Donald Trump


I’m not a Trump supporter, but has Louis C.K. ever called Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan ”Hitler”?


There’s a danger here in minimizing Hitler’s monstrosity (and Stalin’s, Mao’ etc,) by labelling Western politicos with whom you disagree as ”Hitler”. Think it over again.

NOTE: To all Trumpohiles, if you think this is bad, wait until your choice candidate (Dem in drag) Trump gets the nomination, this rhetoric will begin look tame, and it all happening within an endless 24/7 news / social media loop.

Comedian Louis C.K. urges fans not to vote for Trump: ‘The guy is Hitler’

Louis C.K.

Louis C.K.. (photo credit:REUTERS)

Comedian Louis C.K. has joined the ranks of a list of public figures who have taken to condemning US presidential candidate Donal Trump with comparisons to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.

The stand-up star on Saturday urged fans and Trump’s supporters to desist from voting for the Republican front-runner, calling him “dangerous” and an “insane bigot,” according to CNN.

“It was funny for a little while. But the guy is Hitler. And by that I mean that we are being Germany in the 30s,” CNN quoted C.K as writing in a lengthy postscript to an e-mail to promote his web series “Horace and Pete.”

More here.

Thanks to Brian @Israellycool for this who has a post on this as well, he sends me a link to what Winston Churchill wrote about Mein Kampf, what German National Socialism under Adolf Hitler really stood for. It underlines the nonsense of the Left in flinging moronic charges of ”hitler hitler hitler” at someone that they fundamentally disagree with. Like I said, I disagree with Trump, but he’s no Nazi, let alone…. Adolf.


Extract:Although the German authorities had maintained order, and the German court had inflicted punishment, the feeling was widespread throughout the land that they were striking at their own flesh and blood, and were playing the foreigners’ game at the expense of Germany’s most faithful sons. Hitler’s sentence was reduced from four years to thirteen months. These months in the Landsberg fortress were, however, sufficient to enable him to complete in outline Mein Kampf, a treatise on his political philosophy inscribed to the dead of the recent Putsch. When eventually he came to power, there was no book which deserved more careful study from the rulers, political and military, of the Allied Powers. All was there –

  • the programme of German resurrection;
  • the technique of party propaganda;
  • the plan for combating Marxism;
  • the concept of a National-Socialist State;
  • the rightful position of Germany at the summit of the world.

Here was the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless, but pregnant with its message.

The main thesis of Mein Kampf is simple.

  • Man is a fighting animal; therefore the nation, being a community of fighters, is a fighting unit.
  • Any living organism which ceases to fight for its existence is doomed to extinction.
  • A country or race which ceases to fight is equally doomed. The fighting capacity of a race depends on its purity. Hence the need for ridding it of foreign defilements.
  • The Jewish race, owing to its universality, is of necessity pacifist and internationalist. Pacifism is the deadliest sin; for it means the surrender of the race in the fight for existence.
  • The first duty of every country is therefore to nationalise the masses; intelligence in the case of the individual is not of first importance; will and determination are the prime qualities.
  • The individual who is born to command is more valuable than countless thousands of subordinate natures.
  • Only brute force can ensure the survival of the race; hence the necessity for military forms.
  • The race must fight; a race that rests must rust and perish. Had the German race been united in good time, it would have been already master of the globe.
  • The new Reich must gather within its fold all the scattered German elements in Europe.
  • A race which has suffered defeat can be rescued by restoring its self-confidence.
  • Above all things the Army must be taught to believe in its own invincibility.
  • To restore the German nation, the people must be convinced that the recovery of freedom by force of arms is possible.
  • The aristocratic principle is fundamentally sound. Intellectualism is undesirable.
  • The ultimate aim of education is to produce a German who can be converted with the minimum of training into a soldier.
  • The greatest upheavals in history would have been unthinkable had it not been for the driving force of fanatical and hysterical passions.
  • Nothing could have been effected by the bourgeois virtues of peace and order.
  • The world is now moving towards such an upheaval, and the new German State must see to it that the race is ready for the last and greatest decisions on this earth.
  • Foreign policy may be unscrupulous.
  • It is not the task of diplomacy to allow a nation to founder heroically, but rather to see that it can prosper and survive.
  • England and Italy are the only two possible allies for Germany. No country will enter into an alliance with a cowardly pacifist state run by democrats and Marxists.
  • So long as Germany does not fend for herself, nobody will fend for her.
  • Her lost provinces cannot be regained by solemn appeals to Heaven or by pious hopes in the League of Nations, but only by force of arms.
  • Germany must not repeat the mistake of fighting all her enemies at once.
  • She must single out the most dangerous and attack him with all her forces.
  • The world will only cease to be anti-German when Germany recovers equality of rights and resumes her place in the sun.
  • There must be no sentimentality about Germany’s foreign policy.
  • To attack France for purely sentimental reasons would be foolish.
  • What Germany needs is increase of territory in Europe.
  • Germany’s pre-war colonial policy was a mistake and should be abandoned.
  • Germany must look for expansion to Russia and especially to the Baltic States.
  • No alliance with Russia can be tolerated. To wage war together with Russia against the West would be criminal, for the aim of the Soviets is the triumph of international Judaism.

Such were the “granite pillars” of his policy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.