Donald Trump media bias Media malfeasance Media Skullduggery

LAME MEDIA/POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT IN MELTDOWN OVER TRUMP’S CALL FOR MORATORIUM ON MUSLIM IMMIGRATION TO US……..

That the notion of (sadly only temporarily) limiting  people who adhere to a certain ideology (Islam) from coming into the country, that are notoriously overrepresented in all the statistics related to terrorism, is somehow deemed ”controversial”, is the story, not the person who promoted it.

The Telegraph: Block Donald Trump from UK campaign gets huge support as storm rages over Muslim ban call

original

David Cameron leads the condemnation after the presidential candidate said parts of London were so radicalised “police in London are afraid for their own their lives” – while the Pentagon says his comments play into Islamic State’s hatred of the West

• White House: Trump’s comments disqualify him from presidency
• ‘Unhinged… fascist… worse than Voldemort’: how world reacted
• Trump: ‘Areas of London so radicalised, police fear for their lives’
#TrumpFacts: Twitter users mock ‘radicalised London’ comments
Petition to ban Trump from UK gets huge support
• Donald Trump defiant over Muslim stance: ‘I. Don’t. Care’
Donald Trump’s most outrageous quotes
Who said it: Donald Trump or Adolf Hitler?

Republicans, Democrats, world leaders and even JK Rowling all agree: Donald Trump’s call to ban Muslims from entering the United States goes too far.

The Republican presidential front-runner’s statement advocating a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” was condemned as bigoted, unconstitutional and potentially dangerous for American interests abroad.

More here.

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Some days they just tee me up. Some days are just too easy. Question: Has Loretta Lynch arrested Trump yet? Well, isn’t that the kind of stuff she said she’s gonna start arresting people for? Why hasn’t he been arrested? Greetings, my friends. Welcome.

Everybody, everybody — now Paul Ryan has joined in — everybody condemning Donald Trump. The conventional wisdom is that Donald Trump’s insane, he’s a lunatic, crazy. This is dangerous. This is bad. It’s un-American. It’s unacceptable. He’s gotta go.

[…]

You Republicans, you can denounce Trump all day, all week, all month, and the Democrat Party and the media are still gonna say you laid the table for it. You can condemn Trump all you want, but it is not going to buy you any love or respect or admiration from the Drive-By Media and the Democrats. Now, folks, the conventional wisdom is that Trump is scum, that Trump is a reprobate, that Trump is dangerous, that Trump is obscene, Trump’s insane, Trump’s a lunatic, Trump’s dangerous, Trump’s got to go. Why join in with that phrase? Why join that crowd? We never fall in with conventional wisdom here.

More here

Trump in Art of the Deal (H/T: Vasarahammer)

Trump in art of the deal

Finnish Media: Helsingin Sanomat: 

EDITORIAL
Kari Huhta HELSINGIN SANOMAT

Is an aspiring US president real estate billionaire Donald Trump just crazy – or dangerous – and can he really become the next president of the United States? The answers are maybe, in time and barely.

On Tuesday, Trump topped himself by requiring all Muslims to banned from access to the United States, after already offending Mexicans, women, and people with disabilities. Still, or because about 25 percent of the Republican Party mostly conservative supporters of President wants him as their candidate.

More here.

Diana West brings the spotlight on what most in the media and political establishment are either ignorant of, or loathe to divulge:

Hitler, Islam, Religious Freedom and Donald Trump

Written by: Diana West Tuesday, December 08, 2015 9:27 AM

Waffen-SS shoulder patch of Bosnian Muslim division, a brainchild of SS leader Heinrich Himmler.  

Whether it is the New York Daily News’ dead-brain invocation of Adolf Hitler to attack Trump for calling for a moratorium on Islamic immigration, or former Vice President Cheney’s no more astute reliance on religious freedom as a critique, overwhelming ignorance is the underlying theme.

Ignorance about what?

Ignorance about Islam, for starters. Ignorance also about the living, breathing and quite public expressions of fondess for Hitler in the Islamic world only the first monkey wrench in the NYDN’s quite obscene absurdism — also the prevalence of Holocaust denial and popularity of Mein Kampf to boot. There is ignorance, too, about Hitler’s noted admiration for Islam.

For instance, here is an Islamic-world-story-sampler from MEMRI.

1) “Hitler was a genius,” says prominent Algerian writer and former presidential adviser, minister, ambassador, parliamentarian.

2)“Kuwaiti scholar/TV host relies on Mein Kampf and Protocols of the Elders of Zion for anti-Semetic diatribe”

3)Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood former Member of Parliament: “I still insist that the Holocaust is a great lie.”

4)Saudi professor, cleric and member of Qaradawi’s International Union of Muslim Schlars: “If only Hitler had finished them [Jews] off.”

5)Egyptian international arbitration attorney: The Jews helped Hitler with the gas chambers and killed the US ambassador to Libya.

6) Egypt/Muslim Brotherhood’s Qaradawi; Allah imposed Hitler on Jews to punish them for their corruption [Koranic motif].

7)Saudi columnist: Hitler was right about the Jews.

8)Qatari columnist: History has misjudged Hitler, whose war against Jews was based fact that they are a corrupt nation [Koranic motif] that needs to be eliminated.

9) Turkey: Mein Kampf high on bestseller lists, prominently displayed at bookstores.

From this deep, soft spot for Hitler rises a poisonous font of anti-Semitism — or, actually, vice versa. That is, Islamic anti-Semitism has its long, twisted roots in a giant body of Islamic teachings, as documented in Andrew Bostom’s The Legacy of Islamic Anti-SemitismIt is this sacralized hatred for Jews that quite naturally finds its expression in and inspiration from Nazism’s fuehrer. Even scratching the surface, as Pew did in this 2010 poll, continues to yield results that are consistent.

More to the NYDN’s malicious point, however, Hitler deeply admired Islam. He mourned the fact that Germany was not Islamized, which he believed would have made Germans better warriors. Hitler said: “The Mohammedan religion…would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”

Such linkage between Islam, anti-Semitism and Hitler, then, turns the very basis of the NYDN’s Trump=Hitler conceit into a small pile of mental rubble.

Alas, former Vice President Cheney is no more informed in his dismissal of Trump’s call for a halt to the immigration polices that have permitted 680,000 Muslims to receive green cards in just the last five years.

Cheney said: “Well, I think this whole notion that we can just say no more Muslims, just ban a whole religion, goes against everything we stand for and believe in. I mean, religious freedom has been a very important part of our history, and where we came from. A lot of people, my ancestors got here because they were Puritans. There wasn’t anybody here when they came, but it’s a mistaken notion.”

Vice presidential non-sequitors aside, note for clarity’s sake that Trump has not broached the subject of banning Islam, but rather banning Islamic immigration.

Cheney says that Trump’s proposed ban “goes against everything we believe in,” and cites “religious freedom” specifically, which, he notes, is a “very important part of our history.”

It should be (but isn’t) self-evident by now: Continued Islamic immigration will ensure that “religious freedom” is exactly that  — “part of our history.” In the past. Something we read about it books. It is a clear-cut matter, even if seems to have escaped the vice president’s ken (despite his waging two wars in the Islamic world): There is no religious freedom in Islam. Nada. Zilch. Rien. Geert Wilders isn’t kidding when he says, the more Islam in society, the less freedom there is in society.

This central feature of Islamic law, this central feature of Islam — namely, the absence of religious freedom —  turns the vice president’s appeal for Muslim immigration on the grounds of our history of “religious freedom” into so much emotionalism, so much puffery. In other words, it may puff up the old self-esteem — what a kindly, generous, benificent personage am I — but when the inner smile dies our republic and Constitutional liberties are still imperiled by Islamic immigration waves that carry with them a transformative sharia demographic.

Here is Pew’s most recent polling of Muslims on sharia. Notice the two highest percentages, Afghanistan (99) and Iraq (91), are where U.S. troops fought and died for many years to introduce “democracy.”

More here.

LEVIN: LET’S HAVE A THOUGHTFUL DISCUSSION ABOUT MUSLIM IMMIGRATION

By: CR Wire | December 8th, 2015

 

LEVIN: LET’S HAVE A THOUGHTFUL DISCUSSION ABOUT MUSLIM IMMIGRATION

Print
By: CR Wire | December 8th, 2015

When the media attacks Trump or attacks any other GOP candidate, when they denounce conservatives as bigots, or racists, or xenophobes, they do it because they don’t want to talk about the issues.

Because when the American people have a debate about the issues, the left loses.

– See more at:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.