HARDLINE SALAFI MOSQUE GAINING CONTROL OVER OTHER MOSQUES IN THE NETHERLANDS…….

Just like the purists are in the UK and throughout the West.

The reason for this is that there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”, there are moderate Muslims, yes, the type that choose to skip over all of the horror verses in the koran, and settle on the more peaceful ones, the portions of verses that originate during the supposed time of Mohamed’s stay in ~~Yathrib,~~ Mecca, then on to Yathrib, (Medina) a Jewish town before the Muslims came back and murdered them all and Islamized it. (correction, Yathrib is Medina, as pointed out by Jake in the comments.)

There is only a nuance of difference between Salafists and Whabbists which gave birth to the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida. The fundamentalists only have to appeal to the way the koran is written, and the overwhelming unanimity of the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence in order to win the day and turn a mosque, once led by a forward looking Imam, into a mustard hellhole scheming to “fundamentally transform” society.

NOTE: Salafi ideology is just “Islam 101”, and the article grossly understates the significance of that.

More here.(Dutch)

H/T: BadNewsFromTheNetherlands:

Intelligence Service: Salafist Mosque Increases Influence

The intelligence service AIVD writes in its annual report that an important group of Salafists connected to the As-Soennah mosque in The Hague has increasing influence on other mosques in the region. These mosques now also promote Salafism. The AIVD says that Salafist ideology contains elements which conflict with the democratic order. The AIVD is afraid of intolerant isolationism and polarization. At present, the group is not a danger to state security.

Written by KGS

One Response

By Jake Apr 25, 2012

Hi KGS, good post. I’m not at all shocked by this kind of news coming out of Europe (and the rest of the free world), and it’s been a long time since I have. I read Melanie Phillips’ “Londonistan” back in about 2006 or so and everything she and others have been warning about for years is now eventuating, even in the US now!Witness the case of Nidal Malik Hassan and Anwar al Awlaki to cite just two examples. Wherever gullible, useful idiot dhimmi dupes have allowed unchecked Islamic proliferation this situation is only going to deteriorate. I liked this part your post intro, cynical and jaded as I am. You summarise precisely how I feel, and how indignant I am at being regarded as some kind of racist obscurantist bigot for calling the RoP as I see it:

The reason for this is that there is no such thing as “moderate Islam”, there are moderate Muslims, yes, the type that choose to skip over all of the horror verses in the koran, and settle on the more peaceful ones, the portions of verses that originate during the supposed time of Mohamed’s stay in Yathrib, (Mecca) a Jewish town before the Muslims came back and murdered them all and Islamized it.

One correction however – Yathrib is actually Madina, not Mecca. The fact of its Israelite Jewish origin is still evident in the name Madina, which I believe is originally an Aramaic word and has entered Hebrew to mean a state, as in מדינת ישראל – the state of Israel.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Intelligence Service: Salafist Mosque Increases Influence

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply Cancel reply