POLITICAL OPPONENTS SEEK TO USE UKIP COUNCILLOR’S WORDS ON SENDING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BACK AGAINST HER…….

This is pure political scumbaggery, trying to gain political points by twisting the words of someone trying to formulate thoughts for a PR video. The firm in charge of making the video should be sued.

UKIP has backed its councillor Victoria Ayling, who was filmed saying she wanted to send immigrants home.

Party leader Nigel Farage dismissed allegations that she held extreme views as a political smear and indicated his party would stand by her.

UKIP stands by ‘expel all migrants’ councillor who denied racism accusations after being filmed saying she wanted to ‘send the lot back’

Victoria Ayling denied being offensive or politically incorrect
UKIP leader Nigel Farage has decried ‘appalling attack’ on councillor
Mrs Ayling insisted comments only referred to illegal immigrants

By DANIEL MARTIN

PUBLISHED: 00:21 GMT, 9 December 2013 | UPDATED: 12:25 GMT, 9 December 2013

A UKIP councillor has denied racism accusations over comments on immigration made on a video five years ago.

Footage emerged yesterday of Victoria Ayling – a former Conservative election candidate who defected this year – saying she wished to ‘send the lot back’.

The councillor denied being offensive or politically incorrect, and insisted she had been referring only to people in the country illegally.

Written by KGS

One Response

By Seneca III Dec 11, 2013

Don’t worry guys. The noise you hear from the Leftards, Islamofascists and the Chatterati is but an echo of their new found fears, fears – and rightly founded so – that the world is changing, that the natives are getting restless and that so many of them, in increasing numbers, no longer care whether they are called Racists or Fascists or ‘Extreme Right Wing’, and this essentially ephemeral political pretender is saying what they know in their hearts to be their own desires.

They, the downtrodden, marginalised persecuted and prosecuted native peoples simply want their countries back and they will vote accordingly, by one means or the other, in order to achieve this. Essentially the pendulum has reached its apogee on the left hand side of its path, stopped for an infinitesimal moment and is now accelerating in the opposite direction. And the treacherous scum who have brought this parlous situation about know, at the very least at a subliminal level, that the pendulum will not stop at perigee and that thereafter lies their so well deserved future.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

UKIP stands by ‘expel all migrants’ councillor who denied racism accusations after being filmed saying she wanted to ‘send the lot back’

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply Cancel reply