said:
      What I find extremely distasteful is the fact that because of a few an entire cast of people are being vindicated! I would find it utmost disrespectful if one member of my family had committed a crime and my whole family was made to suffer.

      Also, those who have studied the Qur’aan will know that every verse has a pre-text. Every verse that was revealed was according to the time and situation. No “jihad” “was ever an offensive jihad. In fact the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) never encouraged offensive jihad, only defensive jihad took place.

      TT: What you mean is “indicted”, not vindicated which has the exact opposite meaning. Besides, no one is blaming every Muslim, but the scriptures they hold dear. Therein lies the problem. The Koran, as it is written is a disaster. The Koran contains open ended calls for violence against the unbeliever, if we need to drag them all out for everyone to see, I will. Are you sure you want to go there?

      Mohamed went on an offensive jihad when he raided caravans he deemed as having stolen goods from Muslims. There is no proof today (from Islamic texts) proving he was correct. Also, killing people and murdering them after the fighting stopped does not look good on your beloved leader, Mohamed. It was a revenge attack for not allowing them to pray, pure and simple.

      You said:
      Finally, I would encourage all of you to study the life and teachings of Prophet Muhammad. Why? Simply because you will find that Islam teaches that one’s social conduct and etiquette is considered superior to even the rights of God. The way one interacts with others (Muslim and Non-Muslim) is held in the highest esteem. It is unforgivable that one inflicts any sort of harm or difficulty on a fellow human being.

      Muslims believe that God is All-Forgiving, however, God will not forgive a Muslim until his fellow Human has forgiven him for the harm he has caused. You will also find that women are not subjected to inhumane treatment. This merely boils down to cultural views, not Islam. Islam prevails culture! A verse from the Holy Qur’aan, chapter 3:
      “There is no compulsion in religion”

      TT: Now this is the lamest part of all. Islam is a totalitarian construct that forbids questioning of any kind, one must always submit, never question, to do so one risks beatings or death. Such “etiquette” makes me want to vomit. So no thanks. Muslims have traditionally treated teh non-muslim as an inferior, as a second class being, a dhimmi, whose “protected status” could be ripped away for any perceived slight or failure to pay the jizya tax. So once again, you can take your Muslim kind of interaction with non-Muslims and ram it. The only foregiveness your allah calls for is between Muslims, the non-muslim is to be tread underfoot until they either convert or feel themselves subdued. Nice try but no one is buying your nonsense of “no compulsion in religion”, Dhimmitude is but one form of compulsion as well as we have more than clear examples of how Muslims treat the apostates. Forced retraction or death.

      You said:
      Many Muslim women choose to live their lives in different ways and no-one has the right to force things upon them. In actual fact,there are certain other faiths that subject heir women to treatment beyond imagination.

      I do not disagree that there are those who have tainted this beautiful religion, and many Muslims like myself also oppose these “radical Muslims” and those who believe so fiercely that jihad should be taking place everywhere. These people are probably not even practicing Muslims, rather they are “fantasists”. I have a lot more would like to explain and discuss, however, time does not permit me. As a final comment PLEASE DO NOT TARNISH ALL WITH THE SAME BRUSH, for this also portrays a lack of intelligence. May you all live peacefully. Thank you.

      TT: Women in Islam are treated like cattle, the horror stories abound. They’re deemed to be deceptive temptresses who need “watching over” by males guards. When a woman is raped, she needs four men as witnesses otherwise she risks jail time or even death for her own rape. Save us the BS, we know better already, you’re not fooling anyone.

      The Muslims you call “radicals” are the very same ones who can point to the same Islamic texts and prove you to be apostates, not following the true path. As long as they can successfully do that, you got a problem.

      The problem with Islamic fundamentalists, are the fundamentals of Islam

    • ef says:

      NO, peace must be explain, your peace is not peace of human been.
      Blame hatred against isam on muhame, koran and crimes comited by muslim.

  20. Mohammed says:

    In today’s times we are all hell bent of freedom of speech. However, we fail to see and understand that in the time of Muhammad (peace be upon him) that freedom of speech was not accepted. He was a victim for not accepting their way and for voicing his understanding and belief in God. For this reason the people of Mecca were ready to abolish him at any cost. Is it so wrong that at a time when it was “conquer or be conquered” Muhammad brought order to a state of confusion. Also, no Muslim can deny the texts of the Christian or Jewish faiths. What the Qur’aan is discussing are those who distorted these texts, this has also been confirmed by many a scholar of those faiths.
    With regards to jizya (tax), many countries will also punish those who refuse to pay tax, so your argument is nonsensical.
    All Prophets came with the same message i.e. belief in one God and to be accepted as a Prophet. This the same message that Muhammad invited towards. If you want to term them “muslims” then so be it.
    Many a time people are falsely accused of committing indecencies, therefore, the appearing of witnesses removes all confusion. However, it is not as simple as if she does not produce four witnesses then her word will not be accepted. Many of the verses from the Qur’aan also have a matter of history behind them. It would be helpful if you studied the commentary also, rather then continuously quoting out of context.
    Finally, those “radicals” we are referring to, many of them do not frequent the mosques, and it is the opinion of the majority of Muslims that these people do not represent Islam in the correct manner.
    Once again, I would encourage you, please study the teachings of Muhammad in full. You may be surprised to find the level of conduct and behavior Muslims MUST uphold with all people. Islam does not encourage its followers to ridicule other beliefs and it instructs how one must accept and dignify other religions and people from all backgrounds. As a final comment, it is simply outrageous how one can point fingers at ONE religion when many of our respected countries are steeped in bloodshed, and continue to commit atrocities. With regards to women it is amuses me at the level of ignorance many hold. How many Muslim women have been asked with regards to how they feel and what they think? Not many I imagine! There are far more religions and culture that subject their women to unimaginable torture. I would no like to name them as that would open up another whole can of worms.
    Peace to you all, May we all find comfort and live in harmony!

    • KGS says:

      Mohammed, all other rights that we hold dear, rest upon the single most important right of all, the right to free speech. There is no other right more precious in life than that, all other rights flow from it, hence the importance of defending it. Period.

      If the Koran came to Mohamed in a “supposed ” perfect form, why would freedom of speech not be included in it? What you’re saying essesentially saying is, or saying by default, that allah is anti-free speech, other wise your allah would have thought of it and really revolutionized the region. But no, allah did not, nor did allah give any Muslim or non-Muslim the right to freely choose, otherwise submission would not feature so heavily.

      Also, Islam’s founder was not a victim, but an antagonist, and when the locals jrected his “way of life” he declared war on them and murdered them. I can think of no better historical religious figure that is beeter suited to be an antithesis of Jesus than Mohamed.
      Also, you’re being once again highly disingenuous in claiming that “the distorted texts” in question are the very same ones Christians and Jews have also declare distorted. Everyone knows that Muslims are prideful (a misplaced pride) that the Koran is complete, but of course it isn’t, being a hodgepodge of texts stolen from the Christian and Jewish texts, with the rest being made up on the fly by Mohamed himself to validate his horrid actions.

      In regards to the paying of the jizya, no other non-Muslim country or system makes its citizens to pay a tax with the expressed desire to ensure that they “feel themselves subdued.” The system was nothing more than a same system imposed on shopkeepers by thugs promising “protection”, and only if they continue to pay it…or else. Also, to further highlight the subdued nature of the dhimmi subject, there was a traditional slapping hard of the neck of those paying the jizya tax. This further demonstrates your obfuscations over the true nature and mindset behind the Islamic practice.

      You said:
      “All Prophets came with the same message i.e. belief in one God and to be accepted as a Prophet. This the same message that Muhammad invited towards. If you want to term them “muslims” then so be it.”

      You’re once again lying here, but so bit it. Everyone reading this, and there are many, see what you’re doing here. In English its called word weaseling. Keep it up!
      You fail to properly answer the charge of the need for women to produce 4 male witnesses to in order to prove rape. The fact that women in the Muslim world are routinely being held guilty of adultry for their own rape, which points to the institutionalization of that kind of mindset, proves my point. Face it, I’m correct. Islam treats its women folk like chattel, subhuman inferiors to that of a muslim male. It’s exactly how the Saudi Arabs feel about other non Saudi peoples, whether they be Muslim or not. Supremacy is supremacy.

      You’re just propagandinzing for your ideology, nothing more.

  21. Mohammed says:

    Also, when you commented: “killing people and murdering them after the fighting stopped does not look good on your beloved leader, Mohamed. It was a revenge attack for not allowing them to pray, pure and simple.”
    I kindly inquire to what incident(s) are you referring to?
    May I also kindly ask: Why do you have the images of certain flags on the home page? and why have you depicted people who wear a robe and scarf as wailing babies?
    Thank you so much.
    Finally, a message to all, I am not commenting on these articles/sites because of hatred or anger. It is purely because I am quite inquisitive and would prefer to research first hand as to why many people have a negative attitude towards Islam.
    I sincerely hope and pray that we can all live peacefully as one and respect the moral values of one another without the constant bickering and arguments. I hope I am not asking for too much. Peace!!!

    • KGS says:

      Mohamed, your supposed man of peace, beheaded over 700 Jews after the fighting stopped. Your prophet also allowed for the raping of non-Muslim women and using them as whores. your prophet has committed just about every crime known to man, and yet you people use him as the greatest example of human behavior. Get your head out of the sand, begin to think for yourself, and wake the hell the up. Your worshiping a warlord criminal. That’s what we have against your ideology.

      What flags are you referring to, the Finnish – US and Israeli flags?

      If that’s the images you are referring to then its because the TT is proud a supporter of Israel, as all sane people should be.

      The image of the crying babies are the OIC, and Arab League, the biggest bunch of cry babies the world has ever seen. It also represents Islam in general. The eternal Arab/muslim victim mentality.

      I want to live in peace with all, Christians, Jews, Muslims and all the rest, but the Muslims have to be brought into the 21st century, kicking and screaming if need be, and part of that process is getting them used to the same treatment the rest of society has to go through. There is no such thing as freedom from being offended.

  22. Mohammed says:

    with regards to your last comment:
    If you actually studied the history, you will find that it was the opinion of Muhammad NOT to kill these people, however, it was God’s will and therefore had to be carried out. This was in the very early days of Islam and it had to be done, due to the fact that it was a war and had they not, these people would have retaliated.
    Secondly, you continue to emphasize that it was Jews, in this you are incorrect. It was not only people of Jewish faith. Also, there is no evidence that he allowed the raping of women. This is once again your misguided attempt to portray Muhammad (peace be upon him) in a barbaric fashion. You continue to advertise your views without reference and as everyone knows that intimates weakness on your part.
    As for your comment “worshiping a warlord criminal”- Simply outrageous! Any person who worships Muhammad is not a Muslim. You sing the praises of America and Israel despite their despicable acts on humanity, well, quite simply you are steeped in hypocrisy. Why should all sane people be a supporter of Israel? When out of cowardliness they have bombarded a people with rocks as defense. You have marginalized many of the Human planet, not ONLY Muslims with this comment.
    As for the pictures and many of the videos on your site: I thought this was an opportunity for intellectual debate, I am obviously mistaken. You seem to laud praise on anything anyone says as long as it is against Islam and Muslims. Many of the videos clearly suggest that those people are either lacking intelligence or are fame hungry animals. I do not know if there is any point in continuing to post messages after observing those videos. Please argue otherwise! If someone has an objection to make against anything, then there are many avenues one could explore. However, after the uploading of those clips, any sane person will inform you that this has seriously damaged your reputation and the credentials of this website.
    P.S. No-one else seems to be posting messages????

    • KGS says:

      Mohamed killed these people from his desire for vengence, pure and simple, go ahead and ascribe it to his invisible friend for all I care, but the fact remains, if not for mohamed antagonizing the locals, no one would have been bothered him.

      Proof:
      “When the apostle openly displayed Islam as Allah ordered him, his people did not withdraw or turn against him, so far as I have heard, until he spoke disparagingly of their gods. When he did that, they took great offence and resolved unanimously to treat him as an enemy. “(Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 167)

      Rape in Islam sanctioned, proof:
      Koran 4:24 [9] extends the “privilege” of having sexual intercourse with captured slave women to all Muslim men. [4:24] “Also prohibited are the women who are already married, unless they flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you. These are GOD’s commandments to you.”
      Dr.Andrew Bostom writes: For example, Muhammad and his minions attacked and subdued the prosperous Jewish tribe Banu-Mustaliq in a surprise raid (during 626 A.D.). The Banu al-Mustaliq males were slaughtered and the “booty” included the victims’ women. Juwayriyya, the most beautiful captive and daughter of the leader of the Banu al-Mustaliq was taken as a “bride” for Muhammad himself. The mass rape by “coitus interruptus” of the captured women—as sanctioned by Muhammad—was described in a canonical hadith, thusly:

      (Sunan Abu Dawud 2167)—Muhairiz said: I entered the mosque and saw Abu Sa’id al-Khudri. I sat with him and asked about withdrawing the penis (while having intercourse). Abu Sa’id said: We went out with the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to Banu al-Mustaliq, and took some Arab women captive, and we desired the women, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, and we wanted ransom; so we intended to withdraw the penis (while having intercourse with the slave-women). But we asked ourselves: Can we draw the penis when the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) is among us before asking him about it? So we asked him about it. He said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.”

      Also the 4 witness protection plan (for males):

      Koran 24.4 [7] states: “And those who accuse honourable women but bring not four witnesses, scourge them (with) eighty stripes and never (afterward) accept their testimony – They indeed are evil-doers.”
      Ibn Warraq states: Muslim jurists will only accept four male witnesses. These witnesses must declare that they have “seen the parties in the very act of carnal conjunction.” Once an accusation of fornication and adultery has been made, the accuser himself or herself risks punishment if he or she does not furnish the necessary legal proofs. Witnesses are in the same situation. If a man were to break into a woman’s dormitory and rape half a dozen women, he would risk nothing since there would be no male witnesses. Indeed the victim of a rape would hesitate before going in front of the law, since she would risk being condemned herself and have little chance of obtaining justice. “If the woman’s words were sufficient in such cases,” explains Judge Zharoor ul Haq of Pakistan, “then no man would be safe.”

      Face it, while Muslims will catagorically deny it, they in fact worship Mohamed as a deity. There’s no mistaking it. teh veneration for his character and honor is indeed worship, no matter what you people say. You’re idol woshipping. But its all the same to me. Go for it.
      Your Israel hatred is to be expected, you’re a Muslim, Jew hatred is a must.

    • ef says:

      muhammed, you are really example of islamic” peace”.

  23. BobSmith says:

    If you want to know why Muslims never speak up – read my theory on Islam is Fear at
    http://islamsfatalflaw.blogspot.com/

    Here is just the first few lines.

    Would you wear a T-shirt with a Mohammad cartoon printed on it?

    You might in Montana. Don’t try it in Mecca.

    Why?

    Because, Islam trains a small number of its most devout believers it’s OK to kill. And Islamic killers have been trained to kill anyone who insults Allah and/or Mohammad.

    In Montana you’d have a good chance none of these Islamic killers would see you.

    In Mecca you wouldn’t last five minutes. One of Islam’s killers would come from out of nowhere and kill you. It is that simple.

    You don’t believe me? Ask any Muslim!

  24. Mohammed Khatri says:

    AHAHHAHAHAH THIS SITE IS SO FUNNY. IF U GUYS ARE REALLY THAT SCARED THEN JUST COME TO MOSQUE AND FIND OUT FOR YOUR SELF WHAT WE EVIL MUSLIMS ARE UP TO… :)

    • KGS says:

      Exactly: “COME TO MOSQUE AND FIND OUT FOR YOUR SELF WHAT WE EVIL MUSLIMS ARE UP TO… ” I’m hoping state security is doing just that.

      • Diane says:

        Mohammad, I appreciate your attempt at breaking the ice with these prejudiced fellows. It’s funny how you’re the Muslim here, the only one using humor which isn’t meant to insult, and yet these bloggers accuse Muslims of using violent methods to defend themselves. Since when was self-defense wrong?

        • KGS says:

          Ahh but your idea “self defense” is according to Islamic victimhood mentality where any criticism of Islam is judged as ….an offense. Screw that.

  25. Diane says:

    You claim to have understood and interpreted the Quran, but I believe you might have been misguided. I’ve also read the Quran, and it forsees that those who do not believe, will rarely believe. If you do not agree or understand the Islamic religion, then that concerns you and you only. BUT, if that causes you to have to torment and use all this verbal abuse against them, even setting up a site mocking them, that is low. Low and extremely disrespectful. You might not have said it directly, but through your posts, you’re acting like you’re the best in the world. Well, NEWS FLASH: you’re not. If you truly believe that Islam is destruction, then who am I to change your mind? But when it comes to you having to outrightly disturb the peace, then honestly, you deserve any hate you’ll get for this.

    Honestly people, this is 2011, show some love for multiculturalism!

    • KGS says:

      Why should I show “love” for an intolerant monocultural ideology (Islam) that uses multiculturalism to increase its clout in a non-Muslim society, which at the end of the day, spells doom for our modern western way of life. The Koran is a highly lethal, destructive ideology that can’t ever hope to compete within a truly free democratic, pluralistic society, so it seeks to change that society to conform to its own backward, medieval system of law and governance. No thanks.

    • ef says:

      We know, if we will come you will not smile.

  26. Mohammed says:

    well commented Diane. The most astounding fact is that “for all Islams evil” it has been statistically proven that it is the fastest growing religion. However, as they say “you can never straighten a dogs tail”, well this is the case with many of the people who have a fixed attitude towards Islam.

    • KGS says:

      For all you Islam apologists out there, Islam is not the world’s fastest growing religion, but the world’s largest totalitarian cult ideology that’s being picked apart and shown for what it is. People are leaving it in droves and converting to either Christianity or to nothing at all. Islam is a death cult, which leaves misery and destruction in its wake. Once people are free to choose without fear, the Islamic numbers crumble, just like what happened to Soviet Communism. The truth is, you can’t allow for freedom of choice, hence the Islamic world’s penchant for the intimidation tactics of street vigilantism. Face it, Islam sucks, where ever its tried.

  27. Bilal Bin Saeed says:

    May Lord open your hearts to the truth.

  28. Muslim says:

    War is just stupid…. PEACE ALL

  29. Zahid says:

    This guy KGS or whatever needs to be castrated so his testosterone levels get normalized. He seems to get instantly afflicted by a severe case of painful haemorrhoids the moment you even mention the word Islam. I pity him.

    Now I look forward to a long diatribe against all things Muslim with pseudo quotes that are mostly out of context and generally BS frothing out through all his apertures.

    • KGS says:

      Islam needs to be castrated. Then you’ll see me not paying it any attention. Seeing that you’re from Lahore, you should know very well about the fundamustard activity I’m concerned about. A muslim talking about castration , is both ironic as it is par for the course, seeing that Islam took to castrating black slaves from Africa and in the process killing 9 out of every ten slaves that were brutalized in that fashion. Islam and brutality go hand in hand, or should I say balls in hand.

      • Zahid says:

        Your response is exactly as expected.. incorrect and with one sole intent.. malign Islam. Maybe you get paid for this. You talk a lot about free speech.. choice etc. 2 billion people have made their choice and voted in favor of Islam on this planet. Continue with your BS under the garb of free speech. Good luck my friend. Those who read your blog know instantly what your opinions are all about.

        • KGS says:

          Exactly my point. Thanks for responding in the manner that you have, you’ve shown my readers the typical response by muslims who are dealt the facts, the wall of denial comes up and its time to change the subject. Thanks!

          • Zahid says:

            You have dealt no facts at all. I provided the basic fact that 2 billion humans on this planet have chosen Islam. You are in denial not I. If you believe in freedom of speech and choice, then please respect the choice of 2 billion people and shut up with your Satanic verses.

  30. Simon says:

    Zahid,I don’t believe that 2 billion people have chosen Islam. Most were born into it. I believe that there are moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. The Koran’s chapters are not printed in chronological order – it is a confusing mixture of often contradictory messages. A big problem appears to be the principle of abrogation, that is, that later verses can be said to cancel earlier verses which contradict them. This principle is recognized by Muslims themselves and has been named – “mansukh” (the abrogated) and “nasikh” (the abrogating) verses (Koran 16:101 and 2:106 or thereabouts) recognize this principle. It appears that Mohammed revealed verses which were pertinent to the situation of the Muslims at a particular time. When in a weakened situation the verses were tolerant towards “unbelievers.” I realize that all Muslims do not agree on exactly which verses have been abrogated. To me it appears obvious that “jihadists” regard surah 9 (which we are told is one of the last revealed chronologically) and one which contains exhortations to fight, as a surah which cancels earlier tolerant verses including the “let there be no compulsion in religion” verse. It is verse 9:29 which talks of the “jizya” tax and the humbling of the People of the Book by fighting them until they submit.
    Another problem is that the “jihadists” believe themselves to be “divinely” enjoined to create around themselves a society which lives under one form or another of sharia law. I know there are different schools of sharia law, but I also believe that all of them are incompatible with democracy. So these two problems – abrogation in the Koran and the desire of fundamentalist Muslims to live under sharia law create problems when such people emigrate to Western countries for their economic betterment. If Muslims truly want peaceful coexistence, these two problems must be addressed and overcome.

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, I am sorry but your delayed reply is incorrect and a rambling irrelevance. Facts are… Of the Abrahamic religions, Judaism is the oldest since around 3600 but has a mere 14 million followers mostly born into it without any choice. Islam is the newest at 1432 years but still has around 2 billion followers of which much more than 14 million are recent converts who actually chose Islam. I offered facts. Please accept the majority view. We respect your minority view even if we disagree with it.

      • KGS says:

        While the rest are enslaved to Islam, and those wishing to leave it are routinely hounded, threatened with bodily harm, and worse, murdered. In spite of that, millions are leaving Islam, opting for an other faith or no faith at all.

        • Zahid says:

          The fact still remains Islam’s followers number 2 billion while you represent a paltry 14 million. Not even a respectable fraction of the world’s population after doing what you are doing for 3600 years. This is not a failure but a disaster. Your jingoistic responses remind me of the saying “empty utensils make the loudest noise”.

      • ef says:

        islam folowers are 2 billions because you kill people who don’t
        want to follow islam and kill people who want leave islam.
        Liars, Liars, Liars, Liars, Liars, Liar

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, my answer to your question is “NO”.

  31. Simon says:

    Zahid, I would like to know if you believe that Muslims must fight until Islam is the only religion in the world and if you believe that this would lead to world peace?

  32. Simon says:

    Thanks for your reply Zahid. Something about the Jewish religion – it’s my understanding that Jews haven’t really actively sought to convert people to Judaism. That’s why you are right about most of them having been born into it. Do you think it would be a good idea for the Bible (especially the New Testament) to be studied and discussed in all Islamic schools in an effort to create understanding? Not everyone has access to the internet to study such subjects unfortunately. I believe that in some countries the Catholic high schools offer study of the Quran as part of the study of different faiths. Hopefully this would encourage mutual tolerance without any need for deception. Mr. Anjem Choudary openly talks of his plans for Britain to become an Islamic state under Sharia law – something no-one who supports democracy can accept. He refused to condemn the London train bombers of 2005. I believe government by religion is “tailor made” for the tyranny of dictators.

    • Zahid says:

      Thanks Simon. What you say about the Jewish religion is true. Its the first and a great Abrahamic religion that I have reverence for. I would be glad if my children study all religions to understand better. Extremists are extremists and detestable whichever faith they misinterpret and follow. Cruelty has no religion. There have been cruel rulers in every religion. I believe all governments wherever if based on religion alone would not be human friendly. I further believe instead of falling into the trap laid by extremists the majority moderates in all religions should get together. If this somehow could happen, the world would be a better place for all. All the great religions also had moderate good rulers.

  33. Simon says:

    Zahid, I think we can agree that most religious people regard the life in this world as a kind of “testing ground.” I feel that some people turn away from God (especially in the West) because they resent the concept of being “put to the test” and having to follow rules in life. I believe that in order to show us the seriousness of the choices we make in the battle with evil, God sent Jesus to give us the finest example of love for humanity, humility, and perseverance even until death (as we must also be humble and sometimes suffer to do what is right) but then he was given the victory over death by his resurrection. We are told that almost all of his eleven remaining disciples suffered and died at the hands of religious zealots and Roman authorities. They spread Christianity because they truly believed Jesus had come back to life after his crucifixion. These were men who had mostly denied knowing him when the Romans were crucifying him. What changed these former cowards to belief if not the resurrection? True Christians take the example of Jesus found in the New Testament as the way to treat others.

  34. Zahid says:

    I fully respect what the Christians believe. I cannot dare to have disrespect for Jesus who undoubtedly is the finest example of the virtues listed by you. If more of us follow his example, the world would become a wonderful place.

  35. Simon says:

    You are a tolerant man Zahid. Regarding religious and political differences – whenever you get two or more people in a room, there will always be differences of opinion. In order to be fair to all, I think government should be by a democratic voting process free from any fear of coercion put upon those who vote. I just hope the Muslims who have received a balanced education will agree with me and refuse the rule of tyrants who use religious or political ideologies to further their own ambitions. There are plenty of examples of Christian upon Christian violence and Muslim upon Muslim violence. During World War One, Italy and Austria (both strongly Catholic countries) fought each other with much loss of life. The Shiah -Sunni conflicts, the breaking away of Bangladesh, the current situations in Libya and Syria and “Black September” 1970 in Jordan are Muslim examples. A “one world” religion won’t change anything in this regard in my opinion.

    • KGS says:

      Sorry Simon, comparing Christianity with Islam is just an excuse to bury one’s eyes about traditional Islamic ideology inspired mayhem, which has legal bearing in Islamic thinking. Christian on Christian violence has no Christian legal foundation, while Islamic inspired violence indeed does.

  36. Simon says:

    This video link to Anjem Choudary calling for Sharia law in Britain is treasonous.
    http://www.muslimsagainstcrusades.com/media/press-conference

    • Zahid says:

      All media that propagates hate is negative and grossly myopic. All religions or believers of these religions should be respected. Their religions leaders should be respected instead of being deliberately insulted for whatever reasons. Those in all all religions who promote moderation and harmony should join together as forces of reason and toleration. They can be part of the solution. People such as KGS or what they continue to spread create terrorists like those Saudis who flew planes into buildings on 9/11 and killed all those on the ground irrespective of whether they were Christians, Muslims, Jews or of any other faith. They also create or radicalize weak minds into violence such as the recent Norway incident Anders Braevik or even the Unabomber, Timothy McVeigh etc. who professed to be Christians. Therefore, I believe KGS and what they represent are part of the problem.

      Lets us face it, despite people like KGS doing their best, it is impractical to expect that 14 million Jews will eradicate 2 billion Muslims or over 2 billions Christians will remove around 2 billion Muslims from the face of the earth. The need is not to spread more hate and create more terrorists. The need is to create harmony, tolerance and possibilities for co-existence. In this, the moderates are the solution and what KGS represents is part of the problem.

      It is irrelevant whether the terrorism is by a person, a group of people, a state or a nation. Terrorism is detestable. If a missile is fired from Gaza into Israel it is detestable and all should denounce it and do what is necessary to stop it. Similarly those who feel persecuted, and Jews would be the best people to know what is persecution due to the historical facts, should be at the forefront to deny persecution to all . The moderates can get together and try to shorten distances between faiths created by hardliners in each faith. That in my opinion is a desirable route to follow by all rather than insulting each others beliefs in their respective religions whether a person reach there by birth or by conversion. When insulted different people react differently. Hate grows. Horrific errors grow. Innocent people get killed. No one really wins. All loose.

      I know what I am saying sounds difficult in todays polarized world. We have to start somewhere so that our future generations may coexist peacefully. For this mature and sane minds need to prevail within their respective folds.

    • Zahid says:

      All those who spread hate are grossly myopic and part of the problem. The world cannot be a single religion planet. It was always and will always remain pluralistic with regard to religious and political beliefs. Those who demand the contrary are in error. Nature thrives in diversity. Whenever you have a monopoly, the results are disastrous irrespective of religion.

      Kings are not democratic. All humans are equal and no one has ‘blue blood’. Nepal was the only Hindu kingdom and now it is a lovely and chaotic democracy. Pakistan was ruled by dictators for too long, not due to choice of its people. Now it has a flawed democracy that is evolving with all the cacaphony of noises that combine into the orchestra of democracy. Pakistan finally has free press to a large extent, a free judiciary and more institutions gradually coming in line with democratic requirements. It also has hardliners who were created due to political interventions in Afghanistan by USA, the West generally, Saudi, UAE, India and Pakistan. India is a large democracy but it too has a history of atrocities over Muslims in Kashmir. The recent ethnic cleansing mostly of Muslims in Bosnia Herzegovina. The situation in Aceh. The list goes on. The hardliners in Muslim areas utilize all such situations and convert these to their advantage by recruiting young children mostly through brain washing using hate and promising heaven. Mostly the poor fall for this and the problem continues to expand.

      The majority of the Muslims are moderate and too busy with earning their bread and living peaceful lives. They are also afraid to come out into the open to confront those hardliners. The moderates have no resourcs other than their work to earn their livelihoods. The hardliners have support from moneyed vested interests domestic as well as from other countries. Case in point is the relationship between Hamas and Iran. USA and elements in Afghanstan. Australia and Aceh. Too many examples all around.

      Then there are states ruled by dictators, kings, queens even democratically elected people such as in India where killing of Muslims was encouraged by a state minister who is still comfortably in power.

      The hardliners are those in every religion who are focused on creating hate, violence and insulting all other religions and trying to find allies within other religions who also have similar hate promoting agendas. These hardliners and their hate and violence creates terrorists everywhere whether born as Christians, Muslims, Hindus Jews or from any other religion. There are many examples from all these religions and I prefer to not to list or quote them because such listings create no love for each other. All such examples are horrific and detested.

      Let us face it, 14 million Jews cannot eradicate around 2 billion Muslims, or over 2 billion Christians cannot remove around 2 billion Muslims from the face of the earth or around 2 billion Muslims cannot erase around 1 billion Hindus from earth. We have no choice but to coexist. The best way is to promote interfaith harmony and not be distracted by the hate mongers amongst us.

      Harmony is possible if we do not insult each others religions or beliefs and show respect to their leaders. Casting insults will not create harmony but increase the divide. That is what is the problem in today’s world.

      The moderates need to get together from all religions and join forces so that reason, tolerance, moderation enables peaceful coexistence for our future generations. The moderates can be the solution while KGS and what such people represent are part of the problem. They create Breviks and Timmy McVeighs and all those Saudis who flew planes into buildings on 9/11 and also people with ugly mindsets who fire bullets and missiles from Gaza into Israel and from Israel into Gaza etc.

      Science does not exist as yet when a bullet can be told to kill only a Muslim or a Jew or a Christian etc. A bullet kills a human, who may be a father, a mother, a son, a daughter, a husband, a wife etc. A bullets kills a small world occupied by a lot of people. This bullet must be stopped by the moderates through spread of love and respect for each others beliefs.

  37. Simon says:

    Zahid, how dangerous would it be for moderate Muslims to speak up and debate militant Muslims about the Quran verses which encourage harshness against “unbelievers” on forums such as public television etc.?
    I believe different interpretations need to be openly discussed if the problems are ever to be overcome. I believe that moderate Muslims believe Surah 9 (almost the last in chronological order) was revealed at a time of war and does not need to be applied in an “expansionist” manner today? Perhaps if Muhammad had lived longer a later verse could have moderated this chapter of war. I think KGS doesn’t believe a “moderate” consensus to be possible. I think he hopes Muslims will choose another belief system.

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, when debating any religion at public forums moderates are always at risk of being damaged by indoctrinated hardliners who are devoid of common sense and generally misinterpret the religion they follow. Hardliners and extremists are mentally sick, dogmatic and therefore dangerous. Brevik is an example.

      I fully endorse that all controversial religious verses from any of the Books should be openly discussed and common interpretations reached for contemporary applicability.

      Glass is half empty or glass is half full both mean actually exactly the same. However both statements give diverging connotations that could lead to entirely different interpretations in describing a situation. Therefore unbiased understanding of the context and historical situations is crucial to establish a correct unbiased interpretation.

      I quote from the Bible Matthew 10:34 “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword”. A study of Biblical exegesis will clearly indicate a metaphorical use of the word ‘sword’. Still extremist Christians interpret this allows violence and take the reference to the sword physically. Contemporary examples of Christian violence on Muslims due to such misinterpretation is in the Phillipines and Serbia.

      It is fact that the only 2 atomic bombs ever usedthat killed millions of humans were dropped by those who were Christians. Or may be it is better to say they committed such wholesale genocide in spite of they being Christians. Instead of “turning the other cheek” to the atrocity committed by deranged minds on 9/11, Christian powers have killed over 300000 Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq. Does this make Christainity a religion of violence? No it doesn’t. It shows that extremists could misinterpret and commit extreme violence in spite of their religion.

      Studying the context and historical war conditions background under which the Quranic Surah 9:29 was revealed in similar fashion to studying the Biblical exegesis will establish beyond doubt the narrow physical applicability of this Surah as a defensive measure rather than an offensive open call to arms.

      The Roman Caeser assisted by some Christians in north of Arabia around 640 AD had killed an unarmed delegation of 15 Muslims, the unarmed Muslim Ambassador to the Roman Empire was killed, the commander of Roman Empire in Arabia was also killed by Caeser because he converted to Islam and the Romans were amassing a huge army near Syria to attack the Muslims. Surah 9 was revealed in this backdrop. It is applicable today also only as a defensive measure if Muslims are first attacked by any one including those from the Abrahamic religions. Muslim hardliners take this as an open ended call towards violence which is actually not permitted at all. Islam is a religion of peace not violence. Misinterpretations, reactionaries and negative propaganda by the West try to muddle or distort the truth. Immediately after the Norwegian carnage before establishing facts some western media and most hardliner blogs were screaming Jihadist. It turned out to be a current day Crusader instead.

      While I offer no comment on the Old Testament, in my opinion both Christainity and Islam are religions of peace. The moderates must come forward sidelining the hardliners and extremists.

      It is a shame that dedicated and intelligent fighters for a cause such as KGS have become negative. It is impractical to expect 2 billion Muslims will start following another faith. He is sadly wasting his energies in the negative direction. As a human I invite him towards the positive path and to work for interfaith harmony rather than promoting disharmony and hate.

      • KGS says:

        To Zahid: As long as the Muslim ideology remains unchanged/watered down in which all four schools of Islamic jurisprudence uphold all of the violent and anti-Jew passages in the koran and hadiths, it’s futile to promote “interfaith harmony” dialogue. Islam holds the keys to its own fate, totally reject political sharia, violence against the unbeliever and apostates, reject Islamic supremacism and hegemony and renounce the anti-female doctrines and systemic judeophobia that’s rife throughout Islamic texts, then we might have a basis for talks. This is the minimum I ask for. I believe in everyone’s right to believe in what they want to believe in, but not when it comes at the expense of others and our western hard fought for liberties and rights. I raise the bar, it’s up to you and your fellow religionists to meet it.

        • Zahid says:

          KGS it is obstinate people like you who create terrorists. Jess is correct it is possible your misguided venom against peaceful majority in Islam could have influenced people such as Brevik into becoming extreme rightists that bring shame to civilization.

          I always wondered why Jews have been persecuted every where as a rule. Why it did not happen to others with isolated exceptions. I am starting to get the idea from one sided positions being taken by you.

          That is why your numbers keep shrinking while Islam and Christainity grow in size by leaps and bounds.

          Unless you start screwing hard within your community, you might become genetically flawed and eventually extinct soon.

          Better to come into the mainstream human flow by promoting interfaith harmony.

          • KGS says:

            He listen pal, its your scriptures that inspire jihad, which includes murder, rape and other assorted mayhem. My problem has never been non violent muslims, but the koran itself and the hadiths that contain one antisemitic verse after the other, and opened ended calls to violence in page after page of islamic books. The reason Jews have been persecuted throughout the centuries is that they are the conveniént scape goats, whether it was in christian europe, who have already apologized for it, as well as in Islamic countries, who have never apologized for persecuting Jews and other non muslims, leta lone the for the slave trade.

            In fact, Islam is shrinking, thankfully as massive numbers of muslims convert to christianity or to no faith at all. Islam is doomed as its founder was.

          • ef says:

            slow but sure, zahid show his face of “peaceful” muslim, continue.

      • KGS says:

        To Zahid: Koran 4:89 says this: They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they). But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (from what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.

        This clearly calls for the killing of apostates, at least all four schools of Islamic jurisprudence deems it as such. As for Breivik, he was not mentally ill, but a person of low self esteem and sexually frustrated and sought to counter his bad image by engaging in a long project that would thrust him onto the world stage. choosing to murder people to achieve that notoriety, he need to murder people but in order to do that he needed a cause to wrap himself in, in order to legitimize it.

        The lone scripture you use to equate Chritian*extremists* with the Muslim variant is disingenuous and downright silly, name me right now one so called christian extremist that used that verse to kill others and provide the details surrounding him or her. You won*t find any. The Koran and hadiths are filled with numerous calles for murder and mayhem, open calls by the founder of islam himself, youäre being disingenuous here, very.

        The US used its weapons of mass destruction on an enemy power, Japan during a brutal and long fought campaign. Would you have preferred that the US simply turn the other cheek and allow imperial Japan to continue to hold hundreds of millions of people in slavery and domination or what? Would you have prefered the US to continue and carpet bomb Japan instead of ´dropping its nukes, thereby killing even more Japanese?

  38. Jess says:

    Interesting..
    Maybe Breivik saw this site :)

    • KGS says:

      Jess, I take your statement to be an insult to the intelligence of everyone fighting for our civil liberties and rights as free individuals. That includes every man woman and child regardless of color and creed, including those who bow to mecca. The day Islam produces people as harmless as Amish farmers is the day it ceases to be a threat to our Western civilization.

      • Zahid says:

        Jess you might have touched his Achilles heel. KGS does not stand for free speech or choice or civil liberties. If he did he would respect Islam as accepted by 2 billion Muslims on earth. He would strive for moderation and promote interfaith harmony. He has shut the door on all reason logic civil liberties that could form bridges and he only needs to hate Islam.

        He wants to dictate his tiny minority view to 2 billion people. In democracy I beieve the majority rules. He wants to show off Jewish power helped by unknowing Christians or whoever he can find common agenda with to spread hate against Islam.

        He is not against terrorism that has no religion. He is against peaceful humans if only they are Muslims. This shows an evil and narrow mindset.

        May the Lord help him

        • Prudence Noble says:

          Zahid: Absurd. Nothing in the comment made by KGS above (8/2/11 – 9:49) suggests or even remotely implies that he (or she) does not stand for free speech or civil liberties. His commentary, incisive and apt, is about the hard-earned liberties under which citizens of the West are privileged to live. Ours is a glorious legacy. Perhaps we don’t belabor the point because we live in the gift that has been handed down to us every single day. Do we take it for granted? I don’t think so. We criticize and openly debate or oppose…our government, schools of philosophy, various religions, branches of science, etc.. We do so passionately without fear of losing our freedom, or being stoned to death for critical thinking and the pursuit of individual consciousness. This is not some small thing, and none of we who have been so blessed to inherit a place in the sun of this freedom will EVER abandon it. We don’t belabor this point, but perhaps we should. His (KGS’) is not a minority view by any means. He is dictating nothing, nor does he have to, and to suggest a display of “Jewish power” is a desperate leap on your part.

          Having said that, this is not some kind of competition either, (i.e., my religion is better than your religion, etc.) That’s utterly inappropriate where religion is concerned, and further ignites one of the greatest issues facing people today: resentment. Every internet chat/blog site of this kind is literally teeming with resentful dialogues. If we were all truly praying for peace instead of spending our time typing inflammatory opinions on peace…well.

          The violence that has come from modern day extremist Islam has torqued much of the world. That’s not some narrow reactionist observation, it’s a fact. Sadly, the response has all too often been a muddied appraisal of the various factions of Islam — moderate, semi-extreme, somewhat moderate, in an attempt to somehow save one portion of a pie that shares its crust with the rotten fruit of the other portion. In short, it is truly difficult at this point in time to pinpoint what Islam in all its branches and multiply confused interpretations IS. The renditions, the scholars, (self-appointed and otherwise), the practitioners who could never strap a bomb to their back, but wouldn’t object to others doing so, etc….it just simply runs the gamut, making it difficult, at best, for those within and without to assess, let alone begin to understand these many inconsistencies. One may counter with ancient history, Christianity in the Middle Ages enacting similar deeds for example, but what a ridiculous redundant and dead-end retort: We are well beyond the Middle Ages. Christianity does not function in this manner any longer. In fact, you can go round and round on such concretized arguments for centuries, just as the Middle East has done and continues to do, driving its ever deeper root into consciousness.

          However, scratching for the moment religions and their differences, and considering instead prosperous, thriving societies and their foundations… The constitution of the United States was founded on very certain principles and remains one nation under God, with all its flaws and its differences. There is enormous advantage in the fact that most Americans can fold up and carry the tenets of that constitution and bill of rights in the “back pocket” of their minds. No continuous re-inventing and re-interpreting of those most basic rights by whatever scholarly authority, or whatever twisted circular logic. This has always been our strength and always will be. And we should speak loudly and often about it.

        • ef says:

          zahid, why you think KGS is jewish. probably bad islamic feeling. Liar, deception is islamic way.

  39. Simon says:

    Zahid, I agree with your statement that:
    “All controversial religious verses from any of the Books should be openly discussed and common interpretations reached for contemporary applicability.”
    You have “hit the nail on the head.” If peace is ever to have a chance, the Muslim moderates MUST debate the hardliners. The hardliners are currently winning through tactics of intimidation as they always have. Up until recently, any criticism of Catholicism would be taken by an Irish person as an attack upon them personally, so ingrained were their beliefs. I ask Muslims to think about the “death for apostasy” penalty. If the “no compulsion in religion” verse is still applicable, why have such a penalty? There is much to be discussed by Muslims themselves, but I understand the “fear factor.” That is how criminal extortionists act. The crooks say “pay us or we will kill your children.” A balanced education in “secular” schools with exposure to multiple belief systems is the key I think for critical thinking. I realize that “drone” strikes which kill children and innocents along with the Taliban create resentment and are not helpful in creating more moderate Muslims. Governments need to be very selective about the type of people who educate children.

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, majority of the Muslims do not know about the intricate details about the Surahs. Most are too busy in earning a livelihood. This lack of knowledge is misused by hardliners by propagating religion as per there self serving objectives.

      The extremists also exploit follies committed by Western powers and advertise drone attacks killing innocent civilians as collateral damage perpetrated by ‘Christian powers’.

      Further the Western powers find it convenienrt to support dictators, kings, emirs and sultans rather than the uncertain chaos that is nascent democracy. Care for democratic ideals, civil liberties, freedom of choice are merely home based subjects for Western leaders elected by democratic and secular electoral colleges. Beyond their own borders Western civilization forgets about democracy and human rights.

      Tunisia, Eqypt, Syria, Jordan, Libya are Muslim lands ruled by kings or permanent dictators helped by western powers against the free choice of the people. Yearning for democracy by the Muslims of these countries is clear. Will the moderate world support them or discuss meanings of Surahs with them while the people get trampled by West supported dictarors who prefer to impose self serving interpretations of Islam that may be far removed from the truth.

      Blogs such as TT confirm to the gullible that the extremists are right and entire West is against them. Moderates are up against local dogmatic hardliner clerics who cannot see reason. The moderates also have to explain why the ‘civilized west’ through such blogs and some media comes through as doggedly and almost illogically anti Islam.

      Prohibiting head scarves to Muslim women (in France ) who may want to wear it of their own free choice is not only a clash of tradition and religion it also throws out the concept of personal civil liberty and choice.

      While Muslims go to Europe for work, Europeans also come in increasingly large numbers to Muslim lands for work. Why is there a self righteous supremacist stance in Europe over Muslims while there is no such issue in Muslim lands?

      Regarding the death penalty, I am against it not for religious reasons but due to the fact that humans could make errors or misuse their powers and death is irreversible.

      In today’s internet connected world, communication is not an issue. Moderates should get together and confront all wrongs done to humanity wherever it happens. The West could take the lead.

  40. Simon says:

    Zahid, you make a lot of valid points. I know that when communism was a big threat to the West, often corrupt dictators were backed up by Western governments in order to combat the communist menace. I think we all in the West realize that the Iraq invasion was about oil and not “weapons of mass destruction.” This stance, in sometimes choosing to support corrupt dictators is an obvious example of the “we must support the lesser of two evils approach.” I am sure the pragmatic military minds regard this as the only sensible way to act. When we read about how the men of the Qurayza tribe of Jews were “put to the sword” by the Muslims of Medina, we believe that Muhammad was afraid to let them go away as he had done with the other tribes of Jews in case they came back and attacked him at a later date. No thought of ethics there, just pragmatism. I appreciate that you realize the dangers of “government by religion” and that you did not disagree with my earlier statement that it was “tailor made” for dictators. I believe the people of Iran are very tired of their “religious dictatorship.” What Westerners fear is that many refugees from Muslim countries may bring with them in their “mental baggage” the very belief system they fled from that is “tailor made” for dictators, i.e. the desire for government by Sharia law. Is it not correct that a “true” Muslim must desire to live under one of the recognized schools of Sharia law? Otherwise that person can be declared an “apostate” and killed? I appreciate your honesty and wish there were more with your sensible views. The poor need to become educated like you.

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, the Quran states punishment for apostasy in the hereafter. It does not specify any earthly punishments. Death for apostasy is a man made law. If moderates of the world get together and western electorates deny that their elected governments support dictators then it is possible for Islamic moderates to join forces with them to establish a common contemporary interpretation of controversial verses in all books. Man made laws can always be amended.

      If we reach this point, achieving harmony amongst at least the major Abrahamic religions would not be too difficult.

      There are huge skeletons and a lot of blood in the cupboards of all the Abrahamic religions. What happened, who did what etc. 3600 or 2000 or 1400 years ago is a discussion that can be countered with similar examples in a perpetually fruitless debate.

      If Westerners are afraid of refugees from Muslim countries, you should stop making war in Muslim areas and stop supporting dictators for your own sake. If you brew a witch’s cauldron here, huge scalding splashes of the brew would inevitably fall on you as well.

      After the global economic financial crises due to the inherently flawed interest system and greed in the civilized west that seems to love borrowed money, I have seen long qeues of Westerners in Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta, Dubai, Doha, Bahrain, Muscat, Jeddah and Riyadh coming in as blue collar workers. There females are generally available at reasonable cost as maids and masseuses. Most of them don’t want to go back. Immigration is a two edged sword. I travel regularly to these places as well as Europe, UK and North America on business. I know ground realities very well. In this changed world you need to carefully consider repercussions.

      It is fact that a huge majority of religious extremists in the United Kingdom are home grown. They are a direct result of historical colonization of our lands by your forefathers and recently due to mushrooming of hate groups in your areas. Please remember what you sow, so shall you reap.

  41. Simon says:

    Zahid, I appreciate your moderate approach. It appears that the death penalty for apostasy comes from the Sahih al-Bukhari hadith and others. They say it was what the Prophet did. Obviously it has been applied historically due to these sort of scriptures and is not taken from the Quran. The same story applies to stoning to death for adultery. I hope the internet will last as an information resource so that Muslims can discuss these theological differences between themselves and come to a moderate modern consensus. You are right, the GFC was caused by flawed economic practices and greed. Another point I would take bring up: Some Muslims say that the “jizya” tax was just a “light tax” like the Muslim “zakat.” From what I have read, there was no specific amount set for the tax. It was up to the ruler of a particular place to set the amount. It could be a heavy tax. If someone couldn’t pay it they could be enslaved. I think most people will agree that there is no place for slavery in the modern world. Yes I know so-called “Christians” condoned slavery in past times also. I realize that it’s dangerous for any Muslim to support the existence of Israel. There is widespread sympathy for the Palestinians. I believe there have been injustices done by both sides. I also believe that many Jews were forced to leave Arab lands with the creation of the state of Israel, and that they received no compensation for their lost homes etc. The Jews have a right to a homeland. All the best to you and your business enterprises.

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, hadiths were recorded much after the death of Prophet Muhammad. Laws based on hadiths are man made hence debatable. All man made laws can be amended. The hardliners would label me a heretic but this is the truth.

      In early Islam Jizya was charged from able bodied adult non-Muslim males after exempting them from military service, establishing their submission to the state laws and assuring them protection from internal and external threats. All old people, invalids, women, children and their slaves were exempt. This was the norm while exceptions did take place during some oppressive regimes. Rates of Jizya tax were generally a continuation of the pre-Islamic tax rates.

      As a comparison Muslims had to pay a compulsory Zakat (a wealth tax) and also do compulsory military service. Non-Muslims did not have to pay any Zakat tax. Many non-Muslims who were persecuted elsewhere preferred living peacefully in the Muslim lands after paying a small Jizya tax and getting exemption from military service.

      Today no Muslim state charges Jizya to my knowledge. Pakistani Taliban did try to illegally charge Jizya from Sikhs. All Pakistanis protested except a few brain washed nuts. The Taliban were chased out by the Pakistan Army.

      I find nothing wrong in supporting Israel as a homeland for the Jews. I believe it is their basic historical right. What they are doing wrong is usurping others land by right of might supported by USA and UK. Even if they achieve this now, the resentment will not go away and they will have to pay a heavy cost some day. I hope good sense prevails.

      This is also a historical homeland for the Palestinian people. They must be given a respectable homeland not a corridor behind huge barrier walls within which illegal Israeli settlements continue to grow.

      Thanks for the good wishes that I reciprocate heartuily.

      • ef says:

        Why “palestinian people” never call themselves palestinians.
        They start to do this no more then 40 years ago to establish ligitimacy to the land. Muslim, you don’t have enough land?,
        you want more and more. What ever you touch is your, whole
        world is your, don’t choke yourselves.

    • KGS says:

      Hey Simon, ask Zahid why the dhimmi was forced to feel subdued while paying the jizya, with a blow to the jaw as he handed over his forced payments. Also why is it that the Muslim Slave trade receives no official apology let alone recognition as a de facto fact of history. Ask him that.

      • Zahid says:

        KGS, the Dhimmi normally did not have to face any blow toi the jaw. He had to be willing to pay Jizya and get protection and exemption from military service. By they being subdued, it means, “Islamic rulings are enforced on them.”. I do agree some rulers may have been tyrants and some Dhimmis arrogant like you to receive a few blows.

        As for the slave trade….So many Slavs were enslaved for so many centuries from Slavonic areas of Europe between the 6th and 10th centuries AD that the very name ‘slave’ is actually derived from their name. These were non-Muslim areas.

        The slave trade was monopolised by Iberian Jews (known as Radhanites) who were able to transfer the slaves from pagan Central Europe through Christian Western Europe to Muslim countries in the Andalus.

        Slavery is mentioned in great detail in the religious texts of all Abrahamic religions and all of them had condoned it.

        African slave trade pre-dates Islam and continued for a millenium thereafter.

        The Quakers of Britain and Netherlands traded in over 11 million slaves in the transatlantic trade.

        Jews, Christians and Muslims were all involved in this inhuman activity at some time. Why not all three apologize led by the Jews who had slaves and made money from their trade much before the Muslims or Christians?

        • KGS says:

          Great to hear that the Dhmmi didn’t normally have to get beaten on the jaw, that’s real comforting to the Jews who had to guess when to expect it. The Islamic system of dhimmitude is an arbitrary system of discrimination from which the minority is left to the whim of the ruler and society in question, thanks for backing my position. As for the slave trade, you left out the African slave trade in which millions of slaves died in transit as well as through undergoing hideous castration to render them useful in heirems etc. of which only one in ten survived the cutting of their balls off. Millions died . The African slave trade was first a muslim slave trade before christian europe took it over, and subsequently apologized for it,……no muslim power has ever apologized for it, let alone dare recognizes the history of it.

          Slavery is mentioned in abrahamic texts, but not condoned to the point of advising future generations that they have a right to enslave the infidel. Mohamed was a slavery, and rape promoting warlord. The Muslims had a monopoly on the slave trade for centuries, and only till the christian West began in earnest to end it, to stigmatize as an evil, and forced Islamic states to sign treaties to end it. the Muslim slave trade involved over 14 million to 22 million slaves with a great number dying as previously stated.

          INDIVIDUAL JEWS WERE INVOLVED PERIODICALLY but they were not representing a Jewish state, but themselves, whole Christian and Muslim states involved their own peoples, with the former apologizing for it, that’s a big difference, and the Muslims have yet to apologize and make ammends for their role, instead, like you Zahid, play a game of pointing the finger elsewhere. We all see what you’re doing.

          • customer187 says:

            I know I am late in joining, but I just wanted to point out that everyone is talking about slavery and slave trade as something that is in the past and has been eliminated.
            While it’s true that it has been outlawed everywhere, it still exists and is very much ingrained in the societies in northern Africa (Muslim nations).
            Also, it is my understanding that “Jizya” is still used and paid within Iran.

        • ef says:

          zahid, continue show who you are. deception is islamic way.

  42. Simon says:

    Well Zahid, I guess there are some things on which we can agree and others perhaps not. Before the 1967 war Jordan occupied what is now the “West Bank.” Egypt occupied the “Gaza Strip.” After the 1967 war (when Israel attacked first because they felt threatened), the borders changed. I don’t think Egypt wants Gaza back. Too many troublemakers there. Israel gave back the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt. Jordan is also wary of the PLO etc. after what happened in 1970 when the Palestinians fought with the Jordanian Govt. This was the time of the Black September massacre of Palestinians by the Jordanian army. Probably the Israelis feel that the Arab lands should have taken in more Palestinians as we are told many Jews were forced to leave their homes in Arab countries without compensation. I can believe this. I once worked with a guy of Greek ethnicity who told me his family was forced out of Egypt by President Nasser. They say that there is a substantial minority of Muslim Arabs who are Israeli citizens and happy to be so. I believe the real problem is the fundamentalists who regard the existence of the state of Israel to be an “insult to Islam” and can never accept it. Someone like you there would be given the “proverbial hard time” if not killed by these hardliners. Everyone remembers the displaced Palestinians but forgets about the displaced Jews from Arab lands. If I had been born as a Palestinian Muslim I could well have become like them. If I had been born as a Jew in the British Mandate of Palestine (there have been Jews there for hundreds of years) I could have become like them. The whole situation is a “can of worms.” regarding “jizya,” I can well imagine there were plenty of abuses of power in such a situation. All regimes have their tyrants. The “dhimmis” were not allowed to bear weapons and thus couldn’t serve in the army. I have read there were revolts when new converts to Islam were still forced to pay the jizya because the Caliphate liked the income. I have read it was often a heavy tax. May knowledge, peace and understanding progress. Peace to all peaceful Muslims.

    • Zahid says:

      Simon, I don’t have much knowledge about this can of circumcised worms. Probably what you say may be right. I hope they sort it out in a mutually satisfactory and wise way.

  43. Simon says:

    KGS, you are doing a good thing I believe in having a site that is easy to post on. I don’t use Facebook or Twitter. This sort of discussion helps to point out things that one side or the other can often forget in our sometimes polarized positions. Everyone, everywhere, must oppose those who would take away our right to freedom of speech by any totalitarian system be it religious or atheistic.

    • KGS says:

      Thanks Simon, I appreciate that. If Islam were not a total totalitarian society bent on subverting non-muslim societies to conform to their norms. then we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Zaheid can point to any number of moderate muslims and say look, see, moderate = moderate Islam, but the truth is that there is no such thing as a moderate Islam, he knows that but isn’t forthcoming because it undermines his case. The point here is, the more a Muslim is influenced by western mores, the more tolerant and easy going he/she becomes. The Koran offers plenty of intolerant fodder for the more tradtional/fundamentalist minded Muslim, the ones who either reject or overlook the more intolerant portions of the Koran, are the the ‘mild’ muslims which we can call likable people, the more they are in tune with their ‘inner mohamed’, (read= what would mohamed do) the more likely they will be a fundamustard.

  44. Sultan muhammad says:

    Actually these all stupids who has posted thier stupid coments on Islam is wrong.
    Basically Islam is a true religon there is no difference between black and white green and yellow rich and poor all are equal in Islam. Islam is Pure religon and all of the other religons are closed when islam cames. ONLY THIS IS ONE RELIGON WHICH ALLAH LIKES IT. the person who is a muslim will come Jannat and all the peoples which is non muslim like Jews and cristions will be fired in the day of judgement and will be in the hell for ever. AND YOU ALL LISTON ALL THE MUSLIMS ARE READY TO SACRIFIES THIR LIVES ON THE NAME OF ISLAM WE ARE READY TO DIE FOR ISLAM AND FOR OUR HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMUD SAW ANY ONE WHO TALKS WRONGLY ABOUT ISLAM . SO HE SHOLD READY HIM SELF FOR DIE BECAUSE WE MUSLIMS WILL NOT LIVE HIM IN ANY PLACE.

    • KGS says:

      Thanks Sultan, you prove my case, real followers of Islam are intolerant bastards and preach hatred and genocide.

  45. Pingback: A FLAMING FUNDAMUSTARD ALERT: I KEEL YOU……! |

  46. abdussamadh says:

    Which is more violent, the Bible or the Quran?

    The LORD is a man of war. Exodus 15:3
    Fight in the way of Allah. Quran 2:244

    Which is more violent, the Bible or the Quran? Is there a way to objectively answer such a question?

    Well, it wouldn’t be easy. But it is possible to compare the amount of cruelty and violence in the two books.

    Here is a summary of the highlighted verses.
    Number of Cruel or Violent Passages
    Bible 1214
    Quran 527

    now can all of tell me : “Which is more violent, the Bible or the Quran?”

    • KGS says:

      Its easy : “When expressed as a percentage of cruel or violent verses, the Quran has about twice that of the Bible. (5.34 vs. 2.71%).” Also, the Bible’s depiction of violence is historical, the koran’s however, are an open ended call for violence towards the non-muslim till all the world is under the domain of Islam. That’s a big difference.

      • abdussamadh says:

        Dear Brother KGS,

        I would say one thing to you and the all who blame ISLAM, “each and every person has death, and its not very far. On average a person life is 70 years, and most of the people have spent 50% of it. Don’t be worried in a few years (after life) we all will know what was right and what was wrong.” So, plz be cool and take it easy, whatever you or any one write here or any where is not going to affect ISLAM or QURAN even in an slightest way.

        and Dear Brother Sultan Muhammad, plz be patient
        “Innallaha ma Asabireen”. Allah is with the patient ones.
        and plz REMEMBER
        “hasbunallahu wa ni mal wakeel” – “Allah is Sufficient for us, and He is the Best Disposer of affairs.”

        • KGS says:

          I’m going you and every Muslim a favor by warning you that Mohamed is a fraud. He brought nothing new to mankind that wasn’t known already. He was an impostor as was foretold in Christian scripture. The Koran is a sophomoric attempt to establish a cult of personality, wrapped around a belief in a deity in order to sway the masses. Flee Islam while you still have the chance.

    • ef says:

      I don’t know which is more violent koran or bible but I know that now
      koran is a tool to murder innocent people around the world.

  47. nadeer says:

    the dwellers of hell fire will never believe if we present them a proof. KGS is fraud. his belief is fraud he is strongest fuel of hell and he will be burn forever. hhhhaaa

    • KGS says:

      Nadeer believes in a cult of personality started by an illiterate warlord who
      advocated rape of women. That’s proof enough for me that he’s following a loser.

  48. Simon says:

    To all the Muslims out there – what sites like this one are about is exposing the violent actions of some Muslims and the reasons for that violence. Most “westerners” do not want you to abandon your belief system entirely but rather realize that no belief system is beyond criticism. There has been much violence in the world in the name of various religions throughout history in general.
    I believe that even if the whole world were to become “Muslim” there will still be wars. Soon after Muhammad’s death the conflict which created the Shiah branch of Islam occurred. Muslim killed Muslim. Early last century the Arabs violently rebelled against the Turkish caliphate. Any religious book which contains exhortations to violence in the name of religion can be open to interpretation and therefore problematic to say the least.
    Government by religion leads to totalitarianism which leads to injustice. Injustice leads to rebellion and conflict. Although mullahs will say that “man made” laws are satanic, in fact, man made laws by a democratic process (where every adult can vote) is the only safeguard against the rule of tyrants.
    Any government run by mullahs who say they rule “with God’s laws and guidance” is problematic. Look at Iran – anyone with a different view or interpretation from the mullahs can be declared to be an “apostate” and “legally killed.” That is dictatorship. Who can oppose the mullahs? Most ordinary people don’t have the years of religious study required to join the “elite group worthy to govern the masses.”
    I will leave you with a famous Western quote regarding people who have power- “All power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

    • KGS says:

      Thank you Simon, I think that you put it in the most succinct way possible, and that anyone who begs to differ with you, cannot be reached.

  49. TOUFIK says:

    KGS was born to bark! you think your self a somebody,trying to get support for Israel just admit it!,that’s so pathetic,Israel will be erased oneday but the great Islam won’t.

    • KGS says:

      No, actually I never really thought about Islam until it appeared on my doorstep screaming blood jihad and demanding that I convert. That’s why I support every way in opposing that degenerate ideology of political Islam.

    • ef says:

      toufik, you prove the point of this site. islam is barbaric believe.

  50. Rehan Mehdi says:

    Being a muslim and then a Pakistani, I warn all the thrid class jews and third class christians and zoinist newcon americans … we are the lovers of martyr … israel is an illegal state … and we Pakistanis will destroy it InshAllah.

    hahaha .. soon InshAllah .. wait for me .. :D lolololol Israel I am coming .. hahaha .. to send all illegal jews to hellfire…. forever with their father “devil” …. soon InshAllah.

    • KGS says:

      The only thing that’s third class is the sh*t hole you live in somewhere in Islamabad Pakistan. One more note. The Saudis look at Pakistanis and any other muslim born outside the Arabian peninsula as being “third class” because your first language isn’t Arabic. Your belief system is supremacist and racist, against non-Muslims as well as between yourselves. You people really are a joke.

    • ef says:

      you and people like you are criminal bastards and you must be stopted before it is too late.

    • Greg Nelson says:

      Have you ever heard of the jazreel valley and do you know the significance of it?

  51. Power says:

    Hi all, me from India, and am new to these blogs’ world.

    I want to share my view with you all who are not yet uncorrupted by the leftist brainwashing.

    The Islamic conquest and Muslim rule of India is one all of you should study to get more informative on the true nature of Islam.

    The great [and honest] historian, William James Durant, in his ‘Our Oriental heritage’ [The Story of civilization – Vol. 1] makes some observations on the islamic conquest of India. You must all read it for sure.
    I am not sure how your history books in the west are written. But in India, they are simply negationist and project the islamic rule as ‘great’ [all ‘inconvenient’ facts are left out] The vast majority of historians in India are of the Marxist school. and most of them openly admit it. Generation after generation is brainwashed into believing their half truths and distorted views.

    The moslim chronicles of those times themselves ‘proudly’ record the unprecedented vandalism of Hindu shrines [the entire northern India is almost wiped clean of any major Hindu temple… which, before the Islamic conquest, are said to be in several thousands.] The butchery of hindus is simply repulsive…Dr. Durant calls it ‘a discouraging tale..’

    At the time of independence, muslims declared that they CANNOT live together with Hindus and demanded a separate country for themselves. [Pakistan ]
    They initiated anti-hindu pogroms in Bengal [1946-47 Partition pogroms] just to browbeat the British and Congress into submission.

    [Request you all to read UNBIASED [non marxist] history of Calcutta riots of 1946-47 in Bengal ruled then by the Muslim league.]

    And look what has happened to the hindus in pakistan after independence… take note of the percentage of hindus in Pakistan in 1947 and what it is now! Hindus have virtually become an extinct species in Pakistan. And Pakistan is just a repetition of the history of Afghanistan… which too was earlier populated by Hindus and Buddhists… but the entire populations were put to the sword by the muslims… so much so that the mountain ranges in Afghanistan are commemoratively named ‘Hindu Kush’ meaning ‘Hindu murder’.

    The contemporary history of India is probably here for all of you to see… people do not know when and where the next bomb goes off…

    The congress is a party heavily infiltrated with Marxists. They just dont do anything to stop these attacks… for the fear of displeasing the muslims….

    Muslims are very critical for the congress because they form a solid ‘vote bank’ for them at the time of elections… muslims en mass vote for congress and congress simply does not want to lose it’s votes by taking any measures that might cause any ‘inconvenience’ to muslims… It prefers rather to sit idle and watch the show as more and more people are killed in these muslim bomb attacks.

    WAKE UP all!! The threat is too serious not to take note of.

    We in India used to feel helpless and resigned to this mindless violence… now that the western countries too have to deal with these merchants of death and destruction, we see some hope … to follow the lead, given the backwardness of our country.

    Another thing that I noticed with the practice of muslims is that they try to build a monolithic muslim community wherever they go… MONOLITHIC in everything… they speak in only one language – arabic [because the ‘prophet’ spoke in arabic?] irrespective of the language of their host country. They demand that the majority speak in their tongue!!! [you may find this strange, but it happens only in India, where the majority community finds itself dominated by the minority community in almost all social spheres] and may sooner or later happen in your countries too as they will start demanding ‘minority rights’…
    they vote en mass to only one party
    an attack on one muslim will be taken as an attack on the entire muslim community and soon all muslims will appear on the scene with whatever arms they could gather…

    read somewhere that an albanian muslim shot dead some american soldiers in germany because they were fighting afghan muslims!!! [need to verify this though]

    will any hindu/christian attack a muslim in say Germany because christians were killed by muslims in Nigeria???

    In India, even if a neighbouring hindu is killed, nobody will come to his aid… but if a muslim is attacked hundreds of other muslims will come to his aid.. this kind of unity is missing among hindus here.
    they build their strength through such close knit bonds dictated by their religion…

    Watch out pals!!
    M.S.

    • Danko says:

      very informative!

    • AlAlban Arnauti says:

      Did you write this comment from your slam? or have you become a slamdog millionair?
      Hahahahah, an Indian commenting, hahaha.
      I have worked with Indians with UN and every one refused to share the office with them, dirty, not having showers for weeks, smelly.
      When Darwin talked about the origine of humans from monkeys he meant Indians.

  52. TOUFIK says:

    You’re wrong KGN you think there’s 1st class and 2nd and 3rd class,none of this mentioned in Quran,Mouhamed said ‘ there’s no different between the arabian and Foreign and between the black and the white nor between the yellow and the red but by the Piety’
    and you talking about Islam like you spent a 1000 year understaning it,but you didn’t, all you know is couple of a hierd killers,they killed Muslims more they did to the other guys,so what about Zionism they think the others are underclass People,and christianity made Inquisition the kill Muslims and jews!
    i’m not attacking christianity or Judaism,but every side has a good belivers and a bad belivers!

  53. Simon says:

    KGS, it is amazing how many Western people still don’t realize that a strong contingent of Muslims worldwide will NEVER accept the existence of a “Jewish” state. These foolish politicians who think they can negotiate peace are just victims of deception. I have seen “leftist” students outside businesses that sell Israeli products protesting about Palestine. Although I have never been to Israel, I have read that many Muslim Arabs are Israeli citizens (20% of total population) and live there peacefully. I suspect that the Muslims in Pakistan and other places are unaware of this significant peaceful minority. Why then the “Palestinian” problem? Obviously “religious ideology” is to blame. The stirrers of the Muslim world won’t allow peace. Western leaders must realize this fact.

  54. Umair says:

    hey KGS.. it was better if u promoted love & peace among all u faced.. Instead u spit out evrt word against islam.. tell me what benefit u r getting from doing this shitty business?? how much from zionists? how much from all those who waged a war against muslims?? han? May Allah (SWT) show u the right path..

    • KGS says:

      Hey Umair, Islam promotes fear, intimidation and death towards Christians and Jews and everyone else not a Muslim. So spare me the sanctimonious nonsense. To know all about Islam is to despise it. I reject all totalitarian ideologies, Islam included. Cut the whining and victimhood routine and take a seriously hard look at the ideology that has strangled, warped and obliterated countless number of peoples and cultures, replacing it with the monoculture of Islam. No thanks. Move along now.

  55. KGS says:

    You’re one sick bastard Umair. You’re officially banned from the site.

  56. Peace Lover says:

    Hope the one who banned umair meets his nemesis

  57. Power says:

    Just as Breivik planned an operation for about 9 years and got it executed,

    can there not be any islamists who are planning to/ already infiltrated the armed forces of the western countries… plan to lay their hands on some WMDs, and turn them on to US or Israel or other country?

    or may be, is such a plan more easy for a westerner with Mecca as a target… given that it is the very heart of Islamic empire… with yearly Haj turning into a socializing/networking occasion for muslims plotting attacks on western soil…
    Nuking Mecca during Ramadan can have a very desirable effect of obliterating the nucleus/fount of this virus and can help relieve earth of some burden…

    It is better to be preemptive… strike first, strike once, strike hard and close the operation-with 100% mission accomplished.

    We can always claim that it was the act of an isolated ‘deluded terrorist’, our countries can always dissociate themselves from the act… just as the muslim countries do..

    It would just take one Kamikaze Knight for this operation… a well planned, long gestation, high yield project.

    • AlAlban Arnauti says:

      Why take on Kamikaze Knight and not do it yourself?
      Because one should have balls to do it and you are not the one.

  58. anon says:

    KGS are you really that retarded ????? I take it you are a jew…

  59. Malakh says:

    Some really stupid people here! I want all of you supporting Islam to go live in the Middle East while publicly living as a Christian or a Jew, and THEN come give your opinion. Did it for 16 years…. this is why I am now living in the West!

  60. Ash says:

    about women : nevermind coz Islam is the first religion who took women place higher than the barbaric area. before islam, rich people had 40 concubine,slavery etc.women are considered as sex slave before Islam. so basically the so called civilized people that exist today is due to existence of Islamic law. btw bout violence in Islam. it is called self defence. basically happen when people attack the muslim country @ the ruler of certain country try to annihilate muslim from their country.

    • KGS says:

      What a load of crap Ash. The record is clear, Islam retards society, not improve it. Your Islam today can’t even compete with mythical golden period of yesteryear.

    • Danko says:

      …and after Islam, rich people had Harems: The word harem is strictly applicable to Muslim households only, but the system was common, more or less, to most ancient Oriental communities, especially where polygyny was permitted. The Imperial Harem of the Ottoman sultan, f.ex., which was also called seraglio in the West, typically housed several dozen women, including wives. It also housed the Sultan’s mother, daughters and other female relatives, as well as eunuchs and slave servant girls to serve the aforementioned women.

      So much for the high place in Islam for women, not counting stonings, honor killings, etc…

    • AlAlban Arnauti says:

      Ash, if they do not want muslims to kill them it is simple they should not go and kill muslims.

  61. Mohammed says:

    Against Islamic Extremism or just against Islam? Concerned civilians or just Racists?Leicester Mercury acting editor Richard Bettsworth on the distortions that will bring the English Defence League back to our city.

    The English Defence League is heading to Leicester in two weeks’ time to protest against the UK’s “two-tier justice system” which it claims treats Muslim offenders more leniently than others.


    If this claim was true it would, of course, be utterly outrageous. Any justice system which operated such double-standards would be manifestly unfair and would quickly lose public trust.

    So, what on Earth could the EDL possibly have in the way of evidence to back up such a serious claim?

    This week’s Insider seeks to examine that question and to sort out the truth from the hysteria.

    The group’s reason for coming to Leicester is the case of Rhea Page, a young woman who was subjected to a horrific attack in the street by four women.

    The EDL suggests Rhea’s attackers were dealt with leniently because they were Muslims and that if a white gang had launched an attack on a Muslim girl they would have been dealt with more severely.

    There are two things about this case that are used to justify this claim.

    The first is a suggestion that the attackers were spared prison because they were Somalian Muslims who were not used to alcohol. The second is that the victim was called a “white bitch” during the assault, but that the perpetrators were not charged with a racially aggravated offence.

    Let’s deal with the first point.

    At this stage it is important to understand how this story emerged. The Leicester Mercury was the only newspaper which covered the case and we carried a report on the proceedings on November 24.

    The observation about the women not being used to alcohol was made by defence lawyer Gary Short. We quoted him on this point towards the end of our article but we did not suggest that this was the reason why the judge spared the attackers an immediate prison sentence.

    On the contrary. We gave the actual reason earlier in the report which was that the judge, Robert Brown, said he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from the victim’s partner (Rhea says her partner was only trying to protect her).

    Since then, I have got hold of a transcript of the sentencing which clearly confirms this was the reason that the judge decided on a suspended sentence rather than sending the attackers to prison.

    However, two weeks after our article, the story emerged in the national newspapers, where the line about the women being Muslims who were not used to alcohol was given much more prominence.

    Most of these articles reported that the attackers were freed “after” the judge heard this evidence. Even though they used the word “after” instead of the word “because” these articles clearly implied that the two things were connected.

    This was misleading and created a perception about this case which is at odds with the facts.

    Let’s have a look at the second point – the fact that the attackers were not charged with a racially aggravated offence. A video on YouTube promoting the EDL demonstration says: “This is an obvious racist attack on a white English female, yet it was dealt with quietly and as a drunken thuggish gang attack.”

    It goes on: “Unfortunately, many believe that it’s not possible to be racist against white people.”

    This is what the Crown Prosecution Service says about its decision: “The CPS reviewed all the evidence in this case, including whether a racially aggravated offence should be brought on the basis that the comment ‘white bitch’ was reported to have been heard during the incident.

    “However, this racist comment could not be attributed to any particular suspect and was not adopted by the group as a whole. There was therefore no realistic prospect of conviction for a racially aggravated offence.”

    So, clearly the CPS does consider that it is possible to be racist against white people. Its reason not to charge anybody with a racially aggravated offence was purely a legal one. It could not be sure of securing a conviction.

    The EDL states its central aim is to combat “Islamic extremism”. However, the women involved in this attack were clearly not “Islamic extremists” and the incident has nothing whatsoever to do with that issue.

    One can only conclude that the reason the EDL has leapt up on the misunderstandings about this case is because it actually has a much wider agenda. It is seeking to propagate a message that white English people are becoming second-class citizens in their own country and preferential treatment is given to Muslims.

    That is, of course, deeply divisive and dangerous stuff which breeds resentment between communities. And, as we have seen, its argument crumbles as soon as one carries out a detailed examination of the facts.

    At this point, I would add something of a footnote about the Rhea Page case.

    Like Rhea, I did not agree with the judge’s decision to suspend the sentences and I felt that the defendants should have been imprisoned.

    It was an appalling attack and I think the justice system needs to send out a clear message in such cases that this sort of random, drunken violence will not be tolerated.

    However, I have absolutely no doubt that the judge’s decision was based on a proper and legitimate assessment of the case, and had nothing whatsoever to do with the religious persuasion of the defendants and their lack of tolerance to alcohol.

    Unfortunately, nothing I have said will dissuade the EDL from carrying out their demonstration.

    They will come to Leicester on February 4, in a protest which will cost huge amounts of public money to police and will probably hit trade in the city centre. And all of this disruption and potential discord will have been based on an entirely flawed premise. That’s not fair on any of us, whatever our race or religion.

  62. Danko says:

    Moderate muslims do not exist: here’s the proof – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnmNBbOuOsY

    I put it on my youtube channel not long ago. After a while I received threats from youtube on having to pay fines, being jailed, or my pc being blown off because of certain “copyright infringements”. I won’t open it anymore, that’s for sure.

  63. Danko says:

    the channel given above is not mine. I just mirrored it, and I got the threats.

  64. Mohammed says:

    Wow! KGS, I surprisingly feel sympathy towards you. You are clearly deranged and hellbent in your animosity towards Islam. You clearly have plenty of time on your hands as all you ever do is post ridiculous videos and articles. Nevertheless, if this is your source of livelihood then I suppose you are just “winning your daily bread”. On a final note, people like yourself i.e. Harbour enmity and hostility towards Muslims (also, let me point out, that the comments above are not directed to you as an insult. I believe you ARE a kind fellow being, however, I take issue with your views. Surely, there is nothing wrong with that?) bleed hypocrisy. You accuse Islam of brainwashing etc. Despite your (ridiculous) opinions, you continuously attempt to brainwash people towards your way of thinking? And anyone who “dares” to disagree with you is subjected to a tirade of insults. So, how are you any better than that which you proclaim to be fighting? (which is largely superficial)

    • KGS says:

      Hey Mohammed, thanks for that, it’s clear to everyone else who is observing this exchange that you’re not interested in facts, your main aim is to cover for Islam. The mere fact that you can’t keep away from this blog shows your high level of fear, you know that independent thinkers can see through the Muslim propaganda and are coming to the same conclusion as I, Islam sucks.

      • Anz says:

        Hey Please look at this….
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiWp__KLam8&feature=related&fb_source=message

        Islams objective: Attack the non-believers and put islam ideology in them its easy to fill a empty cup.
        Attack the younger generation they don’t believe in religion.
        Go to any extent even lie or be tolerant for sometime to spread islam.
        Atack slowly and steadily!!

        Then impose sharia..
        Islamist flag would be hanged over white house and also in every country..by 2050

        • anthony says:

          we must stop the overbreeding by muslims,i have noticed a growth in numbers and the disrespect they have for us and our ways

          • KGS says:

            I have no idea about what you mean…”stop the over breeding by Muslims”. enforcing anti-sharia legislation would remove a large portion of the problem, as well as ending the nanny state and mass immigration that overwhelms it.

  65. customer187 says:

    About slavery -TODAY… this is not “once upon a time”…. it’s now:

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/17/world/africa/mauritania-slave-owner-abolitionist/index.html?iref=allsearch

    (Please cut and paste to view the link as I don’t know how to post as a hyperlink)

  66. Joe Bloe says:

    KGS, how are you? What a useless website propagating hate….you are no better then the nazis. Stick to your day job & stop the hate non-sense. You should go see a psychiatrist.

  67. Random dude says:

    Hey Joe Bloe, Don’t embarass yourself, stop talking.. Applauds to KGS for standing up to these misguided folks with facts, even though it might be frustrating since they put a veil on their eyes as soon as you state them..

  68. Mohammed says:

    KGS, surely you could do better than upload a link of a criminal. One who is loathed by majority of his country. A drug dealer, who names himself after a convicted football hooligan? Tommy Robinson! You have lost all credibility!

    • KGS says:

      You’re named after a pedophile and a warlord who raped and plundered and enslaved thousands during his lifetime, and who’s followers have done the same to hundreds of millions over the centuries.

      I’ll choose Tommy any day of the week you moron. Get the hell out of here you jerk.

  69. Greg Nelson says:

    Everyone should be aware of radical islam. Mohammad’s life can be divided into 2 parts, his early years of proclaiming his revelations in Mecca and his preaching which became conversion by the sword after his exile to Medina. Mohammad began conversion by the sword because his strategy of peace to convert jews was not working. Those 2 sides are found in the Quran. In 1979 when the soviet union invaded afghanistan bin laden’s beliefs about jihad(holy war) against infidels were fired up. Who are infidels to islam? All who do not believe in islam. Surah 9:5 But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war). For Islam, the interpretation of their faith requires that they hate all non islamists. I read a post above that said we should be tolerant. In light of that remark, listen to portions of a speech that were given by prominent muslim americans in illinios and new jersey.
    1) Siraj Wahaj- a recipient of the american muslim communities highest honors said the following to an audience of new jersey muslims. “If only muslims were more clever politically, they could take over the U.S. and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate(islamic leadership body). He concluded, “if we were united and strong, we would elect our own leader and give allegiance to him…take my word, if the six or eight million muslims in america unite, the country will come to us.”
    2) Abdurahman Alamoudi- Addressed a muslim crowd in illinios saying, ” I have no doubt in my mind, muslims sooner or later will be the moral leadership of america, it depends on me and you, either we do it now or we do it after a hundred years, but this country will become a muslim country. And i think if we are outside this country we can say, oh allah destroy america, but once we are here, our mission in this country is to change it.”

    Those prominent muslim figures openly talked about the overthrow of america in our own country. If we allow tolerance then that weakness will be the death of America, in this context i do not consider tolerance to be different from appeasement. Appeasement shows fear, and an enemy nation will thrive off of it.

    Much of this text has been paraphrased from Can America Survive and In Defense of Israel by John Haggee.

  70. Kevin says:

    I have read with interest quite a few of the letters here… about as many as I could that is.

    I am English, and of white Saxon descent. I am not religious in any way shape or form. I was bought up through the “state” school system, in the seventies and eighties. Our school had RE (religious education) as did everyone else. It was a meaningless lesson for me, as it was for most of my classmates I think. I recall only one objection by a fellow pupil, and that was because his parents were atheists. He was allowed to do some other class I recall. To be honest, I didn’t even know what atheist meant back then! I recall once the frustration of our RE teacher as he tried in vain to brush off our questions that called into question the science and logic surrounding some of the more “extreme” claims made by the bible.

    I am now nearing fifty years of age. Since my leaving school some 34ish years ago, I have seen parts of my country turn into what can only be described as “foreign land”. Every city has one or more areas which have been given over to “immigrants”, by which I am talking mainly “Islamic’s”. There are Mosques popping up all over the dam place, black ghosts wandering about the streets, men in pyjama’s (or so it looks like to me), flip-flop sandals and funny headgear.

    Now I say this not to offend, but this is my personal view which I am sharing here, a view from behind the eye’s of a middle aged average English bloke. When I go on holiday to a far away land, I would expect to see these most strange and wondrous sights. I would also expect to have to obey the “law of the land” however foreign, strange or maybe distasteful it may appear to me. That is the risk you take when travelling to see the world, all its wonders, and dangers. The difference is, I don’t expect to see this in my own country, my own town, my own street.

    If this isn’t bad enough, these same people are bringing with them their own rules, their own laws it seems. Laws which allow them to do things different to the way I do things. Laws which allow them to punish “their own kind” (and others?) in a way which differs from the laws which we ordinary folk have to live our lives by. And if all of this isn’t enough, then what about the thousands of these same people who march in our streets spouting openly how they will take over completely, how they will kill the infidels, how they will destroy the western way of the world, trash the country that gives them shelter… all in the name of ISLAM. Also, I used to work for a company in the city of Derby, two streets away from where the infamous “airplane shoe bomber” grew up!….

    Getting back to the nuts and bolts of religion, you either believe in it, or you don’t. For me, thank God (excuse the pun once again) I don’t. And for that I feel free. I feel free to choose, free not to have to give thanks to some all powerful, all seeing invisible entity, free to make my own choices based on a fear of those things tangible and real. Free to do as I please whilst being civil to my fellow man, and of course obeying the laws of the land… blah blah blah. For those who do believe, then you pays your money and takes your choice; unless you were brought up in an Islamic society that is, then I believe you don’t really get one, but that’s another matter. At least with Christians they don’t make you believe in their God. They only say that if you don’t believe, you will burn in hell fire forever, which is a bit of an empty threat when you think about it, to someone who has no belief in religion .
    However, as “free” as I would like to be from all of this bullshit, unfortunately like everyone else these days, I am affected by it whether I like it or not.

    How? I could right a book. But maybe just a few examples here.

    Travel: When we travel abroad we are screened for explosives, ie we have limitations on what we can take onboard our flight, have our shoes removed and scanned, our laptops checked for chemical explosives… etc. And is this isn’t enough, we still have the worry that some sick fuck has found yet another ingenious way to smuggle explosives onboard. Maybe up a baby’s ass, in a feed bottle or whatever…

    Holiday destinations:
    I could have put this under travel, but I thought that it deserved its own special mention.
    Its not bad enough that we have to suffer the indignities and worries of being scanned, X-ray’d, partially undressed and photographed before boarding the plane, but when we arrive, we are still in danger of being blown up sitting in a bar or restaurant minding our own business. Personally I have had one close call in Sri Lanka a few years ago, also I know a couple who were caught up in the Bali bombing, on the second day of what should have been a two week well needed rest.

    Financial costs:
    Extra security has pushed up the cost of flights, overseas postage costs, goods in general…

    Business:
    Many of the goods that I used to source from the US as part of my business have been either severely restricted, with MASSIVE levies now being applied, and in some cases are now banned from export outright, all in the name of “defense” of the country. All brought about since the attack on the twin towers.
    We are now TOLD that we MUST give equal consideration to everyone, race, creed, colour, ethnic disposition sexual or religious bent, should we advertise a job, an apartment.. whatever. Even if this individual insists on his/her right to stop work and pray every hour, to our cost..!. We are then told that we should provide a place that this same worker can do this in private, so that they wont be interrupted or looked upon by other workers…all at the expense of the business owner.

    Loss of identity/UK Schooling:
    Schools in the UK are now restricted, in that they have to be especially tolerant of “special ethnic/religious needs” for pupils. These are such things as special foods, special lessons, special rooms for prayer, special holidays… then there is the flip side which prevents the same schools from celebrating Christmas, lest they offend “some” of their pupils. But it seems okay if their schools teach “Muslim” kids that other religions are nonsense and vile..!

    We are told that we MUST be tolerant of other religions, even when they are alien to our way of thinking, our own belief, all beit our own certainty that it is all a crock..! This tolerance impacts on us in countless ways, all of which effect they way we go about our everyday lives. It costs us money, it makes us angry, resentful, it causes friction, it goads us into fighting just to keep things as we know them, as we love them to be, as our parents and Grandparents fought for years ago. We don’t want to see “our” country over run by flag burning extremists who would either have us all killed or indoctrinated into their way of thinking, their madness.

    Islam does not belong in the western world. It is a sickness. It brings with it a whole host of problems, many of which will never be resolved while there are others who believe differently those who follow its teachings.
    You may argue all day about what the Koran means, how to interpret its scribbling’s, but at the end of the day there are those out there, and not few I may add, that live by this dammed book, and would have it that everyone else is inferior, evil and should be fought and extinguished. By this very fact alone, it is without question that Islam and its followers cannot be a part of civilised society, and one where some of us choose to believe in something other than this vile book.

    Christians, Jews etc… they are all in some way to blame for the perpetuation of this bullshit religion called Islam. I mean come on. How can they refute it to be a nonsense, when they in fact have their own book/s of equally meaningless crap and dribble?

    There are literally hundreds of religions to believe in, some new, some old. The common denominator here is that each and every sect believe that it is they who are right. How pompous, how self righteous. The other thing they all have in common, and this is the kicker, is that the followers all have little more than blind faith and a book of rules.

    Personally, I have no problem with a cymbal toting Hare Krishna type trying to sell me something at the airport, but I do have a problem with those who would try and blow up the plane while I’m on it!

    Fuck Islam, fuck its followers. I would say let them burn in hell, but that would be of me, seeing as I don’t believe in it… rather ironic huh? Guess I will have to be content dodging their bullets and keeping my head down, all the time with a smirk on my face knowing that they waste their pathetic days head banging the carpet and offering themselves up to some non existent deity who’s identity seems based on the memoires of some camel shaggin’ paedophile.

  71. Barry Grossman says:

    I shared today your post about Interpol’s involvement in the tragic story of Hamza Kashgari only to delete my re-posting of it from your site after reading the hateful rubbish you publish.

    I have many times compared passage by passage the colourful language used in both the Old Testament or Torah and the Qur’an and, though I see little meaning in such comparisons, the former contains considerably more references that might be interpreted by some as incitements to hatred or violence than the latter.

    As I said, I see little point in such comparisons so it follows that I also see no validity whatsoever in attacking Judaism by pointing out that the Talmud by comparison contains more passages inciting hatred toward Goyim and many more anachronistic justifications for pedophilia than both the Old Testament and Qur’an combined a hundred times over.

    All of this brings me to the point. Your site is quite clearly dedicated to promoting hatred, racism and violence in terms which, if expressed against any other group (like say Jews for instance) would result in your immediate incarceration for the crime of inciting hatred. That you are not in jail and still spewing this tripe stands as a testament to the fact that there is now indeed a world wide campaign against Islam and, more importantly, against Muslims. Since there are over 1 billion of us, this seems to be a very silly and obscenely destructive, short sighted campaign rooted in the ignorance and malleability of uneducated and inexperienced fools like you.

    You would do well to consider that religion is a matter of personal choice. Islam, Christianity, Hinduism and Judaism are all in their own way valid to those who embrace them and any gratuitous blaspheming by members of one group against the other should be condemned.

    If indeed you have read the Holy Qur’an as you claim, you will have to concede that it repeatedly declares as a tenet of the Islamic faith that both the Gospels and the Torah must be respected by Muslims as true expressions of God’s word. If you are honest, you must concede that the Qur’an clearly condemns in the strongest possible terms any Muslim who treats badly any Jew, Christian or non-Muslim living in Islamic lands who pays a tax similar in amount to the zakat paid by Muslims and who has not disrespected Islam. You are quite wrong to assert that Islam attempts to co-opt every prophet recognized by Christianity and Judaism while at the same time according them a lower status than that accorded to the Prophet Mohammed (peace be Upon Him). That there are some Muslims who do not always abide by these core tenets of our faith, speaks only about them and not about Islam, the same way that the practices of radical Christians and radical Zionists speaks about them rather than Christianity or Judaism. That radical/political Islamists exist only in relatively small numbers is itself no small miracle when one honestly considers the abuse and deprivation Islamic peoples have so long endured in no small part through the power exerted on their nations by western governments and big business.

    In any case, who do you think you are to tell the people of any other sovereign state what society and belief system they must embrace?

    • KGS says:

      Hateful rubbish? It’s all about Islam, so I’m glad you unwittingly agree with me. As for comparing the Koran with the New and Old Testaments, the violence contained in them are relegated to that time period, there are no open ended calls for any holy war or ”jihad” against non-believers in both Judaism and in Christianity. You on the other hand disingenuously overlook legions of passages in the koran and in the hadiths and sura of mohamed (its not all that clear anymore that he even existed at all). The open ended calls for violence against those who refuse to convert (you know, the verses that came later, after Mohamed supposedly left Mecca for the Jewish city of Yathrib/Medina, those verses abrogate the earlier relatively peaceful verses) and the subjugation of them into dhimmis (3rd class serfs/slaves).

      Your reading on the Talmud is skewed, perhaps out of ignorance, perhaps not:http://www.adl.org/presrele/asus_12/the_talmud.pdf

      Also, Islam is not a race, ethnicity, it’s an ideology, I perfer to liken it to either of the other two totalitarian ideologies of Nazism or Communism with the aaded baggage of a religious subservience to a deity.

      The only reason there is a campaign against Islam, is because Islam has waged a campaign against the non-Muslim (throughout its history) in the modern age. It’s your fellow religionists who have slaughtered anyone not adhering to Islamic dictates, (more Muslims than non-Muslims) and are hell bent on subjugasting the rest of the non-Islamic world. Talk about Chutzpa pal, you have it in spades.

      Morons like you are unfortunately a dime a dozen, spewing nonsense like you actually think it’s something of value, but it’s pure buillshit, dissembling, disingenuous bullshit. You’re not fooling anyone here pal, not even close. Islam is never a personal choice, its a forced choice, from birth, or through subjugation, yes there are few morons who willingly buy into it, but they’re the anomoly, the rest are forced into it through either force or dhimmitude or demographics.

      You say: “You would do well to consider that religion is a matter of personal choice. Islam, Christianity, Hinduism and Judaism are all in their own way valid to those who embrace them and any gratuitous blaspheming by members of one group against the other should be condemned.”

      That statement would earn you a hacked off head if you lived in a real Islamic paradise (hellhole actually), only in hte West is such nonses uttered. You don’t really believe that, this is just nonsense spewing once again.

      You say:” If indeed you have read the Holy Qur’an as you claim, you will have to concede that it repeatedly declares as a tenet of the Islamic faith that both the Gospels and the Torah must be respected by Muslims as true expressions of God’s word.”

      The Koran clearly teaches that Christians and Jews corrupted their own holy books, since they contradict Islamic texts, so who are you trying to fool here? Not me. Stop the lying, you’re making a complete ass out of yourself. Or…keep on lying and show the rest of us (in a teaching moment) just how stupid you are, and serve as a lesson for others to learn from. I prefer the latter, so keep it up.
      Muslims are driving out Christians from every land, and you have the nerve to say that Islam forbids their mistreatment. well tell that to the Jew or christian who had to pay the jizya and then receive a blow on the cheeck to “make themselves feel subdued.”
      Honestly, you muslims are a hoot.

  72. Sweden says hello. NS! Please feel free to visit my anti-islamig blog in Sweden :)
    RS

  73. PROUD BRIT says:

    GREAT SITE YOU KNOW YOUR STUFF KGS

  74. Pedro Rabacal says:

    About Barbara Lerner Spectre:

    I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

    Barbara Lerner Spectre, who runs a government-funded Jewish study group in Sweden.

    Surprised your site doesn’t include anything on this insane woman.

    • KGS says:

      Pedro, I understand the sarc. :-) . Multiculturalism is the death knell to nation states. only integration and assimilation as in the US, can lead to social cohesiveness between the many different peoples. Why people like spectre think Yugoslavia is such a great idea is beyond me.

  75. Geetikia says:

    Dear Friends,
    Why are you forgetting Hindus? Jihad against them was started in 900 AD.. starting with conquest of Sindh..Muslim Conquest of India was the bloodiest,barbaric act of invasion..destruction of Buddhism, north india denuded of all it’s grand temples…millions killed, and taken slaves. Hindus are far removed from Jews,Christians and Islam..so didn’t know what was this fight all about!

  76. 21Albatross says:

    KGS thanks for you blog its quite refreshing to see there are more people opening there eyes to the likes of islam. the more people read about it and the lies they spread about the religion of peace the better for all.

  77. truth seeker says:

    Interesting site KGS. A lot of interesting information.
    Just adding some websites to check out.
    http://www.takebackcanada.com/
    and
    http://answering-islam.org/index.html
    When people say “christians did atrocities in the name of God/Jesus” we have to learn to distinguish between people who say they are christians and or say they are doing things in the name of Jesus and those who are real christians. Jesus said that the way to identify the real deal is looking at their fruit (love, peace, joy,peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness and faith- If an apple tree is not producing good aples than it is not really a good apple tree. The other thing Jesus said about his followers is that they obey the will of the father(God) the question then becomes what is the will of the father? Jesus summed up the 613 old testaments laws into 2- Love God with everything you have and love your neighbour as yourself.
    Here is also a great christian apolgogetic philiosphical website by a well know intellectual that was born in India.
    http://www.rzim.org/

    peace and God bless

  78. Nordic Fan says:

    GREAT SITE ! I just found it. I’ve been learning a lot. Please add me to your email list.
    Thank you,
    NF

  79. Ethan Grunderon says:

    A famous American General once commanded his troops, “Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes!”
    Only an idiot would claim that is the policy of the U.S. Army. That command was given to specific soldiers under specific conditions. Taking a specific command from the Bible and claiming that it is a blanket command to all Christians is idiotic.

    Now, a U.S. Army General once said, “…..no soldier is to give his weapon to an enemy soldier.” How is this directive different from, “Do not fire till you see the whites of their eyes?” You who claim the Bible tells Christians to kill or stone homosexuals, can you tell the difference?

    The Bible records a command to an army specific in time and place, to kill it’s enemies. It is obvious that this isn’t a moral principle. The Koran tells it’s believers to kill ANYONE who doesn’t believe Islam with no time or place specifics. Just, “Kill them.” It is clear this is a moral principle of Islam.

    The dishonest or deluded can pretend there isn’t a real difference, but thinking people know. Islam is hate masquarading as a religion.

  80. Freedom to IW says:

    All religions are invented for brainless people and the greatest danger will come from these idiots.

  81. Pingback: Top News Stories Islamist Anger Feeds On Chechnya History Financial Times | Top News Stories

  82. The probleme for all religions are the extremists. All religions have to bring peacy and hope to the peoples and not hate and gore

  83. ssa says:

    So now we have Islamophobia after Anti-antisemitism .Get a life Internet trolls .Leave the poor people in peace !

  84. RAchel says:

    For the poster who said that there was a Muslim protest in Luton that terrified them. I was THERE, and it really was a beautiful day. But of course, the media won’t show that will they. You people know nothing about Islam. It was the blacks, the Jews. Now it’s the Muslims. EDUCATE yourselves!

    • KGS says:

      the more people know about Islam, the real uncut raw version of it, the more appalled they are and reject it.

  85. RAchel says:

    FAO KGS

    ‘ Islam is never a personal choice, its a forced choice, from birth, or through subjugation, yes there are few morons who willingly buy into it, but they’re the anomoly, the rest are forced into it through either force or dhimmitude or demographics.’

    I am being honest with you here. 100%. This made me laugh out loud at my screen. Anomoly? Forced? Do you actually know many Muslims? Muslims from all around the world? I know many. I have muslim friends and friends who became muslims. Just so you know, that happens pretty often. A non muslim, becoming a Muslim. Like, hundreds a day.
    Ok so I’m wandering from my point. My point is, I know no-one who was forced, or coerced, or subjugated into being a Muslim. One of the most important things about being a Muslim, is that you CANNOT be a Muslim if you don’t believe in Islam. So forcing doesn’t make you muslim. Being beaten into it doesn’t make you muslim. Following everyone else if your country won’t make you a Muslim either. God knows if you believe, and if you don’t – you aren’t a Muslim!!

    I’ve held my manners in for quite a while now. So I’m going to have to release a little. (The western rebel in me, you see)

    You lot, talk the biggest amounts of bollox.

    Yours in humanity

    Rachel

    • KGS says:

      The mere fact that apostasy from Islam brings an automatic death or prison sentence anywhere the sharia is in force, or even partially in force, renders your entire apologetic/diatribe moot.

  86. Barry Stanley says:

    There’s a lot of unnerving energy going into these posts.

    I’ve lived and worked in the Middle East and all over the globe.

    All this religion stuff is just a big blanket that’s used to cover up all other motives.
    I’m talking about the 3 Abrahamic ones. THE MAJORITY of Christians, Muslim and Jews don’t give a shit … SERIOUSLY … Just ask them.

    It’s only the politically driven and uneducated ones that seem to convey that type of strong belief in “the man up there”.

    All murder, occupation, intolerance and oppression is wrong. Regardless of who it’s committed by.

    What’s happening on this page has definately crossed over to hate and not awareness.

    I ate pork, drank alcohol and had tons of “unmarried sex” … WHILE LIVING IN SAUDI ARABIA …. NOBODY GIVES A SHIT (as long as you’re not an ass about it).

    The majority of human beings have the same urges. They want to eat, sleep, piss, shit, f*^k etc.

    Religion (especially in the Middle East) has become more of a cultural thing.
    “I pray because i’m used to it”. “I fast because my family does” etc.
    It’ll wear off by time. So let time take it’s course.

    Try not to focus on hate and justifying intolerance too much.

    I appreciate you guys letting me express my opinions.

    Thank you for listening.

    • tamimisledus says:

      You are committing the simplest of logic errors, arguing from your own particular experience to a general case. It is also somewhat like arguing that there is no law against speeding because not everybody who speeds gets punished for it. In your “analysis”, you should also compare the behaviour towards you, a Westerner whose skills are vital to muslim states, and compare that with the behaviour towards unskilled labourers who are easily replaceable who are often treated as no better than slaves.
      As an aside, it is also quite fallacious to argue that because islam looks like Christianity (superficial appearances in this case are very deceptive), it will eventually behave like Christianity. Even if it were true (and there are very compelling reasons for believing it is untrue), we should not tolerate evil attitudes or behaviour condoned by islam because eventually it might reform. We don’t do that for human beings who behave badly. We shouldn’t do that for ideologies which promote (putting it mildly) bad behaviour.

      The only reasonable response of a rational person towards those who follow islam, a doctrine which says that those who do not follow its doctrine are of no value and will be tortured for eternity, is to protect yourself from them. If that self-protection inevitably brings in its wake what you call hatred, then that is a necessary “good”.

      And if you think Saudi Arabia is tolerant of behaviour which offends muslims, go to any Western store, buy your wife a dress and walk with her in her new dress down a street in Saudi. You know the consequences for you, and even more so your wife, will be dire. One should judge any society or its beliefs by what it enforces as the norm. NOT by what it fails do in certain very untypical circumstances.

  87. Sweetness says:

    I love your site and I read it every day! :) <3
    I also love the taquiya and kitman contributions of the Muslim apologists.
    Keep up the good work, Champ!

  88. AIJdanjo77 says:

    Islam is a Racist Religion. In the Qur’an Allah says on Judgment Day every pious Muslim’s skin colour will change white, and remain white forever in Islamic heaven. But every impious Muslim, and all non-Muslim’s skin colour will change black, and remain black forever in Islamic hell “On the Day when some faces will become white and some faces will become black; as for those whose faces will become black it will be said: ‘Did you reject Faith after accepting it? Then taste the torment in Hell for rejecting Faith.’ And for those whose faces will become white, they will be in Allah’s Mercy, therein they shall dwell forever.” Qur’an 3:106-107. The Qur’an is eternally preserved in Classical Arabic on a tablet in Islamic heaven Qur’an 85:21-22. This is the language the Qur’an was originally written in. Classical Arabic was the language Muhammad received his racist revelations from Allah. In the Classical Arabic Allah says every impious Muslim, and all non-Muslims will appear on Judgment Day with black skin, and shiny eyes full of lustre Qur’an 20:102 because their eyes will be filled with horror “Consider not that Allah is unaware of that which the polytheists, and evil do, but He gives them respite up to a Day when the eyes will stare in horror.” Qur’an 14:42, and “And the true promise shall draw near. Then you shall see the eyes of the disbelievers fixedly stare in horror. They will say: ‘Woe to us! We were indeed heedless of this; we were polytheists, and evil.” Qur’an 21:97, and “And remember the Day on which the Trumpet will be blown-and all who are in the heavens and all who are on the earth, will be terrified except him whom Allah will exempt. And all shall come to Him humbled. And you will see the mountains and think them solid, but they shall pass away as the passing away of the clouds. The work of Allah, who perfected all things, verily! He is well-acquainted with what you do. Whoever brings a good deed will have better than its worth, and they will be safe from the terror on that Day.” Qur’an 27:87-89, and “The Day when they will come out of the graves quickly racing to a goal with their eyes lowered in fear and humility. That is the Day which they were promised!” Qur’an 70:43-44
    They will completely see Judgment Day, and hell “Say: ‘The angel of death, who is set over you, will take your souls, then you shall be brought to your Lord.’ And if you only could see when the disbelievers, and sinners shall hang their heads before their Lord saying: ‘Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back to the world, we will do righteous deeds. Verily! We now believe with certainty.’ And if We had willed, surely! We would have given every person his guidance, but the Word from Me took effect that I will fill Hell with jinn and mankind together. Then taste you the torment of the Fire because of your forgetting the Meeting of this Day of yours, and surely We too will forget you, so taste you the abiding torment for what you used to do.” Qur’an 32:11-14, and “Verily, you shall see the blazing Fire! And again, you shall see it with certainty of sight!” Qur’an 102:6-7, and “Or he should say when he sees the torment: ‘If only I had another chance to return to the world then I should indeed be among the good.” Qur’an 39:58, and “And the Trumpet will be blown-that will be the Day a warning had been given of the Day of Resurrection. And every person will come forth along with an angel to drive him, and an angel to bear witness. It will be said to the sinners: ‘Indeed you were heedless of this, now We have removed your covering, and sharp is your sight this Day!” Qur’an 50:20-22. On Judgment Day their faces will be black “And the Day of Resurrection you will see those who lied against Allah saying He has partners, and a son with black faces. Is there not in Hell an abode for the arrogant?” Qur’an 39:60, and have a stealthy glance “And you will see them brought forward to Hell made humble by disgrace, and looking with a stealthy glance. And those you believe will say: ‘Verily, the losers are they who lose themselves and their families on the Day of Resurrection. Verily, the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, and in His Messenger will be in a lasting torment.” Qur’an 42:45. Here is a list of more verses showing horrified eyes which will certainly see Judgment Day, and Islamic hell Qur’an 24:37, 40:18-19, 41:30-33, 41:50, 42:22, 46:35, 52:14-16, 52:45, 54:6-8, 67:3-12, 67:27-28, 68:42-43, 79:6-14, 99:1-8.

    On Judgment Day the people who are going to Islamic hell will have black skin, and chains tied around their hands, and tied to their necks, and their feet “And if you O Muhammad wonder at these polytheists who deny your message of Islam and have taken besides Allah others for worship, then wondrous is their saying: ‘When we are dust, shall we indeed then be raised in a new creation?’ They are those who disbelieve in their Lord! They are those who will have iron chains tying their hands to their necks. They will be dwellers of the Fire to abide therein.” Qur’an 13:5, and “Verily, We have prepared for the disbelievers iron chains, iron collars, and a blazing Fire.” Qur’an 76:4, and “those who were deemed weak will say to those who were arrogant: ‘No, but it was your plotting by night and day, when you ordered us to disbelieve in Allah and set up rivals to Him!’ And each of them will conceal their own regrets for disobeying Allah when they behold the torment. And We shall put iron collars around the necks of those who disbelieved. Are they requited aught except what they used to do?” Qur’an 34:33. All of them will be chained together “When iron collars will be rounded over their necks, and the chains, they shall be dragged along.” Qur’an 40:71, and “Verily, with Us are fetters to bind them, and a raging Fire.” Qur’an 73:12, and “And when they shall be thrown into a narrow place thereof, chained together, they will exclaim therein for destruction.” Qur’an 25:13, and “And also others bound in fetters.” Qur’an 38:38. And they will be chained in Islamic hell forever “But as for him who will be given his Record in his left hand, will say: ‘I wish that I had not been given my Record! And that I had never known how my Account is? I wish, would that it had been my death! My wealth has not availed me. My power and arguments to defend myself have gone from me!’ It will be said: ‘Seize him and fetter him, then throw him in the blazing Fire. Then fasten him with a chain whereof the length is seventy cubits!” Qur’an 69:25-32

    All impious Muslims, and non-Muslims will be dragged on their faces to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever “Verily, the polytheists, disbelievers, and sinners are in error and will burn in the Hell-Fire. The Day they will be dragged in the Fire on their faces. It will be said to them: ‘Taste you the touch of Hell!” Qur’an 54:47-48, and “Those who will be gathered to Hell lying flat on their faces, such will be in an evil state, and most astray from the Straight Path.” Qur’an 25:34, and “And whoever brings an evil deed, they will be cast down on their faces in the Fire. And it will be said to them ‘Are you being recompensed anything except what you used to do?” Qur’an 27:90, and “Then they will be thrown on their faces into the Fire-they and the devils, and those who were in error. And the whole hosts of Satan together.” Qur’an 26:94-95
    Pious Muslims collected hadiths after the death of Muhammad. They are a collection of what Muhammad said, and did. They are the second most important writings in Islam after the Qur’an. The two best collections of hadiths are first Sahih Bukhari, and then Sahih Muslim. The third most important writing in Islam is the earliest biography of the Prophet Muhammad by Ishaq. The hadiths show more proof impious Muslims, and all non-Muslims will be dragged on their faces to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said, ‘On the Day of Resurrection Abraham will meet his father Azar whose face will be dark and covered with dust. The prophet Abraham will say to him: ‘Didn’t I tell you not to disobey me?’ His father will reply: ‘Today I will not disobey you.’ Abraham will say: ‘O Lord! You promised me not to disgrace me on the Day of Resurrection; and what will be more disgraceful to me than cursing and dishonouring my father?’ Then Allah will say to him: ‘I have forbidden Paradise for disbelievers.’ Then he will be addressed, ‘O Abraham! Look! What is underneath your feet?’ He will look and there he will see an animal, bloodstained, which will be caught by the legs and thrown in the Fire.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.569. Abraham’s father’s face will be dark, and covered with dust because he will be dragged on his face to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever “Narrated by ‘Anas bin Malik: A man said, ‘O Allah’s Prophet! Will Allah gather the disbelievers on their faces on the Day of Resurrection?’ He said, ‘Will not the One Who made him walk on his feet in this world be able to make him walk on his face on the Day of Resurrection? Qatada, a subnarrator, said: ‘Yes, By the Power of Our Lord!” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.6, Hadith No. 283

    They will be black skinned like coal to serve as fuel for the fire of Islamic hell. Humans, and stones will serve as fuel for the fire “But if you do it not, and you can never do it, then fear the Fire whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.” Qur’an 2:24, and “O you who believe! Ward off from yourselves and your families a Fire whose fuel is men and stones, over which are appointed angels stern and severe, who disobey not from executing the Commands they receive from Allah, but do that which they are commanded.” Qur’an 66:6. Here are more similar examples Qur’an 3:10, 21:98, 72:15.

    The white skinned will be segregated from the black skinned by a wall “And between them will be a barrier screen and on a wall with elevated places will be men who would recognise all of the people of Paradise and Hell by their marks. They will call out to the dwellers of Paradise, ‘Peace be on you,’ and at that time the men on a wall with elevated places will not yet have entered Paradise, but they will hope to enter it with certainty. And when their eyes will be turned towards the dwellers of the Fire, they will say: ‘Our Lord! Place us not with the people who are polytheists and evil.’ And the men on the wall with elevated places will call unto the men whom they would recognise by their marks, saying: ‘Of what benefit to you were your great numbers and wealth, and your arrogance against Faith?” Qur’an 7:46-48. “Their marks” means their white skin, and black skin. Another example “On the Day when the hypocrites-men and women- will say to the believers: ‘Wait for us! Let us get something from your light!’ It will be said: ‘Go back to your rear! Then seek a light!’ So a wall will be put up between them, with a gate therein. Inside it will be mercy, and outside it will be torment.” Qur’an 57:13, and “And a barrier will be set between them and that which they desire, as was done in the past with the people of their kind. Verily, they have been in grave doubt.” Qur’an 34:54

    Many Muslims lie, and say their skin will not be really white, or black in colour. They
    say their skin will be bright, and radiant, and not white, and their skin will be gloomy, and dark, and not black. But this is a lie. Their faces will be black like the darkness of night “For those who have done good is the best reward of Paradise and even more rewarding is the honour of looking at the Countenance of Allah. Neither darkness nor dust nor any humiliating disgrace shall cover their faces. They are the dwellers of Paradise, they will abide therein forever. And those who have earned evil deeds, the recompense of an evil deed is the like thereof, and humiliating disgrace will cover their faces. No defender will they have from Allah. Their faces will be covered, as it were, with pieces from the darkness of night. They are dwellers of the Fire, they will abide therein forever. And the Day whereon We shall gather them all together, then We shall say to those who did set partners in worship with Us: ‘Stop at your place! You and your partners whom you worshipped in life.’ Then we shall separate them, and their partners shall say: ‘It was not us that you used to worship.” Qur’an 10:26-28. Their faces certainly will be different “But when they will see the torment on the Day of Resurrection approaching, the faces of those who disbelieve will be different, and it will be said to them: ‘This is the promise which you were calling for!’ Say O Muhammad: ‘Tell me! If Allah destroys me, and those with me, or He bestows His mercy on us-who can save the disbelievers from a painful torment?” Qur’an 67:27-28
    But why do some Muslims say their skin will not be white, and black in colour but bright, and radiant, and gloomy, and dark? Why are they lying? The translations of the Qur’an before the Civil Rights, and Doctor Martin Luther King junior say black, and white but some translations of the Qur’an after the Civil Rights, and Doctor Martin Luther King junior say bright, and radiant, and gloomy, and dark. The Qur’an is eternally preserved in Classical Arabic on a tablet in Islamic heaven Qur’an 85:21-22. This is the language the Qur’an was originally written in. Classical Arabic was the language Muhammad received his racist revelations from Allah “Verily, We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an in order that you may understand” Qur’an 12:2, and “We verily, have made it a Qur’an in Arabic, that you may be able to understand its meanings and its admonitions.” Qur’an 43:3, and “A Book whereof the Verses are explained in detail-a Qur’an in Arabic for people who know.” Qur’an 41:3, and “And if We had sent this Qur’an in a foreign language other than Arabic, they would have said: ‘Why are not its verses explained in detail in our language? What! A Book not in Arabic and the Messenger an Arab?’ Say: ‘It is for those who believe, a guide and a healing. And as for those who disbelieve, there is deafness in their ears, and the Qur’an is blindness for them. They are those who are called from a place far away for they neither listen nor understand.” Qur’an 41:44, and “And thus We have sent it down as a Qur’an in Arabic and have explained therein in detail the warnings in order that they may fear Allah, or that it may cause them to have a lesson from it.” Qur’an 20:113
    And the Qur’an was written in clear, easy Classical Arabic to understand what it says “Certainly, We have made the Qur’an easy in your tongue, in order that they may remember.” Qur’an 44:58, and “In the plain Arabic language.” Qur’an 26:195, and “These are the Verses of the Book, a plain Qur’an.” Qur’an 15:1, and “Those who disbelieve say: ‘The Hour will not come to us.’ Say: ‘Yes, by my Lord, it will come to you. Allah is the All-Knower of the unseen, not even the weight of a small thing or less than or greater, escapes from His Knowledge in the heavens or in the earth, but it is in a Clear book.” Qur’an 34:3, and “And when Our Clear Verses are recited to them, their argument is no other than that they say: ‘Bring back our dead fathers, if you are truthful!” Qur’an 45:25, and “An Arabic Qur’an, without any crookedness therein in order that they may avoid all evil which Allah has ordered them to avoid.” Qur’an 39:28, and “And We have indeed made the Qur’an easy to understand and remember, then is there any that will remember?” Qur’an 54:17, 54:22, 54:32, 54:40, and “And indeed We know that the polytheists say: ‘It is only a human being who teaches Muhammad.’ The tongue of the man they refer to is foreign, while the Qur’an is a clear Arabic language.” Qur’an 16:103

    If the Qur’an is written in clear, easy Arabic to understand then why are Muslims saying their skin will not be white but bright, and radiant, and dark, and gloomy, and not black? Why are Muslims making the Qur’an confusing? Is not the Qur’an written in a clear, plain, Arabic language? Why then is there confusion? Why then are Muslims lying to non-Muslims? Because Muslims believe it is moral to lie to non-Muslims always only if it benefits Islam. It is called al-Taqqiya in Arabic. It means to hide, to conceal, to protect, to veil in Arabic. Muslims must lie, and deceive non-Muslims. They will lie about Islam to protect it against criticism. They will do it to deceive non-Muslims, and Muslims can pretend to not be true Muslims to non-Muslims to hide, to conceal, to protect themselves, and Islam only if they are true Muslim believers inside in heart “Whoever disbelieved in Allah after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith-but such as open their breasts to disbelief,-on them is wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a great torment.” Qur’an 16:106, and “And why should you not eat of that meat on which Allah’s Name has been pronounced at the time of slaughtering the animal, while He has explained to you in detail what is forbidden to you, except under compulsion of necessity? And surely many do lead man astray by their own desires through lack of knowledge. Certainly your Lord knows best the transgressors.” Qur’an 6:119, and “And remember when the disbelievers plotted against you Muhammad to imprison you, or to kill you, or to get you out from Mecca; they were plotting and Allah too was plotting, and Allah is the Best of plotters.” Qur’an 8:30. Pious Muslims collected hadiths after the death of Muhammad. They are a collection of what Muhammad said, and did. They are the second most important writings in Islam after the Qur’an. The two best collections of hadiths are first Sahih Bukhari, and then Sahih Muslim. The third most important writing in Islam is the earliest biography of the Prophet Muhammad by Ishaq.
    “Narrated by Abdullah bin Umar: ‘Two men came from the East and addressed the people who wondered at their eloquent speeches. On that Allah’s Apostle said: ‘Some eloquent speech is as effective as magic.” Sahih Bukhari 7:71:662
    “I am the best of plotters. I deceived them with my guile so I delivered you from them.” Ishaq 323, and “By Muhammad’s order we beguiled them.” Ishaq 442, and “Muhammad informed Umar the second Caliph, and he called the Prophet a liar.” Ishaq 567

    But the true Qur’an in Classical Arabic which was written before the Civil Rights, and before Doctor Martin Luther King junior says their skin colour will be white, and black.
    It is true the Qur’an says some faces will be bright, and radiant, and some faces will be dark, and gloomy “Some faces that Day shall be radiant looking at their Lord. And some faces that Day will be dark, and gloomy thinking that some calamity was about to fall on them.” Qur’an 75:22-25, and “On the Day you shall see the believing men and the believing women-their light running forward before them and by their hands. Glad tidings for you this Day! Gardens under which rivers flow to dwell there forever! Truly, this is a great success! On the Day when the hypocrites-men and women-will say to the believers: ‘Wait for us! Let us get something from your light!’ It will be said: ‘Go back to your rear! Then seek a light!’ So a wall will be put up between them, with a gate therein. Inside it will be mercy, and outside it will be torment.” Qur’an 57:12-13, and “O you who believe! Turn to Allah with sincere repentance! It may be that your Lord will remit from you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow-the Day that Allah will not disgrace the Prophet Muhammad and those who believe with him, their light will run forward before them and with their record of deeds in their right hands they will say: ‘Our Lord! Keep perfect our light for us and do not put it off till we cross over safely a slippery bridge over Hell and grant us forgiveness. Verily, you are Able to do all things.” Qur’an 66:8, and “So Allah saved them from the evil of that Day, and gave them a light of beauty and joy.” Qur’an 76:11, and “Has there come to you the narration of the overwhelming Day of Resurrection; some faces, that Day, will be humiliated, labouring, weary. They will enter in the hot blazing Fire. They will be given to drink from a boiling spring. No food will there be for them but a poisonous thorny plant, which will neither nourish nor avail against hunger. Other faces, that Day, will be joyful, glad with their endeavour. In a high Garden, where they shall neither hear harmful speech nor falsehood. Therein will be a running spring. Therein will be thrones raised high and cups at hand. And cushions set in rows. And rich carpets spread out.” Qur’an 88:1-16
    But it also says “Then, when there comes the second blowing of the Trumpet on the Day of Resurrection, that day shall a man flee from his brother, and from his mother and his father, and from his wife and his children. Every man that Day will have enough to make him careless of others. Some faces that Day, will be bright, laughing, rejoicing at the good news of Paradise and other faces that Day will be dust-stained and darkness will cover them. Such will be the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammad.” Qur’an 80:33-42. This is similar to ““For those who have done good is the best reward of Paradise and even more rewarding is the honour of looking at the Countenance of Allah. Neither darkness nor dust nor any humiliating disgrace shall cover their faces. They are the dwellers of Paradise, they will abide therein forever. And those who have earned evil deeds, the recompense of an evil deed is the like thereof, and humiliating disgrace will cover their faces. No defender will they have from Allah. Their faces will be covered, as it were, with pieces from the darkness of night. They are dwellers of the Fire, they will abide therein forever. And the Day whereon We shall gather them all together, then We shall say to those who did set partners in worship with Us: ‘Stop at your place! You and your partners whom you worshipped in life.’ Then we shall separate them, and their partners shall say: ‘It was not us that you used to worship.” Qur’an 10:26-28. “There faces will be covered, as it were, with pieces from the darkness of night” is similar to “And have made the night as a covering through its darkness.” Qur’an 78:10, and “Neither darkness nor dust nor any humiliating disgrace shall cover their faces” explains why all white pious Muslims on Judgment Day will not have dust on their faces because they are not like the black skinned disbelievers who will be dragged on their faces to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever “Verily, the polytheists, disbelievers, and sinners are in error and will burn in the Hell-Fire. The Day they will be dragged in the Fire on their faces. It will be said to them: ‘Taste you the touch of Hell!” Qur’an 54:47-48, and “Those who will be gathered to Hell lying flat on their faces, such will be in an evil state, and most astray from the Straight Path.” Qur’an 25:34, and “And whoever brings an evil deed, they will be cast down on their faces in the Fire. And it will be said to them ‘Are you being recompensed anything except what you used to do?” Qur’an 27:90, and “Then they will be thrown on their faces into the Fire-they and the devils, and those who were in error. And the whole hosts of Satan together.” Qur’an 26:94-95. The impious Muslims, and all non-Muslims will have black skin, and dust covering their faces because they will be dragged on their faces to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever. Pious Muslims collected hadiths after the death of Muhammad. They are a collection of what Muhammad said, and did. They are the second most important writings in Islam after the Qur’an. The best collections of hadiths are first Sahih Bukhari, and then Sahih Muslim. The third most important writing in Islam is the earliest biography of the Prophet Muhammad by Ishaq. The hadiths show more proof impious Muslims, and all non-Muslims will be dragged on their faces to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said, ‘On the Day of Resurrection Abraham will meet his father Azar whose face will be dark and covered with dust. The prophet Abraham will say to him: ‘Didn’t I tell you not to disobey me?’ His father will reply: ‘Today I will not disobey you.’ Abraham will say: ‘O Lord! You promised me not to disgrace me on the Day of Resurrection; and what will be more disgraceful to me than cursing and dishonouring my father?’ Then Allah will say to him: ‘I have forbidden Paradise for disbelievers.’ Then he will be addressed, ‘O Abraham! Look! What is underneath your feet?’ He will look and there he will see an animal, bloodstained, which will be caught by the legs and thrown in the Fire.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.569. Abraham’s father’s face will be dark, and covered with dust because he will be dragged on his face to Islamic hell, and in Islamic hell forever “Narrated by ‘Anas bin Malik: A man said, ‘O Allah’s Prophet! Will Allah gather the disbelievers on their faces on the Day of Resurrection?’ He said, ‘Will not the One Who made him walk on his feet in this world be able to make him walk on his face on the Day of Resurrection? Qatada, a subnarrator, said: ‘Yes, By the Power of Our Lord!” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.6, Hadith No. 283

    When the Qur’an says “their Light will run forward before them” their Light comes from their white skin like a full-moon at night. The hadiths show more proof Islamic heaven is a place filled with white skinned people. Their skin is white in colour like the moon at night. “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘Allah’s Messenger said, ‘The first group who will enter Paradise will be like the moon on a full-moon night. They will neither spit therein, nor blow their noses therein nor relieve nature. Their utensils therein will be of gold and their combs of gold and silver; in their censers the aloeswood will be used, and their sweat will smell like musk. Every one of them will have two wives; the marrow of the bones of the wives’ legs will be seen through the flesh out of excessive beauty. They will neither have difference, nor enmity amongst themselves; their hearts will be as if one heart, and they will be glorifying Allah in the morning and in the afternoon.” Sahih Bukhari Vol. 4, Hadith No. 468
    Another example shows Allah’s Light will turn every pious Muslim’s skin colour white on Judgment Day. Allah’s Light will not make them radiate with glory. It will instead make their skin so white their white skin will radiate with glory like the moon. In Ansab al-Ashraf by Al-Baladhuri a Muslim poet said during the late 7th century “The blacks do not earn their pay by good deeds, and are not of good repute. The children of a stinking Nubian black-Allah put no light in their complexions!” What kind of Racist Light is this? Allah’s Light is Racist.

    Every impious Muslim, and non-Muslim will be black skinned in Islamic hell like the devil. “Then they will be thrown on their faces into the Fire-they and the devils, and those who were in error. And the whole hosts of Satan together.” Qur’an 26:94-95. The hadiths show this “Abu Dhar reported: ‘The Messenger of Allah said: ‘When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him a thing equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by the passing of an ass, woman, and black dog. I said: ‘O Abu Dar, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: ‘O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah as you are asking me, and he said: ‘The black dog is a devil.’ Sahih Muslim 4:1032. After the Qur’an, and the hadiths, the biography of the Prophet Muhammad by Ishaq is important. “I heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!’ He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks….Allah sent down concerning him: “And among them are men who hurt the Prophet Muhammad and say: ‘He is lending his ear to every news.’ Say: ‘He listens to what is best for you; he believes in Allah; has faith in the believers; and is a mercy to those of you who believe.’ But those who hurt the Messenger will have a painful torment.” Qur’an 9:61 ‘Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, ‘If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey’s.” Ishaq 243. “A black man with long flowing hair.” Beads, braids, dreadlocks? “With dark ruddy cheeks” He is so angry, and full of rage his cheeks are ruddy even though he is black skinned? The Angel Garbriel told the Prophet Muhammad a black man’s heart is more gross than a donkey’s? Islam is a Racist Religion, and Muslims are Religious Racists.

    All pious Muslims will have white skin on Judgment Day, and in Islamic heaven forever. They will have white skin like the 72 white probably Arabian virgins, and young boy attendants in Islamic heaven. The word for these virgins in Classical Arabic is houri. It comes from the root hwr ‘white’. The word houri means ‘white virgins’ “For them there will be a known provision in Paradise. Fruits; and they shall be honoured in the Gardens of delight, facing one another on thrones. Around them will be passed a cup of pure wine; white, delicious to the drinkers. Neither they will have any kind of headache, hurt or sin from that, nor will they suffer intoxication from it. And with them will be chaste females, restraining their glances desiring none except their husbands with wide and beautiful eyes. Delicate and pure as if they were hidden eggs well preserved. Then they will turn to one another, mutually questioning. A speaker of them will say: ‘Verily, I had a companion in the world, who used to say: ‘Are you among those who believe in the resurrection after death? That when we die and become dust and bones, shall we indeed be raised up to receive reward or punishment according to our deeds?’ The man said: ‘Will you look down?’ So he looked down and saw him in the midst of the Fire. He said: ‘By Allah! You have nearly ruined me. Had it not been for the Grace of my Lord, I would certainly have been among those brought forth to Hell.” Qur’an 37:41-57, and “This is a Reminder, and verily, for the pious who love Allah much is a good final return. Everlasting Gardens, whose doors will be open for them. Therein they will recline; therein they will call for fruits in abundance and drinks. And beside them will be chaste females restraining their glances only for their husbands, and of equal ages. This is what the pious are promised for the Day of Reckoning! It will be said to them! Verily, this is Our provision which will never finish. This is so! And for the disbelievers and disobedient will be an evil return-Hell! Where they will burn, and worst indeed is that place to rest!” Qur’an 38:49-56, and “Verily! The pious who abstain from all kinds of sin and evil and love Allah much will be in a place of Security. Among Gardens and Springs. Dressed in fine silk, and also thick silk, facing each other. So it will be, and We shall marry them to fair females with wide, lovely eyes. They will call therein for every kind of fruit in peace and security. They will never taste death therein except the first death of this world, and He will save them from the torment of the blazing Fire” Qur’an 44:51-56, and “But for him who believes in Islam and performs all the duties ordained by Allah and His Messenger Muhammad and keeps away from all kinds of sin and fears the Day before his Lord, there will be two Gardens. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? With spreading branches; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? In them both will be two springs flowing free. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? In them both will be every kind of fruit in pairs. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Reclining upon the couches lined with silk brocade, and the fruits of the two Gardens will be near at hand. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Wherein both will be maidens restraining their glances upon their husbands, whom no man or jinn has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before them. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both deny? In beauty they are like rubies and coral.” Qur’an 55:46-58, and “Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both jinns and men deny? Is there any reward for good-other than good? Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? And besides these two, there are two other Gardens. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Dark green in colour. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? In them both will be two springs gushing forth water. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? In them both will be fruits, and date-palms and pomegranates. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Therein the gardens will be fair wives good and beautiful. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Beautiful fair females restrained in pavilions. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Whom no man or jinn has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before them. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Reclining on green cushions and rich beautiful mattresses. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you jinns and men deny? Blessed by the Name of your Lord Allah, the Owner of Majesty and Honour.”Qur’an 55:59-78, and “Verily, for the pious who fear Allah and love Allah much, there will be a success. Gardens and grapeyards; and young full-breasted maidens of equal age. And a full cup of wine. No dirty, evil, vain talk shall they hear therein, nor lying; a reward from your Lord, an ample calculated gift according to the best of their good deeds from the Lord of the heavens and the earth, and whatsoever is in between them-the Most Beneficent, none can dare to speak with Him.” Qur’an 78:31-37
    Spreading branches, date-palms, and pomegranates, and grapeyards, and pavilions, or tents with beautiful fair full-breasted maidens like rubies, and coral who are virgins? Islamic heaven sounds like a oasis in Arabia with big shaped white Arabian women “Narrated by Annas: When the Prophet was made to ascend to the heavens, he said after his return: ‘I came upon a river in Paradise the banks of which were made of tents of hollow pearls. I asked Gabriel, ‘What is this river?’ He replied, ‘This is the River in Paradise.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.6, Hadith No.488

    In Islamic heaven there will be white young boys who will attend the pious white Muslims, and 72 white Arabian virgins. But they will not have sex with the white virgins, and white pious Muslims “They will be on thrones woven with gold and precious stones reclining thereon, face to face. They will be attended by immortal boys with cups, and jugs, and a glass from the flowing wine. From where they will get neither any aching of the head, nor any intoxication. And fruit that they may choose. And the flesh of fowls that they desire. And there will be fair females with wide, lovely eyes like unto preserved pearls as wives for the pious. A reward for what they used to do. No dirty, false, vain talk will they hear therein, nor any sinful speech but only the saying of: Peace! Peace! And those on the Right Hand-who will be those on the Right Hand? They will be among the thornless lote-trees. Among trees with clusters of fruits piled one above another. In shade long-extended. By water flowing constantly and fruit in plenty whose season is not limited, and their supply will not be cut off. And on couches or thrones, raised high. Verily, we have created maidens of special creation and made them virgins loving their husbands only, equal in age. For those on the Right Hand” Qur’an 56:15-38,
    and “And their recompense shall be Paradise, and silken garments, because they were patient. Reclining therein on raised thrones, they will see there neither the excessive heat of the sun, nor the excessive bitter cold. And the shade thereof is close upon them, and the bunches of fruit thereof will hang low within their reach. And amongst them will be passed round vessels of silver and cups of crystal. Crystal-clear, made of silver. They will determine the measure thereof according to their wishes. And they will be given to drink there a cup of mixed wine. A spring will be there. And round about them will be boys of everlasting youth attending them. If you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. And when you look in Paradise you will see a delight and a great dominion. Their garments will be of fine green silk, and gold embroidery. They will be adorned with bracelets of silver, and their Lord will give them a pure drink. And it will be said to them: ‘Verily, this is a reward for you, and your endeavour has been accepted.” Qur’an 76:12-22, and “Verily, the pious who fear Allah much and love Allah much will be in Gardens, and delight. Enjoying in that which their Lord has bestowed on them, and their Lord saved them from the torment of the blazing Fire. ‘Eat and drink with happiness because of what you used to do.’ They will recline on thrones arranged in ranks. And We shall marry them to female, fair ones with wide lovely eyes. And those who believe and whose offspring follow them in Faith-to them shall We join their offspring, and We shall not decrease the reward of their deeds in anything. Every person is a pledge for that which he has earned. And We shall provide them with fruit and meat, such as they desire. There they shall pass from hand to hand a cup, free from any dirty, false evil talk between them, and free from sin. And there will go round boy-servants of theirs, to serve them as if they were preserved pearls. And some of them draw near to others, questioning, and saying: ‘Aforetime, we were afraid with our families. But Allah has been gracious to us, and has saved us from the torment of the Fire. Verily, we used to invoke Him along before. Verily, He is the Most Kind, and Generous, the Most Merciful.” Qur’an 52:17-28

    The hadiths show more proof Islamic heaven is a place filled with white skinned people.
    “The Prophet added, ‘Then the prophets and angels and the believers will intercede, and the Almighty will say, ‘Now remains My Intercession. He will then hold a handful of the Fire from which He will take out some people whose bodies have been burnt, and they will be thrown into a river at the entrance of Paradise, called the Water of Life. They will grow on its banks, as a seed carried by the torrent grows. You have noticed how it grows beside a rock or beside a tree, and how the side facing the sun is usually green while the side facing the shade is white. Those people will come out of the River of Life like pearls, and they will have golden necklaces, and then they will enter Paradise whereupon the people of Paradise will say, ‘These are the people emancipated by the Beneficent. He had admitted them into Paradise without them having done any good deed and without sending forth any good for themselves.’ Then it will be said to them, ‘For you is what you have seen and its equivalent as well.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.9, Hadith No.532B

    Another example which shows Allah will change a pious Muslim’s skin white in colour on Judgment Day is in the classic Arabian book The 1001 Nights translated by Richard Burton. In it a Black slave was rewarded for his Muslim piety by turning white at the moment of his death. One of the greatest essay writers in Arabic literature was the Black-Muslim Jahiz of Basra. He died in 869, and wrote The Boast of the Blacks against the Whites. He defends Black people in it. Jahiz defends the equality of Blacks as marriage partners, and writes about the paradox when discrimination against them first came when Islam came. He wrote “It is part of your ignorance that in the time of pre-Islamic Arabia you regarded us as good enough to marry your women, yet when the justice of Islam came, you considered this wrong.” One example comes from a Black-Muslim court poet named Nusayb al-Asghar the Younger. He died in 791, and said to the Caliph Harun al-Rashid “Black man, what have you to do with love? Give over chasing white Arabian girls if you have any sense. An Ethiopian Black like you has no means of access to them.” Another example of this attitude came from The 1001 Nights. In the book King Shahzaman left home to visit his brother King Shahriyar but turned back to get something he forgot. When he came back to his palace at night he found his wife sleeping in his bed next to a Black slave who fell asleep. The king was angry when he saw this, and killed both of them in bed.

    Why did Allah eternally chose Black skinned people only for Islamic hell? One of Allah’s great signs is his creation of diverse people with different coloured skins “And among His Signs is this, that He created you from dust-behold you are human beings scattered! And among His Signs is this, that He created you wives from among yourselves, that you may find repose in them, and He has put between you affection and mercy. Verily, in that are indeed signs for a people who reflect. And among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the difference of you languages and colours. Verily, in that are indeed signs for men of sound knowledge.” Qur’an 30:20-22, and “O mankind! We have created you from a male and a female and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know one another. Verily, the most honourable of you in the Sight of Allah is that believer who are pious and righteous who fear Allah and love Allah. Verily, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Aware.” Qur’an 49:13, and ”See you not that Allah sends down water from the sky, and We produce therewith fruits of varying colours, and among the mountains are streaks white and red, of varying colours and very black. And of men and living creatures, beasts, and cattle, in like manner of various colours. It is only those who have knowledge among His slaves that fear Allah. Verily, Allah is All-Might, Oft-Forgiving.” Qur’an 35:27-28. Why of all the colours Allah created did he only chose Black for all impious Muslims, and non-Muslims who are going to Islamic hell? Why didn’t he choose yellow, or brown skin? Why did he only choose Black skin? This shows Allah is an Eternal Racist. Allah is perfect because he is a spirit. But why is he a Racist Spirit? Why couldn’t Allah be like the Christian God who says in the Bible every race, nation, tribe, and language will be in his heaven “After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count from every race, nation, tribe, and language standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice: ‘Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne and to the Lamb!’ All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshipped God saying: ‘Amen! Praise and glory and wisdom and thanks and honour and power and strength be to our God for ever and ever. Amen!’ Then one of the elders asked me, ‘These in white robes-who are they, and where did they come from?’ I answered, ‘Sir, only you know.’ And he said, ‘These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Therefore, ‘they are before the throne of God and serve him day and night in his temple; and he who sits on the throne will spread his tent over them. Never again will they hunger; never again will they thirst. Neither the sun nor any scorching heat will touch them. For the Lamb at the centre of the throne will be there shepherd; he will lead them to springs of living water. And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.” Revelations 7:9-17. On Judgment Day God will not turn people’s skin colour white, or Black. In the Bible Jesus said “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’ Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” Matthew 25:31-46. Another example “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous and throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” Matthew 13:47-50, and “At that time the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and all the nations of the earth will mourn. They will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky, with power and great glory. And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.” Matthew 24:30-31, and “Then Jesus went through the towns and villages, teaching as he made his way to Jerusalem. Someone asked him, ‘Lord, are only a few people going to be saved?’ He said to them, ‘Make every effort to enter through the narrow door because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to. Once the owner of the house gets up and closes the door, you will stand outside knocking and pleading, ‘Sir, open the door for us.’ But he will answer, ‘I don’t know you or where you come from.’ Then you will say, ‘We ate and drank with you, and you taught in our streets.’ But he will reply, ‘I don’t know you or where you come from. Away from me, all you evildoers!’ There will be weeping there, and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves thrown out. People will come from the east and west and north and south, and will take their places at the feast in the kingdom of God. Indeed there are those who are last who will be first, and first who will be last.” Luke 13:22-30. In Christian heaven they will wear white robes like angels, and be whatever race, nation, tribe, or language they are. They will be like angles. For example “Then the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. ‘Teacher,’ they said, ‘Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. Now there were seven brothers. The first one married and died without leaving any children. The second of one married the widow, but he also died, leaving no child. It was the same with the third. In fact, none of the seven left any children. Last of all, the woman died too. At the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her? Jesus replied, ‘Are you not in error because you do not know the Scripture or the power of God? When the dead rise, they will be like the angels in heaven. Now about the dead rising-have you not read in the book of Moses, in the account of the bush, how God said to him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. You are badly mistaken!” Mark 12:18-27. Matthew 22:23-30, and Luke 20:27-40 say the same also. We will be like angels of every race, nation, tribe, or language who will be wearing white robes. Everyone will not be white skinned as in racist Islamic heaven.

    The word ‘race’ is of Arabic origin. The Arabic word ‘ras’ in Arabic means ‘origin, beginning, head.’ This is how the word ‘race’ began. It came from the Arabic word ‘ras’. A person’s race tells where a person originated from. It tells where he came from, or from where he began.

    Anyone who criticises Islam is called Islamophobic. Phobia is a irrational fear. How can anybody who criticises Islam be irrational when it is a racist, discriminating, colonialist, imperialist, favours jihad, favours slavery, violent religion? How can anyone be called irrational? How can anyone be called Islamophobic?

    Hitler loved Islam, and hated Christianity. He hated Christianity for many reasons, and he loved Islam for many reasons. He hated Christianity not just because Jesus was a Jew but because he found Christianity not to be similar to his Nazi beliefs. Hitler loved Islam because it was similar to his Nazi beliefs. He did not love Islam because it was racist like his Nazi beliefs but also he appreciated Islam because of the idea Muslim warriors would fight to the death, and receive paradise for it. This is similar to Hitler’s love for Nordic mythology because Germanic warriors would fight to the death, and receive paradise also. Nazi soldiers were commanded to fight to the death. Hitler admits to this in the book Hitler’s Table Talks
    “The fact that the Japanese have retained their political philosophy, which is one of the essential reasons of their success, is due to having been saved in time from the views of Christianity. Just as in Islam, there is no kind of terrorism in the Japanese State religion, but on the contrary, a promise of happiness. This terrorism in religion is the product, to put it briefly, of a Jewish dogma, which Christianity has universalised and whose effect is to sow trouble and confusion in men’s minds.”
    “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regarded sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”
    “Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers-already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity!-then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.”
    Also disturbing Hitler wrote Mein Kampf. It means My Struggle in German. Jihad in Arabic means struggle.

    Why do white European leaders such as scholars, politicians, the government, the media, schools, and so many white European people defend Islam, and praise it? They praise it because they love it like Hitler did. They are Nice Nazis. They hide their racism by defending Islam, and tolerating Religious Racist Muslims who practise Divine Discrimination against Christians, and Jews just like Hitler did. They appear nice because they defend Islam, and Muslims but Nice Nazis hate Christians, and Jews just like Hitler did. They should be ashamed of themselves. Because they defend, and praise Islam Muslims are convinced it is morally right what they do to non-Muslims. We Black Africans suffer because of them in Africa, and everywhere. Shame on you Nice Nazi white Europeans!

    Please spread this writing everywhere. You may spread it anywhere you like. The world must know the truth about Islam.

    >>>>>>>I was given this handout abroad. If you can translate it into various other European, African, South Asian, East Asian, et cetera languages, it would help<<<<<<<

  89. AIJdanjo77 says:

    Allah commands Muslims in the Qur’an to force Divine Discrimination against
    Christians, and Jews. Christians, and Jews must pay a discriminatory poll-tax called jizya, and they must always be politically, socially, economically subdued in their own native land by Muslim colonialists. Allah commands Muslims to “Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah, and His Messenger, and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews, and Christians) until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Qur’an 9:29 If they do not willingly submit then they must become slaves, or be expelled by Muslims from their own native homeland. “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say the Messiah is the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers of old. Allah’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!” Qur’an 9:30 “They disbelievers, Jews, and Christians want to extinguish Allah’s Light with their mouths, but Allah will not allow except that His Light should be perfected even though the disbelievers hate it.” Qur’an 9:32 Every Muslim must force Christians, and Jews to pay the jizya. Both Christians, and Jews who live under Muslim rule are called dhimmis. The Arabic word dhimmi means both guilty, and protected. They are guilty because they have rejected Islam. Because they are guilty they may live in Islamic ruled countries but not equally as Muslims socially, economically, politically. The jizya symbolises their submission because they are not citizens of a Islamic country even though the dhimmis are natives of the country. The jizya is a sign of the subjugation of conquered non-Muslims. It shows their inferior condition, and is a punishment for their disbelief in Islam. The jizya literally means ‘penalty’. It means penalty because they are not Muslim. Dhimmis are treated as second-class citizens in their native land. Muslims enforced regulations to make dhimmis feel humiliated, and inferior everyday, and everywhere in their homeland. When they must pay the jizya they must pay in public to a Muslim. The Muslim is sitting down, and the dhimmni is standing. He bends down to give the money, and then the Muslim slaps him on the face in public to humiliate him to feel subdued. This is why there is no compulsion in Islam. The Qur’an says this 2:256. If Muslims forced all non-Muslims to convert then Muslims could no longer force dhimmis to pay the jizya. Dhimmis are also forced to pay more taxes than Muslims, and under Muslim law non-Muslims must pay double custom duty than Muslims. They are all discriminating taxes. But the jizya is a Divine Discriminating tax. Dhimmi money paid for the Muslim military, government, society. Allah wants Muslims to benefit from dhimmi money to pay also for jihads. The jizya is also like tribute forced by the Arab-Muslim conquerors. “And those of the people of the Scripture who backed the disbelievers-Allah brought them down from their forts and caused terror into their hearts, so a group of them you killed, and a group of them you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden before. And Allah is Able to do all things.” Qur’an 33:26-27. Allah here commands Muslims to conquer, and colonise Christian, Jewish, and all other disbeliever lands in these verses. Muslims are colonialists. They are Islamic Imperialists. Muslims have already colonised one third of Africa, and they want to colonise more.

