SALAFISTS AND THE REST OF THE WORLD……..

 

This piece was sent to me by regular reader and commenter, Anushirvan, concerning the recent beatings a cadre of Salafists gave to members of the “Anti-Fascist” movement in Solingen Germany on May Day.

Anushirvan: Salafi militants can have no use for infidels fighting alongside them in order to further the cause of Islam. It is un-Islamic, haram by default in the mind of Salafis: the prototype of the “genuine” or “authentic” Muslim can be none other than the Muslim that takes his guidance from the one and only source that can be considered incorruptible by Salafis: the Quran.

What PC socialist movements don’t realise is that Salafi militants in general are a self-proclaimed moral elite within Islam, that elevates itself well above all other Muslims, even those that take their guidance from Sunni clergy. Clerical guidance can be considered by Salafis as a potential corruption of the Quran’s content. In fact, all Muslims who adhere to such a thing can be considered kafir by a Salafi militant, according to takfir, which refers to the practice of one Muslim declaring another Muslim an unbeliever.

Therefore, Salafism is the most puritanical strain of Sunni Islam. It doesn’t recognise Muslims who stray from the Salafi path as genuine Muslims. Which means that all Muslims who display Munafiq (hypocrite) attitudes in their religious zeal can be declared unbelievers or apostates by default. The biggest problem anti-fascists have is a type of blind spot, the very inability to make a clear distinction between those Islamic supremacist groups, that will deliberately display taqqiyya by incorporating Western antifa groups in what they’re doing (like Hamas) on the one hand, and those Islamic supremacist groups who consider Muslim Brotherhood affiliate groups as equally kafir and immoral (because they integrate Western leftists in their cause) from their own puritanical perspective, on the other hand. *

Hence, Salafism will increasingly operate independently from gullible left-leaning PC “world solidarity” views in its struggle to counter criticism of Islam. Salafis will not tolerate infidels (either Muslim or Westerner) corrupting the purity of the Salafi moral stance with regards to Jihad. In other words, any act to incorporate some alliance with Westerners in Jihadism can be considered as a de facto defilement of Quranic standards, a moral corruption of the Quran’s content, plus a hindrance and a threat to the purity of the Salafi view on what Jihad should be.

Although the puerile vision of antifa anarchists is probably akin to the idea that “all Islamic groups could do with our support, since basically they’re all the same”, they can’t be more wrong in their ill-conceived PC naivety, because realistically speaking, both groups can’t possibly go hand in hand. Salafis will never tolerate PC antifa movements usurping their ‘moral stance’ on Jihad. Simply put, useful PC idiots will increasingly feel how Salafism will slam down on them like a ton of bricks.

As long as PC idiots find themselves wondering “Why are these people against us and not WITH us, as expected ?”, then I suppose they’ll have to live with being bludgeoned, beaten to a pulp, stabbed or even decapitated in the long run. Remaining stupid, contrary to the evidence presented, is not good for your health, to put it like that. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I say.

If however, some of them will turn their attention to actual knowledge of the subject, then they might even enlighten themselves and find out that:

when

1) Islamism = moral supremacism

then

2) Salafism = ultra- Islamic moral supremacism

and thus

3) Salafism won’t ever mix or mingle with secular-oriented ideology. Both of them are de facto polar opposites !

In that case, they might just learn a thing or two…Don’t hold your breath however, it’s anyone’s guess how many of those wankers will have their physical integrity harmed before they’ll start getting real !

* Which is the main reason why Vittorio Arrigoni got killed, for instance. Being a foreign Hamas militant was of no use to him in the long run.