This was submitted by the ICLA yesterday in the concluding session of the OSCE meeting in Poland. Asking for a better description of Islamofauxbia is exactly what the sharia spreaders fear doing. They want to keep it as ambiguous as possible, and leave it up to themselves to determine what is and isn’t. That should be the warning signal to all of the fence sitters.
International Civil Liberties Alliance
OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting 2013
Working Session II – Review of the implementation of commitments on promotion of mutual respect and understanding: – Combatting intolerance and discrimination against Muslims
The International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) has been spending a great deal of time within the current OSCE Human Dimension meeting (Warsaw 2013) trying to clarify the meaning of the term “Islamophobia”. Unfortunately, despite our diligent efforts no one has been able to provide us with an unambiguous and politically neutral definition.
ICLA believes that the undefined nature of the term “Islamophobia” stereotypes and demonises any and all people who voice concerns about sharia law. As such we believe that the continued use of the term in this undefined form is actually a barrier to cooperation and dialogue and that it does little to solve the serious problem of discrimination against Muslims.
The exclusion of ICLA and other stakeholders from the meetings that were convened to put together an OSCE booklet that had the subtitle “Addressing Islamophobia Through Education” was missed opportunity for serious dialogue on this important issue. If all stakeholders had been involved then people with divergent views would have come closer together and an honest and politically neutral definition of Islamophobia could have been devised.
We believe that it is important to urgently address the matter of the definition of Islamophobia because the lack of a clear definition impacts negatively on many basic human rights that are claimed to be protected in international law. In addition to the obvious area of freedom of expression it also impacts negatively on things like freedom of assembly.
The International Civil Liberties Alliance is concerned about human rights abuses that can arise from certain aspects of sharia law. Increasingly any person or organization that has legitimate concerns in this area is unfairly labeled “Islamophobic”. This can impact negatively on freedom of assembly because a lack of definition contributes to the likelihood of them being physically or verbally abused, being unfairly demonized, being sacked from their jobs, and being subject to overzealous policing.
We therefore make the following recommendations:
That the OSCE provide an official definition of the term “Islamophobia” including a comprehensive list of what Islamophobia is not. This would go a long way to helping organisations like ICLA to articulate their messages in the most sensitive way possible.
That the OSCE organize a much more diverse range of stakeholders to come together to create a revised booklet for educators that is both fair and politically neutral. For such an important publication to achieve what it purports to want to achieve, it has to be more inclusive with regard to those who compile it.