RACE BAITING AL-SHARPTON COMPARES ALABAMA LAWS ON IMMIGRATION TO ‘JIM CROW’ LAWS…….

Al Sharpton Immigration Incitement Racism or not

RACE BAITING AL-SHARPTON COMPARES ALABAMA LAWS ON IMMIGRATION TO ‘JIM CROW’ LAWS…….

Never mind that Alabama’s immigration laws are modeled on Arizona laws that are modeled on US laws already on the books that the Obama administration refuses to uphold, but they all pale in comparison to Mexican immigration laws. Al Sharpton is a race baiting hate monger who is indirectly connected to the Obama administration, who is tasked with the job of keeping the racial rhetoric ramped up. It’s disgusting to see and hear, but that is exactly what is going on.

NOTE: How could it be racism for a state to require a person to properly identify themselves before voting? Finnish law requires it, and I have yet to hear one African American living here raise an objection to it. This is pure race baiting, and I might add, bigotry towards minorities on behalf of the Left.

They not only assume Blacks and other minorities are unable to afford an identity card, they treat them like simple minded children who can’t be counted on to acquire identification. Not treating minorities like the majority, is a double slap in their faces.

Here is Al courtesy of Breitbart.com:

NOTE: Dumber than dirt.

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By joy52 Mar 10, 2012

I grew up in Alabama and Jim Crow laws were still in effect through at least 14 years. Under Jim Crow laws whites and blacks had “separate” accomodations, such as separate places in movie theaters, separate churches, separate lunch counters and restaurants, separate water fountains and waiting areas, separate hospitals, their own day at the fair, and blacks did have to sit in the back of buses and give up their seats to whites. Blacks could not be in certain areas except to work.

The Alabama immigration law has none of that. The law deals with enforcing what are already felonies with regard to persons who committed a crime by entering the country illegally. Al Sharpton must be banking on the Democrat induced ignorance of current citizens. Any person who saw Jim Crow laws in effect and say the Alabama law is the same, is lying and they know it. Proof is that the Alabama law was never denounced as a Jim Crow law–until Sharpton’s fantasy.

Leave a Reply to joy52 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply to joy52 Cancel reply