Finnish Immigration Concerns MUSLIM SETTLERS

TINY COMMUNITY IN CENTRAL FINLAND GETS ITS FIRST MUSLIM SETTLERS VIA SWEDEN THROUGH ROVANIEMI……

This is crazy, but it’s Finnish law. The owner of a building (even an apt.) cannot stop the rentee from renting the same facilities to another.

So lets see if what rolls off the buses are nothing more than 20-35 yr. old men, Muslim settlers.

UPDATE: In the Central Finland paper Keskisuomalainen, they’re saying that the same firm which is renting the Kivilahti camping facilities, Omnis Medica limited, is renting yet another building, a small motel, in Äänekoski, which will possibly be for Muslim settlers as well.

The Helsinki firm Omnis Medica Oy, which is renting to the Finnish Red Cross, has also leased the Äänekoski Hotel Särkkä facilities. Also Särkkä is being planned as a reception center.

They’re all full grown men! 

52 Iraqi asylum-seekers will arrive in the early hours to the Äänekoski Suolahti Kivilahden camp center on Friday. The new comers are full age men, and all have already registered as asylum seekers in Finland.

Now, it’s for sure! Kivilahti will be a reception center

Here is Äänekosken first reception center

Here is Äänekoski’s first reception center

Located in the Suolahti Kivilahden camp center, some 60 asylum-seekers arrive on Thursday evening September 17, from Rovaniemi.

The situation has been ongoing throughout the day. Around four o’clock pm it was confirmed that asylum seekers will be accommodated at Kivilahti.

– At 18:00 the bus leaves from Rovaniemi, which will be directed to Suolahti. Approximately 60 people will be placed at the Kivilahti camp center already for tonight, Red Cross’ Western Finland circuit collection and Preparedness director, Riitta Kangaskesti, says.

According to the SPR, what’s in question isn’t an emergency accommodation unit even though the length of the lease agreement has not yet been detailed.

– Yes, this is a reception center, Kangaskesti confirmed.

SPR is taking care of the necessary personnel and things lacking for the site.

– There are mattresses and beds, and we will get them fed when they arrive. Blankets and pillows are in this situation the least of worries, Kangaskesti said.

The church of Äänekoski owns the Kivilahti camping center. However, currently the camping center has been leased Omnis Medica Ltd, which in turn leased the facilities to the Finnish Red Cross for use.

Soon we will be facing this:

3 Responses

  1. Not that I condone arson, but someone should burn the building before ISIS, err…the refugees, arrive. Would you rather wait for your daughters to be raped by these thugs, as in Sweden?

    1. They should simply be removed, sent packing to the nearest border crossing back into Sweden.

  2. These people must be sent back to their homeland. Who would have ever thought that Europe would take it hook line and sinker, muslims running from islam is absurd. The so called “refugee” is the new Trojan horse, refugee today, terrorist tomorrow.

    Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life. Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table.

    Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    Has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *