/

/

/

/

/

FINLAND: INTERIOR MINISTRY ADMITS 2/3 OF “REFUGEES” TO FINLAND (20 000) ARE FRAUDS, WILL BE DEPORTED…….

Finland Finnish Immigration Concerns MUSLIM SETTLERS

FINLAND: INTERIOR MINISTRY ADMITS 2/3 OF “REFUGEES” TO FINLAND (20 000) ARE FRAUDS, WILL BE DEPORTED…….

By KGS8 years ago2

And I deeply suspect that the remaining 1/3 are also as well.

Interior Ministry: Finland set to reject two thirds of asylum seekers

Ahead of the Malta summit on the migrant issue, Finnish officials warn of a dire shortage of places to accommodate asylum seekers and say that most applications will be turned down.

Pansion vastaanottokeskuksen telttamajoitus syyskuussa 2015 — Tent housing in Pansio, near Turku in September – when the weather was still warm. Image: Kimmo Gustafsson/ Yle

Interior Minister Petteri Orpo estimates that two thirds of asylum seekers come to Finland in hopes of a better standard of living.

Orpo said on Wednesday that he is concerned that the number of asylum seekers could break up the Schengen Area. He says this is because various countries are increasingly making selfish decisions, and that this can be seen particularly in the eastern Balkans.

With winter closing in, Sweden has already announced that it can only offer tents to new arrivals. Finland too is working on plans to offer shelter in tents and containers.

Orpo: Hotspot in Sweden?

In Orpo’s view, a so-called hotspot processing centre should be set up as soon as possible in southern Sweden. Under an EU plan agreed in September, these centres are tasked with registering and fingerprinting new arrivals, and separating genuine refugees from other migrants.

Orpo’s comments come as the number of asylum seekers arriving in Finland registers a new uptick. In October 7,058 asylum seekers arrived in Finland, mostly through the northern border town of Tornio. So far this year 27,000 asylum seekers have arrived in Finland.

Most of the recent arrivals have been from Afghanistan. In relation to its own size, Finland has received the fourth-largest number of asylum seekers in Europe.

NOTE: Just think of all that money (that the Finnish state has had to borrow, with interest) wasted in dealing with these miscreants.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Nov 13, 2015

Now why can’t the German interior minister admit the same thing?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.