/

/

/

/

Anti-Israel bigotry and bias

/

YLE’S HACK JOURNALIST HANNU REIME SMEARS ISRAEL YET AGAIN …….

Anti-Israel bigotry and bias Hannu Reime YLE

YLE’S HACK JOURNALIST HANNU REIME SMEARS ISRAEL YET AGAIN …….

By KGS12 years ago1

Too bad it’s on the taxpayers’ own dime.

Totally frustrating to be forced to pay this A-hole’s salary, it’s one reason why there shouldn’t be a state fee for watching TV, we end up paying for mediocrity like Hannu Reime, Sanna Negus (and a whole host of others) and there seems to be no way of getting rid of them. Hannu Reime is a carbon copy of Erkki Tuomioja, Finland’s 1960’s Marxist radical Foreign Minister who gets everything wrong.

(What’s with the Lenin look with these neo-Marxists anyways?)

No amount of information that would easily counter Hannu Reime’s world view would induce him to modify, let alone change his mind on some of the issues surrounding his pet subject, and whipping post, Israel.

Here he is sitting in on a seminar after hearing pseudo scholar, Avi Shlaim, speak back in Dec of 2009, almost two years ago. He’s listening to the Israeli Ambassador to Finland, Avi Granot, explain why it’s important to keep a level head on the issues surrounding the conflict.

It’s obvious in today’s radio broadcast (only in Finnish) where he compared Israeli policies to those of ‘some European areas during the WWII’ which is an anti-Semitic act. These lovers of the EU should read up on its own guidelines on what constitutes an act of anti-Semitism. Comparing Israeli policies to that of the Nazis is defined as an act of anti-Semitism.

He also spread the false claim that the security fence is a land grab, regardless of all the evidence to the contrary, like Israel moving its border fence with Lebanon after their claims were upheld in the world court, at the cost of millions to its taxpayers. Also the moving of its own security fence to accommodate Palestinian claims upheld by its own supreme court.

Nope, no amount of factual evidence will suffice for this hack, yes that’s right, he’s a hack, because he’s not interested in the truth, but in spreading of his own failed ideology… that YLE obviously agrees with.

Journalism, what a joke of a profession, or should I say, hacks like Reime make a joke of the journalistic profession. KGS

Written by KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.