/

/

/

/

/

Finland: New Justice Minister says ”the law is always right”, hate speech laws should never be debated nor dissed……..

Finland TYRANNY

Finland: New Justice Minister says ”the law is always right”, hate speech laws should never be debated nor dissed……..

By KGS7 years ago1

Stalinist….

Nirvana has been reached, no dissent is acceptable. By his own thinking, Blacks in the US segregated (Democrat) South should never have been able to speak against immoral judicial rulings against them, since they were enacted by “A majority of Parliament which decides what the law is”. The statist mindset is easy to spot and to debunk. What a Häk….

Crime and punishment

The new Justice Minister, Antti Häkkänen, has told the media that he is concerned by the rise in criminal convictions of active politicians. In practice, the criticism in his interview with the Finnish News Agency STT, carried by dailies including Savon Sanomat, was directed at the Finns Party. Finns Party MP Teuvo Hakkarainen, MEP Jussi Halla-aho and a number of municipal council members have been convicted of incitement to ethnic or racial hatred and in some cases of breaches of the sanctity of religion.

Häkkänen told STT that in his opinion there is no justification for civil disobedience in a country like Finland.

“All parallel justice systems which adhere to personal desires, morals, religion and considerations of human rights policies should be put aside in a constitutional, rule of law country such as Finland,” he stated. “A majority of Parliament decides what the law is. That should be followed. And, say, those MPs which have been convicted should accept the decisions of the courts without a murmur and respect the doctrine of the division of powers.”

Häkkänen views on civil disobedience have come in for criticism in the past. For example, Political Science Professor Marja Keränen of the University of Jyväskylä criticized Häkkänen’s stand in an interview with Uutissuomalainen, arguing that civil disobedience has had a critical impact on social reform in Finland and is a feature of its strong tradition as a civil society.

Written by KGS

One Response

By vivienne Havalant-levijonhufvud May 05, 2017

Criminal class of Muslims has been imported at the demand of the UN & EU and it is wrong.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.