Speaks for me.
The Islamic concept is of women is as ‘Halal meat’, and there are some hadith which make vile reading concerning Mohammed’s attitude to women, attitudes that Muslim males are encouraged to emulate.
This gives the socialist sponsors of Islam some severe headaches — feminism or Islamism? So far, the choice has come down on the side of Islamism; Islam is capable of providing the chaos of proxy war, the ‘sturm and drang’ that feminism cannot abide but that is so necessary for ‘change’. Feminism emasculates males, but Islam promotes absolute male superiority. Feminism has rendered our society unable to defend itself, so the masculinity of Islam is met by feminist acquiescence and appeasement. This in turn causes disintegration of society, the chaos of a seventh century bandit and desertification culture mixing with twentieth century ‘polite’ society has the effect of pouring water into concentrated sulphuric acid and resulting in a spitting, seething corrosive mess, exceedingly dangerous to all exposed flesh.
This socialist action is provocative and much as socialism is wont to do, but socialism has already proven itself unable to ‘ride the tiger’. There is no reason on earth why a dead tyrant should be any more controllable than the more usual socialist ‘live’ tyrants. Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot and the other cultic tyrants rose to absolute power, but then consolidated that power by killing those who brought them to power in the first place. Islam however brings us a new concept, that of distributed tyranny.