/

/

/

/

/

Finland: FM Soini fishes for Finns Party supporters in negative stance on future Muslim settler asylum transfers…….

Finland MUSLIM SETTLERS

Finland: FM Soini fishes for Finns Party supporters in negative stance on future Muslim settler asylum transfers…….

By KGS7 years agoLeave a comment

He’s not fooling me, at all….

I like the stance and support it, but it’s amazingly transparent what he’s up to. Do take note that he mentions nothing at about the need to turn these people around at sea and keep them from continuing on towards Europe.

Soini: Finland refuses to new transfers of asylum seekers in the EU

Foreign Minister Timo Soinin, Finland may not be bound asylum-seekers to new internal transfers within the EU.

The meeting was attended by Foreign Minister Soini representing Blue Reform, who says that all EU countries must first adhere to old promises.

Hungary, Czech Republic and Poland have refused to comply with the joint decision of the EU to move asylum seekers from Italy and Greece. Finland has been among the best in taking asylum-seekers in the EU.

Internal transfers may rise again in the autumn, when the EU countries discuss assistance to Italy.

Soini believes that the situation in eating the whole credibility of the EU.

– We require that the agreement be upheld. There you have it, 160 000 on the ground, for which a solution has to be found. Then, if it is found, a continuance can be considered. Before that it can not be considered, Soini said in Brussels.

“The refugee quota requires the approval of all”

Interior Minister Paula Risikko (cons.) has estimated in the past that Finland, too, can receive a request in the autumn for asylum-seekers directly from the countries of origin or Italy, which 93 000 immigrants have arrived this year from across the Mediterranean.

– The best thing about how Italy can help, is that the situation in Libya can be resolved, says Soini.

Risikko and Prime Minister Juha Sipilä (center.) have suggested that Finland could increase the refugee quota as part of the overall European settlement. However, the European Minister Sampo Terho (uv.) have rejected the idea.

Soini says that the refugee quota may be amended only by a joint decision of the Government parties.

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.