YALE UNIVERSITY SUCCUMBS TO ARAB PRESSURE AND SHUTS DOWN ISLAMIC ANTI-SEMITISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE…….

MUSLIM LEADERS SEEN GRINNING

This goes part and parcel with the program/agenda of large Muslim international organizations like the OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) and Arab League in taking Islam off the radar screen. Islamic anti-Semitism is one such subject (as well as Islamic slave history) that they are loathe to have a light shine upon.

The OIC’s top guy, Sec-Gen Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu told the Tundra Tabloids face to face after the TT confronted him with it, that Islamic anti-Semitism is a myth. There is a concerted effort in the international arena to quash the entire subject. No one knows this more than David G.Littman, who confronted the UN over the issue time and again in its halls in Geneva, as well as Andy Bostom who has written an excellent book on the subject.

Shame on Yale for succumbing to the whining of these Muslim groups. KGS

“Saving the Yale Anti-Semitism Institute –

Walter Reich (Washington Post)

Yale just killed the country’s best institute for the study of anti-Semitism – the Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism. Why? The answer is simple. The institute held a three-day conference last August on “Global Anti-Semitism: A Crisis of Modernity,” where more than a hundred scholars delivered papers. Some spoke, inevitably, about the fastest-growing and most virulent manifestation of contemporary anti-Semitism – the anti-Semitism in the Arab/Muslim world. The conference provoked a firestorm. A Syrian American law student published a broadside in the Yale Daily News attacking the institute and the conference as fueling “anti-Arab bigotry and Islamophobia.”

The PLO representative to the U.S. wrote to Yale’s president accusing the conference of demonizing Arabs. Yale administrators and faculty quickly turned on the institute, accusing it of being too critical of Arab and Iranian anti-Semitism. A requisite five-year review of the institute was held five months after the conference. Its director was told that the institute would be shut down and its staff fired.”

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By John Jun 16, 2011

Here we see Nazism all over again. Let’s face it, fundamental Islam is the same as the basic Nazi fundamentalism.

We are seeing the re-writing of history by burying any possibility of discussion or learning and in doing that you are turning the truth into a lie. Sounds backward but that is what the OIC and groups like it are doing.

Nazism did not die with Hitler or the fall of the Third Reich. It is alive and well in the form of Islam.

Leave a Reply to John Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

“Saving the Yale Anti-Semitism Institute –

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply to John Cancel reply