Middle East Obama obamablunders Syria

BARRY RUBIN, AMERICA’S (OBAMA’S) IMPENDING DEFEAT IN SYRIA…….

 

The price paid for electing a man, whose only job description was street organizer, to higher office.

There can be no meddling/negotiating when both sides are very intent in wiping the other out. Lobbing a few shells or missiles is useless, as well as drawing red lines in sand when there is no clear viable partner in the conflict to align oneself with.

Middle_East_Map

America’s Impending Defeat in Syria

BY BARRY RUBIN AUGUST 27, 2013

barry-rubin2It’s really pretty simple. The American people understandably don’t want to go to war with Syria — not to mention with Syria’s patron, Iran — and especially not for the goal of putting the Muslim Brotherhood and murderous Islamists into power there. Going to war is a serious matter, to say the least. There’s no assurance how long it will take, how many lives it will cost, and what turns it may take. And the Middle East has just had several examples of these wars.

Iraq and Afghanistan cost a lot of money and lives as they extended for a much longer time than had been expected. In addition, they derailed the Bush administration’s electoral fortunes and domestic programs. With the main emphasis of the Obama administration being a fundamental transformation of America, such distractions are not desired.

There is one other important consideration: the Obama administration does not accept the traditional diplomatic and great power strategies. It believes that it can reconcile with Islamist states, it does not comprehend deterrents, it does not keep faith with allies, and it does not believe in credibility, the belief that only power exerted can convince a foe of seriousness.

Of course, that wouldn’t rule out a one-time targeted attack. But even if that were to be done, is America going to fight a full-scale war on the ground with allies–including al-Qaeda –which will never be satisfied and will always be eager to stab them in the back?

The administration has trapped itself with two problems: the rebels who are being supported in Syria are extreme radicals who may set off bloodbaths and regional instability if they win; and a challenge has been given to the very reckless forces of Iran, Syria, and Hizballah. When the United States threatens these three players, the response is always: “Make my day!”

So this is the situation, and the Obama administration is bluffing.

It does not want to exert force and probably won’t. Iran and Syria would be quite willing to fight a war, but the United States–people and government–do not have the will to do so.

What is the best option for the Obama administration? To try to negotiate — as unlikely as it is — a deal in which some kind of interim or coalition arrangement would be arranged with Russia and Iran to make a transition from the current regime. Mainly, this means a stalling tactic. This could work, though, if the regime does not actually win the war. Aid to rebels and some gimmicks perhaps, but no decisive action.

There is, however, still a problem — the two Syrian sides want to wipe each other out.

Read the rest here.

One Response

  1. A losing America is very much a success for the Muslim POTUS, who has done so much damage already on so many other fronts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *