Pseudo Science Statism

DAN GREENFIELD: THE LEFT’S WAR TO INSTILL ALLEGIANCE TO ITS PSEUDO SCIENCE……..

 

Still trying to create the ‘new man’, or it.

Actually, the last 166 years has been a continued Leftist war to impose its statism in every corner of society and on every level of government. Political correctness is the Left’s watchdog to enforce conformity.

lysenko_with_stalin
Lysenko with Stalin

Political diversity when applied to science logically leads to immutable homosexuality and mutable gender. It leads to a construct of race governed by a politically correct version of the one-drop rule in which racial identification always trends toward minority status, rather than majority status. The science is bad, but the political calculation is impeccable.

The Left’s War on Science

April 12, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

“We did not come to ask for mercy from nature,”  Ivan Vladimirovich Michurin, the Lysenko of Soviet agriculture, once declared. “We must wrest it from her.”

Communist science was guided not by the journey from hypothesis to fact but by the dusty proclamations of Marxist theorists. Soviet scientists were expected to reject capitalist science and formulate a science that matched the Communist worldview.

The Communist worldview insisted that every living creature could be completely transformed into anything. It rejected natural selection as having a competitive capitalist bent that suspiciously resembled a biological version of free market competition. And pseudo-scientists like Lysenko and Michurin matched bad science to bad ideology laying out an official dogma in which transforming the environment could transform any creature and in which intraspecies struggle did not lead to evolution.

The USSR’s politicization of biology crippled its agriculture. Its leaders rejected free market competition on the human level and in the plant and animal kingdoms. They insisted that nature had to follow Marxist dialectical materialism and locked up and murdered the scientists who disagreed. By the time the USSR fell, a land which had once exported wheat to the world had gone deep into debt to buy wheat from the United States.

But bad ideology driving bad science didn’t die with Lysenko and Michurin. The new Lysenkos are Warmunists like Michael Mann and James Hansen. The environmentalists, like the Communists, believe that human beings have total control over the environment and that the environment determines all.

Warmunism, like Communism, originates not from science, but from ideology. The Communists divided industry into two types by ideological classification; the good cooperative Socialist industry and the bad competitive Capitalist industry. The Warmunists similarly ideologically classify two types of industry; environmentally conscious green technology and dirty non-socially conscious brown technology.

The Warmunists, like the Communists, classify science and industry not by outcome, but by ideology, and then paper over that classification with bad science. Green technology is often dirtier and less efficient than the so-called brown technology, but like the collective farms and the idiotic ramblings of Michurin and Lysenko, it’s better because it more closely fits the Socialist vision of how things ought to work.

[…]

The Lysenkoism of attempting to force science to conform to politics always leads to a biological dead end. Homosexuals are not infertile. They are not in the class of relationships that are biologically capable of conceiving life. Since every homosexual couple is infertile, every such couple would be entitled to infertility treatments. But no amount of treatments will enable them to conceive a child without the biological intervention of a member of the opposite sex at some point in the process.

More here.

2 Responses

  1. Global Warming – the greatest fraud of all time. Its now renamed itself as Climate Change when it became evident that there was no Global Warming man made or otherwise.

    This fraud was not perpetrated by enviro-fanatic scientists. They may be fanatics but have no power to implement policy or direct research funding. This was, from first to last, a scheme by the government to raise revenue with no strings attached, and the added bonus that they were saving the planet on data provided by the “scientists”.

    In all crime, real or drama, the first question to ask is who profits from the crime. The answer is the government treasury. As the treasury swells, it allows ministers to do what is the only real perk of the job – excercise power via patronage. And this is what has happened – taxpayer subsidized Green energy projects for their friends and control.

  2. “Since every homosexual couple is infertile, every such couple would be entitled to infertility treatments.”
    No one is entitled to anything except death and taxes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *