al-Qaida obamablunders Syria

OBAMA ADMITS WANTING TO AID AL-QAIDA TERRORISTS IN SYRIA, WAIVES PROHIBITION BAN ON ARMING THEM…….

 

I have never seen anything like it.

Who would have thought 12 years later after 9/11, that the U.S. would have a president with the middle name of Hussein, arming al-Qaida terrorists, with the lame ‘leadership’ of the GOP giving him a fist-bump?

NOTE: It would be like the Israeli government arming Hamas to go after Fatah.

mccain-obama

Obama waives ban on arming terrorists to allow aid to Syrian opposition

BY JOEL GEHRKE | SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 AT 7:16 PM

President Obama waived a provision of federal law designed to prevent the supply of arms to terrorist groups to clear the way for the U.S. to provide military assistance to “vetted” opposition groups fighting Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

Some elements of the Syrian opposition are associated with radical Islamic terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, which was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., in 2001. Assad’s regime is backed by Iran and Hezbollah.

The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would “waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction.”

Those two sections prohibit sending weaponry to countries described in section 40(d): “The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism,” Congress stated in the Arms Control Export Act.

“For purposes of this subsection, such acts shall include all activities that the Secretary determines willfully aid or abet the international proliferation of nuclear explosive devices to individuals or groups or willfully aid or abet an individual or groups in acquiring unsafeguarded special nuclear material,” the law continues.

The law allows the president to waive those prohibitions if he “determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”

More here. Via ZIP

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *