As predicted, academic surrender monkeys…
The most consistent line I’ve heard from most of my fellow activists in the Counter-Jihad in the fight against Islamization, is the rejection of the dhimmi mindset. Encapsulated in the following video by Weapons of Musical Defense:
This professor, Christian de Moliner (who I strongly disagree with) is actually underlining our premise, that Islam is not compatible with Western values. However, he’s too stuck in his multicultural harness to admit that ”co-existence” with Islam, especially on this level, will work, when evidence around the world proves that Islamic enclaves are always at perpetual war with the non-Islamic host state.
This has already been discussed in full over at the Gates of Vienna and at other CJ websites, what Muslim enclaves (No-Go Zones) will lead to, civil war, the very thing this naive and very foolish professor is hoping to avert. The inertia behind these Islamic communities is directly tied to the weakness of the governing state(s). You only have to look to Israel which has an almost 20% Islamic minority. The only thing keeping those Muslims in check is the widespread support of Jewish identity and culture by the majority of its citizens (Left & Right) and most importantly, its government.
That’s something of which most European states lack, and are not even close to addressing. Therein lies the reason as to why an academic professor in supposedly secular France dares to proffer such a radical idea, he no longer believes in French (Western based) culture and sees the Islamic writing on the wall. In spite of all that he sees to be true, he will nonetheless refuse to reject future Islamic migration to France, nor call for other self preservation measures to safeguard the republic. He’s a dhimmi.
FRENCH ACADEMIC: CREATE A MUSLIM STATE WITHIN FRANCE TO AVOID CIVIL WAR
‘One territory, one government, but two peoples: the French with the usual laws and Muslims with Qur’anic status.’
Professor Christian de Moliner claims that a second society has formed in France, which he described as: “A branch that wants to settle their lives on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded.
“We can never convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of sharia law to the merits of our democracy and secularism.
“We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name. Rather than veil the face or adopt unimaginable measures in democracy (remigration, forced evictions of the most radical), why not establish a dual system of law in France?”
De Moliner writes that Emmanuel Macron winning the Presidential election will not make the problems disappear, it will only kick the can down the road.
“We will never be able to eradicate the radical Islamism,” he says, adding: “While we are not yet at open war, the faithful of the Prophet are already regrouping in areas sometimes governed by special rules.”
