/

/

/

/

/

FINNISH FREEDOM OF SPEECH ORG WEIGHS IN ON SUPREME COURT’S CONVICTION OF JUSSI HALLA-AHO FOR HATE SPEECH…….

Free Speech Jussi Halla-aho

FINNISH FREEDOM OF SPEECH ORG WEIGHS IN ON SUPREME COURT’S CONVICTION OF JUSSI HALLA-AHO FOR HATE SPEECH…….

By KGS12 years agoLeave a comment

Simply put, Jussi Halla-aho should never been brought up on any charges at all, let alone convicted. What’s worrisome here is the notion that hate speech needs defining, when in fact, it needs to be stricken down once and for all. The ambiguity of these hate speech laws is what makes all of this possible.

Should hate speech definitions be clarified?

IltaLehti: In Effi’s view (Electronic Frontier Finland – Effi ry), the judgment received by Halla-aho of ethnic agitation currently shows that freedom of speech is excessively limited in relation to other freedoms and rights.

– Penal Code Section on incitement against ethnic group is too open to interpretation, says Effi’s Vice Chairman Leena Romppainen.

According to the Supreme Court, it believes that Halla-aho’s blog post “A few baits for Mika Illman” was hate speech. Effi criticized the Supreme Court on the fact that “hate speech” is not defined by law, and therefore, it is difficult to judge.

– Now try to stop people from saying all sorts of nasty things, says Romppainen.

Effi based on its position that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has outlined its ruling, that freedom of expression also covers other posts that offend, shock or disturb the State or any part of the population.

According to Effi, it would be important for society to discuss a greater variety of opinions.

– the organization believes that Halla-aho’s opponents would have been equally quick to open their mouths and does not necessarily head for the courtroom. For example, the U.S. public debate is, according to Romppainen more active than in Finland.

Effi is also willing to make some restrictions on complete freedom of speech.

– Everything can’t be allowed, and one must stand behind the words. However, speaking anonymously should be made possible. The fact that things are said in the name of others is again not acceptable, Romppainen says.

Romppainen believes that the law of incitement against an ethnic group should be clarified for ordinary people to understand.

SAIJA RÄSÄNEN
@ ILTALEHTI.FI

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.