/

/

/

/

/

FINLAND: COURT ORDERS TWO WAITRESSES TO PAY 6000 EUROS TO SIX ROMA FOR MAKING THEM PAY EARLY…….

FINLAND: COURT ORDERS TWO WAITRESSES TO PAY 6000 EUROS TO SIX ROMA FOR MAKING THEM PAY EARLY…….

By KGS8 years ago1

MInd you, waiters/waitresses have a hard enough time making ends meet as it is, as well as slim profit margins for management.

Likely scenario, after having been ripped off by either the people in question or others like them, the waitresses/management would do what common sense dictates in an unwanted situation, they forced them to pay ahead of time, like you do at a McDonald’s, or as I have done in regular restaurants when i’m in a hurry and don’t want to wait around for the check after i’m done eating.

Two waitresses fined, pay 3,000 euros in damages for discrimination

Two waitresses who were found guilty of discrimination against six Roma customers at a Turku eatery last year were fined and ordered to pay the victims a total of 3,000 euros by a Southwest Finland District Court judge on Monday.

Image: YLE

Finland’s Southwest District Court handed down fines of several hundred euros and ordered two waitresses to pay the victims a total of 3,000 euros in damages for an incident of discrimination which took place a year ago in a Turku restaurant.

One day in March of 2015, six Roma entered the restaurant to eat a meal. But unlike the other diners at the establishment, the waitresses demanded that the Roma customers pay for their food in advance.

The court heard testimony that the waitresses told the customers it was restaurant policy to have Roma pay beforehand, but later the pair refuted they said that.

Directed by management, not owner

The court found the two waitresses guilty of discrimination on the basis of nationality or ethnic origin and handed down fines of 320 and 220 euros respectively.

The two were also ordered to pay the six customers a total of 3,000 euros in damages.

The owner of the restaurant was not found to be responsible and was acquitted in the case.

In its decision, the court said that the waitresses had been directed by management to treat Roma in a discriminating way, but it was mainly the restaurant’s manager who issued such orders.

Because he was not involved in the day-to-day operations of the eatery, and did not directly work with staff, the owner was cleared of the charges.

Written by KGS

One Response

By Dad Mar 15, 2016

The waitress’ pay for the meal if its a dine and dash. So they starve. Is a victory for insanity, I mean liberals.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.