CHRISTIAN DEMOCRAT INTERIOR MINISTER RÄSÄNEN SAYS FINLAND COULD TAKE 500 SYRIAN REFUGEES NEXT YEAR…….

Syrians, coming to a place near you.

Never mind that fact that they would be better off in areas near home, not in far away Finland. She also seems intent to ‘spreading her good will’ around the country, with Syrians being given permanent residency and housing outside of traditional refugee housing facilities. The lunacy of it all.

NOTE: How many refugees from Syria has Japan taken in?

Interior Minister: Finland could take in 500 Syrian refugees

Päivi Räsänen says that the operation would cost less if refugees were to be directly placed in municipalities around the country rather than in reception centres. This would also be better for the newcomers themselves, she points out.

Interior Minister Päivi Räsänen proposes that Finland could accept 500 refugees from Syria next year. The United Nations refugee agency UNHCR has asked all member states to take in Syrian refugees beyond their normal quotas.

Räsänen tells Yle that under her plan, 200 refugees would be counted as part of Finland’s standard annual quota of 750 refugees, with the other 300 included in a separate supplementary quota. She says that the arrivals would be given permanent residence permits.

The Christian Democrats chair stressed that although Finland faces its own economic difficulties, it must take extra strides to help those in distress because of the civil war in Syria. She notes that the proposal must still be considered by the cabinet and by the other ministries involved. These include the Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of Employment and the Economy, which is responsible for integration of refugees into Finnish municipalities.

Räsänen says that the operation would cost less if refugees were to be directly placed in municipalities around the country rather than in reception centres. This would also be better for the newcomers themselves.

More here.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Raymond Sep 19, 2013

Very surprising that Rasanen would take this stance. Doesn’t matter whether the’re Sunni or Shia . . sooner or later they’ll start up their destructive ways and Finland will be all the worse off for this decsion.

Why not take in an equivalent number of Coptic Christians?

Some one needs to put the question directly to Rasanen and see how she handles it.

Very disappointing – I thought she had more sense.
By Cloudberry Sep 20, 2013

And by Syrian refugees she means “No Christian Syrians allowed!” They get to stay and die at the hands of the islamofascist Syrians.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply