BBC POLITICAL CORRECTNESS: DON’T CALL FAT MUSLIM EXTREMIST A FAT MUSLIM EXTREMIST…….

Extremist suggests value judgement? You see folks what Israel has had to endure from the hands of the morons at the Beeb? Utter nonsense. Not calling them extremists, or even excrement, is a value judgement in itself. States (including Finland) need to divest themselves from news organizations that operate on public funding. Period.

THE DAILY MAIL HERE PULLS NO PUNCHES…….

Whose side are they on? BBC tells journalists to stop calling Abu Qatada ‘an extremist’ – and they can’t show pictures of him looking fat either (but we can, so here he is!)

The term ‘extremist’ suggest a value judgement, say Beeb bosses
Cleric should instead be described as ‘radical’

By Charles Walford

Last updated at 2:32 PM on 8th February 2012

BBC journalists have been told not to call hate preacher Abu Qatada an ‘extremist’.

Using such a term to describe the man once called ‘Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe’, is making a ‘value judgment’ and should be avoided, bosses have said.

The corporation’s managers have insisted he should be described as ‘radical’, according to meeting notes seen by the Telegraph.

Journalists were also advised not to use images that suggest the preacher is overweight, the paper says.

Written by KGS

3 Responses

By wtd Feb 09, 2012

OT, but UK related . . .a second suspect has been arrested in the case of violent Asian gang assault against Daniel Stringer Prince. I won’t post the story, but here’s the link as it provides no additional detail other than a 17 year old teen aged male was arrested. M.E.N.’s ‘journalism’ continues to disgust with the way Danny Prince’s identity and location as well as family relations are identified, yet the identities of 7 or 8 Asian thugs and the 3 girls that were involved in attempted murder remain veiled behind a curtain of protection. From the same source, Cyclist’s horror as road-rage “ASIAN” thug mows him down at lights in Fallowfield

LUCKY ESCAPE: Alexander Foreman with his damaged bike

A road rage-driver deliberately ploughed into a cyclist, throwing him over his bonnet and leaving him lying on the road.

Alexander Foreman was cycling on Egerton Road in Fallowfield, Manchester, when he was clipped by a car’s wing mirror.

The driver then became enraged and deliberately ploughed into Alexander when he was waiting at traffic lights at the junction with Wilmslow Road.

Police are now trying to trace the driver of the car, a gold Toyota Yaris.

Alexander, who is studying anatomy at Manchester University, was left with minor injuries but was shaken by the incident.

He said: “I was cycling along when a car clipped me with his wing mirror. I heard him swear loudly, even with his windows wound up, and he became really angry.

“I just wanted to get away so I cycled on. At the traffic lights, he mounted the kerb and the next thing I knew I was on his bonnet. It was all over really quickly.”

Alexander, 21 and who lives in Fallowfield, was on his way to Sale Water Park when the incident happened.

He was left with minor injuries, bruises and small cuts.

He said: “People don’t realise how vulnerable cyclists are when they are on the road. If you are in a car, you weigh about a tonne. If you’re on a bike, you weigh about 100kg.

“Motorists need to be aware of the damage that can be done.”

The driver is described as being an Asian man with stubble.

Detective Constable Richard Lees said: “This man did not even bother to check on the person he had driven into. His impatience meant he had little regard for other road users and we therefore need to catch him as soon as possible.

“We are appealing to any of the motorists who witnessed the incident, particularly those who may have made a note of the registration number to come forward.”

Anyone with any information is asked to call police on 0161 856 6090 or call the independent charity Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.
1. By KGS Feb 09, 2012
  
  Thanks WTD, I put it in a post, much appreciated.
By Big Frank Feb 09, 2012

Not only is this inbred mutant fat he is also ugly.

Leave a Reply to KGS Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Whose side are they on? BBC tells journalists to stop calling Abu Qatada ‘an extremist’ – and they can’t show pictures of him looking fat either (but we can, so here he is!)

Share this:

Written by KGS

3 Responses

Leave a Reply to KGS Cancel reply