MARK LEVIN EXPLAINS THE ROMNEY-RON PAUL NEXUS……..

As only the Great One can.

It’s a tag-team of the anti-conservatives. Here’s the link to the full video (that won’t embed correctly) available here.

UPDATE: Here is a portion of it here:

defeatthemarxists: “Mark says it is now clear that Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are teaming up to attack the most conservative candidate, Rick Santorum. Mark goes through the history of libertarianism and how it is at odds with traditional conservatism and this is why Ron Paul is not a conservative. Both the establishment Republicans and the libertarian anarchists both have a common foe; the traditional conservative and the Reaganites. There is a movement against us, the conservative and it is becoming evident with every passing debate and the media coverage about it.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/02/conservatives_and_libertarians_1.html

http://www.textfiles.com/politics/ron_paul.txt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCxDrfs4GtM

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/ron-paul-u-s-encouraging-iran-to-get-nuclear-weapon-because-we-threaten-them

Written by KGS

4 Responses

By David Fellows Feb 24, 2012

I used to respect Mr. Mark Levin. I would anxiously await each of his radio shows to enjoy his profound insight into the constitution. Now, after his paranoid rant about a Paul-Romney nexus, I have had to reconsider Levin’s perspective: I’ve come to the conclusion that he’s loosing his marbles. Mr. Levin’s radio program was good, and even great, while his mind lasted.
1. By KGS Feb 24, 2012
  
  You made a claim David, now back it up. RP followers are big on slamming, but without giving any substance at all. Refute Mark’s persepective, and, not just here….call him up and tell it to his ear. Also, what do you mean that you used to follow Mark’s show and listen to his profound insight….until yesterday’s broadcast. His observation of the Rube Paul-Romney nexus is profound, dead on, and in my opinion, the best analysis of what’s taking place.
  
  Show exactly how he’s “got it all wrong”. My guess is that you can’t, and that you’ve never been a supporter of the conservatism Mark Levin represents. You’re a Ron Paul guy, and no matter what the neo-confederate / libertarian anarchist says, and who he teams up with to take real conservatives down, (at a crucial time when conservatives are desperately needed) you’ll still be a Rube Paul guy.
By joy52 Feb 24, 2012

If Paul and Romney have teamed up against Santorum, don’t forget Mr. Innocent who stood on the other end of the debate group, like a cherub. Newt would benefit mightily from a Santorum demise and the consummate politician that he is, would exploit it. The southern bloc is coming up. Never count Newt out until he takes himself out.

(From a ABO voter, expanded to include all scenarios.)

Leave a Reply to David Fellows Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

4 Responses

Leave a Reply to David Fellows Cancel reply