Leftism Leftism in America

CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMAN LEWIS TURNED AWAY BY MARXISTS IN WEIRD CHANT……..

 

THE OCCUPY WALL STREET GANG IN THE RAW

Yes folks, this is a real weird chant, and something that only a group of leftist nut-jobs could come up with. Please be reminded, that congressman Lewis lied about the “N-word” being shouted “15 times” at the rally at the Capital building. Now he’s at the receiving end of something that really happened, complete rejection to voice his thoughts to a crowd he believed shared his ideals.

They’re a bizarre collection of died-in-the-wool marxists and other assorted statist collectivist nut-jobs who should all leave the US and join the grand utopias of N. Korea and Cuba. This is the mob that would strip you of everything you have, shove you into reeducation camps and murder the rest of us deemed refuseniks. A sick bunch of flat earth dead enders. KGS

Many curious citizens and media outlets came to the first Occupy Atlanta event, and were visibly shocked and confused by the consistent Marxism employed by the group. People abandoned their individuality and liberty to be absorbed into a hypnotizing collective. The facilitator leader made it clear that he was not a “leader” and that everyone was completely equal; words often spoken by leftists, but in this case they actually applied their philosophy. Into this surreal and oppressive environment, Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights hero and icon of American leftism, came to speak as has so often done at left-wing rallies and events in Atlanta. He is practically worshiped in Democrat circles, and was visibly stunned to see these Marxists turn him away. It was reminiscent of previous Marxist revolutions in history when those who ignorantly supported the revolutionaries are, over time, purged and rejected for the “good of the collective”, when their usefulness has expired.

8 Responses

  1. This is so F’d up! The moderator and his shill are obviously manipulating this crowd in a completely transparent way. They have gotten the crowd to repeat what is said only to enforce conformaty and force an illusion of consensus upon the crowd while in fact they are openly manipulating it.

    Notice that he had one person give a reason why the guy should not speak and then immediately asked the crowd to vote. BUT HE DID NOT CALL ON SOMEONE TO SAY WHY THE GUY SHOULD SPEAK!!!

    These people are scumbags. They are NOT democratic. They only provide their followers with an illusion of democracy in order to control them.

    It’s just like the voting process that was used to establish what would be protested. They allowed everyone to offer things to protest. That lead to 90 choices and spread out the vote. However one group (most likely the organizers) organized a block to vote for one of the choices. The other ninety choices were allowed only to dilute the votes of people who would have voted for something else. They used an illusion of democracy to make people think they had a say so when in truth their mechanism ensured that there would be no real choice at all.

    Utterly despicable.

  2. Sorry what actually happend is the moderator guaged the feelings of the crowd. When they didn’t say what he wanted them to, he called on his shill to speak against it Then asked them again.

  3. At the end he says there was no consensus. But it looks like there was consensus for everything. Most people voted for allowing him to speak and most people voted for allowing him to speak at an alloted time. Most people voted yes to whatever they were asked.

    Did he put in two choices so that people wold agree to both and so he could then conclude that there wasn’t conensus?

    I am confused. We can see that everyone voted to allow him to speak but the moderator said that they didn’t vote that.

    It also looks like they were repeating everything in order to both slow things down and to make it difficult for people to actually think.

    If they do it to prevent people from thinking it would help them control the group. A few people think about what to day beforehand but make everyone repeat everything so they can’t formulate articulate dissagreements at the time of the meeting.

  4. The exact pattern of protests has happend in Israel. It was organized by an American political strategist as well as media consultants. The goal was to have a leader emerge from the social ferment the protests “created”. The protests were to give the illusion that it was a natural process but one can easily suspect that leader was chosen beforehand.

    This behavior indicates a similar goal in this country and the man who wanted to speak is not the man who is designated to “emerge” as the leader.

  5. This should put to rest the idea that this is a movement that has been started by the Obama White House or the Democratic Party.

    I believe our Founding Fathers would be proud of what we are witnessing.

    As Thomas Jefferson said, ” “When a people fear their government, there is tyranny. When a government fears its people, there is liberty.”

    1. Nonsense, the Obama admin has been the frequent host of the big unions, they’ve been planning this thing for a long time, that a group of Marxists stole the show from a Dem shouldn’t be confused for non-involvement by that party. The rabble in the streets are in no way representative of true America, but with everything that is wrong with asinine socialism. Thomas Jefferson wouldn’t have anything to do with that mob of stinking hippies and malcontents, which are no more than a bunch of whining children who haven’t a even a coherent message.

      These people don’t want liberty, they want more and more big government stacked with their fellow miscreants and malcontents, to turn the US into a socialist “utopia”. Get real here. They represent the very mindset the Founding Fathers were building a political system to protect society from. They are for pure democracy, which is in fact tyranny. They are for the further erosion of property rights, which is in fact tyranny. They are for mob rule as in the French revolution, which is in fact tyranny.

      So the next time you quote Jefferson, you better get your facts straight.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *