Blasphemy Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff EU Free Speech

Exclusive: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff’s press release on recent ECHR court verdict supporting sharia blasphemy laws…….


 

I just received this from Elisabeth…

 

Press release Re Ruling E.S v ECHR

On Thursday, 25 October the ECHR ruled that my conviction by an Austrian court for discussing the marriage between Prophet Mohammed and a six year old girl, Aisha, did not infringe my rights of freedom of speech.

 

I was not extended the courtesy of being told of this ruling. Like many others, I had to read it in the media.

 

The ECHR found there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights and that right to expression needed to be balanced with the rights of others to have their religious feelings protected, and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.

 

In other words, my right to speak freely is less important than protecting the religious feelings of others.

 

This should ring warning bells for my fellow citizens across the continent. We should all be extremely concerned that the rights of Muslims in Europe NOT to be offended are greater than my own rights, as a native European Christian woman, to speak freely.

 

I am proud to be the woman who has raised this alarm.

 

I am also optimistic. Since giving my seminars in Austria in 2009, we have come a very long way.

 

Ten years ago the press labeled me a “confused doom-monger” and I was compared to Osama Bin Laden. Now, Islam is being discussed in every sphere of life and people are waking up to the reality of a culture so opposed to our own.

 

The cultural and political threat posed by Islam to Western societies is now widely recognized and discussed. It is fair to say European society, as well as the political realm, is undergoing an enlightenment, as it is more awake than ever to the need to defend our own Judeo-Christian culture.

 

I believe my seminars in 2009, and subsequent work have contributed to strong push back against an Islamic culture which is so at odds with our own. And note with interest that only one sentence out of 12 hours of seminars on Islam was a prosecutable offense. I assume the remaining content is now officially sanctioned by our Establishment masters.

 

It is obvious to me that public education and discourse on the subject of Islam can have a fundamental and far-reaching impact, even if our state or supra-national authorities try to stifle or silence it, in order to appease a culture so foreign to our own.

 

This fight continues. My voice will not and cannot be silenced.

 

(To support ESW please go to en.savefreespeech.org)

 

Robert Spencer @ Jihad Watch:

This is an important step toward the imposition of Sharia in Europe, as it is a tacit acceptance of Sharia blasphemy restrictions on criticizing Muhammad.

AA.COM:

On today’s ruling, the ECHR said it “found in particular that the domestic courts comprehensively assessed the wider context of the applicant’s statements and carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected, and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.”

 

4 Responses

  1. No one has the right NOT to be offended, The UNHCR is run by a majority of muslims and their cronies so what other results did you expect? You want to be careful not to go into any Saudi embassies.

  2. Many thanks,Elisabeth, for standing up for civilised values both on your seminars and in taking your fight to defend free speech as far as the ECHR.

    This is a dark day for freedom in Europe.

    Paul
    Law spokesman, For Britain Movement

  3. i suppose that this ruling will be extended to other religions. might i suggest leaving eurabia to all publicly-exposed atheists? also, andres serrano (“piss christ”) will probably be arrested should he make the mistake of visiting eurabia, and chris ofili (“the holy virgin mary”) will probably be arrested in UKistan.

    not.

    the hard-core left isn’t doing this for any religion except islam. i’m sure they will have reasonable-sounding excuses for that, but only if one’s parents were educated in leftist indoctrination centers, and also if one passed through them oneself, with none involved ever having been exposed to (horrors!) a non-leftist opinion. which pretty much is everybody in the EU, everybody in canada, everybody in the u.s., everybody in australia, everybody in south africa, everybody in india, … and the *reason* they are doing this is because the pious muslims statistically guaranteed to be embedded within the masses of muslims being granted entry to eurabia form the proxy army of the hard left, who are charged with the destruction of civilization, both explicitly by pervert muhammed and implicitly by the acolytes of karl marx, who control all the gears of power in civilized nations.

    we here in the u.s. aren’t as far down the road as the poor citizens of eurabia – yet. at this point, since *no* political parties of europeans (as opposed to leftists) in eurabia that have a chance of reaching the pinnacles of power exist, and one faces arrest or compulsory psychiatric “examination” (“ruination” would be a more apt term) for complaining about the invasion, there is but one avenue that the left leaves open: revolution. those who are suppressing the average european don’t seem to realize that if one seals up a teapot full of water and puts it over a flame, it *WILL* explode. no doubt there will be a lot of blood shed, especially once turkey gets involved (wannabe caliph erdogan is already interfering). and all that blood will be on the hands of the left. every person, deliberately evil or not, is a child of God, and i will grieve for each person lost, but that will be really hard when i see hard-core leftists strung up with piano wire.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.