    Dhimmis must be subdued. Allah commands Muslims to force Divine Discrimination against them. Not only must they pay the jizya they must live as second-class citizens in their own land. Muslims do not allow dhimmis to renovate a church, monastery, synagogue. They cannot rebuild ones which were destroyed, and they cannot build new churches. They are allowed to renovate old churches, synagogues but they cannot add new construction. The following laws must also be enforced on dhimmis who live under Muslim rulers. Dhimmis cannot pray, or read the Bible out loud at home, or in churches, synagogues. If they are loud Muslims can hear their prayers. Dhimmis cannot print, or sell the Bible in public places, or markets. They can only do this inside their churches, and synagogues among their own people. Dhimmis cannot put a cross on their homes, or churches because it symbolises infidelity. Dhimmis are not allowed to gather in streets during their religious holidays. Dhimmis cannot join the army. If they do they cannot serve as leaders above Muslims. They cannot ride on horses, or mules. They can only ride on donkeys. They cannot carry weapons to protect themselves. They must wear special clothes to identity who is Christian, and Jewish to show their shame in public. They must walk on the left side of roads, and Muslims must walk on the right side of the road because the left side symbolises those who are going to hell, and the right side symbolises those who are going to heaven. “Then when the Trumpet will be blown with one blowing, and the earth and the mountains shall be removed from their places, and crushed with a single crushing, then on that Day shall the Event befall, and the heaven will split asunder, for that Day it will be weak, and be torn up, and the angels will be on its sides, and eight angels will, that Day, bear the Throne of your Lord above them. That Day shall you be brought to Judgment, not a secret of you will be hidden. Then as for him who will be given his Record in his right hand will say: ‘Take, read my Record! Surely, I did believe that I shall meet my Account!’ So he shall be in a life, well-pleasing. In a high Garden, the fruits in bunches whereof will be low and near at hand. Eat and drink at ease for that which you have sent on before you in days past! But as for him who will be given his Record in his left hand, will say: ‘I wish that I had not been given my Record! And that I had never known, how my Account is? I wish, would that it had been my end! My wealth has not availed me, my power and arguments have gone from me!’ It will be said: ‘Seize him and fetter him, then throw him in the blazing Fire. Then fasten him with a chain whereof the length is seventy cubits!” Qur’an 69:13-32

    Dhimmis cannot ring church bells, sing loudly in church, and synagogue. They must practise their religion in secret, and silence. Dhimmis must have different types of tombs from Muslims. Dhimmis lived separated from Muslims in special quarters of town. The gates to them were closed every night. If Islam did not invent the ghetto it was definitely first to institutionalise them. They must shave their hair in front to be identified. They must wear different clothes by style, colour, length to distinguish Christians from Jews, and both from Muslims. This was already forced with the Pact of Umar in the 7th
    century. The Jews were first made to wear a mark in Christian lands in the 13th century. This was later used by the Nazis. This Nazi idea originally came from Islam. They cannot criticise Islam, or they will be killed. They cannot convert Muslims but Muslims can convert them. They cannot display publicly their funerals, or holidays. They cannot build buildings higher than Muslim buildings, and they can never be given a position higher than a Muslim. A Muslim must have a higher position than a dhimmi because dhimmis must be subdued, and humiliated. They must have shorter houses than Muslims. Their houses must be marked to identify who they are in public. They cannot wear, or show religious objects in public. A Muslim man can marry a dhimmi woman but a dhimmi man cannot marry a Muslim woman. A dhimmi cannot marry a Muslim woman, or have a Muslim concubine but a Muslim man can marry a dhimmi woman, and have dhimmi concubines. “And do not marry idolatresses until they believe in Allah. And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a free idolatress even though she pleases you. And give not your daughters in marriage to disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and His Messenger Muhammad until they believe in Allah Alone, and verily a believing slave is better than a free disbeliever even though he pleases you. Those disbelievers invite you to the Fire, but Allah invites you to Paradise, and Forgiveness by His Bidding, and makes His verses clear to mankind that they may remember.” Qur’an 2:221. Allah hates Christians, and Jews, and all non-Muslims. “Verily, those who disbelieve from among the people of the Scripture, and all idolaters will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.” Qur’an 98:6

    The dhimmi is always reminded of his inferiority. He is not equal to a Muslim. He suffers social, political, economical inequality always. He has unequal individual rights, unequal in law courts. His evidence is not allowed against a Muslim. For the same crime he made his punishment is greater than a Muslim’s. Non-Muslims are not seen as citizens by any Islamic state even if the non-Muslims are original natives of the land. In Islamic law a Muslim life is superior than a non-Muslim life. If a Muslim kills a non-Muslim he will not be killed but a non-Muslim who killed a Muslim will definitely be punished with death. Rape in Muslim countries usually ends with death if victim is Muslim. But not if a Muslim rapes a non-Muslim. The honour of a Christian, and Jewish woman is not equal to a Muslim woman. Dhimmis cannot raise a hand against a Muslim, and protect
    themselves even if the Muslim wants to kill a dhimmi. Dhimmis must accept insults without replying. They must always give Muslims the best places to be. They can never speak to a Muslim except to reply. They must stand in a respectful way in presence of a Muslim. The worst jobs were given to dhimmis. Gravedigger, bathroom cleaners were forced on Jews on Saturdays, and holy days. This Divine Discrimination is a system of oppression. Dhimmis were in permanent state of weakness, subjugation, and inferiority.
    If dhimmis do not follow any of these laws, or break any of these Divine Discrimination Jim Crow laws then they have no protection anymore from Muslims, and the government. Muslims can steal dhimmi property. Muslims can rape dhimmi women. Muslims can destroy dhimmi homes. They can be crucified, or have their hands, and feet cut off, or be expelled from their own native land “The recompense of those who wage war against Allah, and His Messenger, and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed, crucified, or their hands, and feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.” Qur’an 5:33.

    These Divine Discrimination laws were first established in the Pact of Umar. Umar was the second caliph to rule the Islamic ummah from 634 to 644. These laws were forced upon the Christians, and Jews of Israel when Muslim imperialists conquered, and colonised Israel, and Jerusalem in 638. This was only 6 years after Muhammad died. Only 9 years after the death of Muhammad the Arabs began to colonise Africa. In 641 they began to colonise Egypt. Once they conquered Egypt they also invaded Black Nubian African Christian Kingdoms to the south of Egypt. These Black Nubian African Christian Kingdoms existed before Muhammad was born. A African Christian church was created in sub Sahara Africa first before there was a Christian church created in Europe. A Black sub Saharan African became Christian first before the Apostle Paul did on his road to Damascus, and Paul is the Apostle of the Gentiles. “Now an angel of the Lord said to Philip, ‘Go south to the road-the desert road-that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.’ So he started out, and on his way he met an Ethiopian eunuch, an important official in charge of all the treasury of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians. This man had gone to Jerusalem to worship, and on his way home was sitting in his chariot reading the book of Isaiah the prophet. The Spirit told Philip, ‘Go to that chariot and stay near it.’ Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet. ‘Do you understand what you are reading?’ Philip asked. ‘How can I,’ he said, ‘unless someone explains it to me?’ So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him. The eunuch was reading this passage of Scripture: ‘He was led like the sheep to the slaughter, and as a lamb before the shearer is silent, so he did not open his mouth. In his humiliation he was deprived of justice. Who can speak of his descendants? For his life was taken from the earth.’ The eunuch asked Philip, ‘Tell me, please, who is the prophet talking about, himself or someone else?’ Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus. As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, ‘Look, here is water. Why shouldn’t I be baptised?’ And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptised him. When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord suddenly took Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him again, but went on his way rejoicing. Philip, however, appeared at Azotus and traveled about, preaching the gospel in all the towns until he reached Caesara.” Acts 8:26-40 White Arab Muslims demanded annual tribute of Black slaves from these Black Nubian African Christian Kingdoms. In the next centuries they completely destroyed these Black Christian kingdoms through slavery, and dhimmi discrimination. The Black Christians became Muslim because they could not endure anymore political, social, economic discrimination from the Muslims. They were treated by white Arab Muslims as second-class citizens in their own land of Africa. Islam allowed Christians to practise but the social, political, and economic advantages of conversion were great, and Christianity soon declined in the areas colonised by Arabs. The Ottoman Empire gained a lot of its slaves, and soldiers from Balkan European Christian boys. The Ottomans established their institution of devsirme. It was a human tax. Young Christian boys from the Balkans were enslaved by the Muslim Turks. Because the Muslim Ottoman Turks colonised Balkan Europe this was like the jizya, and European Balkan Christians were dhimmis.

    Divine Discrimination is not tolerance. The idea Muslim societies were tolerant, or practised coexistence is a lie. It is not true. For example early 19th century western Jews created myths, or lies about Muslim Spain, and Portugal, and how Jews were treated better than by Christians in the Medieval Age. It was a lie to criticise treatment of Jews in 19th century central, and eastern Europe. Today people still repeat these lies, or myths about Muslim Spain, and Portugal, and the whole Islamic world. Just 6 years after Muhammad died Arab Muslim imperialists conquered Jerusalem. The caliph Umar forced the first Divine Discrimination laws on the Jews, and Christians of Israel. An Arab general who conquered Alexandria in Egypt in 639 wrote a victory letter to Umar “I have captured a city. Suffice it to say that I have seized 4000 villas with 400 baths, 4000 places of entertainment, and 40000 poll-tax paying Jews.” In 640 all of Egypt was colonised by the Arab-Muslim conquerors. In 717-20 Jews were ordered to wear cloaks to identify them from Muslims. Jews had to wear yellow dress, and hats. They could not use bath houses, they could not ride on horse, or mules but only donkeys. They were not to be employed in any government position, and doctors because it would give them authority over Muslims. But the last was not always forced although their laws said it must. In 11th century Egypt the Fatimid caliph al-Hakkim violently persecuted the Jews in 1012. All Jewish synagogues from Libya to Syria were destroyed. In Cairo Hakkim ordered the Jewish ghetto to be burnt to the ground on Passover Eve with all its inhabitants. In Kairawan Tunisia the Jews were persecuted, and forced to leave by the Muslims. They returned later but were expelled again. Hundreds of Jews were killed between 1010, and 1013 near Cordoba Spain, and other areas of Muslim Spain. In Fez Morocco more than 6000 Jews were killed in 1033. In Tunis 1145 Jews were forced to convert, or leave. In the rest of Tunisia from 1150s, and 1270s there were anti-Jewish persecution. In Marakesh Morocco 1232 the Jews were killed. There were anti-Jewish persecutions also through all of Morocco. In Tunis the Jews were forced to wear marks on cloths to show they are Jewish in 1250. In Libya 1588 the Jews were forced to convert to Islam. In Jerba Tunisia Arabs looted Jewish communities. They burned, and looted synagogues, and raped the women in 1864. In 1897 synagogues were looted in Libya. There are more examples but these are just a few. These Divine Discrimination laws were later abolished in the 19th, and 20th century by European colonial powers. They declared equality between Muslims, Christians, and Jews. Then did the dhimmis feel free, and gained economically. They were now liberated from discrimination. Europeans also freed Christians, and Jews, and Hindus, and Buddhists in Africa, Europe, and Asia from Muslims.

    Allah commanded Muslims to expel all impious Muslims, and non-Muslims from Arabia
    “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease and those who spread false news among the people of al-Madina, cease not, We shall certainly let you overpower them, then they will not be able to stay in it as your neighbours but a little while. Accursed, wherever found, they shall be seized and killed with a terrible slaughter.” Qur’an 33:60-61 The hadiths are the most important writings after the Qur’an. They are the sayings, actions, and deeds of the Prophet Muhammad. The two most important hadiths are by Sahih Bukhari, and Sahih Muslim. Muhammad ordered Muslims to expel non-Muslims. “The Prophet on his deathbed gave three orders saying, ‘Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula.’ Sahih Bukhari 4:52:288. Another time Muhammad said “It has been narrated by Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: ‘I will expel the Jews, and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula, and will not leave any but Muslim.” Sahih Muslim 19:4366. Today there are no dhimmis in Saudi Arabia. It must be 100 percent Muslim. It is a discriminating country. It hates Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists. Muhammad like Allah also discriminated against dhimmis “Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: ‘Do not greet the Jews, and the Christians before they greet you, and when you meet any one of them on the roads force them to go to the narrowest part of it.” Sahih Muslim 26:5389. Muhammad ordered to kill Jews “Narrated by Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, ‘The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say: ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.” Sahih Bukhari 4:52:177. Muslims must do this because they must obey both Allah, and Muhammad “And obey Allah, and the Messenger that you may obtain mercy.” Qur’an 3:132, and “O you who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and those of you who are in authority and if you have a dispute concerning any matter, refer it to Allah, and the Messenger if you are true believers in Allah, and the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination.” Qur’an 4:59, and “He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah. But if any turn away, then we have not sent you Muhammad as a watcher over them.” Qur’an 4:80. Muhammad said in a hadith “Narrated by Abu Huraira: Allah’s Messenger said ‘Whoever obeys me, he obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, he disobeys Allah, and whoever disobeys Him, he disobeys me.” Sahih Bukhari Vol. 9 Hadith No. 251, and they must live their lives like Muhammad did, and use him as an example how to live “Verily in the Messenger of Allah you have a good example for him who looks onto Allah, and the Last Day, and remembers Allah much.” Qur’an 33:21

    Muslims expelling non-Muslims occurs many times in history. When the Almohades colonised West Africa from Senegal to Spain, and Portugal they forced many natives to convert to Islam, or become slaves, or be expelled. The Almohades in Spain expelled many Jews. The most famous medieval Jewish scholar Maimonides was expelled from Spain by the Muslim Almohades rulers. The Jewish philosopher found refuge in Egypt after being expelled twice in Muslim Spain, and Morocco. He wrote a letter to the suffering Jews in Yemen “and it is known to you that no nation stood against Israel more hostile than the Muslims that no nation did evil to perfection in order to weaken us, and belittle us, and degrade us like them.”
    A anti-Jewish poem by Abu Ishaq a famous 11th century Arab scholar, and poet against the Jewish minister in Granada Spain Joseph Ibn Nagella says “Put back where they belong, and reduce them to the lowest of the low. Turn your eyes to other Muslim countries, and you will find the Jews there are outcast dogs. Do not consider it a breach of faith to kill them. They have violated our covenant with them so how can you be held guilty against the violators?” “They have violated our covenant” are the laws dhimmis must obey from Muslims. If dhimmis do not obey these dhimmi discriminating laws, or break this dhimmi discriminating covenant then they are no longer protected, and can be killed, raped, crucified, expelled, have their property stolen by Muslims. The whole Jewish community in Granada Spain was killed in1066 by Muslims. 5000 Jews of Granada were killed on 30 September 1066. This was more than the number of Jews killed 30 years later by Crusaders throughout Germany when the first Crusade started.

    Muslims are commanded by Allah never to take Christians, and Jews as protectors, or helpers. They must always remain disloyal to them “O you who believe! Take not the Jews, and the Christians as protectors or helpers. They are but protectors, and helpers to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as protectors or helpers, then surely, he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are polytheists.” Qur’an 5:51 Muslims are not truly loyal immigrants in non-Muslim, or secular countries “They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected Faith, and thus that you all become equal like one another. So take not protectors from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allah. But if they turn back from Islam, take them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither protectors nor helpers from them.” Qur’an 4:89, and “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness with the Qur’an.” Qur’an 25:52. Muhammad said the same as Allah did “Narrated by Ibn Umar: ‘The Prophet said, ‘It is obligatory for one to listen to, and obey the ruler’s orders unless these orders involve disobedience to Allah, but if an act of disobedience to Allah is imposed, we should not listen to or obey it.” Sahih Bukhari 4:52:203, and “Narrated by Abdullah: The Prophet said, ”A Muslim has to listen to, and obey the order of his ruler whether he likes it, or not as long as his orders involve not one in disobedience to Allah but if an act of disobedience to Allah is imposed one should not listen to it, or obey it.” Sahih Bukhari 9:89:258. You cannot trust Muslims. They are commanded by Divine Discrimination to rule non-Muslims as subdued subjects. But Muslims are commanded never to be loyal subjects to non-Muslim rulers. Here are more verses Muslims must not take non-Muslims as protectors, or helpers Qur’an 3:100, 3:118, 4:144-145, 5:57. But why do Muslims pretend to be loyal? Because Muslims believe it is moral to lie to non-Muslims always only if it benefits Islam. It is called al-Taqqiya in Arabic. It means to hide, to conceal, to protect, to veil.

    Muslims can pretend to not be true Muslims to non-Muslims to hide, to conceal, to protect themselves, and Islam only if they are true Muslim believers inside in heart.
    “Whoever disbelieved in Allah after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith-but such as open their breasts to disbelief,-on them is wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a great torment.” Qur’an 16:106, and “And why should you not eat of that meat on which Allah’s Name has been pronounced at the time of slaughtering the animal, while He has explained to you in detail what is forbidden to you, except under compulsion of necessity? And surely many do lead man astray by their own desires through lack of knowledge. Certainly your Lord knows best the transgressors.” Qur’an 6:119, and “Let not the believers take the disbelievers as protectors instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allah in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allah warns you against His Punishment, and to Allah is the final return.” Qur’an 3:28, and “And remember when the disbelievers plotted against you Muhammad to imprison you, or to kill you, or to get you out from Mecca; they were plotting and Allah too was plotting, and Allah is the Best of plotters.” Qur’an 8:30
    “Narrated by Abdullah bin Umar: ‘Two men came from the East and addressed the people who wondered at their eloquent speeches. On that Allah’s Apostle said: ‘Some eloquent speech is as effective as magic.” Sahih Bukhari 7:71:662
    “I am the best of plotters. I deceived them with my guile so I delivered you from them.” Ishaq 323, and “By Muhammad’s order we beguiled them.” Ishaq 442, and “The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.” Sahih Bukhari 7:427

    Muslims must lie, and deceive non-Muslims. They will lie about Islam to protect it against criticism. They will do it to deceive non-Muslims. They also can sign agreements with non-Muslims which are meaningless to Muslims. They will pretend to honour it until they become strong, and can defeat non-Muslim enemies. Then they will cancel it, and conquer non-Muslims, and their land “And those of the people of the Scripture who backed the disbelievers-Allah brought them down from their forts and caused terror into their hearts, so a group of them you killed, and a group of them you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden before. And Allah is Able to do all things.” Qur’an 33:26-27. Allah here commands Muslims to conquer, and colonise Christian, Jewish, and all other disbeliever lands in these verses. Muslims are colonialists. They are Islamic Imperialists. Islam is a colonialist religion. Muslims have colonised one third of Africa, and they want to colonise more.
    The Ummayad period began the Arabisation of the conquered, and colonised populations through conversion to Islam, Divine Discrimination, the speaking, and writing of Arabic, and intermarriage only between Muslim men, and non-Muslim women. The Nubian Kingdoms were the oldest Black Kingdoms in sub Sahara Africa. A sub Saharan African became Christian first before a European did. Christianity was created in sub Sahara Africa by the Holy Spirit before it was created in Europe Acts 8:26-40. By 540 Christianity was introduced into all of Nubia. The Black African Christian Kingdoms of Nobatia, Makkura, Alwa, and Axum were Christian before Muhammad was born, and before he received his first racist revelation from Allah. The Kingdom of Axum was the first sub Saharan African Kingdom in all of Africa to become Christian. King Ezana was the first Christian sub Saharan African ruler in 350. In the 700s Arab Muslims attacks on Axum caused Axum to decline. Christianity was the first religion in Nubia, and the Kingdom’s religion until the Arabs exterminated it completely in the 1200s. Makkura was the strongest Nubian state but it was destroyed by Arab Muslim invaders. The first Arab Islamic invasion of Makurra took place in 652. This was only 20 years after Muhammad died. The Nubian Black Christian Kingdom Makkura was conquered, and destroyed by Arab Muslims in 1317. Only the Christian Nubian Kingdom Alwa, and Ethiopia still remained. Alwa survived until 1505 when it was conquered by both Muslim Arabs, and the Funj. Ethiopia was ruled by the Soloman Dynasty, and it was able to survive from its Muslim neighbours.
    After conquering Egypt the Arabs began to move west, and conquered all of North Africa until they reached the Atlantic Ocean. North Africa was colonised by 698. Then they sailed across the strait of Gibraltar to colonise Spain, and Portugal, and southern France. Europe was saved by Charles Martel at the battle of Poitiers in 732. Later in the century they called for a universal jihad against France. This jihad against Europe began centuries before the Crusades. In the 9th century the Arabs sailed across the Mediterranean from North Africa, and colonised Crete, Sicily, Sardinia, parts of southern France, Corsica, and southern Italy, and many Greek islands. In 846 Muslims sailed to Rome, and looted the Vatican. By the end of the 9th century the Islamic Empire spread from India to the Atlantic. Islam was introduced to East Africa by Arab traders in the 10th century who sailed from Arabia. By 1000 there were Islamic trading towns on the East Coast of Africa from Somalia to northern Mozambique.
    Muslim-Arabs conquered Sind, and Multan in India in early 8th century. In 1000 Mahmud of Ghazni invaded India 17 times. He looted, and destroyed idolater Hindu temples. He would annexe Punjab to his empire. Mahmud of Ghazni made jihads against Hindu kingdoms. He destroyed their Hindu temples after he conquered northern India after his victory over Hindus at Peshawar in 1009. The Ghaznaid emirate conquered northwest India, and in 1206 a Muslim sultanate was founded at Delhi. In 1279 it was the largest state in India since the Gupta kingdom. By 1200 Muslims were masters of the Indus, and Gangetic lands, and began 600 years of Muslim dominance in India. They would later extend Muslim rule to the Deccan. Northern, and central India remained under Muslim control. Only in the south there was Hindu independence. Buddhism was completely destroyed when the Muslims destroyed the university at Nalanda in 1199.
    The golden age of Islamic civilisation was during the Abbasid Caliphate. Much of its wealth came from stealing silver from the silver mines in the Hindu Kush Mountains.
    Buddhism in India was destroyed by the Muslims in 1200s. Indian Buddhism only survived in the island Sri Lanka. Both Hinduism, and Buddhism declined in southeast Asia when Islam was introduced to the land, and islands of Malaysia, and Indonesia.
    In the 13th century Arab-Muslim traders from Arabia, and East Africa sailed across the Indian Ocean to spread Islam to the lands, and islands of southeast Asia like Malaysia, and Indonesia. Islam exterminated both Hinduism, and Buddhism there. Islam was also brought to Malaysia, and Indonesia by Indian Muslim merchants in the 13th century.

    Anyone who criticises Islam is called Islamophobic. Phobia is a irrational fear. How can anybody who criticises Islam be irrational when it is a racist, discriminating, colonialist, imperialist, favours jihad, favours slavery, violent religion? How can anyone be called irrational? How can anyone be called Islamophobic?

    Hitler loved Islam, and hated Christianity. He hated Christianity for many reasons, and he loved Islam for many reasons. He hated Christianity not just because Jesus was a Jew but because he found Christianity not to be similar to his Nazi beliefs. Hitler loved Islam because it was similar to his Nazi beliefs. He did not love Islam because it was racist like his Nazi beliefs but also he appreciated Islam because of the idea Muslim warriors would fight to the death, and receive paradise for it. This is similar to Hitler’s love for Nordic mythology because Germanic warriors would fight to the death, and receive paradise also. Nazi soldiers were commanded to fight to the death. Hitler admits to this in the book Hitler’s Table Talks
    “The fact that the Japanese have retained their political philosophy, which is one of the essential reasons of their success, is due to having been saved in time from the views of Christianity. Just as in Islam, there is no kind of terrorism in the Japanese State religion, but on the contrary, a promise of happiness. This terrorism in religion is the product, to put it briefly, of a Jewish dogma, which Christianity has universalised and whose effect is to sow trouble and confusion in men’s minds.”
    “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regarded sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”
    “Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers-already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity!-then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.”
    Also disturbing Hitler wrote Mein Kampf. It means My Struggle in German. Jihad in Arabic means struggle.

    Why do white European leaders such as scholars, politicians, the government, the media, schools, and so many white European people defend Islam, and praise it? They praise it because they love it like Hitler did. They are Nice Nazis. They hide their racism by defending Islam, and tolerating Religious Racist Muslims who practise Divine Discrimination against Christians, and Jews just like Hitler did. They appear nice because they defend Islam, and Muslims but Nice Nazis hate Christians, and Jews just like Hitler did. They should be ashamed of themselves. Because they defend, and praise Islam Muslims are convinced it is morally right what they do to non-Muslims. We Black Africans suffer because of them in Africa, and everywhere. Shame on you Nice Nazi white Europeans!

    Please spread this writing everywhere. You may spread it anywhere you like. The world must know the truth about Islam.

    >>>>>>>I was given this handout abroad. If you can translate it into various other European, African, South Asian, East Asian, et cetera languages, it would help<<<<<<<

  90. AIJdanjo77 says:

    In the Qur’an Allah commands Muslims to fight, and kill impious Muslims, Christian, and Jews, and Hindus, and Buddhists, and all other non-Muslims in jihads “Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, and fight in the cause of Satan. So fight you against the friends of Satan. Ever feeble indeed is the plot of Satan.” Qur’an 4:76, and “Verily, Allah loves those who fight in His Cause in rows as if they were a solid structure.” Qur’an 61:4, and “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who are the pious.” Qur’an 9:123, and “Remember when your Lord inspired the angels, ‘Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.” Qur’an 8:12, and “O Prophet Muhammad! Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be severe against them, their abode will be Hell-and worse indeed is that destination.” Qur’an 66:9, and “And He it is Who has withheld their hands from you and your hands from them in the midst of Mecca, after He had made you victors over them, and Allah is Ever the All-Seer of what you do. They are the ones who disbelieved in the Oneness of Allah and hindered you from the sacred mosque of Mecca and the sacrificial animals, detained from reaching their place of sacrifice. Had there not been believing men and believing women whom you did not know, that you may kill them, and on whose account a sin would have been committed by you without your knowledge, that Allah might bring into His Mercy who He will. If the believers and disbelievers should have been apart, We verily had punished those of them who disbelieved with painful torment.” Qur’an 48:24-25, and “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease and those who spread false news among the people of Madina, cease not, We shall certainly let you overpower them, then they will not be able to stay in it as your neighbours but a little while. Accursed, wherever found, they shall be seized and killed with a terrible slaughter.” Qur’an 33:60-61

    Allah commands Muslims to take non-Muslims as slaves, their possessions, and land from jihad “And abundant spoils that they will capture. And Allah is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise. Allah has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.” Qur’an 48:19-20, and “They ask you O Muhammad about the spoils of war. Say: ‘The spoils are for Allah and the Messenger.’ So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allah and His Messenger Muhammad if you are believers.” Qur’an 8:1, and “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter among his enemies in the land. You desire the good of this world but Allah desires for you the Hereafter. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise. Were it not a previous ordainment from Allah, a severe torment would have touched you for what you took. So enjoy what you have gotten of booty in war, lawful and good, and be afraid of Allah. Certainly, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” Qur’an 8:67-69, and “So, when you meet those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly on them as captives. Thereafter either free them for generosity or for ransom until the war lays down the burden. Thus you are ordered by Allah to continue in carrying out Jihad against the disbelievers till they embrace Islam or at least come under your rule, but if it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them with you. But He lets you fight in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost. He will guide them and set right their state. And admit them to Paradise which He has made known to them. O you who believe! If you help in the cause of Allah, He will help you, and make your foothold firm.” Qur’an 47:4-7, and “And those of the people of the Scripture who backed the disbelievers-Allah brought them down from their forts and caused terror into their hearts, so a group of them you killed, and a group of them you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden before. And Allah is Able to do all things.” Qur’an 33:26-27. Allah here commands Muslims to conquer, and colonise Christian, Jewish, and all other disbeliever lands through jihad. Muslims are colonialists. They are Islamic Imperialists. Islam is a colonialist religion. Ahmed Gran of Adal in the Horn of Africa began a jihad against the Christian Black African Kingdom of Ethiopia. The Ottoman Turks had colonial rule down the Red Sea. In 1540 the Ottoman Turks began to attack coastal Black African kingdoms in eastern Africa. The Muslim Ottoman Turks helped Ahmed’s jihads. Some of the African rulers asked the Portuguese for help against the Ottoman invaders. The next year Portuguese helped. Together the Portuguese, and the Ethiopians fought against the Ottoman Turks, and Ahmed from conquering, and colonising the region.

    A part of the spoils of jihad are slave women, and children “Successful indeed are the believers. Those who offer their prayers with all solemnity and full submissiveness. And those who turn away from all that Allah has forbidden. And those who pay the Zakat. And those who guard their chastity except from their wives or that their right hands possess-for then, they are free from blame.” Qur’an 23:1-6, and Qur’an 70:29-30. “Right hands possess” means their captives, or slaves “And whoever of you have not the means wherewith to wed free, believing women, they may wed believing girls from among the captives and slaves whom your right hands posses, and Allah has full knowledge about your Faith, you are one from another. Wed them with the permission of their masters and give them their bridal-money according to what is reasonable; the captives and slave girls should be chaste, not adulterous, nor taking boy-friends. And after they have been taken in wedlock, if they commit illegal sexual intercourse, their punishment is half that for free unmarried women. This is for him among you who is afraid of being harmed in his religion or in his body; but it is better for you to restrain yourself, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Qur’an 4:25
    “Narrated by Anas: ‘The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a nation to fight, then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.’ Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and women taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives. She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet. The Prophet made her manumission as her bridal-price.” Sahih Bukhari 5:59:512.
    “Narrated by Ibn Aun: ‘I wrote a letter to Nafi and Nafi wrote in reply to my letter that the Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives. The Prophet got Juwairiya on that day. Nafi said that Ibn Umar had told him the above narration and that Ibn Umar was in that army.” Sahih Bukhari 3:46:717

    Allah promises heaven for all Muslims who die in jihad. Allah promises all Muslims heaven if they kill themselves in suicide martyrdom. Muslims are happy to fight because they will immediately go to paradise if they die in battle. Allah says in the Qur’an “And say not of those who are killed in the Way of Allah, ‘They are dead.’ No, they are living, but you perceive it not.” Qur’an 2:154, and “Verily, Allah has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allah’s Cause, so they kill others and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success.” Qur’an 9:111, and “That you believe in Allah and His Messenger Muhammad and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! If you do He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of Eternity, that is indeed the great success.” Qur’an 61:11-12, and “Let those believers who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allah, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allah, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward.” Qur’an 4:74
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘I heard Allah’s Messenger saying, ‘The example of a Muslim warrior in Allah’s Cause-and Allah knows better who really strives in His Cause-is like a person who fasts and prays continuously. Allah guarantees that He will admit a Muslim warrior in His Cause into Paradise if he is killed, otherwise He will return him to his home safely with rewards and war booty.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.46.
    “Narrated by Abu Said Al-Khudri: ‘Somebody asked, ‘O Allah’s Messenger! Who is the best among the people?’ Allah’s Messenger replied ‘A believer who strives his utmost in Allah’s Cause with his life and property.’ They asked, ‘Who is next?’ He replied, ‘A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.45.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘Allah’s Messenger said, ‘Allah guarantees him who strives in His Cause and whose motivation for going out is nothing but Jihad in His Cause and Belief in His Word, that He will admit him into Paradise if martyred or bring him back to his dwelling place, whence he has come out, with what he gains of reward or booty.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.352.
    “Narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah: ‘On the day of the battle of Uhud, a man came to the Prophet and said, “Can you tell me where I will be if I should be martyred?’ The Prophet replied, ‘In Paradise.’ The man threw away some dates he was carrying in his hand, and fought till he was martyred.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.5, Hadith No.377.
    “Narrated by Anas bin Malik: ‘The Prophet said, ‘Nobody who dies and finds good from Allah in the Hereafter would wish to come back to this world, even if he were given the whole world and whatever is in it except the martyr who, on seeing the superiority of martyrdom would like to come back to the world and get killed again in Allah’s Cause.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.53.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said, ‘By Him in Whose Hands my life is! Were it not for some men amongst the believers who dislike to be left behind me, and whom I cannot provide with means of conveyance, I would certainly never remain behind any army going out for Jihad in Allah’s Cause. By Him in Whose Hands my life is! I would love to be martyred in Allah’s Cause and then come back to life, and then get martyred and then come back to life again, and then get martyred and then come back to life again, and then get martyred.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.54

    It is true some verses seem peaceful “Say O Muhammad to the believers to forgive those who harm them and hope not for the Days of Allah, that He may recompense people according to what they have earned.” Qur’an 45:14. But this verse was cancelled by Qur’an 9:36 “Verily, the number of months with Allah is twelve months, so was it ordained by Allan on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth; of them four are Sacred. That is the right religion, so wrong not yourselves therein, and fight against the disbelievers collectively, as they fight against you collectively. But know that Allah is with those who are pious and fear Allah much and love Allah much.”, and “And fight in the Way of Allah those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allah likes not the transgressors. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And disbelief is worse than killing. And fight not with them at the sanctuary at Mecca, unless they first fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.” Qur’an 2:190-191
    “Narrated by Abdullah bin Masud: ‘I asked Allah’s Messenger, ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What is the best deed?’ He replied, ‘To offer the prayers at their early fixed times.’ I asked, ‘What is next in goodness?’ He replied, ‘To be good and dutiful to your parents.’ I further asked, ‘What is next in goodness?’ He replied, ‘To participate in jihad in Allah’s Cause.’ I did not ask Allah’s Messenger anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me more.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.4 Hadith No.41.
    “Narrated by Ibn Masud: ‘A man asked the Prophet ‘What deeds are the best?’ The Prophet said: ‘To perform daily prayers at their stated fixed times; to be good and dutiful to one’s own parents and to participate in Jihad in Allah’s Cause.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 9, Hadith No.625.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said, ‘the one who looks after a widow or a poor person is like a warrior who fights for Allah’s Cause, or like him who performs prayers all the night and fast all the day.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.7 Hadith No.265.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘Allah’s Messenger was asked, ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied, ‘To believe in Allah and His Messenger.’ The questioner then asked, ‘What is the next?’ He replied, ‘To participate in Jihad in Allah’s Cause.’ The questioner again asked, ‘What is the next?’ He replied, ‘To perform pilgrimage to Mecca.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.1 Hadith No.25.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said, ‘No prayer is harder for the hypocrites than the Fajr and the Isha prayers and if they knew the reward for these prayers at their respective times, they would certainly present themselves in the mosques even if they had to crawl.’ The Prophet added, ‘Certainly I decided to order the call-maker to pronounce Iqama and order a man to lead the prayer and then take a fire flame to burn all those who had not left their houses so far for the prayer along with their houses.” Sahih Bukhari 1:11:626, and ‘Following Badr, Muhammad sent a number of raiders with orders to capture some of the Meccans and burn them alive.” Ishaq 316, and “Allah said, ‘A Prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.” Ishaq 327, and “When the Apostle descends on your land none of your people will be left when he leaves.” Ishaq 588, and “Muhammad’s Companions are the best in war.” Ishaq 472

    These verses are cancelled by naskh “Or do they say: ‘He Muhammad has forged it?’ Say: ‘Bring then a chapter like unto it, and call upon whomsoever you can, besides Allah, if you are truthful!” Qur’an 10:38, and “And We change a Verse in place of another, and Allah knows the best of what He sends down, the disbelievers say: ‘You O Muhammad are but a forger and liar.’ No, but most of them know not.” Qur’an 16:101, and “Whatever a Verse do We cancel or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that Allah is Able to do all things?” Qur’an 2:106. The Qur’an is divided into early, and late chapters. The early chapters of the Qur’an are called Meccan, and the later chapters of the Qur’an are called Medinan. The Meccan chapters are more peaceful. The Medinan chapters are more hateful, and violent. Because Allah revealed the Medinan chapters later to Muhammad they are more important than the Meccan chapters. The first Muslim year began when Muhammad moved to Medina from Mecca in 622. It is called the Hijra. It was the beginning of the Muslim calendar. Whenever two verses do not agree Muslims cancel the verse in Meccan chapters, and replace them with verses from the Medinan chapters. Peaceful verses are cancelled, and replaced by hateful, violent verses. Qur’an 9:5 is called the Verse of the Sword, and it canceled every peace treaty, and promise which had been made between Muslims, and disbelievers. This is another reason why Muslims should not be trusted.

    Jihad will continue until the whole world is Muslim “And fight them until there is no more disbelief and the religion of worship will all be for Allah Alone in the whole world. But if they cease worshipping others besides Allah, then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.” Qur’an 8:39, and “And fight them until there is no more disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah and all and every kind of worship is for Allah Alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against the wrong-doers.” Qur’an 2:193

    “Then when the Sacred Months have passed, then kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and offer prayers perfectly and give zakat, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Qur’an 9:5. This verse also allows Muslims to force non-Muslims to convert to Islam. If they do not convert to Islam then Muslims must kill them. “Give zakat” means they must be Muslim. Giving zakat is one of the 5 pillars of Islam. This is the opposite what Jesus said in the Bible “As you go, preach this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven is near. Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse those who have leprosy, drive out demons. Freely you have received, freely give. Do not take along any gold or silver or copper in your belts; take no bag for the journey, or extra tunic, or sandals or a staff; for the worker is worth his keep. ‘Whatever town or village you enter, search for some worthy person there and stay at his house until you leave. As you enter the home, give it your greeting. If the home is deserving, let your peace rest on it; if it is not, let your peace return to you. If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.” Matthew 10:7-14, and “Then Jesus went around teaching from village to village. Calling the Twelve to him, he sent them out two by two and gave them authority over evil spirits. These were his instructions: ‘Take nothing for the journey except a staff-no bread, no bag, no money in your belts. Wear sandals but not an extra tunic. Whenever you enter a house, stay there until you leave that town. And if any place will not welcome you or listen to you, shake the dust off your feet when you leave, as a testimony against them.’ They went out and preached that people should repent. They drove out many demons and anointed many sick people with oil and healed them.” Mark 6:6-13, and “When Jesus had called the Twelve together, he gave them power and authority to drive out all demons and to cure diseases, and he sent them out to preach the kingdom of God and to heal the sick. He told them: ‘Take nothing for the journey-no staff, no bag, no bread, no money, no extra tunic. Whatever house you enter, stay there until you leave that town. If people do not welcome you, shake the dust off your feet when you leave their town, as a testimony against them.’ So they set out and went from village to village, preaching the gospel and healing people everywhere.” Luke 9:1-6

    This is similar to death for leaving Islam. Muslims must be killed if they change their religion. “Narrated by Ikrima: ‘Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn Abbas, who said, ‘Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, Don’t punish anybody with Allah’s Punishment.’ No doubt, I would have killed them for the Prophet said, ‘If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him.” Sahih Bukhari 4:52:260.
    “Narrated by Ikrima: ‘Some atheists were brought to Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event reached Ibn Abbas who said, ‘If I had been in his place, I would have not burnt them as Allah’s Apostle forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment of fire.’ I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” Sahih Bukhari 9:84:57

  91. AIJdanjo77 says:

    A jihad against non-Muslims is allowed by sharia law. Jihads allowed Muslims to slave raid against the non-Muslim world. Muslims believe slavery is a divine blessing for mankind because pagans, and barbarians through jihad, and slavery are brought to Islam, and civilisation. The greatest of all medieval Arab social thinkers was the 14th century historian Ibn Khaldun. He wrote “who were brought to the Land of Islam under the rule slavery, which hides in itself a divine blessing. By means of slavery they learn glory and blessing and are exposed to divine providence; cured by slavery, they enter the Muslim religion with the firm resolve of true believers and yet the nomadic virtues unsullied by debased nature, unadulterated by the filth of pleasure, undefiled by ways of living.”
    The Qur’an accepts slavery. It recognises the inequality between master, and slave, and the rights of the master over the slave. It also recognises concubinage “Successful indeed are the believers. Those who offer their prayers with all solemnity and full submissiveness. And those who turn away from all that Allah has forbidden. And those who pay the Zakat. And those who guard their chastity except from their wives or that their right hands possess-for then, they are free from blame.” Qur’an 23:1-6. Another example is Qur’an 70:29-30. The Qur’an urges but does not demand kindness to slaves “Worship Allah and join none with Him in worship, and do good to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, the poor who beg, the neighbour who is near of kin, the neighbour who is a stranger, the companion by your side, the wayfarer, and those whom your right hands possess. Verily, Allah does not like such as are proud and boastful.” Qur’an 4:36. “Whom your right hands possess” means slaves, and sex slaves. And “O you who believe! Let your legal slaves and slave-girls, and those among you who have not come to the age of puberty ask your permission on three occasions; before morning prayer, and while you put off your clothes for the noonday, and after the late night prayer. These three times are of privacy for you, other than these times there is no sin on you or on them to move about, attending you each other. Thus Allah makes clear the verses of this Qur’an to you. And Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.” Qur’an 24:58. The slave was chattel with no legal powers, or rights. A slave could marry but only if his master allowed it “And whoever of you have not the means wherewith to wed free, believing women, they may wed believing girls from among the captives and slaves whom your right hands posses, and Allah has full knowledge about your Faith, you are one from another. Wed them with the permission of their masters and give them their bridal-money according to what is reasonable; the captives and slave girls should be chaste, not adulterous, nor taking boy-friends. And after they have been taken in wedlock, if they commit illegal sexual intercourse, their punishment is half that for free unmarried women. This is for him among you who is afraid of being harmed in his religion or in his body; but it is better for you to restrain yourself, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Qur’an 4:25. Slaves were exchanged as compensation for killing another Muslim. The family of the deceased would receive the slave, or slaves as compensation Qur’an 4:92. It is true one good act was to free a slave but this only proves Islam recognises, and institutionalised slavery “And shown him the two ways of good and evil? But he has made no effort to pass on the path that is steep. And what will make you know the path that is steep? It is freeing the neck of a slave. Or giving food in a day of hunger to an orphan near of kin. Or to a poor afflicted with misery.” Qur’an 90:10-16. “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said: ‘Whoever frees a Muslim slave, Allah will save all the parts of his body from the Fire, as he has freed the body-parts of the slave.” Sahih Bukhari Vol.3 Hadith No.693. But this act of piety is only for Muslim slaves. Is it the same for disbelieving slaves?

    The Qur’an says Islamic hell is full of chained Black skinned people. Is this why white Arab Muslims enslaved non-Muslim Black Africans the most because it was a holy duty? For every one Black slave who survived the tran Saharan, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean passages to the auction blocks in Muslim lands, 6 would die along the passage. Europeans practised slavery for 400 years. Arab Muslims practised slavery since the beginning of Islam to 1980. They practised it for almost 14 centuries. 11500000 Black slaves traveled across the Atlantic Ocean. 10500000 survived to the auction blocks in the Americas. 22000000 Black slaves survived to the auction blocks in the Muslim lands. More than 110000000 Black slaves died traveling along the Muslim passages.
    By 652 Arab-Muslims began to raid wars into the Black Nubian Christian Kingdoms of Nobatia, and Makkura. Arab-Muslims tried to colonise the Black Christian Nubian Kingdoms of Nobatia, Makurra, and Alwa. When they failed at first they made a treaty between them in Egypt, and the Black Christian Nubian Kingdoms demanding Black slaves from Nubia as tribute every year. This was the first treaty ever made by a Arab-Muslim state demanding slaves as tribute from a non-Muslim state. This tribute lasted every year until the 12th century when the Muslims in Egypt fought wars against Nubia.
    Black slaves were brought to the Islamic empire from the Tran Sahara, and along the Red Sea by ship, and across the Indian Ocean by ship from East Africa to Arabia, Persia, India, southeast Asia, and Indonesia, and China.
    The oldest route was from the Sudan down the Nile to Egypt, and across the Red Sea to Arabia. This route began with the first slave tribute agreement forced by Arab-Muslims on Black Nubian Kingdoms. Today Sudan is Muslim but before it was the first sub Saharan Black Christian Kingdom in all of Africa. The Arabs raided West Africa for slaves since 738, and by 750 the tran Saharan trades began to increase. Around the year 800 trading towns are found on the East African coast such as Kilwa Kisiwani Mombasa in Kenya, and the Island of Zanzibar. East African Black slaves called Zanj worked in southern Iraq to drain salt flats, and other Black slaves were forced to work in salt mines in the Sahara, and the gold mines of West Africa. Cotton, sugar, and rice was worked by Black slaves on Arab-Muslim plantations in North Africa, and later by the Ottoman Turks.
    A 7th century poet wrote in Arabic “I am being led in Damascus without honour as though I am a slave from Zanj.” In 765 a revolt of Black African slaves occurred in the second holiest Muslim city Medina in Arabia. In the Muslim countryside Black slaves were forced on plantations, and large groups to work in agriculture, mines, marshes. In eastern Arabia 30000 Black slaves were forced to do the hard work. Tens of thousands of East African Black slaves who worked in the salt flats of Basra Iraq removed, and stacked the topsoil to clear the land for sugar, and to extract the saltpetre. They were treated horribly, and revolted several times against their Arab-Muslim masters. In 869 the first Black Zanj slave revolt occurred southeast of Baghdad. These Black slaves worked in salt flats, and on sugarcane plantations, and revolted against their Muslim slave owners. In 874 the second Black Zanj slave revolt began. Black slaves working in the salt flats southeast of Baghdad again revolted against their Muslim slave owners. The Black Zanj slaves were led by Riyah ‘the lion of the Zanj’. They defeated the Abbasid Caliph al-Mutamid’s forces, and stopped commerce for 15 years. From 868 to 883 they became a military threat to the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad. They were masters of southern Iraq, and Basra. But they were defeated by the forces of the Caliph’s brother al-Muwaffaq. Later slaves in the region tried to renew the revolt but Muslims massacred 10000 slaves near Monsul.

    Ahmad Tulun was the first independent ruler of Muslim Egypt. He relied on Nubian Black slaves for his army, and had 45000 Blacks when he died in 884. When the Tulunids were overthrown in 905 by the Abbasid Caliphate to annexe Egypt back to its empire the caliph massacred the Nubian Black army of the Tulunids, and burned their quarters “Then the cavalry turned against the cantonments of the Tulunid blacks, seized as many of them as they couldn’t, and took them to Muhammad ibn Sulayman. He was on horseback, amid his escort. He gave orders to slaughter them, and they were slaughtered in his presence like sheep.” In Baghdad in 930 the Black army was attacked, and massacred by the Arab cavalry, and the people. Their quarters were burned. Afterwards, Black soldiers almost disappeared from the armies of the Caliphate in the Middle East.
    During the Crusades the Muslim leader Saladin in 1169 killed a Black eunuch who wanted to remove Saladin from power. The Black army in Cairo was angry when they heard about this. All the 50000 Black soldiers united together against Saladin, and his army, and fought them between the palaces of the caliph, and vizier. They were defeated because they were betrayed by the Fatimid Caliph al-Adid. The Black soldiers thought they were defending him against the vizier “Al-Adid had gone up to his tower to watch the battle between the palaces. It is said that he ordered the men in the palace to shoot arrows, and throw stones at Saladin’s troops, and they did so. Others say that this was not done by his choice. Shams al-Dawla sent naptha-throwers to burn down al-Adid’s tower. One of them was about to do this when the door of the tower opened, and out came a caliphal aide, who said: ‘The commander of the Faithful greets Saladin’s brother Shams al-Dawla, and says: ‘Beware of the black slave dogs! Drive them out of the country!’ The blacks were sustained by the belief that al-Adid was pleased with what they did. When they heard this, their strength was sapped, their courage waned, and they fled.” Also Saladin’s army attacked their homes. Saladin sent his soldiers to the Black quarters “to burn them down on their possessions, and their children.” When the Black soldiers heard this they returned home but were caught in the streets by Saladin’s army, and destroyed. This battle in Arabian history was known as “The Battle of the Blacks”, and “The Battle of the Slaves.”

    Islam was spread by tran Saharan Arab traders to West Africa in the 11th century. Islam spread to sub Saharan Africa in 1070. The Almohades came to rule a massive colonial empire from Spain, and Portugal across the Mediterranean Sea down to sub Saharan Africa near Burkina Faso. They ruled for a century, and traded in Black slaves, gold, ivory. They slave raided pagan Black societies. In 1076 the Muslim black kingdom of Ghana was invaded by the Almoravids. The author Idrisi (1110-1165) also wrote that Moroccan merchants in Takur “bring wood, copper, and beads, and take away gold and slaves.”
    In West Africa the Kingdom of Mali arose in the 13th century. Its wealth came from controlling rich goldfields. Tran Saharan trade through caravans of camels grew. Caravan routes grew rapidly at centres where Arab Muslims traded cloth, glass, horses, luxuries from North Africa for Black slaves, ivory, and gold. In 1433 Muslim forces led by Akil captured the city of Timbuktu the cultural centre of the Mali Empire. Later the Kingdom of Songhai replaced Mali as the biggest power in West Africa by 1500. Morocco invaded, and destroyed the sub Saharan Black Muslim Songhai kingdom in 1591 at Tondibi. Arab Muslim Morocco now had a colonial empire which reached close to Burkina. Black male, and female slaves were used for hard labour for money in the salt mines, gold mines, copper mines of the Sahara. The great Muslim geographer Ibn Battuta (1304-1377) wrote of Tagadda in West Africa “From this country come excellent slavegirls, eunuchs, and fabrics dyed with saffron.” Later when Ibn Battuta left for North Africa on September 11, 1353 he wrote he traveled “with a large caravan which included six hundred women slaves.” The greatest medieval Muslim historian the 14th century Ibn Khaldun wrote about the people of West Africa “Therefore, the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is human and have attributes quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated.” He later writes about the Black people south of West Africa “beyond them to the south there is no civilisation in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They
    frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings.”

    Around the year 800 trading towns are found on the East African coast such as Kilwa Kisiwani Mombasa in Kenya, and the Island of Zanzibar. Arab traders introduced Islam to East Africa in the 10th century. There were Islamic trading towns in East Africa from the Horn of Africa of Somalia to northern Mozambique. In 915 the Arabian geographer Abul-Hasan Ali al-Masudi wrote about the slave trade on the east coast of Africa. He wrote slaves were being traded at Kilwa, and Mombasa, and were transported to Arab settlements. A large scale network of slave trading existed in the Indian Ocean region in which Black East African people were captured, enslaved, and transported. East African Blacks were exported to the Arabian peninsula, Persia, Madagascar, India, southeast Asia, and China. In the tenth century Mutahhar ibn Tahir al-Maqdisi wrote “To the Zanj food and clothing are exported; from them come gold, slaves, and coconuts.”
    There are medieval accounts where Black Africans from Madagascar were taken as slaves to the markets of Arabia, and the Middle East. Arab slave traders would sail, and trade, or sell Black slaves from the Swahili East African coast to work on the plantations on Madagascar. Muslim Swahili Arabs would slave raid on the Comoro Island, and on Kilwa, Ibo, Mozambique Island, and Querimba. Other Muslim Arab slave traders exported Black African slaves from Nosy Be, and Oman. Slave raiding, and trading occurred from the Horn of Africa to Sofala. In 900 Burzurg ibn Shahriyar a merchant and navigator of the Persian Gulf wrote Kitab al-Ajaib al-Hind. Arab merchants from Oman sailed regularly to East Africa to search for slaves, purchase, and trade them. Burzurg wrote about sailing trips, and it talks about slave trading on the coast of East Africa. Here he wrote about a African King taken captive along with his companions, and was sold into slavery in Oman “When everything was in order, and the king knew of our intention to set sail, he accompanied us to the shore with several of his people, got into one of the boats and came out to the ship with us. He even came on board with seven of his companions. When I saw them there, I said to myself: In the Oman market this young king would certainly fetch thirty dinars, and his seven companions sixty dinars. Their clothes along are not worth less than twenty dinars. One way and another this would give us a profit of at least three thousand dinars, and without any trouble. Reflecting thus, I gave the crew their orders. They raised the sails and weighed anchor…When the day came, the king and his companions were put with the other slaves whose number reached about 200 head. He was not treated differently from his companions in captivity. The king said not a word and did not even open his mouth. He behaved as if we were unknown to him and as if we did not know him. When he got to Oman, the slaves were sold, and the king with them.”

    The Chinese saw this also. In 1000 the Chinese traded with the coast of East Africa which they called Po-pa-li. They Chinese were aware of an early slave trade in the Indian Ocean. They were aware Black Africans of East Africa were kidnapped, and sold as slaves by Arabian, and Persian merchants. They traded with African slaves from Malindi, and sold them to China. “The country of Po-pa-li is in the southwestern sea. The people do not eat any of the five grains but east only meat. They often stick a needle into the veins of cattle and draw blood which they drink raw, mixed with milk. They wear no clothes except that they cover the parts below their loins with sheepskins. Their women are clean and of proper behaviour…If Persian merchants wish to go into their country, they collect around them several thousand men and present them with strips of cloth. All, whether old or young draw blood and swear an oath, and then only do they trade their products. From olden times they were not subject to any foreign country. In fighting they use elephants’ tusks and ribs and the horns of wild buffaloes as lances and they wear cuirasses and bow and arrows. They have twenty myriads of foot soldiers. The Arabs make frequent raids upon them.”
    The author Idrisi (1110-1165) wrote “The Zanj are in great fear and awe of the Arabs, so much so that when they seen an Arab trader or traveler they bow down and treat him with great respect, and say in their language: ‘Greeting, O people from the land of the dates!’ Those who travel to this country steal the children of the Zanj with dates, lure them with dates, and lead them from place to place, until they seize them, take them out of the country, and transport them to their own countries. The Zanj people have great numbers but little gear. The ruler of the island of Kish in the sea of Umar raids the Zanj country with his ships and takes many captives.”
    By the middle 11th century there was extensive slave trading from Ras Asir ‘the cape of slaves’, and Pemba to China for ceramics, and luxury goods.
    In 1178 another Chinese author Chou Chu-fei wrote the travel account Ling-wai-tai-ta which described the slave trading in East Africa “There is an island in the sea on which there are many savages. Their bodies are black as lacquer and they have frizzled hair. They are enticed by food and then captured and sold as slaves to the Arabic countries, where they fetch a very high price. They are employed as gate-keepers, and it is said that they have no longing for their kinfolk…thousands of them are sold as foreign slaves.” “And it is said that they have no longing for their kinfolk?” Was this a lie white Arab Muslims created to convince the Chinese their slave raiding, and slave trading of Black Africans was alright?
    During the 12th, and 13th centuries many Black African people were bought on the islands of Zanzibar, and Pemba, and then sailed to the Arabian peninsula where they were forced to find pearls in the Persian Gulf. In 1437 there were reports of Black East Africans being traded as slaves in western India. In 1486 Black African slaves in India began a revolt, and killed the Sultan of Bengal. They made their leader of the revolt their new sultan. But many of the rebels were later punished by being exiled to the Deccan region of India. Muslim slave raiders began raiding the interior traveling as far as Lake Victoria, and the Upper Congo. They marched large number of slaves chained together in groups for sailing transport to Zanzibar, and used on plantations, or shipped to Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and Turkey. In 1844 Muslim Arabs established a slave trading centre along the East African coast at Unyamwezi near Tabora in Tanzania.
    From the late 18th century, and after African slaves were still being caught in jihads, transported, and sold in the markets of North Africa, and the Middle East. The 19th century Moroccan Muslim historian Ahmad ibn Khalid al-Nasiri (1834-97) wrote “a manifest and shocking calamity widespread and established since of old in the lands of the Maghrib-the unlimited enslavement of the blacks, and the importation of many droves of them every year for sale in the town and country markets of the Maghrib, where men traffic in them like beasts, or worse.” An Arab Muslim Tunisian traveler who visited Darfur at the beginning of the 19th century wrote about farms where Blacks were reproduced for sale “Certain rich people living in the town have installed these blacks from the mountains on their farms, to have them reproduce, and as we sell sheep and cattle, so they, every year, sell those of their children that are ready for this. There are some of them who own five or six hundred male and female slaves, and merchants come to them at all times, to buy male and female slaves chosen to be sold.” We were sold, and used as slaves in your own continent of Africa.

    Unlike the Qur’an the Bible said slavery is an evil sin “We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious; for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers-and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.”
    1 Timothy 1:8-11 The abolition movement began in late 18th century England when Christians like William Wilberforce made parliament stop the slave trade in their colonies across the Atlantic. Soon after other European countries ended slavery, and the slave trade in the early 19th century such as the Dutch, and French. Another Christian Dr. David Livingstone was able to travel to the inside of Africa. He saw how brutal the Arab slave trade was. He soon asked European politicians to end it. When European colonised Africa in the late 19th century they ended the Arab slave trade. The British sought to end the slave trade in the Ottoman Empire, and in 1890 the Ottoman Empire was forced to sign the Brussels Act which prohibited the slave trade in Africa.
    The most popular slave routes were across the Sahara to Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia. From the Sudan down the Nile, or through the desert to Egypt, Arabia, and the Middle East, and from East Africa across the Red Sea, and Indian Ocean to Arabia, Iraq, Iran, India, southeast Asia, Malaysia, Indonesia, and China. Later when the Europeans colonised Africa, and suppressed the Muslim slave trade only Libya was not run by Europeans. The traditional slave routes across the Sahara changed. Later routes led from Kano to Tripoli, and from Darfur, and Waday to Kufra, and Cyrenaica. Libya became a main slave trading centre in the 19th century. They also gained Black slaves from Chad, and Nigeria, and exported them to the Ottoman Empire’s colonies in the Balkans, and Asia.

    Despite British anti-slave trade ships watching the Mozambique Channel, Swahili Arabs, and Muslim Indians were able to still sail Black African slaves to Madagascar, Arabia, Oman, Masqat, the Middle East, and Muslim parts of India in the late 19th century, and early 20th century. But the British, French, and Italian control of the Horn of Africa stopped the Arab slave traders from sailing Black African slaves to Arabia, and across the Indian Ocean. Another important slave trade centre was the Hijaz of western Saudi Arabia along the Red Sea. Mecca is the holiest city in Islam. Medina is the second holiest city in Islam. Mecca, and Medina are in the Hijaz. In 765 a revolt of Black African slaves occurred in the second holiest city Medina in Arabia. Because Mecca, and Medina was in the Hijaz they could still practise slavery in the 19th, and 20th century when other European ruled Muslim countries could not. The Ottoman Turks ruled Arabia, and were forced by Europeans to stop slavery in many Ottoman colonies but it was not possible to allow the end of the slave trade in Mecca, and Medina, and all the Hijaz. The religious centres of Mecca, and Medina resisted the most against the end of slavery. They saw slavery a institution permitted by the Qur’an, hadiths, and tradition. In Jedda some Muslims protested to the religious leaders in Mecca against the abolition of slavery. They said it was a horrible Christian idea. They also protested against other Christian ideas such as women’s rights, and tolerating religiously mixed marriages. They found all these ideas to be anti-Islamic. In the late 19th century Black African slaves were sailed from East Africa, and imported to the Hijaz. Later they would be slave traded to the north, and even Egypt. Slavery did not end in Saudi Arabia until 1962. It ended in Yemen in 1962 also. It ended in 1952 in Qatar, and 1963 in United Arab Emirates, and 1970 in Oman. The last country to end it was Mauritania in 1980. Balkan Christians were made also slaves by Turks because they rebelled against Turkey to make their countries in the Balkans free from Turkey. They were later freed from slavery.

    Muslim pirates from North Africa enslaved 1250000 Europeans for a few centuries. The European men served in the armies of North Africa, and rowed as slaves in their ships. The women became concubines. These Muslim pirates enslaved mostly the Spanish, Portuguese, southern French, Italians, and Greeks. They also enslaved the northern French, some of the English, and Irish, and even enslaved some Europeans from Iceland. In 1627 four Algerian ships attacked several coastal communities of Iceland. They carried 380 Icelanders into slavery in North Africa. In the 16th, and 17th centuries there were 40000 European slaves in the city Algiers. There were tens of thousands of European slaves in other North African cities also. Muslim Tatars, and Turks also enslaved more than a million Russians, and Ukrainians. In 1575 Tatars made a slave raid in Ukraine, and captured 35000 Ukrainians. They were taken to the slave markets in Kaffa in the Crimea, and the slave markets of Istanbul. In 1676 the Tatars captured 40000 more slaves in Ukraine to be sold in the slave markets of Istanbul. In 1688 they slave raided again, and captured 60000 slaves to be sold as slaves in Kaffa, and Istanbul.
    By 1400 the Ottoman Muslim Turks colonised the Balkans, and conquered Constantinople in 1453. Today Constantinople is Istanbul, and it proves of Ottoman Turks colonial past. Before Europe traders would travel across the Middle East to reach India, and China. But because of dhimmi discriminating custom duties against Christians, and because the Ottomans colonised Byzantium the Ottomans made it more difficult for Christians to travel east through Muslim colonial lands to reach India, and China. This is why 39 years after the Muslim Turks colonised Constantinople Columbus searched for a new way to reach the Far East. European colonialism of the Americas was caused by the Muslim Ottoman Turks. In the 16th century the Muslim Ottoman Turks controlled a massive colonial empire in North Africa up to Morocco, some of Sudan, and Eritrea.
    The Armenians gained independence from Muslim rulers in 886. The Muslim Turks killed more than 1000000 Armenians in the Armenian Genocide. They still will not admit to it. Everybody knows they did it but they will not admit it. The Ottoman Muslim Turks immigrated Muslims to the Balkans, and Divine Discrimination against the European Christians forced many to convert to Islam. Today the Balkan Peninsula suffers from conflict, war, and genocide. It is called Balkanisation. It is the Ottoman Muslim Turk’s fault.

    If there were so many Black slaves in the Muslim world then why are there not so many Blacks today like the Americas? Many reasons include Black eunuchs. Before Black African slaves arrived in the Muslim world they were castrated. European slaves were also castrated. Another reason is the low birth rate, and high death rate among Black slaves in North Africa, and Arabia, the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire, and Persia. White Arab Muslims did not take good care of all Black slaves because sub Sahara Africa is next to North Africa, and the Middle East. It was easier for white Arab Muslims to renew their Black slaves.

  92. AIJdanjo77 says:

    A few verses in the Qur’an show respect towards women “O you who believe! You are forbidden to inherit women against their will, and you should not treat them with harshness, that you may take away part of the bridal-money you have given them, unless they commit open illegal sexual intercourse. And live with them honourably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allah brings through it a great deal of good.” Qur’an 4:19, and “Lodge the divorced women where you dwell, according to your means, and do not treat them in such a harmful way that they be obliged to leave. And if they are pregnant, then spend on them till they deliver. Then if they give suck to the children for you, give them their due payment, and let each of you accept the advice of the other in a just way. But if you make difficulties for one another, then some other woman may give suck for the father of the child.” Qur’an 65:6

    But the rest of the verses do not. Muslim men must control Muslim women, and scourge Muslim women if they do wrong “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend from their means to support them. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient to Allah and to their husbands, and guard in the husband’s absence what Allah orders them to guard. As to those women on whose part you see ill-conduct, admonish them first, then refuse to share their beds, and scourge them, but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means of annoyance. Surely, Allah is Ever Most High, Most Great.” Qur’an 4:34, and “And remember Our slave Job, when he invoked his Lord saying: ‘Verily! Satan has touched me with distress and torment! Allah said to him: ‘Strike the ground with your foot: This is a spring of water to wash in, cool and a refreshing drink.’ And We gave him back his family, and along with them the like thereof, as a Mercy from Us, and a Reminder for those who understand. ‘And take in your hand a green branch and beat your wife with it, and break not your oath. Truly! We found him patient. How excellent a slave! Verily, he was ever oft-returning in repentance to Us!” Qur’an 38:41-44. The hadiths prove this. “Narrated by Ikrima: ‘Rifaa divorced his wife whereupon Abdur-Rahman married her. Aisha said that the lady came wearing a green veil and complained to her and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating. It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s Messenger came, Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any women suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!’ When Abdur-Rahman heard that his wife had gone to the Prophet, he came with his two sons from another wife. She said, ‘By Allah! I have done no wrong to him, but he is impotent and is as useless to me as this,’ holding and showing the fringe of her garment. Abdur-Rahman said to her, ‘If that is your intention, then know that it is unlawful for you to remarry Rifaa unless Abdur-Rahman has had sexual intercourse with you.’ The Prophet saw two boys with Abdur-Rahman and asked him, ‘Are these your sons?’ On that Abdur-Rahman said, ‘Yes.’ The Prophet said, ‘You claim what you claim that he is impotent? But by Allah, these boys resemble him as a crow resembles a crow.” Sahih Bukhari 7:6:715.
    “Narrated by Aisha: Abu Bakr came towards me and struck me violently with his fist and said, ‘You have detained the people because of your necklace.’ But I remained motionless as if I was dead lest I should awake Allah’s Apostle although that hit was very painful.” Sahih Bukhari 8:82:828.
    “He (Muhammad ibn Qais) then reported that it was Aisha who had narrated this: Should I not narrate to you about myself and about the Messenger of Allah? We said: Yes. She said: When it was my turn for Allah’s Messenger to spend the night with me, he turned his side, put on his mantle and took off his shoes and placed them near his feet, and spread the corner of his shawl on his bed and then lay down till he thought that I had gone to sleep. He too hold of his mantle slowly and put on the shoes slowly, and opened the door and went out and then closed it lightly. I covered my head, put on my veil and tightened my waist wrapper, and then went out following his steps till he reached Baqi. He stood there and he stood for a long time. He then lifted his hands three times, and then returned and I also returned. He hastened his steps and I also hastened my steps. He ran and I too ran. He came to the house and I also came to the house. I, however, preceded him and I entered the house, and as I lay down in the bed, the Holy Prophet entered the house, and said: ‘Why is it, O Aisha, that you are out of breath?’ I said: ‘There is nothing. He said: ‘Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me.’ I said: ‘Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you’ and then I told him the whole story. He said: ‘Was it the darkness of your shadow that I saw in front of me? I said: ‘Yes.’ He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?” Sahih Muslim 4:2127

    Muslim men may confine Muslim women inside a house, and starve them to death “And those of your women who commit illegal sexual intercourse, take the evidence of four witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine women to houses until death comes to them or Allah ordains for them some other way.” Qur’an 4:15

    Muslim men may marry four women “And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan-girls, then marry other women of you choice, two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with them, then only one or the captives and the slaves that your right hands possess. That is nearer to prevent you from doing injustice.” Qur’an 4:3. “Narrated by Anas bin Malik: ‘The Prophet used to have sex with all his wives in one night, and at that time he had nine wives.” Sahih Bukhari 7:62:142

    Muslim women cannot divorce Muslim men “And divorced women shall wait for three menstrual periods, and it is not lawful for them to conceal what Allah has created in their wombs, if they believe in Allah and the Last Day. And their husbands have the better right to take them back in that period, if they wish for reconciliation. And the women have rights similar over their husbands to what is reasonable, but men have a degree above them. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.” Qur’an 2:228

    Muslim men are allowed to rape their slaves “Forbidden to you for marriage are: your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your father’s sisters, your mother’s sisters, your brother’s daughters, your sister’s daughters, your foster mother who gave you suck, your foster milk suckling sisters, your wives’ mothers, your step-daughters under your guardianship, born of your wives to whom you have gone in-but there is no sin on you if you have not gone in them to marry their daughters,-the wives of your sons who spring from your own loins, and two sisters in wedlock at the same time, except for what has already passed; verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. Also forbidden are women already married, except those captives and slave whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you seek them in marriage with bridal-money give by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage from your property, desiring chastity, not committing illegal sexual intercourse. So with those of whom you have enjoyed sexual relations, give them their bridal-money as prescribed; but if after the bridal-money is prescribed, you agree mutually to give more, there is no sin on you. Surely, Allah is Ever All-Knowing, All-Wise.” Qur’an 4:23-24, and “And those who guard their chastity except with their wives and the women slaves and captives whom their right hands possess- for then they are not to be blamed.” Qur’an 70:29-30, and “And whoever of you have not the means wherewith to wed free, believing women, they may wed believing girls from among the captives and slaves whom your right hands posses, and Allah has full knowledge about your Faith, you are one from another. Wed them with the permission of their masters and give them their bridal-money according to what is reasonable; the captives and slave girls should be chaste, not adulterous, nor taking boy-friends. And after they have been taken in wedlock, if they commit illegal sexual intercourse, their punishment is half that for free unmarried women. This is for him among you who is afraid of being harmed in his religion or in his body; but it is better for you to restrain yourself, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Qur’an 4:25.
    “Narrated by Abu Said al-Khudri: ‘While he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Companions came and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?’ Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Do you do that? It is better for you not to do it for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.” Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600.
    “Abu Said al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hunain Allah’s Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom you right hands possess” Qur’an 4:24 Sahih Muslim 8:3432.
    “Abu Said al-Khudri reported: ‘We took captives, and we wanted to do coitus interruptus with them. We then asked Allah’s Messenger about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of Judgment must be born.” Sahih Muslim 8:3373.
    “Narrated by Ibn Muhairiz: ‘I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us? We asked him about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so for if any soul is predestined to exist, it will exist.” Sahih Bukhari 5:59:459.
    “Abu Sirma said to Abu Said al-Khudri: ‘O Abu Said, did you hear Allah’s Messenger mentioning coitus interruptus?’ He said: ‘Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger on the expedition to the Bil-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives but we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them by observing coitus interruptus. But we said: ‘We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger and he said: ‘It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.” Sahih Muslim 8:3371.
    “Narrated by Ibn Muhairiz: ‘I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said said, ‘We went with Allah’s Apostle in the Ghazwa of Barli Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle whether it was permissible. He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul destined to exist up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come into existence.” Sahih Bukhari 3:46:718.
    If Arab women then how more worse for non-Arab women?

    Muslim women are sex objects, and men can have sex with them whenever “Your wives are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth when or how you will, and send good deeds before you for your ownselves. And fear Allah, and know that you are to meet Him in the Hereafter, and give good tidings to the believers.” Qur’an 2:223. “Narrated by Abu Huraira: ‘The Prophet said, ‘If a man invites his wife to sleep with him and she refuses to come to him, then the angels send their curses on her till morning.” Sahih Bukhari 7:62:121, and “Abu Huraira reported that Allah’s Apostle said: ‘When a woman spends the night away from the bed of her husband, the angels curse her until morning.” Sahih Muslim 8:3366

    Women are possessions for Muslim men “Narrated by Ibrahim bin Sad from his father from his grand-father: ‘Abdur Rahman bin Auf said, ‘When we came to Medina as emigrants, Allah’s Apostle established a bond of brotherhood between me and Sad bin Ar-Rabi.’ Sad bin Ar-Rabi said to me, ‘I am the richest among the Companions, so I will give you half of my wealth and you may look at my two wives and whichever of the two you may choose I will divorce her, and when she has completed the prescribed period before marriage you may marry her.” Sahih Bukhari 3:34:264. “The Muslims said among themselves, ‘Will Safiyah be one of the Prophet’s wives or just a lady captive and one of his possessions?” Sahih Bukhari 5:59:524

    If a Muslim female slave commits illegal sexual intercourse then she will be whipped 50 times. But if a Muslim free woman who is not a slave commits illegal sexual intercourse then she will be whipped 100 times, or be stoned to death “And whoever of you have not the means wherewith to wed free, believing women, they may wed believing girls from among the captives and slaves whom your right hands posses, and Allah has full knowledge about your Faith, you are one from another. Wed them with the permission of their masters and give them their bridal-money according to what is reasonable; the captives and slave girls should be chaste, not adulterous, nor taking boy-friends. And after they have been taken in wedlock, if they commit illegal sexual intercourse, their punishment is half that for free unmarried women. This is for him among you who is afraid of being harmed in his religion or in his body; but it is better for you to restrain yourself, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Qur’an 4:25

    Stoning is allowed “The woman and the man guilty of illegal sexual intercourse, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allah, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of the believers witness their punishment. The adulterer marries not but an adulteress or a polytheist and the adulteress none marries her except an adulterer or a polytheist or prostitute, then surely he is either an adulterer, or a polytheist. And the woman who agrees to marry a polytheist or an adulterer, then she is either a prostitute or a polytheist. Such a thing is forbidden to the believers. And those who accuse chaste women, and produce not four witnesses, flog them with eighty stripes, and reject their testimony forever, they indeed are the liars. Except those who repent thereafter and do righteous deeds, verily Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. As for those who accuse their wives, but have no witnesses except themselves, let the testimony of one of them be four testimonies by Allah that he is one of those who speak the truth. And the fifth testimony should be the invoking of the Curse of Allah on him if he be of those who tell a lie against her. But it shall avert the punishment of stoning to death from her, if she bears witness four times by Allah, that her husband is telling a lie.” Qur’an 24:2-8.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid: ‘Two men had a dispute in the presence of Allah’s Apostle. One of them said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Laws.’ The other who was wiser, said, ‘Yes, O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Laws and allow me to speak.’ The Prophet said, ‘Speak.’ He said, ‘My son was a labourer serving this person and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people said that my son is to be stoned to death, but I ransomed him with 100 sheep and a slave girl. Then I asked the learned people, who informed me that my son should receive 100 lashes and will be exiled for one year, and stoning will be the lot for the man’s wife.’ Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Indeed, by Him in Whose Hand my soul is, I will judge between you according to Allah’s Laws: As for your sheep and slave girl, they are to be returned to you.’ Then he scourged his son 100 lashes and exiled him for one year. Then Unais Al-Aslami was ordered to go to the wife of the second man, and if she confessed the crime, then stone her to death. She did confess, so he stoned her to death.” Sahih Bukhari 8:78:629.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani: “A Bedouin came and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Law.’ His opponent got up and said, ‘He is right. Judge between us according to Allah’s Law.’ The Bedouin said, ‘My son was a labourer working for this man, and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people told me that my son should be stoned to death; so, in lieu of that, I paid a ransom of one hundred sheep and a slave girl to save my son. Then I asked the learned scholars who said, ‘Your son has to be lashed 100 lashes and has to be exiled for one year.’ The Prophet said, ‘No doubt I will judge between you according to Allah’s Laws. The slave girl and the sheep are to go back to you, and your son will get a 100 lashes and one year exile.’ He then addressed somebody, ‘O Unais! Go to the wife of this man and stone her to death.’ So, Unais went and stoned her to death.” Sahih Bukhari 3:49:860.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani: ‘A Bedouin came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! I ask you by Allah to judge my case according to Allah’s Laws.’ His opponent, who was more learned than he, said, ‘Yes, judge between us according to Allah’s Laws, and allow me to speak.’ Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Speak.’ He said, ‘My son was working as a labourer for this man and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people told me that it was obligatory that my son should be stoned to death, so in lieu of that I ransomed my son by paying 100 sheep and a slave girl. Then I asked the religious scholars about it, and they informed me that my son must be lashed 100 lashes, and be exiled for one year, and the wife of this man must be stoned to death.’ Allah’s Apostle said, ‘By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, I will judge between you according to Allah’s Laws. The slave girl and the sheep are to be returned to you, your son is to receive 100 lashes and be exiled for one year. You, Unais, go to the wife of this man and if she confesses her guilt, stone her to death.’ Unais went to that woman next morning and she confessed. Allah’s Apostle ordered that she be stoned to death.” Sahih Bukhari 3:50:885.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid: “Two men had a dispute in the presence of Allah’s Apostle. One of them said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Laws.’ The other who was wiser, said ‘Yes, O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Laws and allow me to speak. The Prophet said, ‘Speak.’ He said, ‘My son was a labourer serving this man and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people said that my son is to be stoned to death, but I ransomed him with 100 sheep and a slave girl. Then I asked the learned people, who informed me that my son should receive 100 lashes and will be exiled for one year, stoning will be the lot of the man’s wife.’ Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Indeed, by Him in Whose Hand my soul is, I will judge between you according to Allah’s Laws: As for your sheep and slave girl, they are to be returned to you.’ Then he scourged his son 100 lashes and exiled him for one year. Then Unais Al-Aslami was ordered to go to the wife of the second man, and if she confessed, the stone her to death. She did confess, so he stoned her to death.” Sahih Bukhari 8:78:629.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani: ‘A man came to the Prophet and said, ‘I beseech you to judge us according to Allah’s Laws.’ Then his opponent who was wiser than he, got up and said, ‘He was spoken the truth. So judge us according to Allah’s Laws and please allow me to speak, O Allah’s Apostle.’ The Prophet said, ‘Speak.’ He said, ‘My son was a labourer for the family of this man and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife, and I gave 100 sheep and a slave as a ransom for my son, but I asked the religious learned people, and they informed me that my son should be flogged 100 stripes, and be exiled for one year, and the wife of this man should be stoned to death.’ The Prophet said, ‘By Him in Whose Hand my soul is, I will judge you according to Allah’s Laws. The 100 sheep and the slave shall be returned to you and your son shall be flogged 100 stripes and be exiled for one year. And O Unais! Go in the morning to the wife of this man and ask her, and if she confesses, stone her to death.’ She confessed and he stoned her to death.” Sahih Bukhari 8:82:842.
    “Narrated by Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani: ‘A Bedouin came and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Book.’ His opponent stood up and said, ‘He has said the truth, so judge between us according to Allah’s Laws.’ The Bedouin said, ‘My son was a labourer for this man and committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people said to me, ‘Your son is to be stoned to death,’ so I ransomed my son for 100 sheep and a slave girl. Then I asked the religious learned men and they said to me, ‘Your son has to receive 100 lashes plus one year of exile.’ The Prophet said, ‘I shall judge between you according to Allah’s Book! As for the slave girl and the sheep, it shall be returned to you, and your son shall receive 100 lashes and be exiled for one year. O you, Unais!’ The Prophet addressed some man, ‘Go in the morning to the wife of this man and stone her to death.’ So Unais went to her the next morning and stoned her to death.” Sahih Bukhari 9:89:303.
    “Narrated by Ash-Shabi: from Ali when the latter stoned a lady to death on a Friday. Ali said, ‘I have stoned her according to the tradition of Allah’s Apostle.” Sahih Bukhari 8:82:803.
    “Narrated by Ibn Abbas: ‘Umar said, ‘I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, ‘We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,’ and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession.’ Sufyan added, ‘I have memorised this narration in this way.’ Umar added, ‘Surely Allah’s Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him.” Sahih Bukhari 8:82:816.
    “Abdullah ibn Abbas reported that Umar ibn Khattab sat on the pulpit of Allah’s Messenger and said: ‘Verily Allah sent Muhammad with truth and He sent down the Book upon him, and the verse of stoning was included in what was sent down to him. We recited it, retained it in our memory and understood it. Allah’s Messenger awarded the punishment of stoning to death and after him we also awarded the punishment of stoning. I am afraid that with the lapse of time, the people may forget it and may say: ‘We do not find the punishment of stoning in the Book of Allah, and thus go astray by abandoning this duty prescribed by Allah. Stoning is a duty laid down in Allah’s Book for married men and women who commit adultery when proof is established, or if there is pregnancy, or a confession.” Sahih Muslim 17:4194.
    “Abdullah ibn Buraida reported on the authority of his father that Maiz ibn Malik al-Aslami came to Allah’s Messenger and said: ‘Allah’s Messenger, I have wronged myself; I have committed adultery and I earnestly desire that you should purify me. He turned him away. On the following day, Maiz again came to him and said: ‘Allah’s Messenger, I have committed adultery.’ Allah’s Messenger turned him away for the second time, and sent him to his people saying: ‘Do you know if there is anything wrong with his mind? They denied of any such thing in him and said: ‘We do not know him but as a wise good man among us, so far as we can judge. Maiz came for the third time, and the Holy Prophet sent him as he had done before. He asked about him and they informed him that there was nothing wrong with him or with his mind. When it was the fourth time, a ditch was dug for him and the Holy Prophet pronounced judgment about him and he was stoned. The narrator said: ‘There came the Holy Prophet a woman from Ghamid and said: Allah’s Messenger, I have committed adultery, so purify me. The Holy Prophet turned her away. On the following day she said: ‘Allah’s Messenger, why do you turn me away? Perhaps, you turn me away as you turned away Maiz? By Allah, I have become pregnant.’ He said: ‘Well, if you insist upon it, then go away until you give birth to the child. When he was delivered she came with the child in a rag and said: ‘Here is the child whom I have given birth to.’ He said: ‘Go away and suckle him until you wean him.’ When she had weaned him, she came to him with the child who was holding a piece of bread in his hand. She said: ‘Allah’s Apostle, here is he as I have weaned him and he eats food. He entrusted the child to one of the Muslims and then pronounced punishment. And she was put in a ditch up to her chest and he commanded people and they stoned her. Khalid ibn Walid came forward with a stone which he flung at her head and there spurted blood on the face of Khalid and so he abused her. Allah’s Apostle heard Khalid’s curse that he had hurried upon her. Thereupon the Holy Prophet said: ‘Khalid, be gentle. By Him in Whose Hand is my life, she had made such a repentance that even if a wrongful tax-collector were to repent, he would have been forgiven. Then giving command regarding her, he prayed over her and she was buried.” Sahih Muslim 17:4206

    Muslim free women are stoned to death, or whipped more than Muslim slave women. What is the punishment for non-Muslim women, and slave women such as Christians, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists?

    Two Muslim women witnesses are equal to one Muslim man witness “O you who believe! When you contract a debt for a fixed period, write it down. Let a scribe write it down in justice between you. Let not the scribe refuse to write as Allah has taught him, so let him write. Let the debtor who incurs the liability dictate, and he must fear Allah, his Lord, and diminish not anything of what he owes. But if the debtor is of poor understanding, or weak, or is unable himself to dictate, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And get two witnesses out of you own men. And if there are not two men available, then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of the two women errs, the other can remind her. And the witnesses should not refuse when they are called for evidence. You should not become weary to write your contract, whether it be small or big, for its fixed term, that is more just in the Sight of Allah; more solid as evidence, and more convenient to prevent doubts among yourselves, save when it is a present trade which you carry out on the spot among yourselves, then there is no sin on you if you do not write it down. But take witnesses whenever you make a commercial contract. Let neither scribe nor witness suffer any harm, but if you do such harm, it would be wickedness in you. So be afraid of Allah; and Allah teaches you. And Allah is the All-Knowing of each and everything.” Qur’an 2:282

    A woman should never be allowed to be a ruler “Narrated by Abu Bakra: ‘During the battle of Al-Jamal, Allah benefited me with a Word I heard from the Prophet. When the Prophet heard the news that the people of Persia had made the daughter of Khosrau their Queen, he said, ‘Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler.” Sahih Bukhari 9:88:219

    Muslim women are to be covered almost completely “And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and protect their private parts and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent like the hands and eyes and to draw their veils all over their bodies, faces, necks, and bosoms and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husband’s sons, their brothers or their brother’s sons, or their sister’s sons, or Muslim women or female slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who lack vigour, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful.” Qur’an 24:31, and “O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks all over their bodies. That will be better, that they should be known as free respectable women so as not to be annoyed. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Qur’an 33:59. “Narrated by Safiya bint Shaiba: ‘Aisha used to say: ‘When the verse: ‘They should draw their veils over their bodies, faces, necks, and bosoms’ was revealed, the women cut their waist sheets at the edges and covered their faces with the cut pieces.” Sahih Bukhari, Vol.6, Hadith No.282, and “When we reached Khaybar, Muhammad said that Allah had enabled him to conquer them. It was then that the beauty of Safiyah was described to him. Her husband had been killed, so Allah’s Apostle selected her for himself. He took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad where her menses were over and he took her for his wife, consummating his marriage to her, and forcing her to wear the veil.” Sahih Bukhari 4:52:143

    Muslim women receive unequal inheritance “Allah commands you as regards your children’s inheritance; to the male, a portion equal to that of two females; if there are only daughters, two or more, their share is two thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her sharer is half. For parents, a sixth share of inheritance to each if the deceased left children; if no children, and the parents are the only heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased left brothers or sisters, the mother has a sixth. The distribution in all cases is after the payment of legacies he may have bequeathed or debts. You know not which of them, whether your parents or your children, are nearest to you in benefit, these fixed shares are ordained by Allah. And Allah is Ever All-Knower, All-Wise.” Qur’an 4:11

  93. Fred Bryer says:

    Dear Sir/Sirs and madam,

    The old Bill Warner lecture link on Foundational Audio Lectures on Political
    Islam by Bill Warner, has been down for a long time now.

    The old link was found here:
    http://actwestnashville.com/?page_id=544

    We have therefor put up a new link page here:
    https://sites.google.com/site/warnerlectures/

    Either you have the new link or not, please put it somewhere on your website.

    Thanks in advance

    Kind regards

    Fred

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by sweet Captcha