CAUGHT! FINNISH GUINNESS WORLD RECORD HOLDER AND ANTI-SEMITIC SCREED WRITER RICHARD JÄRNEFELT PROVES ORIGINAL APOLOGY INSINCERE……!

By KGS14 years ago1

WHAT A WHACK JOB!

Commenting on his own post, serial anti-Semitic screed writer Richard Järnefelt manages to compound his gross errors by a factor of ten, as he sock puppets himself with yet another anti-Semitic rant against the Jewish state, then claims someone was using his computer, but he agrees with what was written. Is the man mentally ill or what?

Referring to the Tundra Tabloids’ original point, which he now accepts, that the EUMC does in fact have a working definition of anti-Semitism, he now tries to descredit it as a violation of his “free speech”. He blamed the Germans earlier for not being able to handle and accept their history, and now they are making the rest of the EU pay for their crimes. The guy is clueless.

This is not about free speech, but about racism towards Jews, and something which the TT is not seeking any judicial redress for, but only that the man would own up to his anti-Semitism apologize, and remove his nonsense from his website. It’s something which he refuses to do. If he continues to keep it up, the TT will not remove its pages pointing out his anti-Semitism which he now agrees with, proving that his original attempt at apologizing was a pack of lies.

1.) Post:

Ha hah haa, the Germans have managed to create a stupid document.
If Israel kills innocent civilians, then they’re doing just like the Nazis. It’s totally foolish if it isn’t stated.

2.) Post:

I agree with the writer who was using my computer.

The man is a howling loon. KGS

FROM THE COMMENTS: “KGS, I have to agree with you again. Somehow Mr. Järnefelt is adamant in comparing Israel to Nazis. His argument is that Israel killed innocent children like the Nazis did. But US, UK, French, Russian, Japanese and, yes, Finnish army killed innocent children. This does not differentiate the Nazi policies one bit from the rest of the world.

Why are the Nazis Nazis. Because they embarked on a racist genocide. This was the trademark and the basic ideology of Nazi Germany. With this Israel has no whatsoever resemblance. Actually Israel is the exact opposite to Nazi ideology because the major ideological feature was anti-Semitism.

Mr. Järnefelt is so obsessed in dehumanizing Israel that he seems totally unable to understand the basics of anti-Semitism. This does not bother him to demand that Germans be able to say freely Sieg Heil, but calling him anti-Semite, for which he provides ample evidence, irritates him.

If saying Sieg Heil is to Mr. Järnefelt’s opinion part of freedom of speech, calling him an anti-Semite is surely equally within the boundaries of freedom of speech.

Stefan

Written by KGS

One Response

By Stefan Nov 04, 2009

KGS, I have to agree with you again. Somehow Mr. Järnefelt is adamant in comparing Israel to Nazis. His argument is that Israel killed innocent children like the Nazis did. But US, UK, French, Russian, Japanese and, yes, Finnish army killed innocent children. This does not differentiate the Nazi policies one bit from the rest of the world.

Why are the Nazis Nazis. Because they embarked on a racist genocide. This was the trademark and the basic ideology of Nazi Germany. With this Israel has no whatsoever resemblance. Actually Israel is the exact opposite to Nazi ideology because the major ideological feature was anti-Semitism.

Mr. Järnefelt is so obsessed in dehumanizing Israel that he seems totally unable to understand the basics of anti-Semitism. This does not bother him to demand that Germans be able to say freely Sieg Heil, but calling him anti-Semite, for which he provides ample evidence, irritates him.

If saying Sieg Heil is to Mr. Järnefelt’s opinion part of freedom of speech, calling him an anti-Semite is surely equally within the boundaries of freedom of speech.

Stefan

Leave a Reply to Stefan Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply to Stefan Cancel reply