Oh really Hosein? An ex-Muslim exposed to the world the deception of the “No compulsion in religion“and the Egyptian government NON compliance of the UN Human Rights Chart. Click here.
Lets face facts, the flag of Islam, whether it be the Black Flag of Jihad, or the Saudi National Flag, has the sword of Mohamed on it for a reason, to conquer. Who’s kidding who? There’s no concept of ‘choice’ in an ideology where the central focus is submission.
CORRECTION: The Shiek is right. “Sorry KGS, but 9:5 is not the appropriate sura to answer this one. You probably know that the “no compulsion” verse is one of the earlier Meccan verses, when Muhammad had no power and only a few followers. This verse and all those earlier, Meccan verses, were then abrogated after the profit became a successful caravan raider in Medina, with an ever growing band of murderers and assassins.”
What’s valid, and what’s applied, is ” “Whoever changes his (Islamic) religion, kill him” — Bukhari 9.84.57 ‘baddala deenahu, faqtuhulu’
The TT was to quick with this post, I should have caught it. Mea Culpa. KGS
Koran 9:5 “When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.”
Well Hosein, Allah doesn’t exist, get over it.
yes! Only as Mohamed’s imaginary friend.
Gotta love this one
Warning to Jihadis: Shooting at Americans From a Mosque’s Minaret Not Always a Good Idea…
https://weaselzippers.us/2011/01/15/warning-to-jihadis-shooting-at-americans-from-a-mosques-minaret-not-always-a-good-idea/
Sorry KGS, but 9:5 is not the appropriate sura to answer this one.
You probably know that the “no compulsion” verse is one of the earlier Meccan verses, when Muhammad had no power and only a few followers.
This verse and all those earlier, Meccan verses, were then abrogated after the profit became a successful caravan raider in Medina, with an ever growing band of murderers and assassins.
What’s valid, and what’s applied, is ” “Whoever changes his (Islamic) religion, kill him”
— Bukhari 9.84.57 ‘baddala deenahu, faqtuhulu’
More here: https://sheikyermami.com/apostasy-whoever-changes-his-islamic-religion-kill-him/
The link to the Weasel Zippers posting above is interesting.
Take a look at the comments. A jubilant, triumphalist echo chamber without understanding.
The jihadist, a ‘martyr’ in his own mind, is to kill and be killed for Allah (9:11.1)
This is the motivation.
It is hardly an achievement for the mighty US army to blow a lone Islamic lunatic out of a minaret. That’s the easy part.
What the cheerleaders don’t understand is this:
If the shooter manages to kill one US soldier, he has already done his Islamic duty.
If he gets killed, he is a hero for his tribe (who’s blood must be avenged) and he will go to Muhammad’s grand bordello where 72 virgins & 28 pearly boyz will give him eternal sexual pleasure.
Shooting up the mosques and distributing the videos further enrages Muslims worldwide, for whom it is a religious war on Islam, so others will take his place. Great propaganda. Heads they win, tails we lose.
It would be much better for us to begin to understand what we’re up against.
When Suhail Khan (or any other Islamofascist) says “I will kill and die for my religion” we better believe him.
Full quote, here:
“The early Muslims loved death, dying for the sake of almighty Allah, more than the oppressors loved life. This must be the case when we are fighting….What are our oppressors going to do with a people like us? We are prepared to give our lives for the cause of Islam.”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/01/moderate-muslim-suhail-khans-jihadist-ties-and-islamic-supremacist-statements.html
And then we need to ask ourselves, what are we willing to do for what we believe.