LEFT-WING MAROON LABOUR LEADER JEREMY CORBYN WANTS EXPLANATION WHY JIHADI JOHN WAS KILLED……..

This guy must have been dropped on his head after delivery.

I guess American forces just should have dropped leaflets on him asking him to turn himself in at the nearest US military outpost. NOT.

“Obviously people planning things to attack others is wrong, but there is a process to go on about that. That is why I am looking for a political process.”

Jeremy Corbyn: I’m awaiting an explanation for why Jihadi John was killed

LABOUR leader Jeremy Corbyn has suggested he WOULDN’T have ordered the killing of the depraved Islamic State (ISIS) murderer dubbed ‘Jihadi John’.

By GREG HEFFER, POLITICAL REPORTER

PUBLISHED: 07:20, Tue, Nov 17, 2015 | UPDATED: 11:36, Tue, Nov 17, 2015

Jeremy Corbyn and Jihadi John GETTY

Jeremy Corbyn has questioned the legality of Jihadi John’s killing

British extremist Mohammed Emwazi, the ISIS militant responsible for brutally beheading a series of Western hostages, was last week revealed to have been wiped out by a US drone strike in Syria.

Officials said they were “99 per cent sure” the jihadist was killed in the action, with Prime Minister David Cameron describing the strike as an “act of self-defence”.

However, left-winger Mr Corbyn – who has been a life-long anti-war campaigner – yesterday said he was “awaiting an explanation” over the legal motive for the attack, signalling that he wouldn’t have ordered a strike to take out the twisted ISIS killer.The Opposition leader told ITV News: “I would only authorise actions that are legal in the terms of international law.”

Asked whether he believed the strike on Emwazi was legal, he added: “I question that. Surely if somebody is doing something wrong you act legally against them.

“If we are setting ourselves up as the West, as in accordance with the UN, with international law and of our own laws, then I think we have to act in accordance with them.

“I am awaiting an explanation of where the legal basis was for that incident that went on.

More here.

NOTE: Concrete proof that intellect and politicians do not go always hand in hand. This man is need of a physiological review of his mental health.

Written by KGS

One Response

By Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Nov 19, 2015

“…Jeremy Corbyn: I’m awaiting an explanation for why Jihadi John was killed”

Jeremy, the answer to this question which has so confounded you:

Jihadi John was killed because he was an even bigger asshole than you are.

Leave a Reply to Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply to Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Cancel reply