HOW TO MANAGE A HOSTILE ANTI-ISRAEL INTERVIEWER: NAFTALI BENNETT VS. HARDTALK’S TIM SEBASTIAN…….

This jackass of an interviewer thinks he so cerebral by talking over the person he interviews, his bombast is only equaled by his verbal flatulence.

Bennett vs. Sebastian – Fighting for Israel in hostile interview

H/T: Brian of London VIA Aussie Dave

Written by KGS

7 Responses

By Jan Sobieski Nov 10, 2015

Tim Sebastian, waht an a-hole. So rude. Meanwhile in London, his home, the Muslims are making life dangerous, and difficult. But who cares, I’m here to bash the Jews! lol
By andrew nelis Nov 19, 2015

Kudos for Naftali Bennett pushing back at this disgracefully aggressive British interviewer. We in Ireland all know how the British colonialists stifled all legitimate debate to glorify their take on how we should all live.
1. By KGS Nov 20, 2015
  
  Thanks Andrew, old habits and arrogance die hard.
By Doug Dec 25, 2015

Mr Bennet is 100% correct. The Palestinians are used as a spear head to attack the Jews, to deny the state of Israel, to keep the hatred going! It seems the world around us has a very short memory of the open boarders of Israel, which allowed lots of Palestinian jobs etc, Islamic terror put an end to that, how on earth can that be defended or supported? Left wing media is anti- Semitic & nuts!!!
By Carlos Graizbord Jan 03, 2016

Sebastian thinks (as all misguided western journalists) that what he calls incitement- (that is freedom of speech) is wrong because Muslims will get frustrated and kill. What an asshole, this reflects the low intellectual capacity of most British media personnel. According to Sebastian’s logic, we could not incite the nazis by mentioning their murderous behavior. The nazis could be offended, heaven forbid. Cause and effect in Mr. Sebastian’s mind is upside down, he is incapable of understanding anything.
What a shame, it looks like the western world is in complete decay, only fools and anti-Semites like Sebastian are left.
By Jack Wright Nov 13, 2016

I just watched this TIMTAM Englishman interview someone else and my first opinion of him is he’s a GRADE 1 arsehole endof

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Bennett vs. Sebastian – Fighting for Israel in hostile interview

Share this:

Written by KGS

7 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply