Global Warming



The global warming ruse is nothing more than an avenue for statist wealth distribution supporters to take more command of our economies, nothing more, nothing less. It’s bogus science, at least the part that rests solely on CO2 gas as a pollutant and refuse to admit that 15 years of colder temps doesn’t mean that the earth is not getting warmer. Sheeeeh.

NOTE: It’s the sun and solar wind that play a greater part than any CO2 gas ever could.

H/T: Fjordman

Major Danish Daily Newspaper Warns: ‘Globe May Be On Path To Little Ice Age…Much Colder Winters…Dramatic Consequences’!

Paper features Danish solar physicist Henrik Svensmark on the subject of the UN IPCC: ‘…many of the climate models used by IPCC and others overestimate the influence of CO2 and underestimate the influence of the sun. … The IPCC is very one-sided, so I don’t think there will be anything reasonable in the next report.’


Another major European media outlet is asking: Where’s the global warming?

Image right: The August 7 edition of Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, featured a major 2-page article on the globe’s 15-years of missing warming and the potential solar causes and implications.

Moreover, they are featuring prominent skeptic scientists who are warning of a potential little ice age and dismissing CO2 as a major climate driver. And all of this just before the release of the IPCC’s 5AR, no less!

Hat-tip: NTZ reader Arne Garbøl

The August 7 print edition of the Danish Jyllands-Posten, the famous daily that published the “Muhammad caricatures“, features a full 2-page article bearing the headline: ”The behavior of the sun may trigger a new little ice age” followed by the sub-headline: “Defying all predictions, the globe may be on the road towards a new little ice age with much colder winters.”

So now even the once very green Danish media is now spreading the seeds of doubt. So quickly can “settled science” become controversial and hotly disputed. The climate debate is far from over. And when it does end, it looks increasingly as if it’ll end in favor of the skeptics.

The JP writes that “many will be startled” by the news that a little ice age is a real possibility. Indeed, western citizens have been conditioned to think that nothing except warming is possible. Few have prepared for any other possibility.

In its latest 2-page report, the JP now appears to tell its readers that our views on climate science have to be much more open minded and unshackled from the chains of dogmatism.

JP starts by reminding readers that it was just over 100 years ago that the world had clawed itself out of the little ice age, which extended from 1400 – 1900, a time when the Thames river often froze over. All paths in determining the cause of the little ice age all seem to converge to a single factor: solar activity.

The Jyllands-Posten quotes David Hathaway:

‘We now have the lowest solar activity in 100 years,’ David Hathaway from American space research institute NASA newly concluded in connection to the release of new figures for the sun’s activity. He said the activity for the ongoing cycle is half of the previous cycle, and he predicted an even lower activity for the next cycle, which will hit us in few years.”

Suddenly even the greenest of media outlets among us are contemplating what the consequences of a quiet sun may be. The JP then quotes Irish solar specialist Ian Elliott, who says these consequences could be dramatic:

It indicates that we may be on the path to a new little ice age. It seems likely we are on the path to a period with very low solar activity, which could mean that we may have some very cold winters.”

Elliott then cites the ice-cold winters of 2009 and 2010 as early signs.

JP then cites at length Danish astrophysicist Henrik Svensmark, who needs no introduction:

Since the 1940s and up to 10 years ago we have had the highest solar activity in 1000 years. The last time we had solar activity that high was when we had the Medieval Warm Period from year 1000 to around 1300. … Historically there has been a close connection between solar activity and temperature for the last 1000 years. Therefore the sun’s activity will also have influence the coming many years. … The unusual thing right now is that sun’s activity is decreasing while there’s a great increase in atmospheric CO2. For that reason the question is how much the earth will cool in a time of decreasing solar activity. … The development is beautifully consistent with a cooling effect of the solar activity in the same period. This could mean that the temperature will not rise for the next 30 years or maybe begin to decrease.”

JP also quotes Svensmark on the subject of the IPCC: “…many of the climate models used by IPCC and others overestimate the influence of CO2 and underestimate the influence of the sun. … The IPCC is very one-sided, so I don’t think there will be anything reasonable in the next report.

More here.

One Response

  1. AGW was just one more of quack doom hypothesis floated around by a bunch of third rate bean counters. What changed was that corporate financial bodies and governments, came to realize that it had the potential to be the greatest instrument for additional taxation as well as control of the body politic, while making them appear as shining knights who were sallying forth to rescue the planet ( good vote catcher).

    The fact remains, AGW aka Climate Change, has its backers in Western governments, the financial world, including it seems the World Bank, all out to siphon billions of bucks out of the pockets of ordinary people. A fraction of this money is pocketed by the UN, thus the UNs IPCC has a direct interest in not giving any credence to research by these Danish scientists. Ditto for all the so-called Climate “scientists” on the government dime, using ever more statistical fiddles to back up the claim pf CO” being the main drover of AGW.
    This fraud by Western governments has no parallel in history. Even Stalin and Lysenko did not stoop so low. Or for that matter the Pope at the time of Galileo.

    There is hardly any doubt that the sun is the most important drivet of climate. The issue is, is it the internal dynamics of the sun, Malinkowich cycles, this cliam of cosmic rays, or a combination of all three.

    Now the question I would post is – as Cosmic rays depend on supernovas, it follows that the frequency will depend on supernova events. It also follows that the intensity of the cosmic rays will depend on the distance of the supernova from earth. Both these will govern the intensity of the cosmic rays, and thus cloud formation. They claim that cosmic rays are higher when the earth moves into a spiral. This means that supernova events within the galaxy are more important then ones outside the galaxy. Not just that but supernovas within the spiral in which the earth is in, is the important one. This is fair, as supernova outside the galaxy should only contribute to the general level of the cosmic ray background.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *