This is pure propaganda.
“Yle published an article online 7.11.2019 on the clothing industry that resembles an advertisement for “Muslim women’s fashion”. The article interviews a total of seven different Muslim women from an immigrant background. The article was written by Yle’s journalist Mari Jäntti, who self identifies as a “feminist and tolerant.”
YLE’s journalist, Mari Jäntti, deems the forced Islamic veil and the religious clothing of chastity as “fashionable” and “loose dress”. She apparently ignores completely what “modest fashion” implies. Translated directly into Finnish it would be chastity fashion. The implication of a woman’s chastness and a woman who does not follow this “fashion” is therefore promiscuous, as the doctrine of Islam’s foundation teaches.
From the article:
This is, of course, a flat out lie, and easily refuted by the following Islamic texts:
“And tell the believing women to reduce their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.” (Qur’an 24:31)
“O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (Qur’an 33:59)
“Narrated `Aisha (the wife of the Prophet): `Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.’ Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam`a went out and she was a tall woman. `Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while he was in a gathering, and said, ‘I have recognized you, O Sauda!’ He (`Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the Verse of veiling. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes).” (Bukhari 79.14.6420)
Anter Yasa asks the following question:
Journalist Mari Jäntti has been profiled herself as a very “tolerant” and as a “feminist”. Her Twitter timeline is full of feminist news and retweets of feminist MP’s. The question is why Mari Jäntti supports feminism in the western context, but literally promotes the Middle East rape culture as a journalist?
Under the sharia, and in relation to how brutally it’s implemented, no one really has a chance to express themselves freely. There is always someone else wielding the stick, the husband, extended family members, villages, the state. This article is nothing more than propaganda meant to accustom the Finn to seeing more signs of Islam around them, and not react.
It’s quite clear that the Finnish state broadcaster has taken the sharia supremacist view of Islam’s more noticeable symbol, the restrictive clothes worn by Muslim females. It shows the depth of Saudi, Iranian and Muslim Brotherhood influence in Finland.