OSCE

MUSLIM ORG AT OSCE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT MEETING REFUSES TO DEFINE ISLAMOFAUXBIA, ADVOCATES LOCKING PEOPLE UP FOR IT THOUGH…….

Anti-sharia/free speech experts Stephen Coughlin, Elisabeth Sabadtisch-Wolff, Delta Mike and Henrik Clausen are now attending side event at the OSCE, the EMISCO meeting:

emisco-islamofauxbia

11:05: We earned our morning coffee: Asking for a definition of ‘Islamophobia’ derailed them severely. They replied that they ”propose locking people up for Islamophobia but refuse to define it because ‘everyone knows what it is” .

12:20: Next up is hate speech. Perhaps we try to live blog the session at 3. Not now.

12:40: Delta Mike sends the TT the following pic:

rabbi-osce

16:30: An American rabbi talks up about ”extremism” in France and in Sweden, but fails to address exactly where it’s coming from. Islam/Muslims……

18:00: Clair Lopez spoke, she rocked, quoted koranic hate speech, which led to the moderator to remind the meeting about ”tolerance”.

clair-lopez

18:36: Now here comes the sharia brigade barking their bullcrap…..islamofauxbia…islamofauxbia!

tard-talk-osce

Somehow Civil Society with a sharia compliant muslima behind it is a contradiction in terms.

stephen-coughlin-osce-2016-warsaw

18: 35: Stephen Coughlin for Unconstrained Analytics speaks, demands coherent definition of Islamofauxbia, mentions that in 2013 OSCE meeting in Warsaw, it was admitted that there was no definition, ”they already know what it means.” If it means anything than it means nothing at all. Orwellian situation going on here in the discussion on the term.

UPDATE: Coughlin’s statement:

Bashi-Qureyshy-the-anti-islamophobia-spreader

19:00: Bashy Qureyshy (GOV has statement here) spreads his nonsense about islamofauxbia being spewed by Pax Europpa ”and others” in the OSCE meeting.

turk-osce

19:10: Turks seethe, delegate says says no Muslim ngo in the meeting engaged in intolerance, but those NGO’s (those against sharia/hate speech laws) brought hate speech into the forum.

2 Responses

    1. Oh, that would mean the anti-islamofauxbes couldn’t be around to guard against criticism of Islam, they would be all locked up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *