What’s interesting is how child-like the responses are from these Mohammedans, really, you can pick apart their arguments with relative ease.
Abraham from the UK: theres not a shred of evidence that islam was ever on the offensive rather it was on the defensive. perhaps those ignorant should look back in to correct history to identify who really was offensive massacuring inncocent, stealing lands and raping. There is no compulsion in islam if you want ot accept you accept if you want to reject then you reject. You to your way, me to my way
people can find many excuses as they want to exercise their hatred for people of another colour or faith. Most of these racist come from deprived and lack of education background.How can you reason with such people. The EDL members just jumped on the next available band wagon that was giving them excistement without actually understanding. they should record themselves and play back to see what mug they look like that is if they understand.
Here’s how the non-Muslims felt and acted during the period when Mohamed tried to win converts over to his new belief system. The were happy to live in peace with Mohamed and his followers, even though they were insulted and denigrated by them on repeated occasions.
When the apostle openly displayed Islam as Allah ordered him, his people did not withdraw or turn against him, so far as I have heard, until he spoke disparagingly of their gods. When he did that, they took great offence and resolved unanimously to treat him as an enemy. (Ibn Ishaq 167)
[The Meccans] said they had never known anything like the trouble they had endured from this fellow. He had declared their mode of life foolish, insulted their forefathers, reviled their religion, divided the community and cursed their gods (Ibn Ishaq 183)
The decided to send for Muhammad and to negotiate and argue with him… When he came and sat down with them, they explained that that they had sent for him in order that they could talk together. No Arab had ever treated his tribe as Muhammad had treated them, and they repeated the charges… If it was money he wanted, they would make him the richest of them all; if it was honor, he should be their prince; if it was sovereignty, they would make him king. (Ibn Ishaq 188).
But wait, there’s more!
The Meccans truly wanted to live in peace and even after hostilities broke out between the the two side, the Meccans still held out the olive branch. The Mohammedans were the first to act out violently, Hamza, a follower of Mohamed struck a Meccan leader by the name of Abu Jahl ‘violently” with his bow for speaking in an insulting way to Muhammad:
When he got to the mosque [Hamza] saw [Abu Jahl] sitting among the people, and went up to him until he stood over him, when he lifted up his bow and struck him a violent blow with it, saying, ‘Will you insult him when I follow his religion, and say what he says? Hit me back if you can!’ (Ibn Ishaq 185).
And still the Meccan’s tried to make peace:
Abu Sufyan, with other sundry notables, went to Abu Talib and said: “You know the trouble that exists between us and your nephew, so call him and let us make an agreement that he will leave us alone and we will leave him alone; let him have his religion and we will have ours.”(Ibn Ishaq 278)
The Mohammedans were the first to draw blood:
“The Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives” (Bukhari 46:717)
And then there’s the raping, lots of it!
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. Sahih Muslim
Then there’s the compulsion in Islam, convert or die:
[Muhammad] said, “Woe to you, Abu Sufyan, isn’t it time that you recognize that I am Allah’s apostle?” He (Abu Sufyan) answered, “As to that I still have some doubt.” I (the narrator) said to him, “Submit and testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the apostle of Allah before you lose your head,” so he did so. (Ibn Ishaq 814)
Folks, no matter how you slice it and dice it, Islam is not a religion of peace, but an ideology of pieces, the matter that’s left over after all the carnage is done and the dust has settled. The Muslim apologizer “Abraham” (most likely Ibrahim) will of course reject all that is written here, and choose rather to close his eyes while shouting allah akbar. But what’s most important are the Tundra Tabloids’ reader, that they see infantile stupidity of the Mohammedan and realize just what exactly is the mindset arrayed against their societies. KGS
Source for material: The Religion of Peace