ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS WIN BIG IN EGYPT WITH 75% OF THE VOTE…….

It’s everything we warned about.

NOTE: How would you like to have these ‘democrats’ ruling over you?

Egypt’s Islamists win 75 percent of parliament

Jan 21, 4:03 PM (ET)
By AYA BATRAWY

CAIRO (AP) – Final results on Saturday showed that Islamist parties won nearly three-quarters of the seats in parliament in Egypt’s first elections since the ouster of authoritarian president Hosni Mubarak, according to election officials and political groups.

The Islamist domination of Egypt’s parliament has worried liberals and even some conservatives about the religious tone of the new legislature, which will be tasked with forming a committee to write a new constitution. It remains unclear whether the constitution will be written while the generals who took power after Mubarak’s fall are still in charge, or rather after presidential elections this summer.

In the vote for the lower house of parliament, a coalition led by the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood won 47 percent, or 235 seats in the 498-seat parliament. The ultraconservative Al-Nour Party was second with 25 percent, or 125 seats.

The Salafi Al-Nour, which was initially the biggest surprise of the vote, wants to impose strict Islamic law in Egypt, while the more moderate Brotherhood, the country’s best-known and organized party, has said publicly that it does not seek to force its views about an appropriate Islamic lifestyle on Egyptians.

More here.

Written by KGS

12 Responses

By steve bronfman Jan 22, 2012

Good looking bunch! Love the prayer burn on the dudes forehead.
1. By John F. Jan 23, 2012
  
  See, that’s why you never want a a prayer rug made of synthetic fibers — they should be haram!
By Big Frank Jan 22, 2012

Aye, it’s ‘Fat Bastard” complete with a ‘prayer chancre’ on is forehead.
1. By pssndvngr Jan 22, 2012
  
  I call it the mark of satan.
By joy52 Jan 22, 2012

I wonder if the ones with the bruise on their forehead got “it” from an older male relative as a child and has to show everyone how devote he is in order to atone?
Or just has to show how devote to justify what he is doing? And the rest just think it’s normal.
By joy52 Jan 22, 2012

Devoute?Devout? Sorry,…religious.
By Softly Bob Jan 22, 2012

Islamists win with 75% of the seats? Never? But this was meant to be about democracy, freedom, escape from tyranny and a fresh start for the Arab World. No more killing, no more oppression, it was all meant to be good!
Aah, sorry leftards, it was all a dream……
1. By Big Frank Jan 22, 2012
  
  Now we know why our ‘Dear Leader’ and his regime are so in love and admire the methods of the Muslim Brotherhood.The DemocRATS would love to have an election rigged to a 75% victory.
2. By Raymond Jan 23, 2012
  
  No matter what, the leftards will still persist with their “arab spring” nonsense.
By pss&vngr Jan 22, 2012

What a fugly bunch of fat devils. How do I know they are devils? They may be identified by the mark of satan on the forehead.
By Raymond Jan 23, 2012

I think I’d rather have Julia in spite of all her tricks and subterfuge.

Leave a Reply to Big Frank Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Egypt’s Islamists win 75 percent of parliament

Share this:

Written by KGS

12 Responses

Leave a Reply to Big Frank Cancel reply