5 Responses

  1. Muslims might find it easier to convince non-Muslims Mohammed preached peace if they first convinced Jihadists of this same message.

  2. @Steve

    …….but then , they’d just be practicing takkiya.

  3. They ‘…..want people to judge islam on what islam teaches – not on what muslims do…’?

    Well what’s the effing point of that? I hope they mention such niceties as the stoning of adulterers and killing of apostates. ‘Aisha ‘ and ‘mufa’khathat ‘ in these ads.

    Question: ‘It has become widespread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children. (mufa’khathat – literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child).

    What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be pleased with her ?

    Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows:

    As for the prophet, his thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship was due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men.

    Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:

    “A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband’s house rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.”

    Khomeini, “Tahrirolvasyleh” fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990

    “It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”

    Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini’s “Tahrir Al wasila” p. 241, issue number 12

    “Young boys or girls in full sexual effervescence are kept from getting married before they reach the legal age of majority. This is against the intention of divine laws. Why should the marriage of pubescent girls and boys be forbidden because they are still minors, when they are allowed to listen to the radio and to sexually arousing music?”

  4. The Despicable George Bernard Shaw is the image of the first elderly male in that piece of Islamic propaganda which suggests Shaw was known as the “Saviour of humanity?” WTF? & WTH does he have to do with positive influence about Islam? I honestly did not know this!

    A quick search online reveals these GBS quotes:

    If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam.”
    “I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him – the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity.”
    “I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”

    In reflecting on the above information, the moral equivalences of Muhammed and George Bernard Shaw, Adolph Hitler, Carl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao are all in the same league of genocidal thugs.
    perhaps the intended audiences of this video propaganda will also discover the real truth by connecting the dots between these monsters of humanity and the qur’an.

    1. The second image related to Muhammed in that propaganda video is that of the demented “yoda in a diaper” (thx RRA) infamous misogynist, Mahatma Gandhi .
      Gandhi used to greet his followers every morning by asking if they’d had a good bowel movement and made a habit of drinking his own urine. Gandhi also had an unusual way of testing his celibacy. As an old man, he would ask the local hotties to spend the night lying naked beside him. He thought married couples should only have sex three or four times … in total. His wife was no longer temptation enough, apparently, and he described her as looking like a “meek cow.” He refused to allow his sons to get a formal education, and also tried to force his oddball sexual ideas on them.

      If Europe would have taken Gandhi’s advice as below, German would be the language of the perfect Aryan continent. There would be no people living with disabilities or birth defects; the Roma (gypsies) would have disappeared into oblivion and there would be no homosexuality allowed. Free speech would be considered criminal activity and there would be no freedom of religion.
      Some quotes from this Muhammad wannabe:

      “I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions…”

      “If these gentlemen choose to occupy your homes you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow yourselves, man, woman and child to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them.”

      “Hitler killed five million [sic] Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.”

      “But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the godfearing death has no terror. It is a joyful sleep to be followed by a waking that would be all the more refreshing for the long sleep. “

      Louis Fisher, Gandhi’s biographer asked him: “You mean that the Jews should have committed collective suicide?”Gandhi responded, “Yes, that would have been heroism.”

      What Gandhi recommended for the Jews in the face of Hitler, he also applied to his own people on partition of India, which he was vehemently against. During his prayer meeting on 1 May 1947, he prepared the Hindus and Sikhs for the anticipated massacres of their kind in the upcoming state of Pakistan with these words:

      “I would tell the Hindus to face death cheerfully if the Muslims are out to kill them. I would be a real sinner if after being stabbed I wished in my last moment that my son should seek revenge. I must die without rancour. You may turn round and ask whether all Hindus and all Sikhs should die. Yes, I would say. Such martyrdom will not be in vain.”

      Muhammad, Shaw and Gandhi are celebrated by ignorant peace activists worldwide. If they actually studied the actual words, deeds or the real-world consequences of the actions of these misogynists would they/could they continue to emulate and revere such evil?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.