But before your knee jerks due to the subject material, take in the mindset that is rife throughout our university and college campuses who are influencing political decision makers. This lunatic marxist professor (in the below article) gets standing ovations for his calls of wiping out White people, while leftist politicians hailing from minority communities nod in approval. These are the geniuses pushing for complete opening of the U.S.’s southern border, as well as the one that runs along the entire soft under belly of Europe.
On his last day of teaching at the Massachusetts College of Art and Design, Professor Noel Ignatiev reportedly received a standing ovation when he told his class that white males are a cancer and they should kill themselves, Jim Hoft reported at the Gateway Pundit Monday, citing an interview posted at the Diversity Report.
“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others,” he said, according to Ivan Fernando.
Fernando, who wrote the piece at the Diversity Report, called Ignatiev’s comments “sound and reasonable” words that “resonate with every enlightened and progressive mind.”
“They are indisputable and no one can debate them,” he added, calling those who object to Ignatiev’s outrageous call “far-right extremists.”
Fernando said he spoke to Ignatiev about his statement in a phone interview.
According to Fernando’s account, Ignatiev doubled down on his comments, attributing criticism to “white supremacist attitudes.”
“The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it,” he said.
He went on to explain that those who object to his call for genocide “are themselves white supremacists.”
“They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture,” he explained.
When asked if only white males need to be exterminated, Ignatiev said that the entire race needs to be wiped off the face of the earth.
“Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities,” he said, while acknowledging in rather colorful terms that black men like to have sex with white women.
“Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide. It’s the right thing to do,” he added. More here.
The way in which mass immigration has been instituted by the political elite over the past few decades, must be viewed as a systematical attempt at re-engineering society as all statist governments are prone to do, both the Soviet socialists and the National socialists tried to create their ”new man” in radical plans to re-engineer their societies, and the world at large.
As Mark Levin calls them, ”the masterminds and geniuses” are here now to refine and mold you according to their plans and schemes as well. This is what we object to, not immigration per say, nor the mixing of peoples according to their own self interests and desires (individualism based upon the enlightenment demands the freedom to do so), but the artificial manipulation of the civil society by a tyrannical ruling oligarchy according to their own whims and desires, not the peoples, whom they regularly treat with disdain and overturn their voting decisions.