IRANIAN RESEARCHER IN FINLAND: REFUGEES BETTER HELPED IN LANDS NEAR HOME THAN INTEGRATING INTO EUROPE……..

No better words were spoken on the subject.

Expert Iltalehti: Refugees controlled in nearby camps, no to EU countries

Alan Salehzadeh also points out in a blog post that the authorities will find extremely difficult to check the backgrounds of the refugees. According to him, the future feels unsafe, if more Islamist elements settles to Europe.Press image

Domestic PUBLISHED 27/8/2015 4:32

Migratory movement from the Middle East, Africa and Asia should be rather directed from EU countries, to high-quality refugee camps near countries of origin. So writes researcher Alan Salehzadeh in Iltalehti’s blog.

Salehzadeh writes that at the moment, all of the refugees coming to Europe came by way of smugglers. According to him, it is a common fact that is known by all the authorities.

That is why all of the refugees coming to Europe can not be the ones that war has worst effected. Salehzadeh pointed out that otherwise they could not afford to pay thousands of dollars to smugglers.

[…]

“It would be a lot cheaper”

Salehzadeh points out that if it so wished, the international community would have the resources for the proper living arrangement in peaceful surrounding areas of the Syrian and Iraqi conflicts.

He believes that quality refugee camps in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Oman could be arranged, funded by the international community.

– It will be considerable cheaper than the integration of hundreds of thousands of people in Europe, he writes.

According to Salehzadeh, the camps would ensure that the weakest would have access to safety.

– Refugees are able to speak Arabic, so it is much easier for them to integrate into the local society and to enter the labor market, and would not have to start from scratch. In addition, the growth centers such as Dubai, would have a wealth of immigrant labor, so many refugees could find suitable work, he writes.

– I believe that people prefer to live in a safe, high-quality camp as well, than risk their lives on rickety boat toward an uncertain future. I hope that the problem of the refugees would be reacted to quickly. It is not yet too late.

More here at MTV3 H/T: Simon Elo

Translation: Tundra Tabloids

Written by KGS

One Response

By Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullah Aug 28, 2015

“..He believes that quality refugee camps in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Oman could be arranged, funded by the international community…

Exactly – but Saudi or any of those rich arab countries want Europe to absorb literally millions of unassimilable , undocumented, possibly disease carrying irate muslims with zero European language skills. It makes their dreams of the eventual islamic takeover of Europe much easier.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.