LARS VILKS DRAWS FACE OF MUSLIM ON THE EGG THROWN AT HIM……..

The “Mo-Egg”

Lars Vilks: “Miraculously surviving, one of the eggs thrown on its journey from the audience to the podium. It is labeled with my drawing of a typical Islamists face.”

H/T: Jacob_M

Written by KGS

One Response

By Steve Bronfman Feb 24, 2012

Brilliant satire…

It is Orwellian that the Islamo-fascists who oppose free speech can “win” in this case with threats and intimidation. Sure, there are limit’s to free speech eg inciting violence, crying “fire” in a theatre etc but drawing a picture of a man is not incitement.

It’s often pointed out that Muslims demand that we accept their cultural norms when in “their” countries but then demand we also accept those norms when they are in OUR countries. There is not even any reciprocation; with a convert to Christianity facing death in Iran now, Kuwait about to ban the construction of new Churches, S’audi Arabia banning the Bible etc. Muslim religious leaders weekly insult Jews, Christians, Hindu’s etc in sermans freely available to view (at Memri etc).

That the so-called Western left supports this (banning of Mohammed images) really emphasises the, almost clinical sickness, many of them possess. They are truly self-haters who will stop at nothing until their own cultures are distroyed.

Another thing that really bothers me is the MSM’s adoption of the term “The Prophet” when referring to Mohammed. He’s not my prophet, by Muslim’s own accounts he’s a pedophile, murdering, bandit anti-semite warlord. Why would I respect this man or his message? It’s striking that at the same time the MSM ceases to refer to Jesus as “Jesus Christ” out of political correctness (because he’s not everyone’s Messiah) they should do the reverse in relation to Mohammed for the same reasons. The MSM also continiously accept Muslim’s Taqiyya when they say “Islam” means “peace” when Salaam mean’s peace in Arabic and Islam means “Submission” (Muslim’s often accuse Westerners of not understanding Arabic nuances but since the root is the same in Hebrew I know that though they are the same root of SLM they are different words with different meanings).

Our leaders policies of a combination of mass Muslim immigration, political correctness whereby the very culture that resulted in their emigration because of repression is allowed to continue in the West and multi-culturalism whereby they are not assimilated will result in an inevitable civil war. A irony of the current political climate is that if someone points this out they are accused of being either racist or worse still could be charged for inciting such a civil war with anti-Terror laws so stupid that the US State department refuses to use the word “Islam” or “Muslim” in relation to any terrorist act but instead uses those laws to limit free-speech.

Leave a Reply to Steve Bronfman Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply to Steve Bronfman Cancel reply