Russia US Military

J.E.DYER: RUSSIAN JET FIGHTERS BUZZING US SHIPS THE DANGEROUS NEW NORMAL…….

The Russians gleaned far more from their “exercises” with the US ship than the US fleet did.

russian jet us destroyer baltic sea

We’ll become conditioned to sitting passive while the Russians prance around us provocatively, within weapons range.  The more conditioned we are, the more the advantage and element of surprise they’ll have when they do go “hot.”

 

Russian aircraft buzz Navy ships: Violating INCSEA/CUES and the danger of a new normal

By J.E. Dyer April 14, 2016
The danger implied by the 11 April incident in which Russian Su-24 Fencer attack aircraft buzzed USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) is twofold.

One aspect of it is essentially political.  What the Russians did constituted an egregious violation of the longstanding Incidents at Sea Agreement (INCSEA), which the U.S. and the Soviet Union signed in 1972.

And I mean egregious.  The Russians violated the exact language of INCSEA, as if that was their intention.  Here is the summary of the 11 April incident in the Baltic Sea from the U.S. Naval Institute blog, quoting a release from the U.S. European Command:

“On April 11, Donald Cook was conducting deck landing drills with an Allied military helicopter when two Russian SU-24 jets made numerous, close-range and low altitude passes at approximately 3 p.m. local,” read a release from U.S. European Command provided to USNI News.
“One of the passes, which occurred while the allied helicopter was refueling on the deck of Donald Cook, was deemed unsafe by the ship’s commanding officer. As a safety precaution, flight operations were suspended until the SU-24s departed the area.”
Press reports indicated the allied helicopter was Polish. …
The following day, a pair of KA27 Kamov Helix helicopters orbited the ship taking photos in what officials called a “simulated attack profile” in several press reports.

Here is the language by which INCSEA proscribes such unsafe operations:

(Article IV) Commanders of aircraft of the Parties shall use the greatest caution and prudence in approaching aircraft and ships of the other Party operating on and over the high seas, in particular, ships engaged in launching or landing aircraft, and in the interest of mutual safety shall not permit: simulated attacks by the simulated use of weapons against aircraft and ships, or performance of various aerobatics over ships, or dropping various objects near them in such a manner as to be hazardous to ships or to constitute a hazard to navigation.

[…]

That said, the sailors on-scene had the means to be certain which variants the Fencers were.  Since the Navy hasn’t suggested they were simulating attack runs, perhaps we can suppose they were most likely the naval reconnaissance E-variant.  (Actually, the closest inspection I can do suggests the pair may have consisted of one Fencer D and one Fencer E.  I note that the very low, high-speed passes by one of the aircraft – possibly a D – had zero value for reconnaissance.)

In any case, it’s easy enough to say that the ship’s air defense systems held both the Fencers and the Helix helicopters at risk the entire time, in their respective incidents, and could have blown them out of the sky at will.

But that’s the second danger being institutionalized by these repeated dangerous maneuvers from Russian military platforms.  The danger is not that we’ll shoot them down; the danger is that we won’t be able to tell when we should.

We’ll become conditioned to sitting passive while the Russians prance around us provocatively, within weapons range.  The more conditioned we are, the more the advantage and element of surprise they’ll have when they do go “hot.”

One Response

  1. Send Kerry. He will be the USA apologist. The empty suit in the white hose is too busy attacking whites and Christians.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *